&w=3840&q=100)
Spain, UAE visit set to create over 14,000 jobs in state, says MP CM
Yadav stated that following the Madhya Pradesh Global Dialogue-2025, the state received investment proposals worth over Rs 11,119 crore.
In a post on X, CM Yadav stated, "With the motto 'Make in India-Make in Madhya Pradesh,' investment proposals worth over Rs 11,119 crore have been received in all major sectors under the 'Madhya Pradesh Global Dialogue-2025' concluded in UAE and Spain. These will create more than 14,000 new employment opportunities in the state. After the visit to both nations, I reached Bhopal today and shared information with journalist friends."
"In Madrid, Spain, the 'Invest in Madhya Pradesh - Business Forum' was held, where discussions took place with over 200 corporate and diplomatic representatives," he said.
"Addressed over 500 expatriate entrepreneurs at the 'Friends of MP' conference held during the Dubai visit. Conducted one-to-one strategic meetings with heads of more than 30 international and national companies during the visit," he added.
CM Yadav stated that, under the Madhya Pradesh Global Dialogue-2025, he signed MoUs and held productive talks with investors to promote the state's potential growth.
In a post on X on Saturday, CM Yadav said, "Under the Madhya Pradesh Global Dialogue-2025, during the Spain visit, I engaged in discussions with entrepreneurs, investors, and businesspersons, signed MoUs, observed global agri-models like Mercabarna, and also met with the Indian diaspora. This visit will strengthen the vision of a developed Madhya Pradesh on the global stage."
CM Yadav on Saturday said that his visit to Dubai and Spain is nearing its conclusion, highlighting the tour's focus on exploring opportunities for the state's progress and promoting employment, industries, and tourism.
Speaking from Barcelona, CM Yadav said, "We have reached the last leg of our Dubai and Spain visit. As we had set the objective of our tour, we were to explore all the areas for the progress of our state with our Indians connected to Madhya Pradesh, especially everything that provides employment. We also went to the industries and restaurants to promote tourism. Wherever there are Indian restaurants, we visited them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
20 minutes ago
- United News of India
No US Prez role in halting India's military action during OP Sindoor: Jaishankar
New Delhi, July 30 (UNI) Foreign Minister S Jaishankar today reiterated that US President Donald Trump had no role in stopping India's military operation against Pakistan during Operation Sindoor. Speaking in the Rajya Sabha while resuming the discussion on 'India's strong, successful, and decisive Operation Sindoor in response to the terrorist attack in Pahalgam,' Jaishankar said there was no conversation between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Trump to halt the military action. He added, 'There was no telephonic conversation between the two leaders from April 22 to June 16.' Rejecting opposition allegations of diplomatic failure during Operation Sindoor, the Foreign Minister stated that Indian diplomacy was perfectly on track given that the BRICS summit condemned the Pahalgam terrorist attack. 'The BRICS countries condemned the conspirators behind the Pahalgam attack and cross-border terrorism, whereas in the BRICS summit statement after the Mumbai attacks, cross-border terrorism was not mentioned,' he said. He also highlighted that Germany, France, Russia, and the European Union condemned the Pahalgam attack. Jaishankar informed that the United Nations Security Council issued a statement condemning the Pahalgam terrorist attack on April 25, when Pakistan was still a member of the Council and India was not a member of the global body. Praising the valour of Indian armed forces during Operation Sindoor, he said the military struck terrorist hideouts in Bahawalpur and Muridke with precision. 'These were strongholds of terrorism in Pakistan. Several Pakistani airports were also targeted. This was a major success of Operation Sindoor,' he said. Addressing those demanding proof of the Operation's success, he suggested watching videos on YouTube showing terrorists' funerals after they were killed, which would reveal the nature of the Indian Army's action. Acknowledging the closeness between Pakistan and China, Jaishankar said both countries have come closer over time, not overnight. Referring to incidents during Congress governments, he pointed out that Pakistan-China relations have had moments of proximity in the past as well. Taking a swipe at former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, the Foreign Minister recalled that during the Indus Waters Treaty, Nehru was more concerned about Pakistani farmers than Indian farmers. He said Nehru had stated in the Lok Sabha that the water agreement would benefit farmers in West Punjab, which was then part of Pakistan. Jaishankar also appreciated the role of Members of Parliament in various all-party delegations sent to different countries to clarify India's position on Operation Sindoor. He mentioned that India's delegation visited 33 countries, with MPs like Shashi Tharoor, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Sanjay Jha, Supriya Sule, and Srikant Shinde effectively presenting India's viewpoint to the world. UNI AJ SSP
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why has Delhi HC criticised the law capping rents in Delhi as unjust, and called it anachronistic?
