Democratic city officers flocking to cop-friendly red states, police leader claims: ‘Why would anyone stay?'
Joe Gamaldi is the national vice president of the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP). He is an active lieutenant with the Houston Police Department, and he said police in blue cities are tired of facing hostility from local leaders.
Advertisement
'What we've seen is really a mass exodus of police officers leaving far-left cities for basically greener pastures,' he told Fox News Digital.
'Because, ultimately, people want to feel appreciated for what they do, and when you have a boss — in this case, mayors or city councils, who regularly call you a piece of crap to the public — why would anyone stay?'
Florida is one example of a Republican-led state that has benefited from the mass departures.
5 'What we've seen is really a mass exodus of police officers leaving far-left cities for basically greener pastures,' Joe Gamaldi said.
AP
Advertisement
According to a 2024 statement from former Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody, the state welcomed 5,000 law enforcement recruits between 2022 and last year, and 1,200 of them came from out of state.
'Florida is the most pro-law enforcement state in the nation because we back our blue,' Moody said at the time. 'We've been spreading the word about all the great incentives to join our ranks, and individuals like the new Sarasota recruits have answered the call, leaving behind places where their service was not as appreciated as it is here.'
She said she was 'as inspired as ever to continue doing all we can to show our support to those who bravely protect and serve' after seeing the influx of police officers into the state.
5 Florida welcomed 5,000 law enforcement recruits between 2022 and last year, and 1,200 of them came from out of state.
Fox News Digital
Advertisement
Gamaldi said officers are also moving to cities that may lean blue but are in red states and still have the support of elected leadership and the community, adding officers are 'voting with their feet.'
'We're also seeing it [in] Texas in Houston, which is a city that leans a little blue, but they have been supportive of police officers,' he said. 'The mayor there has given a massive raise to police officers. You're seeing officers go there. You're seeing officers go to Dallas. So, you're seeing all these communities, and there's one common thread. It's 'We support police officers.''
Gamaldi emphasized that the trend began after the 2020 defund the police movement and said, in many cities, law enforcement officers are afraid to do their jobs in 'critical incident' situations, even when they do them by the book.
5 Gamaldi said officers are also moving to cities that may lean blue but are in red states and still have the support of elected leadership and the community.
LightRocket via Getty Images
Advertisement
'I think you can look no further than Seattle, Portland, Chicago [and] New York,' he said. 'All of these cities have basically told their police officers, 'We don't support you. We're not gonna be there for you when you need us. We're gonna try to defund you when given the opportunity.'
'I mean, my goodness, right now, one of the mayoral candidates for New York has actively said he wants to defund and dismantle the police department,' Gamaldi said, referring to socialist Zohran Mamdani, who has been open with his anti-police rhetoric.
5 'I mean, my goodness, right now, one of the mayoral candidates for New York has actively said he wants to defund and dismantle the police department,' Gamaldi said
Zohran Mamdani /X
Blue cities, Gamaldi said, are worse off for driving out their police forces.
'Look at the mass exodus of experience in solving cases and experience of just mentoring the next generation of police officers,' he said. 'I mean, the damage that was done in 2020 with the defund the police movement, rhat's going to reverberate for decades. You don't just recover from something like that when you have all of that experience walking out the door.'
5 Gamaldi emphasized that the trend began after the 2020 defund the police movement.
Christopher Sadowski
He also pointed to better pay and other financial perks, like cities covering moving expenses, as reasons law enforcement officers are moving away from far-left areas.
Ultimately, he posed a question to those who patrol the streets where they are unappreciated, saying, 'Why not leave?'
