Cumberland House women to travel Sask. spreading awareness of disruption of northern river delta
For generations, the people of Cumberland House Cree Nation, located about 350 kilometres northeast of Saskatoon, have depended on the Saskatchewan River delta, the largest freshwater river delta in North America, stretching 9,700 square kilometres from northeast Saskatchewan into western Manitoba.
In June, lawyers for the First Nation in northeastern Saskatchewan filed a statement of claim in Saskatoon Court of King's Bench, alleging the government has failed to uphold its treaty obligations. It names the government of Saskatchewan as the defendant.
Now, a group of women calling themselves the Indigenous Saskatchewan Women's Environmental Water Advocacy Keepers Water Movement, or the Iskwewak Movement for short, are planning to travel the province sharing their knowledge of what has happened to the water system.
Veronica Favel, one of the water advocates, said the delta is very important for northern people, who use the waterways to get from place to place.
"Currently the waters are quite low and the river system is very hard to navigate," she said.
She said in some places you come across sandbars, mud bars and rocks more often now because of low waters, which are also impacting land resources and wilderness camps.
"It's very hard to navigate through that because of what's going on. It's actually dangerous to be out there if you don't know the waterways."
Favel said there needs to be better management of water, because soon there will be no river delta.
"We've been saying this for years," she said.
"We've had elders that knew prior to this the existence of the dam. They knew that this was gonna have a huge impact, huge destruction. We've had research studies done on the Sask. River delta, which is our homeland, and we know what it's done to not only the environment, but to the animals that feed off it."
Denise McKenzie, another water advocate in the Iskwewak movement, said water is essential to everyone for survival.
"Water is life, to us it is sacred, and without clean, healthy water, we're done for," she said.
McKenzie said the goal is to spread awareness to people all across Saskatchewan.
"The way things are going now, we're not going to have a Saskatchewan River delta, especially after they put in the Gardiner Dam's $4-billion project plans they have for the irrigation project. That will be the final blow to the Saskatchewan river."
McKenzie was referring to a massive, three-stage irrigation infrastructure plan Premier Scott Moe announced in 2020. Experts have said that a Saskatchewan government-funded report analyzing the costs and benefits of the project showed it is a risky venture that offers, at best, modest gains.
The advocates' journey is set to begin on Aug. 4. They plan to drive from the E.B. Campbell dam in northern Saskatchewan, to Danielson Provincial Park, to Rotary Park in Saskatoon, then finally to Wascana Park in Regina. They say they will be doing ceremonies all along the way and speaking about the harmful effects the dams have on the waterway system.
"Water is life. Without water nothing lives, and we see the devastation of what is happening," McKenzie said. "We know we have to do something about it. We need these much needed changes, we need to the protection."
She said the Cumberland Lake used to be 30 miles (almost 50 kilometres) in length, and 30 to 40 feet deep. Since the establishment of the E.B. Campbell dam in the 1960s, the lake has drastically shrunk, she said.
"Today it is less than two miles across, and it's only two feet of water with the rest sludge down below. You can't even go on a nice canoe trip across the lake," she said.
Favel said this change is impacting her community's culture and way of life.
"We as Indigenous people, we've always lived here and we've always been in connection with the land and what comes with the land.," she said.
"We know that without the land or water our culture is going to die. It's a huge part of it. We're connected with all of that, we're the ones that experience it. We live with it, and we have children, grandchildren that are going to live here forever. So we need to do something about it, and that's this is our duty as protectors of water."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
12 minutes ago
- CBC
How Frank Calder and the Nisga'a influenced modern treaties in Canada
Many First Nations across the country are warning that new infrastructure bills to fast-track build projects may be infringing on their rights — rights that received a huge boost more than 50 years ago, thanks to the pioneering efforts of a hereditary chief of the Nisga'a Nation in B.C. Frank Calder led a case out of B.C.'s northwest coast that would result in the Supreme Court of Canada acknowledging Indigenous rights and title for the first time — and, in turn, contributed to modern treaties and Indigenous self-governing agreements across the country, as it opened the door for Indigenous people to negotiate land claims with the government. Chiefs in B.C. are citing Calder, and other cases that affirmed Indigenous rights and title, at a time when many say their rights aren't being respected. In Ontario, nine First Nations have taken the province and Canada to court over Bill 5 and Bill C-5, which aim to fast-track projects, and chiefs in B.C. are also saying more court challenges are to come. The bills come as Canada experiences economic uncertainty because of tariffs, and Indigenous people are concerned that the environment and their rights are taking a back seat. As Indigenous people gear up for court, previous rights and title cases are top of mind as Canada pushes for "shovels in the ground." With Indigenous people citing the Calder case, and their rights and title, what does that mean? Indigenous rights and title In a 1982 amendment to the Constitution, Section 35 recognized and affirmed the existing Aboriginal and treaty rights of Indigenous people in Canada. It defines "Aboriginal peoples of Canada" as Indian, Inuit, and Métis peoples. Treaty rights are defined in each negotiated treaty. But there is no definition of "Aboriginal rights and title" in the Constitution for Indigenous communities in Canada that didn't sign a treaty — and this has led to debate, controversy and several court cases. Many of the significant cases that aimed to define Aboriginal rights and title took place in B.C., paving the way for First Nations across the country to have a better hand at negotiating tables. One of the earliest is the Calder case, filed by the Nisga'a on B.C.'s northwest coast. The Government of Canada credits Calder for shifting the treaty negotiation process in the country to a rights-based approach. The Calder case Calder was a hereditary chief of the Nisga'a Nation and, alongside others, took B.C. to court in 1967 in an attempt to get his nation's land back and to have Nisga'a rights and title protected in the Nass Valley. The Nisga'a pursued the case, arguing that its rights under the Royal Proclamation of 1763 had been violated because, like most Indigenous communities in B.C. at the time, they had never signed a treaty. The proclamation, still in place today, states that all land in Canada is considered Indigenous land until ceded by treaty, and further, that Aboriginal title existed before settlement, and only the Crown can purchase land from First Nations. The Calder case caused a split decision at the Supreme Court of Canada, with three judges voting in favour of the Nisga'a and three voting in favour of the province. The court's two other judges recused themselves from the case. The seventh judge dismissed the case on the technicality that First Nations needed permission from the government to sue the government, and the Nisga'a didn't have it. Although the case was dismissed, for the first time in Canadian history, the Supreme Court judges who voted in favour of the Nisga'a acknowledged the existence of Aboriginal title. First Nations from unceded territories now had a better hand at negotiating tables and started being invited to them. 