logo
'I'm 28-years-old and earning £100,000 a year - but I'm not rich'

'I'm 28-years-old and earning £100,000 a year - but I'm not rich'

Daily Mirror2 days ago
Jack Kim, 28, from East London, says despite earning £100k-a-year he isn't rich. He says he has to make changes to his lifestyle due to the cost-of-living crisis
A man who earns £100,000 a year says he has been hit by the cost of living crisis despite his eye-watering salary.

Strategy consultant Jack Kim, from East London, says he doesn't see his six-figure salary, once he has stumped up money for tax and bills. The 28-year-old, who owns a home with his partner, has shared a breakdown of his outgoings.

Jack lives in a two-bedroom property which he purchased for £550,000. He says their monthly mortgage payment and council tax is tough.

The 28-year-old denies that he is rich and says his income puts him firmly in the HENRY bracket. HENRYs are young people in the UK's top 10 per cent of earners who say they are left with little at the end of the month after bills, taxes and lifestyle inflation.
Jack claims he's had to adjust his lifestyle due to the cost-of-living - ditching their weekly M&S shop for Sainsbury's, having to reduce luxury holidays in Asia for European mini breaks, and opting for Pure Gym instead of the more expensive Gymbox. "Even though I'm on a six-figure salary, I don't feel rich at all," he said.

"Everyone knows living in London is extremely expensive. It comes to four main things - higher tax rate for people on six-figure salaries, higher living costs, lifestyle inflation and debt. As income rises, so does your lifestyle. I don't wear flashy, high-end clothes or own expensive watches, I opt for high street brands like Uniqlo.
"We try and live below our means by limiting eating out to once a week at a good quality restaurant. Other than a drink at special occasions like weddings, I don't drink alcohol, which is very expensive. We feel the cost of living just like anyone else. I don't feel upper-middle class."

After graduating from the London School of Economics with a bachelor's and master's degree in management in 2019 - which cost £99,000 in tuition fees - Jack began his career as a strategy consultant on a £21,000 salary. He quickly progressed to £45,000 and began saving for a £82,000 deposit to buy a own property with his partner.
"We collectively needed roughly £82,000 for a deposit, and we did that in two years with some help from our parents," Jack said. "It meant we stopped eating out and primarily cooked at home. During that time, it was Covid which did help because it meant we weren't spending as much or travelling at all."
In December 2021, Jack and his partner were able to get on the property ladder and purchased the two-bedroom property they live in now. Jack said: "Being on a combined income helped us for sure, but alongside our own drive and determination.

"I can only imagine how hard it is for young people to get on the property ladder now. Especially if they're single and doing it alone. Affordability and the goalpost for a mortgage have changed - even in the last four years. It's not affordable to get a mortgage these days - unless you have generational wealth.
"Growing up, my family and I were considered a lower-income family. From the ages of seven to eight, my mum, dad, brother and I lived in a studio flat in Seoul, South Korea. Since gaining my education and career in London, I'd say as a whole, my family are middle class. But we certainly don't feel it in the grand scheme of things.
"I don't have an expensive watch or a car. No luxury yacht or Monaco, St Moritz holidays like my friends who are bankers. Consulting is an industry where you can see fast income growth. Even though my income has increased, our lifestyle hasn't changed that much."
Monthly outgoings
Mortgage and council tax: £2,630
Utilities: £450
Groceries: £250
Transport: £100
Savings/ investments: £1,500
Subscriptions: £100
Socialising: £400
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Austria's RBI swings to loss after write-off for Russia legal dispute
Austria's RBI swings to loss after write-off for Russia legal dispute

Reuters

time27 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Austria's RBI swings to loss after write-off for Russia legal dispute

VIENNA, July 30 (Reuters) - Austria's Raiffeisen Bank International (RBI) ( opens new tab swung to a loss in the second quarter after a 1.2 billion euro ($1.4 billion) write-off over a legal dispute in Russia, figures released on Wednesday showed. The bank's consolidated loss was 557 million euros in the quarter, compared with a profit of 661 million euros a year earlier. RBI, the most important Western Bank in Russia, last week said it would "derecognize" 1.2 billion euros in expected proceeds from enforcing claims against Rasperia Trading Limited's Austrian assets. In June, a Russian court had rejected RBI's bid to lift an injunction banning the sale of its local subsidiary. The ban is tied to a lawsuit brought by Rasperia, a Russian investment firm, after a collapsed deal in which RBI was ordered last year to pay 2 billion euros in damages. Excluding Russia, the bank posted a profit of 307 million euros, up from 237 million euros in the year-earlier period. RBI, which came from the United States as well as European regulators to pare its ties to Russia, continued to reduce its loan portfolio in Russia in the first half of the year and is ahead of the schedule agreed with the ECB, the figures showed. Deposit volumes also declined further. ($1 = 0.8659 euros)

Why explanations of market moves are so often wrong: Fridson
Why explanations of market moves are so often wrong: Fridson

Reuters

time27 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Why explanations of market moves are so often wrong: Fridson

