logo
Nantucket property wars after man 'cuts down neighbor's trees'

Nantucket property wars after man 'cuts down neighbor's trees'

Daily Mail​a day ago
A property feud has erupted on a wealthy Massachusetts island after a brazen neighbor allegedly chopped down someone's 50-year-old trees to carve out an 'ocean view' for himself. Patricia Belford, 80, has accused Jonathan Jacoby, 55, of breaking onto her Nantucket property and cutting down 16 trees without her permission in February.
According to a $1.4 million lawsuit, Jacoby removed decades-old cherry, cedar and Leyland Cypress trees from the home 'with the specific purpose of improving the ocean view from his own property' - which he is trying to sell. Belford and Jacoby are next-door neighbors sharing a property line, but most of the trees taken down were far from that border, Belford says. Jacoby has been accused of doing the unauthorized landscaping to make his stunning 4,491-square-foot beach compound at 3 Tautemo Way more appealing to potential buyers.
In its Zillow description, the contemporary home, listed at just under $10 million, has 'sweeping views of the Atlantic Ocean' and Hummock Pond. Hummock Pond, a salt-water pond on the southwestern part of Nantucket, and Cisco Beach are just fractions of a mile away from Tautemo Way. And the only things inhibiting those 'sweeping views' of the nearby bodies of water were apparently the trees the Belfords planted in the 1970s.
When the trees were slashed, Matt Erisman, the property manager of Belford's $4.2 million home, notified the Nantucket Police Department (NPD), prompting an investigation. Belford herself does not live at the property, located at 1 Tautemo Way, but in an assisted living facility, according to the Nantucket Current. Jacoby's former landscaper, Krasimir Kirilov, voluntarily told investigators Jacoby was responsible. In a police statement submitted as lawsuit evidence, Kirilov said Jacoby reached out to him for help cleaning up landscaping work he was going to do on his own.
Once he realized the work was not on Jacoby's property, Kirilov refused the offer. 'The NPD concluded that Jacoby entered the property knowingly and willfully and cut the trees for his own personal benefit,' the lawsuit reads about the ongoing investigation. Nantucket Police Lieutenant Angus MacVicar told the Nantucket Current there are pending charges against Jacoby. Belford, who is suing on behalf of her family's trust, argued the trees added not only privacy, but value to her home - with a nursey estimating they each could cost thousands of dollars. 'Based on the number of trees removed, the replacement cost alone exceeds $486,000,' the document, filed on June 23, states. 'This does not account for the historic value, loss of screening, increased noise, reduction in overall property value. Jacoby's actions were not only economically damaging but also emotionally devastating for Belford.'
Nantucket has become a hot spot for wealthy vacationers looking for a beach getaway. The average home price on the ritzy Massachusetts island was roughly $4.5 million as of May 2025, according to Realtor.com. Only about 14,200 people live on Nantucket year-round - compared to the more than 80,000 that swarm the island for the summer, according to US Census data.
It is unclear if Jacoby lives in Nantucket fulltime, and his lawyer did respond to the Current's request for comment. 'The way I feel is that I am confident once all of the facts and evidence have been presented, that justice will be served,' Erisman told the outlet. 'However, much of what has been taken from the Belfords is irreplaceable, and it's sickening.' The Daily Mail has reached out to Belford and Jacoby for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bengals'Joe Burrow explains why he will no longer purchase the Batmobile
Bengals'Joe Burrow explains why he will no longer purchase the Batmobile

The Independent

time28 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Bengals'Joe Burrow explains why he will no longer purchase the Batmobile

Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow revealed that a December burglary at his Ohio home led him to abandon plans to purchase a $2.9 million Batmobile replica. The NFL star had previously discussed his intention to buy one of the limited edition Batmobile Tumblers before the break-in occurred. Burrow's home was invaded while he was away playing a Monday Night Football game against the Dallas Cowboys. Model Olivia Ponton, who was present at the time, reported the break-in to authorities, describing a shattered window and a ransacked room. The incident, discussed by Burrow in Netflix 's Quarterback docuseries, also sparked speculation about his relationship with Ponton, which they later appeared to confirm.

Ex-NYPD chiefs allege corruption and cronyism in lawsuits against Mayor Adams and his allies
Ex-NYPD chiefs allege corruption and cronyism in lawsuits against Mayor Adams and his allies

The Independent

time32 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Ex-NYPD chiefs allege corruption and cronyism in lawsuits against Mayor Adams and his allies

