
After years of flying high, tequila braces for impact
818 Tequila, the four-year-old brand owned by Jenner, has slowed down hiring and dialed back spending on some of its marketing efforts, a troubling sign for the industry that has experienced seemingly stratospheric growth and garnered celebrity attention for the past several years.
'We've observed a pull-back on discretionary spending and an increase in what we view as more deliberate purchases,' Mike Novy, CEO of 818 Tequila, told CNN, adding that the company is focusing on its core lineup of tequilas to give customers the 'best possible price.'
This year is turning into quite a headache not only for 818 Tequila, but for the whole industry. Tequila sits at a 'critical juncture,' according to a recent report from OhBev, an alcohol marketing agency, with 'signs of market normalization' following a decade of extraordinary gains.
Consumers already aren't spending as much on tequila compared to the height of Covid-19 when people stocked up their at-home bar setups, which has prompted a wave of layoffs.
Plus years of excessive demand have sparked an oversupply of agave — the main ingredient in tequila — causing prices to sharply decline as inventory goes unsold, damaging profits for farmers.
Now there's the threat of tariffs of 25%, as the spirit is produced exclusively in Mexico. Tequila currently falls under the free trade agreement President Donald Trump signed with Mexico and Canada, which is set to expire next year. For now, that trade deal has allowed goods from America's neighbors that comply to come in duty-free, but that could always change.
Consumers are being more discerning of their purchases, with the industry 'seeing a reversion to pre-pandemic levels of business and growth,' according to Andrew Chrisomalis, co-founder and chairman of Pantalones, the two-year-old tequila brand created by Camila and Matthew McConaughey.
He said that tequila drinkers are not spending as much on the super premium category (i.e., the $150 bottle of Clase Azule that's a favorite of celebrities and Real Housewives, alike) with purchases being 'less kind of flash, less sort of showy' as drinkers look for high-quality tequila at an affordable price.
That benefits Pantalones, he said, which costs $45 for a 750 ml bottle of Blanco.
'Given the uncertain economic environment, people are being more cautious… you sort of feel that in everything and in every way of life, including ours,' he said. 'Discernment would be the key word and if you have that differentiated product, you should feel pretty good about yourself.'
But there's some relief on the tariff front – at least for now. 'We have not seen any changes or differences this year at all from a tariff perspective, which has been a blessing, frankly,' he said, but confessed that it's operating in an environment that has a 'little bit of uncertainty, no question.'
That uncertainty has prompted Pantalones, 818 Tequila and other companies to stockpile their supply in the United States, which is tequila's biggest consumer, accounting for 80% of imports. Tequila exports from Mexico jumped 30% in January of this year compared to the same month a year ago, data from Mexico's Tequila Regulatory Council shows.
With sales in the United States possibly nearing its peak amid an uncertain trade environment, Pantalones is eyeing the United Kingdom for further expansion. The brand has recently inked a distribution deal with supermarket chain Tesco, bringing its reach to about 2,500 stores across the country, in addition to being sold in a slew of restaurants and hotels.
Tequila is in its infancy in the country, which means there's an 'education curve' for consumers, Chrisomalis said. The brand is holding tastings to introduce customers to its three varieties plus tapping into McConaughey's star power for promotion.
The McConaughey's 'lend themselves an opportunity with a large audience to help do that. It'd be very difficult for me to do that without them, but with them, it's just a much easier task,' he admits.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Child tax credit gets small boost in Trump's tax bill, but millions of families are left out
The popular child tax credit will receive a slight boost from President Trump's signature tax and spending bill — but there are caveats. Currently, taxpayers who make under $200,000 annually as a single filer, or $400,000 if filing jointly, can qualify for a partially refundable credit of up to $2,000 for each child they claim as a dependent who is under age 17 and a US citizen or qualifying noncitizen. The new legislation increases the credit to a maximum $2,200 per child. Without the bill, the maximum credit would have reverted to $1,000. But the increase, which amounts to a 10% bump, follows years of rising prices that have chipped away at the value of the original benefit. And many extremely low-income children — in addition to US citizen kids of undocumented parents — will be locked out of the payments altogether. 'If you're already receiving the full credit amount, then you will benefit from this,' Joe Hughes, a senior analyst at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, told Yahoo Finance. 'If you're not, then you probably won't benefit.' Read more: Child tax credit: Everything you need to know By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy To qualify for the refundable portion of the child tax credit, which is called the 'additional child tax credit' and can be worth up to $1,700, taxpayers must earn at least $2,500 in annual income. (A refundable tax credit can lower tax liability past zero, potentially generating a refund.) Families who make less than that receive no benefit, while many more children are in low-income households that earn just enough to receive part of the benefit but not enough to receive the full payment. Due to those income restrictions, an estimated 17 million children are unable to receive the full child tax credit, according to the Tax Policy Center, a left-leaning think tank. The average benefit for taxpayers with children who made between $10,000 and $20,000 in 2022, for example, was $800, according to the Congressional Research Service. That pay range includes people who worked full-time jobs at the federal minimum wage. Families earning between $200,000 and $500,000, meanwhile, saw an average benefit of $2,810. Households where both parents lack a Social Security number — undocumented immigrants, including those whose children have a Social Security number and are US citizens — will also be shut out under the new law. 