logo
Pennsylvania rep. introduces legislation to protect cemeteries from eminent domain

Pennsylvania rep. introduces legislation to protect cemeteries from eminent domain

Yahoo28-03-2025
BLAIR COUNTY, Pa. (WTAJ) — A proposed Pennsylvania bill would prevent government agencies from using eminent domain to acquire cemetery land.
Following public outcry over the suggestion that Blair County Commissioners could use eminent domain to acquire land beside the Alto-Reste cemetery a local representative has introduced legislation. Representative Lou Schmitt (R-Blair) is set to introduce legislation titled the Hallowed Ground Bill.
This comes as Blair County Commissioners look to build a new prison in the county. The current one has multiple problems and they've been looking for proper spaces to potentially build a new one.
PREVIOUS COVERAGE: Blair County residents petition against proposed new jail site
Whilst commissioners have since tabled the discussion to use eminent domain to acquire a portion of the Alto-Reste Park Schmitt still feels as though protective legislation may help in the future.
'The people of the district and all of Blair County have been very vocal in their opposition to this plan. I have heard directly from them and so have the commissioners,' Schmitt said. 'It appears the only course forward is a legislative approach to protecting cemeteries.'
Under current law, portions of cemeteries where burial plots are occupied are protected from eminent domain. However, a loophole exists that allows government agencies to obtain unused parts of cemeteries. Schmitt's bill would not permit eminent domain to be used on any cemetery property.
Schmitt hopes to introduce the bill in the coming days.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senators leave Washington without Trump nominees deal
Senators leave Washington without Trump nominees deal

Politico

time3 hours ago

  • Politico

Senators leave Washington without Trump nominees deal

Thune and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer discussed the path forward on the floor before it was formalized, a person granted anonymity to disclose the private conversation said. In a Truth Social message Saturday evening, Trump accused Schumer of 'political extortion' for demanding the release of agency funding that the White House has held back in return for the swift confirmations. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) — who, like Mullin, has been involved in the negotiations — said there 'was no deal' and that senators are going to 'work through our [nominees] that we hadn't done yet' and then leave. The decision came after Thune and Schumer made a final round of offers late Saturday afternoon. Republicans accused Democrats of changing their negotiation demands, which Democrats refuted, while Democrats claimed Trump foiled Senate GOP leaders' attempts to reach an agreement. Schumer took his own swipe at Trump, saying in a news conference Saturday night that the president 'threw in the towel, sent Republicans home and was unable to do the basic art of negotiating.' 'He went home with nothing,' he added. Trump held multiple calls with a key group of GOP senators on Saturday, and senior staffers for Thune were in close touch with White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. 'There were lots of offers being made back and forth, and there were several different times where I think both sides maybe thought there was a deal — but you've got to be able to close it out,' Thune said Saturday night, adding that 'the asks evolved on both sides quite a bit over time.' Shortly before senators decided to leave town, Trump not only offered the scathing critique of Schumer but also signaled to Senate Republicans that they should not accept the contours of the deal senators have been discussing — speeding up dozens of nominations in exchange for the administration unfreezing certain agency funding. The money at the heart of the negotiations circled around foreign aid and the National Institutes of Health, according to two people granted anonymity to disclose private conversations. Democrats had also made a separate offer that would clear the way for confirmations of a second tranche of nominees later this year in exchange for Republicans agreeing not to do another rescissions package clawing back previously approved funding. GOP senators warned they couldn't commit to eschewing additional rescission packages, which only require a simple majority to get through both the House and Senate, and Trump made clear on social media he was not interested in the trade. 'Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country,' Trump said on Truth Social about the agency funding. 'Have a great RECESS and, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!' Instead, Thune teed up seven final nominees for confirmation votes Saturday night before the recess — starting with Jeanine Pirro, the former New York state judge and Fox News host whom Trump nominated as U.S. attorney in D.C. Pirro was confirmed on a 50-45 party-line vote. The decision to abandon confirmations for a larger portion of the 150-plus pending nominees represents a U-turn from just hours before when Republicans said they wanted a resolution by the end of the day. They were considering whether to cut a deal with Democrats, change the rules to confirm groups of nominees more quickly or adjourning to allow Trump to make temporary 'recess appointments.' Inside a closed-door lunch, Republican senators discussed deploying the 'nuclear option' — that is, changing the rules by a simple majority vote — or formally adjourning, which would let Trump make recess appointments. 'We're stuck on stupid,' said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), when asked about the mood. Recess appointments were long considered a nonstarter with much of the Senate Republican conference because it would allow Trump to leapfrog the chamber's advise-and-consent role. But it came back into the conversation as frustrations mounted with the slow pace of confirmations this Congress — and Democrats' demands for allowing more Trump picks through. Thune abandoned the idea Saturday, locking in brief 'pro forma' sessions for the next month, which will prevent Trump from making recess appointments. Republicans now expect to pursue rules changes that would cut down on the amount of time needed to confirm Trump's picks, but only after the summer break ends after Labor Day. It's not clear whether Republicans will pull the trigger as soon as they return in September or wait until after a Sept. 30 government funding deadline, lest the the standoff complicate spending talks. In any case, several GOP senators said they believe an eventual rules change is inevitable. Ideas under discussion include allowing for 'en bloc' votes on groups of nominees, reducing the amount of debate time for mid- and lower-level nominees or possibly getting rid of procedural votes for those lower-level nominees. Republicans are also discussing reducing the number of nominees subject to Senate confirmation. 'What Schumer has done, he's forced this. It's ridiculous that he's doing this,' Mullin said. 'Every action requires an equal reaction.' Schumer, in a floor speech Saturday, defended his party's strategy on Trump's picks, saying that 'historically bad nominees deserve historic levels of scrutiny.' 'I saw the majority leader bring out a chart again today, comparing the situation right now to past nominees from past administrations. What he fails to mention is that we have never seen nominees as flawed, as compromised, as unqualified as we have right now,' Schumer added. Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, Schumer's No. 2, recounted on Saturday how Republicans have held up Democratic nominees, including leaving a Supreme Court seat vacant. 'When we talk about balance and fairness and reforming the Senate,' he said, 'it goes both ways.'

