US drops charges against doctor accused of destroying Covid vaccines
Pam Bondi said Dr Michael Kirk Moore Jr. "gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so". He had been indicted by the Justice Department under the Biden administration in 2023.
The plastic surgeon was already on trial in Utah, where he had pleaded not guilty to all charges including conspiracy to defraud the US.
The acting US Attorney for the district of Utah, Felice John Viti, filed to dismiss the charges on Saturday, saying this was "in the interests of justice".
Dr Moore was accused of providing fraudulently completed vaccination certificates for more than 1,900 vaccine doses, the US Attorney's office in Utah said in 2023.
These were allegedly provided, without administering the vaccine, for a charge of $50 (£37), in exchange for direct cash payments or donations to a specific charity.
The government also accused him of giving children saline shots at their parents' request so that the "children would think they were receiving a COVID-19 vaccine," according to the US attorney's office.
He was accused alongside his company - Plastic Surgery Institute of Utah, Inc. - and three others of seeking to defraud the US and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Bondi wrote on X on Saturday that she had ordered the Justice Department to drop the charges because Dr Moore "did not deserve the years in prison he was facing".
She said US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and Senator Mike Lee, both Republicans, had brought the case to her attention, calling them champions for "ending the weaponization of government".
Lee thanked the attorney general for "standing with the countless Americans who endured too many official lies, mandates, and lockdowns during COVID".
Dr Moore and other defendants faced up to 35 years in prison on multiple charges, according to the Associated Press news agency.
The current US Health Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., ran a group for eight years, Children's Health Defense, that repeatedly questioned the safety and efficacy of vaccination.
Kennedy has in the last year repeatedly said he is not "anti-vax" and will not be "taking away anybody's vaccines".
RFK Jr appoints new US vaccine advisers after sacking committee
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
20 minutes ago
- CBS News
FDA approves new blue food dye derived from gardenia fruit
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Monday approved a new blue color additive derived from the fruit of the gardenia, a flowering evergreen. The color is approved for use in sports drinks, flavored or enhanced non-carbonated water, fruit drinks, ready-to-drink teas as well as hard and soft candy. Petitioned by the Gardenia Blue Interest Group, the additive is made by refining the compound genipin — derived from crushed Gardenia jasminoides Ellis fruit, which is often used in traditional Chinese medicine — by reacting it with soy protein hydrolysate. Though soy, a potential allergen, is used to make gardenia blue, the group has asked the FDA to exempt it from having to declare it as such. In its request, it says the soy protein is not expected to be detected in the final color additive and therefore will not cause allergic reactions. The FDA says it is still reviewing the request. "Every day, children are exposed to synthetic chemicals in food that serve no purpose and threaten their health," Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in a news release. "The FDA's approval of gardenia blue shows we're finally putting kids first. Thanks to Dr. Marty Makary's bold leadership, we're cutting through industry influence and taking decisive action to Make America Healthy Again." The FDA says this marks the fourth color derived from natural sources approved by the administration for use in foods in the last two months. In May, three other colors were approved, including galdieria extract blue, calcium phosphate (white) and butterfly pea flower extract (blues, purples and greens). Kennedy previously called on companies to phase out all petroleum-based dyes by the end of next year, with the goal to replace them with natural alternatives in the U.S. food supply. The food dye industry has denied any safety concerns with artificial dyes. The International Association of Color Manufacturers said in a statement after Kennedy's initial announcement that artificial dyes are "essential for consistency, visual appeal, and consumer trust in food products."
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is 'Food Is Medicine' the Future of Better Health?