Advertisement
'To anyone watching this right now,' Gamaldi said, 'if your boss was constantly telling you [that] you're doing a horrible job, and, in addition, if you were following the exact policies, training and the law of your job, and yet they are still demonizing you, still throwing you under the bus, still trying to indict you, why the hell would you stay?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
16 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump administration pulls billions in funding for high-speed rail project
The Trump administration has canceled billions of dollars in funding for California's high-speed rail project after the state agency rejected the federal government's assessment of the project's failings. The Federal Railroad Administration pulled $4 billion in funding on Wednesday that was intended for construction in the Central Valley, according to a letter that acting FRA administrator Drew Feeley sent to the project's chief executive officer Ian Choudri. Department of Transportation Secretary Duffy has also asked the FRA to review other grants related to the project. The agency said it will consult with the Department of Justice on potentially clawing back other funds. Duffy blamed state leaders for the 'mismanagement' of plans for the train. 'Governor Newsom and the complicit Democrats have enabled this waste for years. Federal dollars are not a blank check – they come with a promise to deliver results. After over a decade of failures, CHSRA's mismanagement and incompetence has proven it cannot build its train to nowhere on time or on budget,' Duffy said in a statement Wednesday. 'It's time for this boondoggle to die.' On X, Duffy said that Newsom and California 'are the definition of government incompetence and possibly corruption.' In response, Newsom said he 'won't be taking advice from the guy who can't keep planes in the sky.' President Donald Trump, a vocal critic of the project who has vowed to defund it, said the decision to pull funding saves taxpayers' money. 'I am thrilled to announce that I have officially freed you from funding California's disastrously overpriced 'high speed train to nowhere,' Trump wrote on social media. 'The railroad we were promised still does not exist, and never will. This project was severely overpriced, overregulated and never delivered.' The high-speed rail project was supposed to be completed by 2020 but is decades off schedule and about $100 billion over budget from its original proposal of $33 billion. No part of the line from Los Angeles to San Francisco has yet to be completed and construction has so far been confined to the Central Valley. The Trump administration initiated a review of the project in February after Republican lawmakers called for an investigation. In a 310-page compliance review released in June, the federal government cited budget shortfalls, missed deadlines and a misleading projected ridership and found 'no viable path forward' for the train. Choudri sent two letters to the Trump administration in response to the review findings. In a letter sent earlier this month, Choudri called the assessment inaccurate and said the administration relied on old information to come to its conclusions, misrepresenting the facts. 'FRA's flawed inputs have led to flawed outputs,' Choudri wrote. 'Rather than rely on the relevant information and documentation provided by the Authority, FRA inexplicably relies on outdated information, unreliable, unsupported third-party sources, and incomplete and flawed analyses to support its conclusions.' Choudri asked the Trump administration for another meeting in early August and for the decision to be delayed. The responses did not satisfy FRA's concerns, the agency said. The high-speed rail authority and state lawmakers have been pushing for private-public partnerships to fund the project outside of government support. The state is also committing $1 billion per year in funding towards the project, which has created thousands of jobs in the Central Valley and has become central to several communities' business revitalization plans.
Politico
17 minutes ago
- Politico
Why Some Trump Allies Want to Protect the Fed's Independence
Few things seem to gall President Donald Trump more than Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's disregard for his views on interest rates. The status quo, where Trump allows Powell to serve out his term until next May, feels untenable, with the president venting grievances and chafing at restrictions on his executive power. What happens next to the Fed may hinge on a counterintuitive question: Can temperate voices persuade Trump that the central bank's insulation from immediate political pressures — from him — is actually good for him? Some of Trump's allies have been making that case to me, and likely to him as well. However exasperating Trump finds the Fed's independence, these supporters see political value to the president in having some distance from the central bank. The idea that Trump is persuadable on this point might seem especially far-fetched this week, after he floated the idea of firing Powell to a group of House Republicans, even reportedly showing them a draft letter that would complete the task. Markets dropped on Wednesday as they digested the possibility that Trump might really try to remove the Fed chief, a move he has been actively considering. But he walked it back soon after. It is a cycle we've seen before. (My colleague Megan Messerly and I reported that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent talked Trump down from a springtime anti-Powell eruption.) And here we are: Trump still has not yet tried to fire Powell. It's legally questionable whether he really could, and the Supreme Court hinted recently that it might shield Powell from such a move. Trump is also aware of the financial instability it would create to attempt to punish the chair so directly for not cutting interest rates. That would suggest, at minimum, that he understands the need for the Fed chair to have credibility with markets. But is that enough to make him pick a person to succeed Powell who has pledged some level of independence? Some of the president's allies are arguing in private that having a Fed chair who is not simply a yes man is a way to help head off the kind of damaging inflation that sank Democrats in 2024. That is, investors and businesses have to believe that the central bank is willing to do what's necessary to avoid inflation, even if that means higher rates. One of the lessons from the 1970s, when President Richard Nixon successfully pressured then-Chair Arthur Burns to keep rates low — and a dramatic lesson from Turkey — is that lowering rates in response to political pressure can lead to higher inflation and force even higher rates down the road. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon made a similar point on Tuesday when I asked him if he was worried about risks that might arise from a less autonomous Fed. 