logo
Teens from upper-income families are far more likely to work summer jobs than poor teens. What's going on?

Teens from upper-income families are far more likely to work summer jobs than poor teens. What's going on?

Yahoo15 hours ago

Twin brothers Alex and Nicolas Alessi and their friend Mason Grant — all 17-year-old rising high-school seniors in the Bay Area — were having a hard time finding jobs leading up to this summer.
'We probably applied to 20 jobs, and we did not get any of them,' Alex said of himself and his brother.
My brother stole $100K from my mom to buy bitcoin. Do I convince her to sue him?
Most American weddings are a lot more extravagant than the nuptials of Amazon's Jeff Bezos
JPMorgan has a new way of forecasting the stock market — and there's a surprising finding
'He doesn't seem to care': My secretive father, 81, added my name to a bank account. What about my mom?
S&P 500 scores record high for first time in 4 months. What could push stocks higher from here?
Grant, meanwhile, struggled to advance beyond the initial stages of the interview process, including at retailers. 'You need multiple references, experience, past history — and as a high-school kid who's very busy with other stuff, it's hard to get your foot in the door,' he told MarketWatch.
The three friends, seeing a need to connect high-schoolers to work opportunities, recently developed a job board targeting teens called JobMatch, with the twins' father, Tom Alessi, acting as an adviser.
'At our school, our nicknames are the Winklevoss twins and Mark Zuckerberg,' Grant said.
Users anywhere can post jobs and search free. The site is currently being used by hundreds of people in the community, according to the founders, and all three of them have also applied to and landed gigs on JobMatch themselves.
'On any given day you will find them washing cars, pulling weeds, helping people move, etc.,' said Tom Alessi, who leads software engineering for Johnson & Johnson Vision. 'Honestly, it's super lucrative for them.'
Teen employment in the U.S. has been declining for decades — the employment-to-population ratio for 16- to 19-year-olds was 37.9% last July, not seasonally adjusted, down from a high of 59.9% in July 1979, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Many working teens today come from higher-income families that encourage them to seek learning opportunities outside of the classroom.
'A young person from a family with a higher income is more likely to be employed during the summer months than a young person from a family earning less,' according to a Labor Department study posted in 2024.
About 44% of 16- to 19-year-olds from families earning $150,000 or more — roughly the top fifth of U.S. households by income — were employed from June to August 2023, the most recent year for which estimates were available. By contrast, only 27% of teens from families earning less than $30,000, or roughly the lowest fifth of households by income, had summer employment during that time.
Tom Alessi, Alex's and Nicolas's father, has noticed this trend playing out in their high-income community. 'The parents from affluent families — we call them 'snowplows' — are out in front of their kids plowing the 'snow' out of the way,' he said.
Grant, the twins' friend, said he knows a teen whose father was able to connect the teen and his friend with jobs at the golf course where the father is a member. 'I am not saying the kids didn't work hard, but they put it on a silver platter for them,' he said.
The employment gap between teens from high- and low-income families is a longstanding disparity. Kids from higher-income families tend to have greater access to a car or to an adult who can drive them to work, a BLS report from 2000 said. The researchers also noted that 'nonmarket work such as housework and unpaid child care' more often falls to teens in lower-income families, making them 'relatively less available for market work — or available only for specific schedules.'
In addition, some teens from low-income families live in labor markets with fewer opportunities, according to a 2010 report from Northeastern University's Center for Labor Market Studies.
The gap became more pronounced in the 2000s. While teens in every income group experienced sharp declines in summer employment between 2000 and 2008, teens from low-income families experienced the sharpest decline, the Center for Labor Market Studies said. By 2010, 'the employment rate for upper-middle-income white teens was four times as high as that for low-income Black teens,' the center later reported.