Four high-ranking former New York City police officials are accusing Mayor Eric Adams and his top deputies of doling out promotions to unqualified allies as part of a scheme that also involved alleged cash bribes paid to the ex-police commissioner. In separate lawsuits filed Monday, the former officials — including the NYPD's one-time chief of detectives — described a culture of rampant corruption and cronyism atop the nation's largest police department, which was rocked by overlapping federalinvestigations late last year. Each of the plaintiffs says that, with Adams' tacit approval, they were either demoted or forced into retirement after raising concerns about the practices, according to their lawsuits. A spokesperson for Adams, who is currently running for reelection, said he would review the lawsuits, adding that all of the police department's leaders are held to the 'highest standards.' Beginning in 2023, the suits allege that Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey, a longtime ally of Adams, began bypassing internal hiring regulations to promote dozens of 'unqualified friends' to key public safety posts. Inquiries to an attorney for Maddrey were not returned. At the time, several veteran NYPD officials raised objections, including the department's chief of detectives, James Essig, who noticed an 'unusually high number' of inexperienced transfers to the department's sex crimes unit, according to his lawsuit. But when Essig complained to Edward Caban, then the first deputy to the police commissioner, he said he was reprimanded for raising the issue. After Caban was promoted to police commissioner, he informed Essig, a veteran of the department for four decades, that he would be demoted from his position by five ranks. According to the suit, Essig later learned Caban was 'selling promotions' to hand-picked friends for up to $15,000. An attorney for Essig, Sarena Townsend, declined to elaborate on the basis of the bribery allegation. Essig resigned in September of 2023 rather than accept the demotion. In an emailed statement, attorneys for Caban called the bribery allegation 'unsupported and reckless,' adding that there was 'no merit to the allegations raised in these complaints.' Caban resigned from his position in September following a raid on his home by the FBI. Maddrey, whose home was also searched by federal agents, stepped down after being accused of demanding sex from a subordinate. Neither has been criminally charged. A spokesperson for the NYPD did not respond to a request for comment. The lawsuits also accuse current police officials, including Chief of Department John Chell, of working to squash internal oversight of the mayor's allies and policing priorities. In one instance, the NYPD's former chief of professional standards, Matthew Pontillo, said that an audit of the department's Community Response Team turned up 'troubling patterns' of unconstitutional stops by officers who delayed turning on their body cameras. After Pontillo raised the finding in a meeting with then-Commissioner Keechant Sewell, Chell pulled him aside and said, 'Why'd you have to tell her?' according to the suit. Sewell met with Adams later that day, according to the suit. She resigned hours later and was later replaced by Caban.

Top House Democrats demand release of Epstein files that mention Trump
Top House Democrats demand release of Epstein files that mention Trump

The Guardian

time38 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Top House Democrats demand release of Epstein files that mention Trump

House Democrats on Tuesday demanded that the justice department release documents related to the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking case that mentions or references Donald Trump, citing a comment by Elon Musk after he fell out with the president this year. The House judiciary committee's ranking member, Jamie Raskin, together with 15 other Democrats sent a six-page letter to the US attorney general, Pam Bondi, accusing her of withholding some Epstein files to protect the president from any damaging disclosures. They also called for the justice department to make public the second volume of former special counsel Jack Smith's report into Trump's alleged mishandling of classified documents, arguing that Bondi has a track record of using the justice department to protect the president. 'Stop protecting your boss and former client, release the Smith report in full without redactions immediately, and publicly release all documents in the Epstein files that mention or reference Donald Trump,' the letter said. No evidence has emerged to suggest Trump was connected to Epstein any more than has already become public, apart from a since-deleted X post by Elon Musk as he exited the White House under a cloud of controversy and accused the justice department of trying to insulate Trump from the matter. 'Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk wrote in his post in June. The missive to Bondi came a day after the justice department and the FBI issued a memo that concluded that no secret client list of Epstein existed and reaffirmed the conclusion reached by federal investigators in 2019 that he died by suicide in a Manhattan jail cell awaiting trial. The justice department also released video surveillance of the hallway outside of Epstein's cell, although the digital clock on the tape skipped from 11:58:58pm to 12:00am. Officials did not address the jump and added that no further materials would be made public. 'This administration has repeatedly claimed that President Trump is 'the most transparent and accessible president in American history'. So far, your DOJ has not only failed to live up to this promise, but you have also consistently hidden from the American public materials and information that may be damaging to President Trump,' the letter said. The release of the Epstein files has become an unlikely goal for the Trump administration after Bondi spent months hyping up the materials as being full of damaging details related to child porn and sex trafficking, creating anticipation among a core group of the president's supporters. The release of the first batch of documents related to the files, handed out to handpicked Trump-world personalities at the White House in white binders bearing the imprimatur of the justice department's seal, prompted widespread derision for containing no new information. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion As detailed in the judiciary committee Democrats' letter, Bondi then rapidly promised in a series of Fox News interviews that a number of teams at the department and the FBI were reviewing hundreds more pages from the Epstein files that would be made public in a second release. But the second release has also fallen flat. The justice department's Monday memo undercut Bondi's own statements and repeated conclusions reached by federal investigators years earlier. With Democrats in the minority, the request for the Epstein files or the second volume of Smith's final report into the classified documents case is almost certain to go unanswered. It was not clear whether Republicans on the committee would join the request. Republicans on the House judiciary committee have instead focused their time investigating the justice department's criminal cases against Trump. The Guardian previously reported in May that the committee interviewed former classified documents case prosecutor Jay Bratt. In that appearance, Bratt asserted his fifth amendment right against self-incrimination, which a spokesperson said he chose to do because 'this administration and its proxies have made no effort to hide their willingness to weaponize the machinery of government against those they perceive as political enemies'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store