Trump's FBI Deputy Director Is A Podcaster Who Thinks The Election Was Stolen
Dan Bongino, a former U.S. Secret Service agent who later hosted a Fox News show and pilots a popular right-wing podcast, is deputy director of the FBI despite having no leadership experience at the department. His appointment did not require a Senate confirmation.
Bongino, who unsuccessfully ran for Senate in 2012, is a major promoter of some of Trump's favorite conspiracy theories about the 2020 election and COVID-19. He's also a 'significant shareholder' in the right-wing video platform Rumble, the company said.
Here are some of the biggest whoppers he's spread.
Researchers haveidentified Bongino as one of the most effective spreaders of misinformation around the 2020 election, noting he spent hours of his podcast and posted widely shared videos on social media promoting debunked claims about ballot harvesting and suspicious votes.
'The FBI and the CIA, members of it, unquestionably tried to rig both the 2016 and 2020 election,' he once told his listeners.
Bongino, who has nearly 6 million followers on Facebook, had over 7.7 million interactions on Facebook the week of the 2020 election, The New York Times found at the time.
In May 2024, he warned his listeners that they should still be leery of Democrats 'stealing an election' from Trump. 'Do not let them fleece this thing again,' he said on an episode of his podcast.
Bongino, who claimed the FBI was 'irredeemably corrupt' after its agents raided Mar-a-Lago, raised diversity, equity and inclusion policies as a possible culprit behind the Secret Service's failure to prevent an assassination attempt on Trump last summer.
'They put out a thousand tweets about all this DEI stuff,' he said of the Secret Service. 'Do I know that's related here? I don't, I'm just saying, like ― you have one job and only one job.'
After another person was apprehended for plotting an assassination attempt on Trump in September, Bongino asked whether there could be a 'mole' among the agents assigned to protect Trump or that one of them could be mishandling information about his whereabouts.
'Is there a honeypot trap going on in the Secret Service?' he asked on an episode of his podcast. 'Is there a guy or a woman in the Secret Service having a relationship with someone who is not who they say they are?'
In an August episode of his podcast, Bongino questioned the integrity of the FBI's investigation into the assassination attempts. 'Folks, the FBI is at it again. I don't trust these people at all,' he wrote on social media alongside a clip from his podcast.
Bongino has also claimed that footage the FBI released of the Jan. 6, 2021, pipe bomb suspect may have been 'manipulated' and that something sinister is afoot.
'Something is going on here. Where is the video of him dropping the bomb? Why don't we have it? Why does it appear manipulated?' he said in a January 2024 episode.
'Ladies and gentlemen, somebody's hiding something, and it's not small. They are hiding something freaking huge,' he continued.
He's also pushed the theory that President Barack Obama's administration had at least one FBI agent tasked with spying on the 2016 Trump campaign. While discussing the idea on Tucker Carlson's Fox News show at the time, Bongino simply cited 'reporting.'
In 2022, YouTube temporarily suspended Bongino's account, which had around 900,000 subscribers, for spreading misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic. Notably, he claimed masks were 'useless' at preventing the virus' spread despite research to the contrary ― something YouTube said violated its misinformation policy.
When Bongino tried to circumnavigate the ban by posting from another account, the video platform banned him permanently.
Shortly after, Google pulled all ads from Bongino's website. He said one of the pieces of content Google cited was about Anthony Fauci, then the chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden, and said that his 'use of masks despite being vaccinated had nothing to do with science.'
In 2022, Bongino suggested Biden's administration may have been responsible for the explosions that ruptured a set of natural gas pipelines — Nord Stream 1 and 2 — running between Russia and Germany. The act of sabotage, the Wall Street Journal reports, was carried out by Ukraine, though Russia blamed the U.S.
Bongino backed up the Kremlin's claims in an episode of his podcast.
'Is the Biden administration crazy enough to do this to light a spark that might cause World War III?' he asked. 'The answer is, 'I wouldn't be surprised, and I bet neither would you.''
'The motivations of the Biden administration and the green agenda, I think, are far greater than the motivations of Russia,' he continued.