Earlier this month, Delhi High Court criticised the tendency of some well-off tenants to 'unjustly' occupy premises paying a pittance as rent, while their landlords are forced into 'impecunious and desperate circumstances'. This, the court said, was an 'egregious misuse' of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, which it described as an 'anachronistic piece of legislation'. The court was hearing a challenge to orders passed by the additional rent controller in 2013, which had dismissed eviction petitions relating to a property in Sadar Bazar, and ruled in favour of the tenants. The 1958 law has allowed many tenants of properties in areas such as Connaught Place, Karol Bagh, and Chandni Chowk to continue to pay rents that are sometimes as low as Rs 500. What is the Delhi Rent Control Act (DRCA)? The DRCA was enacted to regulate rents, prevent arbitrary evictions, and define the rights and duties of landlords and tenants in Delhi. The Act restricts landlords from charging tenants more than a fixed 'standard rent', and prohibits the collection of extra charges. It also specifies the limit by which rents can be increased – not more than 10% in three years. There are strong protections for tenants against eviction, and landlords are allowed to throw out tenants only under specific conditions, such as non-payment of rent and subletting without permission. The law also lays down the procedure for depositing rent, mechanisms for appeal, and summary eviction processes in certain cases. The DRCA was enacted in the aftermath of World War II and Partition to protect tenants in a situation of scarce housing in Delhi. Is the DRCA applicable everywhere in Delhi? The law is not applicable to government-owned premises. Later, certain other categories of properties were excluded from the ambit of the Act, such as those where the rent was more than Rs 3,500, and 'premises constructed on or after the commencement of the Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1988, for a period of ten years from the date of completion of such construction'. It is important to note that while the Act is technically applicable to all remaining properties in the city, the precise percentage of housing to which it is applicable is not known because of the existence of a large number of illegal and unplanned settlements. In fact, about a quarter of Delhi's population is believed to be living in slums or squatter settlements. Implementation of the Act is uneven and mostly ineffective. Tenants pay market rents, not 'standard' rents fixed after both parties approach a rent controller. Landlords often do not issue rent receipts, and in many cases tenants have to make large advance deposits before they move in. What are some of the criticisms of the rent control law? Like rent control laws in other states, the DRCA has been criticised for being too tenant-friendly and facilitating an unfair situation of unrealistically low rents for landlords. Indeed, in the older markets of Connaught Place, Karol Bagh, and Chandni Chowk, monthly rents for some residential and commercial properties that are valued at crores can be still as low as Rs 500. In this situation, landlords often prefer to withdraw their premises from the rental housing market, creating an avoidable shortage and distorting the market. Economists have criticised rent control legislation around the world for decreasing or freezing the supply of urban rental housing, and for leading to a deterioration of housing stocks as a result of a lack of incentive for landlords to invest in maintaining and upgrading it. The National Urban Rental Housing Policy 2015 noted that rent control legislation in various states have 'resulted in rental housing being economically unattractive and thereby creating an informal market'. Rent ceilings had led to reductions in both the quality and quantity of housing, the policy said. 'These laws not only restrict supply but also drive away legitimate seekers of rental housing which force tenants into unrecorded and informal arrangements,' it said. Since land and housing are State subjects, the central government drafted a Model Tenancy Act in 2021 as a framework that could be adopted by states and Union Territories. The model Act sought to balance the interests of landlords and tenants by allowing rent be decided by mutual agreement between the parties. However, the Act has so far been adopted by only four states: Assam, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu.
India.com
20 minutes ago
- India.com
Banks waived off fines, but earned Rs 90000000000, which bank earned the most? Not SBI, PNB, HDFC, ICICI
Banks waived off fines, but earned Rs 90000000000, which bank earned the most? Not SBI, PNB, HDFC, ICICI Public sector banks (PSBs) have collected a penalty of about Rs 9,000 crore (Rs 8,932.98 crore) from customers for not maintaining the 'Minimum Average Monthly Balance' (MAB) in the last five years (from 2020-21 to 2024-25), Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary informed Rajya Sabha. Which banks have stopped collecting fines? According to the Finance Ministry, Canara Bank, Bank of Baroda, Punjab National Bank, Indian Bank, Bank of India and Central Bank of India have also waived off this penalty from this quarter. The country's largest bank, State Bank of India (SBI), was not charging this penalty since March 2020. The Minister of State for Finance also informed that the Department of Financial Services (DFS) has asked banks to consider reducing or waiving this penalty, especially to provide relief to customers in semi-urban and rural areas. How have banks changed their stance? This disclosure comes at a time when recently Union Bank of India also joined several other public sector banks in announcing the waiver of this penalty. The bank said that this move is to 'ensure equality, fairness and better access to basic banking services for customers'. Which bank earned the most? According to a report, Indian Bank collected the highest fine in five years. One-fifth of the total amount i.e. Rs 1,828.18 crores. Punjab National Bank came in second place (Rs 1,662.42 crores) and Bank of Baroda came third (Rs 1,531.62 crores). It was followed by Canara Bank, which earned Rs 1,212.92 crores. Bank of India earned Rs 809.66 crores, Central Bank of India Rs 585.36, Bank of Maharashtra Rs 535.20, Union Bank Rs 484.75, Punjab and Sind Bank Rs 100.92 and Indian Overseas Bank Rs 62.04 crores. Detailed break up of how fines have been increased? 2020-21: Rs 1,142.13 crore 2021-22: Rs 1,428.53 crore, up 25% from last year 2022-23: Again increased by 30% to Rs 1,855.43 crore 2023-24: Again increased by 26% to Rs 2,331.08 crore 2024-25: This year there was a slight decline of 7% and the amount stood at Rs 2,175.81 crore What banks are being pressurised? The decision of banks to abolish this penalty has come at a time when there is pressure on their current account and savings account (CASA) ratio. These accounts are the cheapest source of raising money for banks. In its latest Financial Stability Report released in June, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had said that the share of expensive fixed deposits and deposit certificates (CDs) is increasing in the liabilities of banks instead of cheaper CASA. State Bank of India (SBI), which has not been charging this penalty for the last five years, says the move has greatly benefited first-time bank account openers.