NEW YORK, July 30 (Reuters) - If you consider it good practice to consult more than one news source, you may have been confused by the reporting of the latest U.S. Consumer Price Index release. And the various interpretations of how that report affected stock prices might have truly left you scratching your head. On July 15, 2025, the Bureau of Labor Statistics disclosed that CPI rose by 2.7% year-over-year in June. According to the Wall Street Journal, that increase 'was in line with forecasts.' Business Insider, on the other hand, used the following headline for its story on the CPI release: 'Inflation surged more than expected in June.' And it added this result surpassed 'the 2.6% expected.' Anyone who read both papers was left wondering whether the 2.7% number did or did not exceed expectations. On top of this there was confusion about the impact of the latest inflation print on financial markets. The Wall Street Journal informed its readers the CPI report 'struck a cautious note on Wall Street, weighing down stocks and lifting bond yields.' The Associated Press chimed in, 'Most U.S. stocks slumped on Tuesday after the latest update on inflation hurt Wall Street's hopes for lower interest rates.' But if the inflation news simply confirmed what analysts had previously predicted, how could the CPI release explain the S&P 500's 0.4% decline on July 15? Even when reporters delved into data on the CPI's subcomponents, they failed to turn up anything that constituted a disappointment versus expectations. The Efficient Market Hypothesis suggests that stock prices at any given moment reflect all known information, which includes forecasts of economic indicators. By that reasoning, the inflation news should not have moved the market unless it represented new information, that is, unless it was a surprise. Daily stock market updates seem to insist on identifying a fundamental cause for any given rise or fall, be it economic, political, geopolitical, or a natural disaster. Conspicuously absent from that list is something that makes up the life's work of a large cadre of market professionals: technicals. The core principle of technical analysis is that past price movements influence future price movements. In other words, a one-day market move may sometimes have more to do with price momentum, a moving average or a resistance level than a specific legislative change or shift in gross domestic product. This idea is anathema to most believers in efficient markets, but they should not be closed to the idea. The late Jim Simons used quantitatively advanced forms of technical analysis to compile a long-term return twice as high as Warren Buffett's, according to data from the Wall Street Journal. Or look at fund manager Bill Smead, who recently warned that investors should be wary of a market downturn not because of weak economic indicators, but instead because stocks had just hit a 'line of death' or a 'death cross,' which is when a 50-day moving average falls below the 200-day moving average. That had not happened since the peak of the dotcom craze a quarter of a century earlier, which was followed by a major correction in 2000. When Business Insider reported on Smead's warning, it suggested he might be worth listening to, considering Morningstar's finding that the Smead Value Fund outperformed 96% of its peer funds over the preceding 15 years. Of course, that does not mean one should take market technicians' findings as definitive. After all, even some technicians themselves characterize their discipline as an art, rather than a science. And for every Simons and Smead, there is an underperforming technical analyst assigning too much value to a head-and-shoulders pattern. The lesson from all this is certainly not that market moves can never have a fundamental cause. For example, it is pretty clear what caused the 12% decline in the S&P 500 in the days following President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff announcement. But this example isn't the norm, and one should therefore avoid accepting uncritically any statement claiming that one specific catalyst explains a market shift. Understanding what really drives financial markets requires a change in mindset, a willingness to consider fundamental and technical factors and a refusal to accept the simplistic explanations found in most daily market recaps. (The views expressed here are those of Marty Fridson, the publisher of Income Securities Advisor. He is a past governor of the CFA Institute, consultant to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, and Special Assistant to the Director for Deferred Compensation, Office of Management and the Budget, The City of New York.) Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI),, opens new tab your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI,, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn,, opens new tab and X., opens new tab

Google to sign EU's AI code of practice despite concerns
Google to sign EU's AI code of practice despite concerns

Reuters

time27 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Google to sign EU's AI code of practice despite concerns

BRUSSELS, July 30 (Reuters) - Alphabet's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Google will sign the European Union's code of practice which aims to help companies comply with the bloc's landmark artificial intelligence rules, its global affairs president said in a blog post on Wednesday, though he voiced some concerns. The voluntary code of practice, drawn up by 13 independent experts, aims to provide legal certainty to signatories on how to meet requirements under the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), such as issuing summaries of the content used to train their general-purpose AI models and complying with EU copyright law. "We do so with the hope that this code, as applied, will promote European citizens' and businesses' access to secure, first-rate AI tools as they become available," Kent Walker, who is also Alphabet's chief legal officer, said in the blog post. He added, however, that Google was concerned that the AI Act and code of practice risk slowing Europe's development and deployment of AI. "In particular, departures from EU copyright law, steps that slow approvals, or requirements that expose trade secrets could chill European model development and deployment, harming Europe's competitiveness," Walker said. Microsoft MSFT.O will likely sign the code, its president, Brad Smith, told Reuters earlier this month, while Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab declined to do so and cited the legal uncertainties for model developers. The European Union enacted the guardrails for the use of artificial intelligence in an attempt to set a potential global benchmark for a technology used in business and everyday life and dominated by the United States and China.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store