logo
Final talks underway on setting Michigan's new minimum wage and tipped wage standards

Final talks underway on setting Michigan's new minimum wage and tipped wage standards

Yahoo12-02-2025
Michigan Capitol | Susan J. Demas
Sweeping changes to Michigan's standards on minimum wage and sick leave policies are set to take effect in nine days and it has business owners, service workers and lawmakers at odds with one another.
In 2018 lawmakers in the Republican-led legislature implemented changes to raise minimum wage to $15, phase out tipped wage credits and set mandatory sick leave policies that were being sought after by a ballot petition at the time. But after lawmakers adopted the changes, they amended them following the election, in a maneuver the Michigan Supreme Court in 2024 said was unconstitutional, ordering the changes in the petition to be put in effect on Feb. 21 this year.
Servers and restaurant-owners in Michigan have railed for and against the changes set to take effect in a few days and both the state Senate and House have introduced bills to amend the impending changes.
State Senators heard testimony in the Senate Regulatory Affairs Committee on Wednesday from service industry members on the Senate's version to change minimum wage and preserve tipped wages.
The then-Republican led legislature violated the people of Michigan's constitutional right to petition in 2018 to set rules on sick leave and minimum wage, Senate Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair Sen. Jeremy Moss (D-Southfield) said during a committee meeting Wednesday.
'…the impact of that controversial decision making has pitted employer against employee, worker against worker and Michigander against Michigander. Today, we have to rise above that,' Moss said. 'I will tell you that we will have people here today from the same industry, owners and servers alike, on opposite sides of this issue.'
Under the Supreme Court ruling, which lawmakers have the opportunity to preempt, minimum wage is set to rise from $10.56 to $15 in 2028 and tipped wages will increase annually to equalize Michigan's minimum wage by 2031.
Many restaurant owners and servers have told lawmakers that they like the current system that allows businesses to pay servers a tipped wage, currently 38% of minimum wage, saying that with tips, servers make much more than they would if they were minimum wage employees.
At the same time, some stakeholders say raising the minimum wage for all and eliminating tipped wages would work to lift up all workers.
The legislation for consideration by the committee, Senate Bill 8 would speed up the timeline to a $15 minimum wage by 2027 and not phase out tipped wages completely, raising tipped wage slowly to 60% of minimum wage over the next decade.
The restaurant industry is still licking its wounds from economic losses it suffered during the COVID-19 pandemic, President of the Michigan Restaurant & Lodging Association Justin Winslow said. Having to increase wages and then increase menu prices to compensate could be just the thing that causes small businesses to have to shutter their doors.
'You will see job loss. You will see some of the smaller, some of the more on the edge restaurants right now move towards closure,' Winslow said. '40% of the industry in Michigan right now is not making a profit. There's a staggering number. That means two out of five restaurants are on the edge of closure, and that's not sustainable. This is the kind of policy that would push them over the edge.'
Swaths of servers have come to the Michigan Capitol Building to plead with lawmakers, saying that if tipped wages go away, customers will stop tipping. Loss of tips is not a reality, people will still tip for great service, President of One Fair Wage Saru Jayaraman said.
'There is the fear mongering that the restaurant association engages in in every state… where workers try to get a raise, they say tips will go away. They say restaurants will shut down. They do it in every single state. They have captive audience meetings with their workers and tell them 'your tips are going to go',' Jayaraman said. 'We have good news for everybody in the room, for all of you, and for the state of Michigan, the seven states that have already done this and the many more that have followed in the last several years since the pandemic, are doing great.'
There are a lot of concerns on what iteration of a new policy is the right one and how each policy will be implemented, but it's important to note that there is opportunity for bipartisanship that both works for business owners and employees, Stacey LaRouche, press secretary for Governor Gretchen Whitmer said on behalf of the governor in a statement.
'Governor Whitmer has long opposed the unconstitutional tactic Republicans used to undercut working families and discourage companies from providing sick leave to employees,' LaRouche said. 'The administration has heard concerns about implementation of the new law, and the governor has made it clear that she is open to a bipartisan deal that protects servers and wait staff, while also providing certainty to small businesses and helping Michigan remain competitive.'
Furthermore, LaRouche said the governor called on leadership of the House and Senate to work towards a bipartisan deal and come to an agreement this week. If they can not come to an agreement, Whitmer is calling for the legislature to pass a short-term extension putting off the Supreme Court rules until July 1 to allow more time for negotiations.
Before lawmakers adjourned for the day Wednesday, the committee cleared the Senate's sick leave policy out of committee without the support of any of the four Republican members and with Sen. Sylvia Santana (D-Detroit) passing on the vote.
The Senate's plan, Senate Bill 15, would require businesses with more than 25 employees to offer employees 72 hours of paid sick time. And small businesses would have to permit employees to earn 40 hours of paid sick time, as well as 32 hours of unpaid leave.
The Regulatory Affairs Committee will reconvene Thursday afternoon to consider the future of the minimum and tipped wage standards under Senate Bill 8.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

President Donald Trump endorses Mike Rogers in Michigan U.S. Senate race
President Donald Trump endorses Mike Rogers in Michigan U.S. Senate race