Read more: Generation Z thinks it needs $500,000 a year to succeed. What that says about our economy.
Kyle Ross, a policy analyst at the liberal think tank Center for American Progress, wrote in a 2023 report that youth facing barriers to employment 'such as a low-income background, a disability, or low English proficiency' need access to resources that help build the skills and experience necessary to get a job and achieve their future career goals.
One federal law that subsidized youth employment, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, has relied on temporary extensions after expiring in 2020 and may face cuts in the new spending bill in Congress, which may harm youth who need extra support accessing opportunities in the labor force, Ross told MarketWatch. The Trump administration last month announced that it would pause all contractor-operated centers at Job Corps, a WIOA program to train young people from low-income households, by the end of the month, citing 'a startling number of serious incident reports and our in-depth fiscal analysis.' (The pause was later delayed by a court order.)
As the economy evolves to demand different skill sets for different kinds of jobs, 'a lot of people end up suffering because they're left out,' Ross said.
Today, young college graduates, older workers and foreign-born workers are competing for jobs that were traditionally held by teens, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Those between 16 and 19 made up 18.7% of minimum-wage workers in 2023, down from 25.4% two decades earlier.
As entry-level wages stagnated over the years, employers incentivized young people to get more degrees. Many jobs once paid a living wage to workers with high-school diplomas, but that has changed. Among full-time workers ages 35 to 44, those who completed high school had average annual earnings of nearly $58,000 in 2023, compared with about $105,000 for those with a bachelor's degree, according to the Census Bureau.
With such a stark wage gap between workers with and without college degrees, more young Americans have shifted their focus to education — including during summers. The share of 16- to 19-year-olds enrolled in school in July has been above 40% every year since 2007 — except in 2013, when it was 39.3% — and hit 48.4% in July 2024, according to calculations using BLS data. That share was just 10.4% in July 1985.
'Over the long term, there's just been more educational upgrading,' said Elise Gould, a senior economist at the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute. She also noted that teen employment tends to be higher during stronger business cycles, when opportunities are more abundant and employers are willing to hire people with less experience and do more on-the-job training.
Yet as competition for entry-level jobs heats up, some parents, including those who earn higher incomes, believe that school alone does not prepare teens professionally or financially.
Marilou Davido, a financial planner and vice president of WFA Asset Management, told MarketWatch her kids are 'in a good school district and have lots of opportunities to pad their transcripts' with AP courses. As she and her husband have been saving for college since their children were born, 'I'm not as focused on summer academics because I'm not expecting or needing my kids to get a scholarship for college.'
Related: Brace yourself: This is exactly how much you should have saved for your kid's college by the time they're 5, 13 and 18
Davido said she worries 'that my husband and I spoil our kids. They have much more than I ever did growing up,' she said. So she has pushed her 16-year-old son, Luca, to learn the value of money through work and to recognize that his 'normal' is not shared by everyone else — and will change when he is no longer 'riding Mom's and Dad's coattails.' She also hopes having a job will teach him 'how to talk with his boss, negotiate and compromise.'
Luca refereed hockey games over the winter, earning at least $45 per hour, and recently shucked corn at a fair for $15 an hour plus tips, which he described as 'really good money.' Davido contributes a match equal to his earnings into a Roth IRA she and her husband opened for him, which they hope will compound significantly in the decades ahead.