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." DURING THE LAST several years, 'food is medicine' has become a buzzy phrase among hospitals, researchers, and social media influencers alike. The promise of the food is medicine movement is huge: If more people got their hands on fresh food—by way of at-home 'medically tailored meal' services, 'farmacy' produce prescriptions or food banks, and better grocery options overall—than we might be able to drastically reduce the leading causes of death. After all, poor diet is cited as the No. 1 contributor to 45 percent of U.S. cardiometabolic deaths and 36 percent of global coronary deaths, not to mention 70 percent of new diabetes cases worldwide. The movement carries political clout, too. Under the Biden Administration, research funding flew into food is medicine initiatives with the goal of improving the American diet by way of more fresh foods. Under the current Trump Administration, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has used 'food is medicine' as a rallying cry to purge the food industry of toxins and encourage more people to eat whole foods for better health. Meanwhile The Rockefeller Foundation, American Heart Association, and other organizations have poured hundreds of millions into additional research to study if large-scale healthy food programs can help prevent and treat disease. But, really, what does 'food is medicine' even mean? Much like the word 'healthy,' the phrase doesn't yet have a widely agreed upon definition. There are a ton of different players rushing to put their spin on the phrase—from researchers to meal delivery companies to grocery stores. But if 'food is medicine' means everything... does it mean anything? We decided to find out. Here's our review of where the science on diet and disease actually stands–from an interview with a charge-leading researcher, to a report on the wild world of medically tailored meal startups. This is what "food is medicine" means right now. And what it could mean for NowShop NowShop Now You Might Also Like The Best Hair Growth Shampoos for Men to Buy Now 25 Vegetables That Are Surprising Sources of Protein
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MLB Pension Fights Tom Browning's Widow Over Benefits
The MLB Players Benefit Plan and Pension Committee contend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) lawsuit brought by Dawn Dellapa, the widow of former Cincinnati Reds pitcher Tom Browning, should be dismissed. Dellapa contends she was wrongly denied surviving spouse benefits. The argument was contained in a brief filed on Monday in a Florida federal district court by Jim Brantley and other attorneys from Donnelly & Gross and Bredhoff & Kaiser on behalf of the benefit plan and pension committee. The plan and committee, which are separate entities from MLB and MLBPA, are operated by representatives from both MLB and MLBPA. Advertisement More from As Sportico detailed in April, Dellapa asserts she and Browning, a member of the Reds Hall of Fame, had a relationship that began in 1991 and are parents to a child born in 1995. However, they didn't marry until a couple of months before Browning died in 2022 at the age of 62. The short period between the couple entering into marriage and Browning's death became legally significant when Dellapa's petition for surviving spouse benefits was rejected. An eligibility rule indicates a spouse must be married for a continuous period of at least one year. Dellapa disputes this interpretation, emphasizing that the word 'may' precedes the one-year requirement. She also maintains there are alternative means of qualifying based on how the requirements are expressed in the policy. In addition, Dellapa says the plan causes age discrimination, since it is more protective of retired members who are in 'active' service, meaning managers, coaches, trainers and other ex-players who are employed by teams. Dellapa asserts retired members in active service are less likely to be old, 'due to the physical and mental limitations that accompany aging.' Advertisement Last month, William J. Schifino Jr. and other attorneys for Dellapa rebuked the plan and committee in a brief. They maintain the defendants 'disparage' the Dellapa-Browning relationship 'as a quick, seven-week-long marriage before his death.' The attorneys insist the couple's relationship lasted 'over 30 years, including a child.' In the brief filed on Monday, the benefit plan and pension committee try to rebut Dellapa's arguments. One line of attack is that ERISA affords substantial discretion to retirement plans in how they interpret policy language. ERISA requires only a 'reasonable' interpretation. This means even if a court disagrees with the plan's interpretation, the court must uphold the interpretation unless it was unreasonable. The plan and committee also contend that Dellapa's reading—that the word 'may' renders the one-year marriage requirement permissive rather than obligatory—doesn't prove the plan's interpretation was unreasonable. Likewise, they maintain that a logical reading of 'qualified spouse' would not 'render the one-year marriage requirement entirely superfluous' and that, instead, the 'most reasonable interpretation' of 'qualified spouse' includes the requirement. The defendants also reject Dellapa's insinuation of age discrimination as incompatible with ERISA. They write that her allegations not only wouldn't count as age discrimination under a separate law, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, but they 'fail entirely under ERISA.' This is because any alleged discrimination 'flows directly from the Pension Plan's terms themselves, not from any discriminatory action taken by the Pension Committee.' Advertisement The defendants stress that Dellapa 'cannot cite a single case supporting the proposition' that pension plan terms 'allegedly causing a disparate impact between participant classes based on age can be transformed into discrimination based on ERISA rights.' U.S. District Judge Steven D. Merryday is presiding over Dellapa's case. Earlier this month, Merryday ordered the parties to appear before a mediator in hopes it will lead to a resolution. The docket also indicates that a jury trial would take place in November 2026 if the case doesn't end beforehand. Browning was a 20-game winner in 1985 and threw a perfect game against the Los Angeles Dodgers in 1988. He also led the Reds to a World Series victory over the Oakland A's in 1990. Browning retired six years later with a career record of 123-90 and a 3.94 ERA, along with 1,000 strikeouts in 1,921 innings pitched. Best of Advertisement Sign up for Sportico's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
