Two men found guilty of cocaine smuggling plot into Cornwall
Prosecutor Frederick Hookway told the jury that the drugs were secreted aboard a cargo ship sailing from South America and then off loaded into the English Channel."On the way the drugs are off loaded into the sea." he said. "That may sound rather silly for a valuable commodity," he said, but he explained that black watertight bales of drugs were fitted with a GPS tracking device attached to air tag trackers so that they could be located by a second smaller boat to take to the Cornish coast.Mr Hookway said a Border Force boat spotted a fast-moving rigid inflatable boat (RIB) in the sea off Cornwall one morning in September last year.The Border Force vessel deployed its own RIB to intercept the target RIB which had three men in it.The court was told the target RIB sped off towards land, then dumped drug bales into the sea so the men on board would not be found in possession of their illegal cargo.
The target boat landed at Gwyner Beach at Sennen and the men ran off in all directions but were arrested on the beach.Johnston was one of three men on board the RIB and was also found to have £2,615 in cash on him, the court heard.The other two on the RIB previously admitted drugs-related charges.Mr Hookway said May was arrested in a van on the Cornish coast and was to transport the unloaded drugs.
Mr Hookway said six bundles thrown into the sea were recovered that day and they contained 230 blocks of high purity cocaine, each weighing 1kg (2.2lb), and with a wholesale value of £6.2m, and a street value of £18.4m.Mr Hookway said at least 150kg (330lb) of cocaine were not recovered from the water.May did not give evidence and Johnston said he had no prior knowledge of the smuggling operation in the RIB and was not paid any money for going on the trip.The jury unanimously found the two men guilty.They have been remanded in custody and all the conspirators are due to be sentenced on 1 August.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Ban on Palestine Action to take effect after legal challenge fails
Being a member of, or showing support for, Palestine Action will be a criminal offence from Saturday after a last-minute legal challenge to suspend the group's proscription under anti-terrorism laws failed. A ban on Palestine Action, which uses direct action to mainly target Israeli weapons factories in the UK and their supply chain, was voted through by parliament this week but lawyers acting for its co-founder Huda Ammori had sought to prevent it taking effect. After a hearing at the high court on Friday, however, Mr Justice Chamberlain declined to grant her application for interim relief. Ammori said: 'The home secretary is rushing through the implementation of the proscription at midnight tonight despite the fact that our legal challenge is ongoing and that she has been completely unclear about how it will be enforced, leaving the public in the dark about their rights to free speech and expression after midnight tonight when this proscription comes into effect.' Chamberlain said: 'I have concluded that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is refused but the claim later succeeds is insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force.' Ammori sought permission to appeal against Chamberlain's decision in an 8pm hearing that lasted approximately one hour at the court of appeal on Friday night, in an attempt to prevent the ban coming into force. But at about 10.25pm – less than two hours before it was due to take effect – the three judges, led by the lady chief justice, Sue Carr, refused permission. It means Palestine Action will become the first direct action protest group to be banned under the Terrorism Act, placing it in the same category as Islamic State, al-Qaida and the far-right group National Action. Raza Husain KC, representing Ammori, described the proscription decision in the hearing before Chamberlain, as 'an ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power'. He said it was 'absurd' to label a civil disobedience direct action protest group that does not advocate violence as a terrorist organisation. 'The main target has been stopping Elbit Systems … which markets itself as the backbone of the IDF [Israel Defense Forces],' said Husain. 'As my client says: 'The aim of terrorism is to take lives and hurt people, that's the opposite of what we do.'' He said before making the decision the government had engaged with the Israeli government, Elbit Systems and pro-Israeli lobby groups, while Palestine Action and other pro-Palestine groups were not consulted. Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh KC, also representing Ammori, said what was going on in Gaza was 'an annihilation, it is a genocide' and Palestine Action was 'seeking to disrupt and prevent' UK complicity in it. Ben Watson KC, representing the home secretary, focused on the proscription procedure in his submissions. 'All of these issues, all of that evidence is supposed to go to the secretaries of state… it's only after that process, after the secretary of state has had a chance to consider … then the matter goes before Poac [the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission].' He said only then could the case go to the court of appeal and then, potentially, the supreme court. Watson said Palestine Action's activities met the statutory test for proscription and that if the ban took effect but the group subsequently won a judicial review against proscription it would not cause 'irreparable harm' to it. He told the court that if a temporary block was granted, it would be a 'serious disfigurement of the statutory regime'. The protest group Defend Our Juries wrote to the Met police commissioner, Mark Rowley, on Friday to tell him that it 'may be committing offences under the Terrorism Act' in Parliament Square from 1pm on Saturday. It said non-violent protesters would hold signs saying: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' The letter said that they 'refuse to be bystanders to what's happening to the people of Palestine, who are bombed, starved and gunned down as they queue for food'. Several hundred protesters gathered, waving Palestinian flags and carrying signs saying 'Free Palestine' and 'We are all Palestine Action' outside the Royal Courts of Justice. UN experts, civil liberties groups, cultural figures and hundreds of lawyers have condemned the ban as draconian and said it sets a dangerous precedent by conflating protest with terrorism. Another hearing is scheduled for 21 July when Palestine Action will apply for permission for a judicial review to quash the order. In the meantime, and unless the judicial review is successful, membership of, or inviting support for, the group will carry a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.
The Sun
39 minutes ago
- The Sun
Desperate search for missing woman, 30, who disappeared from a coastal town before she was due to meet a friend
A FRANTIC hunt has been launched for a woman who disappeared from a coastal town without a trace. Emma, aged 30, was due to meet a friend in Bournemouth yesterday, July 4. Police have now launched an urgent search for Emma after she disappeared. She was due to meet a friend at 12pm but has not been heard from since 9:30am. An investigation into her whereabouts has subsequently been launched by the cops who are appealing for the publics help in locating Emma. She is described as five feet one inch tall and of slim build with long black hair. Her disappearance was described as out of character with Emma usually keeping in close contact with friends and family. Inspector Dan Galloway, of Dorset Police, said: 'It is out of character for Emma to not be in contact with family or friends and we need to find her to make sure she is OK. 'I would ask anyone who has seen Emma, or a woman matching the description given, to please contact us. 'Finally, if you see this appeal Emma, please get in touch with us or your loved ones as we all just want to make sure you are safe and well.' Anyone with information or knowledge as to Emma's whereabouts is asked to contact Dorset Police at or by calling 101, quoting incident number 4:237.
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Home Office welcomes Palestine Action ban as it comes into force
The Home Office has welcomed the ban on Palestine Action, after the group failed to block its proscription with a late-night legal bid. The designation as a terror group means that membership of or support for Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The group lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday evening, which sought to stop it being banned, less than two hours before the move came into force at midnight. A Home Office spokesperson said on Saturday: 'We welcome the Court's decision and Palestine Action are now a proscribed group. 'The Government will always take the strongest possible action to protect our national security and our priority remains maintaining the safety and security of our citizens.' The move to ban the organisation was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused around £7 million of damage. A group has said it is set to gather in Parliament Square on Saturday holding signs supporting Palestine Action, according to campaign group Defend Our Juries. In a letter to the Home Secretary, protesters said: 'We do not wish to go to prison or to be branded with a terrorism conviction. But we refuse to be cowed into silence by your order.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. MPs in the Commons voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday, before the House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday. Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident at Brize Norton. They appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977.