'A whole different world': Nisga'a negotiator The Calder case laid the groundwork for modern treaties in Canada. The very first — the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement — was signed two years later. It took longer for the Nisga'a, who signed their treaty in 2000, after 113 years of negotiations. Matthew Moore was on the negotiation team for 16 of those years and remembers how B.C. kept turning them away. "Every time I went to the provincial government, I would get refused with the comment that you guys aren't Canadian citizens, you're wards of the federal government. You have to talk to the federal government," he said. "It was really humiliating and frustrating to go through that." Following Calder, Moore says that Nisga'a members asked then-prime minister Pierre Trudeau if the government was open to negotiating a treaty, or if they wanted to go back to court. "Our people got a response back that the federal government did not want to go back to the Supreme Court of Canada. They wanted to explore negotiations," said Moore. Canada and many First Nations call the period from the 1970s onward the modern treaty era. Saskatchewan impact Among those participating in the modern treaty process is a nation in Saskatchewan that wasn't allowed to sign a numbered treaty between 1871 and 1921. Darcy Bear, chief of the Whitecap Dakota First Nation, told CBC News the Dakota territory spans from the United States to Canada, and negotiators from the government labelled Chief Whitecap and his people as "American Indians," and so, didn't allow him to sign. The Whitecap Dakota signed its self-government treaty with the Crown in 2023. "The self-government treaty recognized Whitecap Dakota Nation members as Aboriginal peoples of Canada with section 35 rights, something they never did before," said Bear. Bear says that it was important for his people to be governed by their own Dakota laws, instead of being governed by the Indian Act — a policy still in place today, enacted in 1876 that changed Indigenous governing systems to the chief and council system. Bear says that his community researched modern treaties and self-government agreements in B.C. and the United States before requesting a negotiation process with the Crown. Yukon impact Another area of Canada that was settled without a treaty is the Yukon. Dave Joe, a member of the Champagne and Aishihik First Nations and the first native lawyer in the territory, says that before modern treaties "it was a dark period in history" for First Nations people in Canada. "It was a period of restrictions about whether or not we could own the land, whether or not we could pursue a land claim, whether or not we could pursue court action." He was involved in creating the Umbrella Final Agreement, the template used to negotiate all land claim settlements for Yukon First Nations. Joe says that the Calder case with the Nisga'a, the civil rights movement in the United States, and another rights and title case pursued by the Tlingit and Haida nations in Alaska, all inspired First Nations in the Yukon to pursue their land claims. "Those were the three sorts of backdrops to Yukon First Nations, saying that hey, we have a valid claim here as well." He says that the Calder case initiated the modern treaty era in Canada. "And so [the Nisga'a] had a good case going forward. That recognition, I think, prompted Pierre Trudeau to accept our proposal to negotiate rather than proceeding with court action." And even as the Calder case was influential in Canada, according to the University of British Columbia, it has also been referenced in Australia and New Zealand.
National Post
41 minutes ago
- National Post
FIRST READING: Mark Carney is pleasing old people and basically nobody else
First Reading is a Canadian politics newsletter curated by the National Post's own Tristin Hopper. To get an early version sent directly to your inbox, sign up here. Article content Three months after the federal election, Prime Minister Mark Carney remains smack dab in the middle of his honeymoon period. Article content An approval rating of 61 per cent. Satisfaction with the government is at highs not seen since the first term of Justin Trudeau. Some polls have Carney's Liberals enjoying a 10-point lead over the Conservatives. Article content Article content In that cohort, 56 per cent of respondents favoured the Liberals against just 28 per cent prepared to vote Conservative. Article content This continues to make Canada the only Western democracy in which the usual demographics of political leanings have been flipped on their head. Article content Everywhere from the U.K. to Germany to the United States, young people continue to favour left-wing parties while old people favour right-wing parties. Article content In the recent Australian general elections, held just a week after Canada's, the left-wing Labor Party won a surprise victory by sweeping constituencies disproportionately populated by younger voters. Article content Some of Canada's peer countries may have conservative parties that are gaining support among young people, or are doing better than usual among younger cohorts. But Canada remains the outlier as a place in which the average 25-year-old is more likely to vote conservative than the average 65-year-old. Article content During the April federal election, in fact, voters in their 20s consistently emerged as one of the strongest single cohorts showing support for the Conservatives. Article content In one of the most surprising manifestations of the trend, a straw poll held among Canadian high school students ended up delivering a result that was more conservative than the general electorate. If it had been up to teenagers, Canada would have had a Conservative minority government. Article content The final days of the election also featured the equally bizarre spectacle of Conservative ads specifically targeting old white men in an attempt to arrest that cohort's stampede to the Carney Liberals.
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Airdropping aid to Gaza is a ‘man-made' last resort: Food crisis expert
Watch Mercy Corps CEO Tjada D'Oyen Mckenna discusses the effectiveness of Canada's airdropped aid to Gaza and the ongoing hunger crisis.