'The independence of the Fed is absolutely critical, and not just for the current Fed chairman, who — I respect Jay Powell — but for the next Fed chairman,' Dimon said to me and other reporters on a call shortly after his bank announced earnings. 'Playing around with the Fed can often have adverse consequences, the absolute opposite of what you might be hoping for.' It's also a theme I've heard on Capitol Hill. 'The independence of the Fed chair may very well come back and help the administration as the economic growth improves with the policies being implemented,' Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) told me recently. Trump clearly doesn't fully buy into this idea, but it's an open and critical question whether he buys into it at all. At the very least, his administration still feels the need to publicly endorse the Fed's freedom to set policy as it sees fit. 'Everybody at the White House understands the independence of the Fed is super important,' National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett, himself a top candidate to replace Powell, said on NBC Wednesday evening. When central banks lose their independence, Hassett said, 'it's bad for the economy and bad for markets.' There's also another classic reason for presidents to like Fed independence: It gives them a scapegoat if the economy goes south. The expectation from investors is that anyone Trump picks will be more receptive to his calls for lowering borrowing costs than Powell is, though there is a wide spectrum of ways that could play out in practice. Certainly, regularly communicating with the president seems to be a baseline expectation. The short list for now is Hassett; former Fed board member Kevin Warsh; Bessent, and current Fed board member Chris Waller, people familiar with the deliberations have told me and my colleague Rachael Bade. The two Kevins are seen as the frontrunners, and Trump said this week that he likes Bessent better where he is at Treasury. All four candidates have suggested that rates should be lower. They likely differ in how low and how fast. It's not an unusual view among economists that the Fed should consider moving later this month rather than waiting until September, with signs that the economy might be slowly weakening and inflation only slightly above 2 percent. Even Powell is forecasting that the Fed will cut rates this year, though he's in no rush to do so, citing uncertainty around how tariffs will play out in the economy. But Trump has called for rates to be dramatically lower, and it's unclear whether any of the frontrunners to replace Powell have such large cuts in mind. Hassett didn't dismiss the idea in the NBC interview Wednesday but didn't endorse it either. Trump's preferred rate might be hard to achieve for any Fed chair. Powell is only one of 12 people who vote on monetary policy, and a future central bank leader who is viewed merely as a stooge of the president might have a harder time making an intellectual case to the rest of the committee. This is also a point that people in Trump's circle have brought up to me, and the president himself recently posted on Truth Social that those other Fed officials are 'equally to blame' for rates staying high. But a new Fed chief could — under current economic conditions — easily make the case for smaller, more gradual cuts, with Trump's influence potentially leading rates to go lower than they otherwise would. Julia Coronado, who is president of the Wall Street consulting firm MacroPolicy Perspectives, argued that any Trump pick for the job will be viewed by markets as having less inflation-fighting credibility than prior Fed chairs since Paul Volcker. 'It's too strong to say [the Fed's independence] is the dam that hasn't broke, because it doesn't look good,' she said. But if Trump tries to kill off that independence entirely, he might not love the world he ends up with. The Fed's future will be determined by whether he heeds that warning.
CNBC
17 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: U.S. producer prices are flat — but they don't factor in imports
No one likes being the person who goes "but actually…". Sometimes, however, it is necessary. The U.S. producer price index in June was flat, meaning that wholesale prices remained stagnant from May to June. This might suggest that U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs are hitting the economy less than feared, in contrast to what the uptick in June's consumer price index suggested. But actually, the PPI measures prices at the level of the manufacturer — which is located in America. In other words, the index "does not include imports, because imports are by definition not produced by domestic firms," according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. By contrast, the CPI considers all goods and services that the consumer purchases, regardless of their country of origin. As the BLS elaborates, "imports compose a substantial portion of the CPI especially within the apparel and new-cars component." While new vehicle prices fell 0.3% in June, those of apparel rose 0.4%, suggesting that the effects of tariffs are starting to show in some components of the CPI. But actually, we might not know the full effect of the tariffs until after Aug. 1 when the updated tariffs kick in — provided Trump keeps to the deadline this time. Trump denies that he plans to fire Jerome Powell. Hours after Trump told Republican lawmakers he will fire the Federal Reserve Chair, according to a source, the U.S. president said he's "not planning on doing it" and it's "highly unlikely." U.S. stocks rise in a rocky day of trading. Major U.S. indexes fell Wednesday on Trump's reported plans to fire Powell, but rebounded sharply after he denied them. The Stoxx Europe 600 retreated 0.57%, dragged down by a slump in ASML shares. Wholesale prices in the U.S. were unchanged in June. The producer price index was flat for the month, compared with the Dow Jones consensus estimate of a 0.2% increase. On an annual basis, headline PPI was up 2.3%, the lowest since September 2024. Crypto bills stumble in Congress. As of 5:30 p.m. ET, more than half a dozen Republicans had voted with all Democrats against letting two of the bills, which involve the regulation of cryptocurrency, proceed in their current forms. [PRO] Ether is starting to outperform bitcoin. Since its April low, ether has shot up over 130%, more than two times the 60% jump in bitcoin over the same period. ETH has also broken out of a technical pattern, implying it could have a double-digit upside. The world's top fintech companies: 2025 Fintech is flourishing as emerging technologies from artificial intelligence to crypto take the financial world by storm — even as the industry continues to navigate an environment of reduced funding. Against this backdrop, CNBC and Statista have named the top 300 fintech companies globally.