Luca told MarketWatch that he is required to take a personal-finance course in school. When his parents recently started sharing the actual dollar figures of their household finances, he said, he became worried that he would not be able to support an equivalent lifestyle when he graduates from college.
Luca is saving and investing his earnings from his jobs to have 'a bit more of a head start to buy things and just deal with issues that might come up' as a young adult, he said. By mid-June, he was still looking for a summer job. 'I want to start my financial life. Start making money,' he said.
Other parents also see the opportunity for teen jobs to kick-start a comfortable retirement in the future. Michael Cochran, a financial planner and chief investment officer at BentOak Capital, told MarketWatch he has two children, 13 and 15. For their older son, who works at a tennis pro shop, 'we introduced a Roth IRA 'match' to encourage saving and help instill strong financial habits early,' he said. Their younger son is earning about $100 a week doing tasks around the neighborhood.
Cochran's goal, he said, 'is to demonstrate that consistent work and even modest contributions — and a 'match' from his parents — can lead to meaningful long-term benefits, both through the power of compounding and by building a strong foundation in financial literacy.'
Teen summer employment remains concentrated in jobs as waitstaff, recreation workers, fast-food workers, coaches, child-care workers and construction laborers, according to the Labor Department.
As today's youth face a job market that stands to be disrupted by technologies such as artificial intelligence, some high-income parents are encouraging their children to practice skills that will be useful for starting their own businesses.
'Some of these kids are saying, 'I don't want a traditional job where I make $15 an hour. I don't want a limit on what I can do, or when I can work. I want to make my own rules,' Tom Alessi, the father of the JobMatch co-founders, told MarketWatch.
'I am super frustrated, so is my wife, that the high school doesn't teach any [real-world] skills. They only teach academics for academics' sake,' he said. 'They do not teach these kids that there's another path, if they so choose, like entrepreneurship.' It's fine that many students choose a traditional employment path, he added, but schools are doing students 'a disservice' by not teaching them that 'there's a different way to earn money' besides being an employee.
While Tom is a full-time employee, his wife runs her own business as a physical therapist, he said, adding that 'the kids have always done jobs at her clinic — laundry, cleanup, office work.'
Helping his kids with JobMatch, he added, has felt 'like a traditional startup.' 'It's chaotic. Everybody has ideas,' he said. 'But I'm trying to teach them skills that they're not going to learn anywhere [else]: Here's how you get customer feedback; here's how you shape a product road map; here's how you push out features; here's how long it takes to develop features; here's how you engage with people.'
Grant said starting JobMatch has also opened up networking opportunities to him. 'I want to work, and I want to meet new people,' he said. Nicolas and Alex said that because their parents still provide for their needs, they plan to give 90% of any earnings from their jobs, as well as any cash gifts they receive, to their father to invest for their futures. Their goal, they said, is to start a successful business together. As other teens put school at the center of their goals, the twins are going to college and investing early as 'backups' in case their entrepreneurial efforts don't work out.
What personal-finance issues would you like to see covered in MarketWatch? We would like to hear from readers about their financial decisions and money-related questions. You can fill out or write to us at . A reporter may be in touch to learn more. MarketWatch won't attribute your answers to you by name without your permission.
There's an important market indicator that suggests investors remain wary. It's good news for stocks.
My job is offering me a payout. Should I take a $61,000 lump sum or $355 a month for life?
What drove stock market's record-breaking week? Don't overlook growing rate-cut expectations.
Coinbase's stock is up over 40% this month as Wall Street projects amazing profit growth
20 banks expected to increase their dividends the most following the Fed's stress tests