Ex-Secret Service Agent And Conservative Media Personality Dan Bongino Picked As FBI Deputy Director
A Conspiracy Theorist Is Officially In Charge Of The FBI Under Trump
New FBI Deputy Director Is 'Significant Shareholder' In Right-Wing Video Platform
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US judge clears the way for imminent deportation of 8 migrants to South Sudan
By Jody Godoy and Nate Raymond (Reuters) -Eight migrants lost their last-ditch effort to halt their deportation to South Sudan by the Trump administration on Friday, clearing the way for their imminent transfer after a judge in Massachusetts denied their request. Lawyers for the U.S. Justice Department said the men were scheduled to be flown to South Sudan on Friday at 7:00 pm Eastern Time after two courts considered the request on an emergency basis on July 4, when courts are otherwise closed for the Independence Day holiday. Lawyers for the migrants had filed new claims in Washington late Thursday after the U.S. Supreme Court clarified that a judge in Massachusetts could no longer require the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to hold them. U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss in Washington paused the deportation briefly on Friday afternoon, but sent the case back to U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy in Boston. Murphy said the Supreme Court order required him to deny their bid, saying their claims that deportation was being used as a form of punishment were "substantially similar" to the ones he had ruled on previously. The order was the latest round in the fight over the legality of the Trump administration's campaign to deter immigration through high-profile deportations to countries where migrants say they face safety concerns, and which has already gone from lower courts to the Supreme Court twice. Jennie Pasquarella, a lawyer with the Seattle Clemency Project who represents the migrants, called the ruling disappointing. No court will hear their claim that the Trump administration is unconstitutionally using deportation to dangerous countries as a form of punishment, on top of criminal sentences the men have already served, she said. "Both courts' decisions today have denied them their opportunity to have these claims heard and to protect their own lives. That is what is so tragic about where we came out," she said. Pasquarella said the men do not plan to file an appeal. A spokesperson for Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Friday. Department of Justice attorney Hashim Mooppan told Moss during Friday's hearing that court orders halting agreed-upon deportations pose a serious problem for U.S. diplomatic relations and would make foreign countries less likely to accept transfers of migrants in the future. The men have been convicted of various crimes, with four of them convicted of murder, the Department of Homeland Security has said. South Sudan has long been dangerous even for locals. The U.S. State Department advises citizens not to travel there due to violent crime and armed conflict. The United Nations has said the African country's political crisis could reignite a brutal civil war that ended in 2018. The eight men, who their lawyers said are from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Burma, Sudan and Vietnam, argue their deportations to South Sudan would violate the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. "It seems to me almost self-evident that the United States government cannot take human beings and send them to circumstances in which their physical well-being is at risk simply either to punish them or send a signal to others," Moss said during the hearing. But he ultimately found their new claims should be heard by the court in Massachusetts. The Friday effort to prevent the deportations came after months of back and forth between Murphy, the Supreme Court, and the Trump administration. Murphy ruled in May to block the U.S. from immediately moving the men to South Sudan after he found that officials had violated his earlier ruling in a class action lawsuit concerning the due process rights of migrants. That ruling, in April, had blocked the administration from sending migrants to countries where they have no ties without giving them the chance to raise safety concerns. The Supreme Court on June 23 put Murphy's April injunction on hold. But Murphy that same day said the high court ruling did not apply to his May order. Calling Murphy's decision a "lawless act of defiance," the Justice Department the next day urged the Supreme Court to clarify its decision. The nine-member Supreme Court on Thursday, over the dissent of two of its liberal justices, sided with the Trump administration and said its decision serves to reverse Murphy's May order blocking the deportations to South Sudan.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US-Iran nuclear talks to resume in Norway next week: Report
(NewsNation) — White House envoy Steve Witkoff will meet Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Norway's capital next week to restart nuclear talks, Axios reported, citing two sources familiar with the situation. There is no official date set for the Oslo meeting, according to Axios. Trump to sign 'big, beautiful bill' at July 4 White House picnic It would be the first direct talks since Trump embroiled the U.S. in the Israel-Iran conflict by ordering strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites. The Islamic Republic retaliated with an attack on America's largest installation in the Middle East, Al Udeid Air Base. Days later, Trump helped broker a ceasefire between Iran and Israel — which has sparked hope for an end to violence in Gaza. Hamas suggested Wednesday that it was open to a ceasefire agreement with Israel, but stopped short of accepting a U.S.-backed proposal for a 60-day pause in fighting. Israel said it has already accepted the deal. Iran could restart uranium enrichment in 'months': UN nuclear watchdog On Thursday, Trump met with Edan Alexander, a former American-Israeli hostage, at the White House. 'I told the most powerful man in the world what I went through, what my friends there are going through, and asked him to continue doing everything in his power. … I hope he can achieve another historic breakthrough — a comprehensive deal to free them all, all 50 hostages,' Alexander said in a statement following the meeting. Pressure is mounting as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepares to travel to Washington on Monday for his own meeting with Trump. Before his departure, 35 hostage families signed a letter to the Netanyahu instructing what they want from the conversation. 'Prime minister, you must reach a comprehensive agreement that guarantees the return of every last hostage and brings an end to the fighting,' they wrote. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas may not enforce migrant arrest law, US appeals court rules
By Nate Raymond (Reuters) -Texas authorities may not enforce a Republican-backed state law that would let them arrest and prosecute people suspected of illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, a divided federal appeals court ruled late on Thursday. A 2-1 panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an injunction that blocked enforcement of the disputed law, which former Democratic President Joe Biden's administration had gone to court to challenge. Republican President Donald Trump's administration dropped the federal government's case, but the Texas law known as SB4 had continued to be challenged by, among others, the immigrant rights group Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center, which argued federal law preempted the state's. The law, which Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed in December 2023, would make it a state crime to illegally enter or re-enter Texas from a foreign country and would empower state judges to order that violators leave the United States, with prison sentences up to 20 years for those who refuse to comply. U.S. Circuit Judge Priscilla Richman, writing for the New Orleans-based court's majority, said that for nearly 150 years, the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that the power to control immigration was exclusively a federal power. Relying on a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down parts of an Arizona immigration law, she said the Texas law, if allowed to be enforced by the Texas Department of Public Safety, would interfere with the federal government's ability to enforce complex U.S. immigration laws. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, vowed to appeal the decision, saying "I will always fight to stop illegal immigration." The ruling upheld a lower-court judge's February 2024 preliminary injunction. The U.S. Supreme Court a month later briefly allowed the law to take effect, but the 5th Circuit within hours halted it pending further review. The opinion by Richman, an appointee of Republican President George W. Bush, was joined by U.S. Circuit Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez, a Biden appointee. U.S. Circuit Judge Andrew Oldham, a Trump appointee, dissented. He said the majority treated as irrelevant that Trump has been encouraging states to aid his administration's efforts to ramp up immigration enforcement. "It is a sad day for the millions of Americans who are concerned about illegal immigration and who voiced those concerns at ballot boxes across Texas and the Nation," Oldham wrote. Cody Wofsy, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at the American Civil Liberties Union, in a statement welcomed the ruling, saying state immigration laws like the one Texas adopted have been repeatedly rejected by courts and "are deeply harmful to our communities.'