'We are excluding some of the most vulnerable kids that have very, very high poverty rates," said Dolores Acevedo-Garcia, a professor at the Boston University School of Social Work. About 1.8 million children live in households where both parents are undocumented, she added. There was a point when the benefits were less restrictive and more broadly accessible. Through the 2021 pandemic-era American Rescue Plan, the child tax credit was temporarily expanded from $2,000 to up to $3,600 per child in what some scholars and advocates hailed as one of the country's greatest-ever antipoverty measures. Combined with stimulus payments, the tax credit hike helped slash child poverty rates by 46%, pushing them to their lowest level on record. When the child tax credit expansion lapsed at the end of 2021, those gains were reversed. At the time, the credit was fully refundable, meaning even the lowest-income families qualified. As for the new tax bill, 'basically what it's doing is giving wealthier families a small boost,' said Adam Ruben, director of Economic Security Project Action, a left-leaning advocacy group. 'But for lower-income and working-class families, they get nothing.' Emma Ockerman is a reporter covering the economy and labor for Yahoo Finance. You can reach her at Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta's Momentum Hits a CapEx Hurdle
Needham has lifted Meta (NASDAQ:META) Platforms to a hold from underperform, balancing strong top-line and margin forecasts against rising costs and heavy capital spending. Analyst Laura Martin shifted Meta's rating after noting that improving labor productivity is slowingheadcount and cost per full-time employee are climbing, which dampens share gains. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with META. Still, Needham expects Meta to outpace its own targets, forecasting 14% revenue growth and 6% EPS growth in fiscal 2025. The firm stopped short of a buy call because Meta's CapEx is set to surge: Needham projects $68 billion in FY25, up 84% year-over-yearthe steepest increase among hyperscalers. Meanwhile, rivals like Google (NASDAQ:GOOG), Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) own scalable cloud assets, giving them a structural cost edge. As Meta stock rallies about 22% year-to-datewell ahead of the S&P 500's roughly 6% gaina hold rating signals caution. Heavy spending on AI infrastructure raises questions about return on invested capital, and the company still faces heightened regulatory scrutiny over privacy, antitrust and content moderation. Needham's neutral stance underscores a trade-off: Meta's growth outlook remains solid, but swelling budgets and cost disadvantages argue for patience over buying. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


WIRED
25 minutes ago
- WIRED
Trump's Defiance of TikTok Ban Prompted Immunity Promises to 10 Tech Companies
Jul 3, 2025 5:48 PM Newly disclosed records show Attorney General Pam Bondi gave cover to not only Apple and Google, but also several other companies that help TikTok operate in the US. Photograph:US attorney general Pam Bondi has told at least 10 tech companies, including Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Google, that they have 'incurred no liability' for supporting TikTok despite the federal ban on providing services to the popular video-sharing app, according to letters disclosed on Thursday. Under orders from President Donald Trump, Bondi has refused to enforce a law passed by Congress last year that classifies TikTok as a national security risk because of its ties to China and bars companies from distributing the app to US consumers. TikTok can dodge the ban by reducing the ownership Chinese entities have in its US operations, and Trump has described those negotiations as ongoing. But constitutional experts have questioned the legality of executive orders by Trump that delay enforcement of the ban as those sales talks drag out. Early this year, TikTok disappeared from the US app stores of Apple and Google after the ban went into effect. But despite the law still being on the books, TikTok returned to the stores after just a 26-day hiatus. Several media outlets reported at the time that Bondi had written to Apple and Google promising they would not face prosecution. But the letters had not been publicly disclosed until Thursday. Silicon Valley software engineer Tony Tan had sought the letters under the Freedom of Information Act. The Department of Justice initially claimed it did not have records matching Tan's request. He sued the department, which ended up releasing several letters to him on Thursday. A Justice Department spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The disclosures show the first letters were dated January 30 and sent to four companies—Microsoft, Google, Apple, and content delivery network provider Fastly. 'Google has committed no violation of the Act and Google has incurred no liability under the Act during the Covered Period,' then-acting attorney general James McHenry wrote. 'Google may continue to provide services to TikTok as contemplated by the Executive Order without violating the Act, and without incurring any legal liability.' Bondi took over as attorney general in early February, and days later Google and Apple separately wrote to her, according to the released documents. In responses dated February 11, Bondi wrote that 'the Department of Justice is also irrevocably relinquishing any claims the United States might have had against' the companies for violating the TikTok ban. After Microsoft inquired, it also received on March 10 a letter 'irrevocably relinquishing any claims.' Similar language was included in letters dated March 10 to Amazon, data center company Digital Realty, and cell phone service giant T-Mobile. In early April, Trump extended the negotiating window for a TikTok sale and further delayed enforcement of the ban. That led to a round of 10 letters on April 5, including to content delivery provider Akamai, cloud vendor Oracle, and TV maker LG. Among those letters, only the ones to Apple and Google mentioned the 'irrevocably relinquishing' vow. But three days later, Bondi sent a new version to Microsoft including the language. Microsoft and the other nine companies didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Tan, who obtained the letters, last month filed a lawsuit against Google parent company Alphabet accusing it of withholding information about its decision to continue distributing TikTok on its Play store. (Google previously declined to comment to WIRED on the suit.) He worries that the promises from Bondi are non-binding, and that Trump or a future president could end up prosecuting tech companies that are currently supporting TikTok. Google could face billions of dollars in fines if found in violation of the ban.