Elections taking place this week across Kansas City metro
Elections taking place this week across Kansas City metro

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Elections taking place this week across Kansas City metro

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Elections are coming up this week in the Kansas City metro. On Tuesday, Aug. 5, Wyandotte County voters will decide on mayoral and sheriff's primaries, as well as board of commissioners for several districts. Johnson County Board of Commissioners approves new district boundaries Lenexa voters will decide on a new city council seat. On Election Day, polls will be open from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Voters must go to their assigned polling places to vote in person. Across the state line in Missouri, Raytown will decide on a parks and storm water sales tax. Oak Grove and Parkville will decide tax levies and Cass County will decide on a waterworks system improvement. Download WDAF+ for Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV You can head to these following election board websites to find your polling place: Jackson CountyCopyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

BAC Applauds Landmark Passage of Trigger Lead Ban
BAC Applauds Landmark Passage of Trigger Lead Ban

Business Wire

time13 hours ago

  • Business Wire

BAC Applauds Landmark Passage of Trigger Lead Ban

WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Broker Action Coalition (BAC) welcomes the passage of the Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act, bipartisan legislation that limits the sale of trigger leads. With the Senate passing the House version on August 2, the bill has officially cleared Congress and now heads to the President's desk. The BAC urges President Trump to sign the bill into law without delay. 'This victory shows what's possible when brokers get involved, stay organized, and invest in advocacy.' Brendan McKay, Chief Advocacy Officer and Co-Founder of the BAC Share The passage of this bill through Congress marks the culmination of a multi-year advocacy effort—driven by the BAC, its advocates, and coalition partners. Led by the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), this united effort aimed to ban abusive trigger lead practices and curb the sale of consumer data without consent. This legislative victory would not have been possible without the leadership of Representatives John Rose (R-TN) and Ritchie Torres (D-NY) and Senators Jack Reed (D-RI) and Bill Hagerty (R-TN). Why Brokers Fought to End Trigger Leads When a consumer applies for a mortgage and their credit is pulled, credit bureaus sell that data as 'trigger leads'—including personal details like full name, contact information, and credit score range. Solicitors buy these leads and unleash a barrage of calls, texts, and emails, overwhelming homebuyers at a critical point in the process. All of this is done without the consumer's permission or proper disclosure. Some solicitors blur compliance boundaries, using deceptive language to imply connections with brokers or lenders. In addition to violating basic data privacy expectations, these tactics erode consumer trust and have been especially harmful to first-time homebuyers, non-native English speakers, and other vulnerable borrowers. The Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act ends these abusive practices while preserving narrow exceptions for pre-existing relationships and giving consumers the power to opt in. Thank You to the Partners Who Powered the Push Advocacy at this level doesn't happen alone. It takes investment, commitment, and shared belief in what's possible. The BAC is proud to recognize the partners that helped make this win possible: Equity Prime Mortgage (EPM), Pennymac TPO, The Loan Store, Inc., Rocket Pro, Paramount Residential Mortgage Group, Inc. (PRMG), Freedom Mortgage Wholesale Division, Newfi Wholesale, Gold Star Wholesale, and West Capital Lending. These partners stood alongside brokers and homebuyers to champion stronger consumer protections and real industry change. Continued Commitment to Homebuyer & Broker Interests 'The BAC was built to channel broker priorities into real policy wins. When we launched, we asked our earliest supporters to help set the agenda. The response was overwhelmingly clear: ending abusive trigger leads was our top priority. Today's congressional action delivered on that,' said Brendan McKay, BAC Chief Advocacy Officer and Co-Founder. 'This victory shows what's possible when brokers get involved, stay organized, and invest in advocacy.' 'This is a major win—but it's just the beginning,' added Rachel Clark, BAC Executive Director. 'If you want more of this kind of progress, brokers need to keep showing up—and start funding the fight.' About the Broker Action Coalition The Broker Action Coalition (BAC) is the grassroots advocacy channel uniting mortgage brokers and their supporters to fight for broker and homebuyer rights nationwide. The BAC aims to level the playing field between independent mortgage brokers and retail banks, to support inclusive homebuying policy change, and to fight for the needs of Veterans, minorities, and underserved communities to make the American dream of homeownership possible for more people than ever before. For more information or to support our advocacy efforts, visit

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store