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

President Donald Trump endorses Mike Rogers in Michigan U.S. Senate race

President Donald Trump endorsed former congressman Mike Rogers July 24 in his Republican bid for an open U.S. Senate seat. Trump announced the endorsement on his Truth Social media platform in a move that strengthened already strong expectations that Rogers, who lost narrowly to U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin in 2024, will again be the Republican nominee in 2026, this time for a seat being vacated by U.S. Sen. Gary Peters, D-Bloomfield Township. 'I'm grateful to have President Trump's complete and total endorsement," Rogers said in a news release. 'He knows that we have what it takes to win this seat and deliver real results for hard-working families." On Wednesday, U.S. Rep. Bill Huizenga, R-Zeeland, announced on X that he would not run for the U.S. Senate, after discussions with his family and "in consultation with President Trump." That announcement largely cleared the field of major potential challengers to Rogers. Huizenga did not say whether he would seek a ninth term in Congress, where he represents the 4th Congressional District and where Republicans hold a slim majority in the U.S. House going into the midterm elections. Rogers, a former FBI agent from Livingston County, served seven terms in Congress and became chair of the House Intelligence Committee before stepping down in 2015 to become a radio talk show host. Rogers also had Trump's endorsement in the 2024 U.S. Senate race. Republicans and Democrats will choose their respective U.S. Senate candidates in a primary election next year. Peters announced in January that he wouldn't seek a third six-year term, setting the stage for Michigan's second open seat U.S. Senate election in two years. A competitive race is developing on the Democratic side, where announced candidates include U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens, D-Birmingham; state Sen. Mallory McMorrow, D-Royal Oak; former state House Speaker Rep. Joe Tate, D-Detroit; and Dr. Abdul El-Sayed of Ann Arbor, a former Wayne County health director who sought the Democratic nomination for governor in 2018. Republicans have not won a U.S. Senate election in Michigan since former U.S. Sen. Spencer Abraham won a single term in 1994. Contact Paul Egan: 517-372-8660 or pegan@ This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: President Trump endorses Mike Rogers in Michigan U.S. Senate race

Tight security as Trump heads to Scotland for diplomacy and golf
Tight security as Trump heads to Scotland for diplomacy and golf

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tight security as Trump heads to Scotland for diplomacy and golf

US President Donald Trump was due to arrive in Scotland on Friday for a mix of diplomacy, business and leisure, with a huge security operation swinging into place and protests planned near his family-owned golf resorts. The president, whose mother was born in Scotland, is expected to split his time between two seaside golf courses bearing his name, in southwestern coastal Turnberry and Aberdeen in the northeast. Air Force One carrying the president and White House staff was due to arrive around at 8:20 pm local time (1920 GMT) and Trump has no public events scheduled for Saturday or Sunday, the White House said. Police Scotland, who are bracing for mass protests in Edinburgh and Aberdeen as well as close to his golf courses, said there will be a "significant operation across the country over many days". An avid golfer, Trump is expected to tear himself away from the greens to meet with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at some point, but details of that meeting have not been released. Starmer is not reputed to be as passionate about golf as the 79-year-old Republican, and may have other concerns to tee off on. The US and the UK announced a trade agreement in May, but London is worried about Trump's stated intention to "refine" the deal. The British leader, who has dodged the exorbitant import/export tariffs other countries have been saddled with, will aim to stay in the good graces of the unpredictable American leader. The international outcry over the conflict in Gaza may also be on the agenda, amid growing pressure on Starmer to follow French President Emmanuel Macron and announce the UK will also recognise a State of Palestine. - Protests - Trump is expected to return to the UK in September for a state visit -- his second -- at the invitation of King Charles III, which promises to be lavish. During a 2023 visit, Trump said he felt at home in Scotland, where his mother Mary Anne MacLeod grew up on the remote Isle of Lewis before emigrating to the United States at age 18. The affection is not necessarily mutual in Scotland. Residents, environmentalists and elected officials have also voiced discontent over the Trump family's construction of a new golf course, which he is expected to open before he heads back to the UK on Tuesday. Scotland's leader, First Minister John Swinney, said the country "shares a strong friendship with the United States that goes back centuries". He said he would meet with Trump during the visit and said the US leader's trip provided Scotland with a "platform to make its voice heard on the issues that matter, including war and peace, justice and democracy". Trump has also stepped into the sensitive debate in the UK about green energy and reaching net zero, with Aberdeen being the heart of Scotland's oil industry. He said the UK should "stop with the costly and unsightly windmills, and incentivise modernised drilling in the North Sea, where large amounts of oil lay waiting to be taken". "A century of drilling left, with Aberdeen as the hub," the president wrote on his Truth Social platform about Europe's oil and gas hub. - US discontent - The trip to Scotland puts physical distance between Trump and the latest twists in the case of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the wealthy financier accused of sex trafficking who died in prison in 2019 before facing trial. In his heyday, Epstein was friends with Trump and others in the New York jet-set, but the president is now facing backlash from his own MAGA supporters who demand access to the Epstein case files. Many support a conspiracy theory under which "deep state" elites protected rich and famous people who took part in an Epstein sex ring. But Trump is urging his supporters to move on and drop the case. The Wall Street Journal, which published an article detailing longstanding links between Trump and the sex offender, is being punished by the White House. Its reporting staff plans to travel to Scotland on its own and join the White House press pool. But it has now been denied a seat on Air Force One for the flight back home. While Trump's family has undertaken many development projects worldwide, the president no longer legally controls the family holdings. But opponents and watchdog groups have accused him of many conflicts of interest and using his position as US president to promote private family investments, especially abroad. The American NGO Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington said in May that 21 development projects were already underway abroad during Trump's second term. aue-jkb/jj/yad Solve the daily Crossword