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

10 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Companies to Buy Now and Hold Forever
10 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Companies to Buy Now and Hold Forever

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

10 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Companies to Buy Now and Hold Forever

Artificial intelligence has become an increasingly integral part of our daily lives, and it's not expected to ebb any time soon. Nvidia and Broadcom are examples of semiconductor stocks that provide strong exposure to artificial intelligence. Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services are two cloud computing platforms that support artificial intelligence computing. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › From the growth of self-driving cars to the explosion in generative artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities, it's clear that AI is going to become increasingly integrated in our lives. Recognizing this fact, investors should keep tabs on leading AI companies since these stocks have the potential to provide sizable returns in the years to come. Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) is a semiconductor stalwart that pioneered the development of the graphics processing unit (GPU). Invaluable for AI applications, GPUs are also critical components found in data centers, where AI computing occurs. The company consistently generates strong free cash flow -- just one of many reasons why Nvidia stock is a must-consider for any investor looking to gain AI exposure. The parent company of numerous businesses, Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) incorporates its large language model (LLM) chatbot, Gemini, into offerings like Google Search and Android phones. Other companies also integrate Gemini into their products, like visual messaging provider Snap and strategy and consulting leader Accenture. Besides Gemini, Alphabet provides extensive AI exposure through its cloud computing service, Google Cloud. Expanding beyond the software offerings that initially made it famous, Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) offers AI exposure through its generative AI chatbot, Copilot, found in several Microsoft products like Microsoft 365. Investors also gain AI exposure through the company's cloud computing platform, Microsoft Azure. Microsoft also provides indirect AI exposure as the company is a major investor in OpenAI, the owner of ChatGPT. Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) may be most recognizable as the parent company of Facebook, but the company emerged as a leader in AI tools after developing Meta AI, an AI-powered assistant that's integrated in other Meta apps and built on the Llama LLM. In June 2025, Meta broadened its AI reach with a $14.3 billion investment in Scale AI, a company pursuing artificial general intelligence. Like Nvidia, Broadcom (NASDAQ: AVGO) is another leading semiconductor stock that has close ties to the AI industry. Data center growth is contributing to strong demand for Broadcom's AI accelerators. For Q2 2025, Broadcom reported over $4.4 billion in AI semiconductor revenue, a 46% year-over-year increase. AI networking represented 40% of AI revenue, a 70% year-over-year gain. Once upon a time, Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) was merely a bookseller. Today, however, it has a robust cloud computing business. Launched almost 20 years ago, Amazon Web Services has emerged as a premier cloud computing option, providing the foundation for companies to develop their own AI resources as well as AI services and tools like Amazon Bedrock and Amazon SageMaker. At the end of 2024, AWS achieved a $115 annualized revenue run rate. For context, Amazon reported total revenue of $638 billion for 2024. Considering its scale and its dedication to innovation, Amazon is sure to remain a premier AI force for years to come. From assisting customers with data integration, to security and compliance, to healthcare advances, to supporting the militaries of the U.S. and allies, software company Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) developed a sophisticated platform for analyzing large datasets. In strong financial health, Palantir is consistently profitable and ended the first quarter 2025 with $5.4 billion in cash and cash equivalents with no debt. Plus, it routinely generates strong free cash flow. With its Dedicated IC Foundry business model, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM) produces semiconductors for customers instead of original semiconductors for itself. Nvidia, for example, is a Taiwan Semiconductor customer, turning to it for help in production of the Blackwell GPU, which is used in AI applications. Illustrating its strong exposure to AI, Taiwan Semiconductor stated that 2024 revenue from AI accelerators represented "close to mid-teens percent" of its total revenue. Most recognize Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) for its electric vehicles (EVs) but its leadership in AI warrants recognition. For one, the company's EVs have sophisticated autonomous driving capability -- capability that's only expected to increase -- and it's making steady progress in advancing its robotaxi business. Tesla reported about $5 billion in 2024 AI-related capital expenditures, and it expects about the same in 2025. Considering Elon Musk's enthusiasm for AI, it would be unsurprising if Musk moves toward a Tesla acquisition of his AI start-up, xAI. Providing infrastructure for AI computing, CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV) developed a cloud platform to support AI's high computing demands. The allure of its technology is highlighted by its recent $11.9 billion deal with OpenAI to develop AI infrastructure. CoreWeave is in rapid growth mode. In Q1 2025, it reported revenue of $982 million, a year-over-year increase of 420% resulting from high demand for the company's cloud platform. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Scott Levine has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Accenture Plc, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, Palantir Technologies, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 10 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Companies to Buy Now and Hold Forever was originally published by The Motley Fool 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤

5 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks Are Worth Over $2 Trillion. Here Are the 2 Most Likely to Join the Club Next.
5 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks Are Worth Over $2 Trillion. Here Are the 2 Most Likely to Join the Club Next.

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

5 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks Are Worth Over $2 Trillion. Here Are the 2 Most Likely to Join the Club Next.

Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and Alphabet make up the $2 trillion club right now. Meta Platforms and Broadcom could be the next to join the club. These two AI stocks could be volatile over the near term but should benefit tremendously from a big long-term AI tailwind. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › The smaller the circle, the harder it is to get inside it. One of the most exclusive circles of all is what some investment writers (including me) call the "$2 trillion club." To be a member, a company must have a market cap of at least $2 trillion. If a company has its sights set on gaining admission to the $2 trillion club, focusing on artificial intelligence (AI) is probably a smart move. All five of the current members invest heavily in AI. And two AI stocks are the most likely contenders to join the club next. Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) and Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) have jockeyed back and forth to be the largest company in the world. Nvidia currently holds the title, with a market cap of nearly $3.8 trillion. Microsoft is breathing down Nvidia's neck, though, with a market cap of nearly $3.7 trillion. Both companies are leaders in the AI arena. Nvidia's graphics processing units (GPUs) remain the gold standard to power servers used to build and deploy AI models. Microsoft's integration with OpenAI's GPT throughout its product suite and cloud platform has been a game-changer for the tech giant. For years, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) reigned as the world's biggest company. However, the iPhone maker now holds the No. 3 spot, with a market cap of a little over $3 trillion. While Apple has significant AI expertise, its perceived slowness in rolling out generative AI (genAI) capabilities, along with the lackluster response to the genAI functionality it ultimately did launch, has allowed Nvidia and Microsoft to leapfrog it. Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) claims the No. 4 position, with a market cap of nearly $2.3 trillion. The e-commerce leader is also the cloud services leader, with Amazon Web Services (AWS) commanding a significant advantage in market share among cloud services providers. AWS' AI offerings have helped it stay at the top, even with other cloud companies gaining ground. One of those rising cloud stars is Google parent Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL). Google Cloud is the fastest-growing major cloud service provider. Google Search has also introduced generative AI functionality, such as AI Overviews and AI Mode. In addition, Alphabet's Waymo unit is the leader in autonomous ride-hailing, which relies heavily on AI. The two companies that trail behind Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and Alphabet are also, not so coincidentally, AI leaders. Both are the clear favorites at this point to be the next members of the $2 trillion club. Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) is already knocking at the door, with its market cap approaching $1.8 trillion. All the stock needs is a gain of 23.5% or so to take its place alongside the other five AI stocks. That might not prove to be too difficult. Meta's shares are up more than 20% year to date. Some have criticized Meta's AI efforts. However, the company is using AI extensively internally to recommend content to users of its apps and help advertisers. Its Meta AI large language model (LLM) has almost 1 billion active monthly users. Meta is also a leader in AI-powered smart glasses. Broadcom (NASDAQ: AVGO) has a steeper climb than Meta does to join the $2 trillion club. With a market cap of $1.24 trillion, the chipmaker's share price would have to jump by more than 60% to become a member. Broadcom stock has risen around 14% so far in 2025. AI networking presents a tremendous growth opportunity for Broadcom. Its AI revenue soared 46% year over year to $4.4 billion in the second quarter of 2025, with AI networking making up 40% of the total. Broadcom CEO Hock Tan said on the company's fiscal Q2 earnings call that he expects the demand for AI accelerators to increase in the coming quarters. I think both of these prospective $2 trillion club members are smart picks for long-term investors to buy now. Granted, Meta and Broadcom could be volatile over the near term. Meta faces some regulatory issues in Europe. Broadcom's valuation is sky-high, with shares trading at more than 40 times forward earnings. If you're patient, though, I expect both companies to continue to benefit from major AI tailwinds. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $409,114!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,173!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $713,547!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Keith Speights has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 5 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks Are Worth Over $2 Trillion. Here Are the 2 Most Likely to Join the Club Next. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

I Make $400,000 a Year and Want to Retire at 45 -- Should I Invest More in Stocks or Focus on Real Estate?
I Make $400,000 a Year and Want to Retire at 45 -- Should I Invest More in Stocks or Focus on Real Estate?

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

I Make $400,000 a Year and Want to Retire at 45 -- Should I Invest More in Stocks or Focus on Real Estate?