Republicans and independents have warmed on the Supreme Court, but Democrats haven't: AP-NORC poll
Republicans and independents have warmed on the Supreme Court, but Democrats haven't: AP-NORC poll

Associated Press

time15 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Republicans and independents have warmed on the Supreme Court, but Democrats haven't: AP-NORC poll

WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans' views of the Supreme Court have moderated somewhat since the court's standing dropped sharply after its ruling overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022, according to a new poll. But concern that the court has too much power is rising, fueled largely by Democrats. The survey from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that about a third of U.S. adults have 'hardly any confidence at all' in the court, but that's down from 43% three years ago. As the new AP-NORC polling tracker shows, about half of Americans have 'only some confidence' in the court, up from 39% in July 2022, while a relatively small number, about 1 in 5, have 'a great deal of confidence,' which hasn't shifted meaningfully in the past few years. The moderate increase in confidence is driven by Republicans and independents. Still, views of the nation's highest court remain more negative than they were as recently as early 2022, before the high-profile ruling that overturned the constitutional right to abortion. An AP-NORC poll conducted in February 2022 found that only around one-quarter of Americans had hardly any confidence in the court's justices. Persistent divide between Republicans and Democrats The partisan divide has been persistent and stark, particularly since the Dobbs ruling, when Democrats' confidence in the nine justices plummeted. The survey shows Republicans are happier than Democrats and independents with the conservative-dominated court, which includes three justices appointed by President Donald Trump, a Republican. Few Republicans, just 8%, view the court dimly, down from about 1 in 5 in July 2022. For independents, the decline was from 45% just after the Dobbs ruling to about 3 in 10 now. The views among Democrats were more static, but they are also slightly less likely to have low confidence in the justices, falling from 64% in summer 2022 to 56% now. In recent years, the court has produced historic victories for Republican policy priorities. The justices overturned Roe, leading to abortion bans in many Republican-led states, ended affirmative action in college admissions, expanded gun rights, restricted environmental regulations and embraced claims of religious discrimination. Many of the court's major decisions from this year are broadly popular, according to a Marquette Law School poll conducted in July. But other polling suggests that most don't think the justices are ruling neutrally. A recent Fox News poll found that about 8 in 10 registered voters think partisanship plays a role in the justices' decisions either 'frequently' or 'sometimes.' Last year, the conservative majority endorsed a robust view of presidential immunity and allowed Trump to avoid a criminal trial on election interference charges. In recent months, the justices on the right handed Trump a string of victories, including a ruling that limits federal judges' power to issue nationwide injunctions. Katharine Stetson, a self-described constitutional conservative from Paradise, Nevada, said she is glad that the court has reined in 'the rogue judges, the district judges around the country' who have blocked some Trump initiatives. Stetson, 79, said she is only disappointed it took so long. 'Finally. Why did they allow it get out of hand?' she said. Growing concerns the court is too powerful Several recent decisions were accompanied by stinging dissents from liberal justices who complained the court was giving Trump too much leeway and taking power for itself. 'Perhaps the degradation of our rule-of-law regime would happen anyway. But this court's complicity in the creation of a culture of disdain for lower courts, their rulings, and the law (as they interpret it) will surely hasten the downfall of our governing institutions, enabling our collective demise,' Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote when the court ruled on nationwide injunctions. The July AP-NORC poll found a growing similar sentiment. About 4 in 10 U.S. adults now say the court has 'too much' power in the way the federal government operates these days. In April, about 3 in 10 people were concerned about the court's power. The shift is largely due to movement among Democrats, rising from about one-third in April to more than half now. Debra A. Harris, a 60-year-old retired state government worker who now lives in Winter Haven, Florida, said the court's decisions in recent years 'just disgust me to my soul.' Harris said the court has changed in recent years, with the addition of the three justices appointed by Trump. 'I find so much of what they're doing is based so much on the ideology of the Republican ticket,' Harris said, singling out last year's immunity decision. 'We don't have kings. We don't have dictators.' George Millsaps, who flew military helicopters and served in Iraq, said the justices should have stood up to Trump in recent months, including on immigration, reducing the size of the federal workforce and unwinding the Education Department. 'But they're bowing down, just like Congress apparently is now, too,' said Millsaps, a 67-year-old resident of Floyd County in rural southwest Virginia. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,437 adults was conducted July 10-14, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 3.6 percentage points. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store