On balance, the returns on rental real estate more or less match the stock market's average returns. However, these two types of investments are dramatically different in terms of convenience. In one scenario, the more complicated and capital-intensive option could make the most sense. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › As always, The Motley Fool cannot and does not provide personalized investing or financial advice. This information is for informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Always seek the guidance of a qualified financial advisor for any questions regarding your personal financial situation. If you'd like to submit your question for feedback, you can do so here. Which is the better investment: real estate or the stock market? It's a question that never seems to stop circulating, mostly because there's never a crystal-clear answer. There are pros and cons to both, and they can vary from one investor to the next. Fortunately, it's possible to figure out the best answer for you. The key is getting a handle on which upsides and which downsides are most applicable in your particular situation. Someone recently asked an entire Reddit community if he should stop buying and renting out residential real estate and instead start pouring this money into the stock market to achieve faster returns. What would you do if you were me?by u/Straight_Ad8203 in Fire It's a great question to be sure. To fully appreciate the answer though, there's a bit more context needed. The individual in question is a 35-year-old medical doctor earning on the order of $400,000 per year at a job that's very demanding. There's a fair amount of money already tucked away in a retirement account and plenty in an emergency fund as well. This person also owns -- and owes on -- four different rental houses. His plan is to accelerate the payoff on these properties with whatever net cash flow is left behind from their rent revenue. This plan at least implies there will be little to no net profit from these properties for the foreseeable future. But paying off these rental houses as soon as possible will allow this doctor to semi-retire at 45 and enjoy some income as an MD, as well as some respectable rental income. His only concern? "Real estate is great but just feels like a slow return." This feeling isn't an uncommon one. But it's also possibly misleading, mostly because the money involved with being a one-person rental real estate company isn't the neat and tidy matter it is when you're running an apartment complex or own enormous office buildings. Yes, the net gains in the value of real estate itself generally lag the stock market's average annual return of around 10%. Although the wild real estate market of late has been an exception to this number, mortgage lender Griffin Funding reports that since 1967, the average U.S. home gains just a little more than 4% per year. Not great. That's also not the whole story, however. In this instance, the property owner is also monetizing this real estate by (presumably) charging rent that's at least a little more than his mortgage payments. The taxes, mortgage interest, and depreciation on this real estate are also tax-deductible expenses, adding to the owner's net/reported profits even if not adding to his tangible cash flow. On balance, renting out real estate you're conventionally financing produces an annual return on your investment of anywhere from 5% to 12%, with an average of 10%, matching the stock market's average full-year return. But that might not be the actual concern to address here, particularly for this busy investor. Far more important are the stress and missed opportunity that come with this plan over the course of the coming decade before he reaches age 45. Being a small-time residential landlord isn't a great venture for busy people. Even just four different tenants are a lot to handle when they're living in four different properties. And, while these rental houses are almost certainly insured, as a landlord, one accident can wreck what's already relatively thin cash flow. Then there's the time factor. This individual is already busy. Finding a new tenant or coordinating with repair people will require more personal time that simply doesn't exist. Also consider the opportunity cost involved with this plan. That's the cost of tying up money to finance the purchase of real estate, or for that matter, just taking care of it. While interest payments are tax-deductible expenses, they're still a real out-of-pocket personal expense using money that could otherwise be invested for growth in other ways -- for free. Ditto for sales commissions and buying and selling. Tax-deductible? Yes. But they're a net cost all the same. (Remember, tax deductions aren't the same as tax credits. You may not get all of this spent money back on the back-end, even if you've got a great accountant.) These nickels and dimes add up when you're not looking. Perhaps the chief reason owning rental real estate isn't quite ideal in this scenario -- when there's a viable alternative use of after-tax income -- is the lack of liquidity should the owner choose to sell a property. You can always sell stocks, even if at a price you don't love. There's never a guarantee you'll be able to get rid of a rental home you no longer want, however, even if you're offering it at a great price. If all goes as planned and this doctor can cut back to working three days per week 10 years from now, the time to effectively manage four rental houses likely will exist then. The business will be net-profitable, with at least a big chunk of properties being paid off. That's a pretty big "if," though. There aren't a lot of part-time doctors who actually only work part-time hours these days. The job often just doesn't allow it. There are no absolutely correct answers, and there's always more to the story. Indeed, there may be a terrific unmentioned reason here to continue focusing on real estate rather than committing this money to stocks. On balance, though, what's known about this particular situation favors owning buy-and-hold stocks over rental homes. If this individual invests wisely over the course of the coming decade -- keeping things simple and efficient, like just owning an index fund -- and actually ends up cutting back to part-time hours at age 45, he can still buy rental property then. He may even be able to outright purchase rental real estate rather than financing it if that's still his goal at that time, saving at least some money as a result. He'll save some money in the meantime too, since the cost of being in the stock market is a pittance compared to owning rental real estate. But you're still committed to owning rental properties right now? Consider this: While it feels great to pay down these loans early, that's not necessarily the best financial move. If the interest rates on these mortgages are low enough, there's a case to be made for drawing out these tax-deductible loans on this cheap money for as long as you can, and investing the extra cash flow in something with a higher rate of return. Your cash flow is certainly going to grow. Remember, rental rates rise regularly, but the size of your mortgage payments usually doesn't. This real estate venture should at least be a measurably higher-margin one 10 years from now. That's one of the chief reasons to stick with it. If you've got time, inclination, money, and ability to own rental real estate, your answer may be different. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $402,034!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,158!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $704,676!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. I Make $400,000 a Year and Want to Retire at 45 -- Should I Invest More in Stocks or Focus on Real Estate? was originally published by The Motley Fool

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store