G7 summit minus Trump rallies behind Ukraine
KANANASKIS - Group of Seven leaders on Tuesday vowed greater support for Ukraine but stopped short of joint condemnation of Russia for its growing attacks, at a summit missing Donald Trump.
The US president had been due to speak at the G7 summit with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky, with whom he has had a volatile relationship, but flew back Monday over the Israel-Iran conflict.
Zelensky met the remaining leaders at a remote lodge in the Canadian Rockies hours after Russia hit Kyiv with one of the worst bombardments since it invaded in February 2022, killing at least 10 people in the capital.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney welcomed Zelensky and announced Can$2 billion ($1.47bn) of military support, including drones and helicopters, for Ukraine.
But the G7 summit stopped short of issuing a joint statement, unlike in past years under Trump's predecessor Joe Biden when the club of major industrial democracies denounced Russian "aggression."
A Canadian official, backtracking on an earlier account of the United States trying to water down a proposed statement, said there was never an attempt to issue one due to Trump's continued hopes of mediating with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
"It was clear that it would not have been feasible to find detailed language that all G7 partners could agree to in that context," the official said on condition of anonymity.
Carney dismissed suggestions of friction, saying that all G7 leaders agreed to be "resolute in exploring all options to maximize pressure on Russia, including financial sanctions."
But he admitted that some G7 leaders "would say above and beyond" what was in the chair's summary he issued instead of a formal statement signed by all leaders.
G7 leaders, however, managed unity Monday on a joint statement on the Iran conflict that backed Israel but also called broadly for de-escalation, despite Trump contemplating greater US military involvement.
US WAITS ON PRESSURE
Carney earlier joined Britain in tightening sanctions on Russia's so-called shadow fleet of ships used to circumvent international sanctions on its oil sales.
"These sanctions strike right at the heart of Putin's war machine, choking off his ability to continue his barbaric war in Ukraine," Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement.
US lawmakers have drafted a package of new sanctions on Russia but Trump has been hesitant to give his support and isolate Putin, to whom he spoke by telephone on the eve of the G7 summit.
Trump infamously berated Zelensky in the Oval Office on February 28, saying he was ungrateful for US aid, but has since voiced disappointment that Putin has rebuffed a US proposal for at least a temporary ceasefire.
Zelensky told Carney the latest Russian attack showed the need for allies' support and pressure on Moscow - while making clear that he still backed Trump-led calls for negotiations.
"It's important for our soldiers to be strong in the battlefield, to stay strong until Russia will be ready for the peace negotiations," said Zelensky, who cut short meetings in Canada scheduled after the summit.
French President Emmanuel Macron accused his Russian counterpart of exploiting global focus on the Middle East to carry out the deadly attack.
"It shows the complete cynicism of President Putin," Macron told reporters at the summit.
In Washington, the State Department also condemned the Russian strikes and offered condolences to the victims' families.
TOUGH TRADE TALKS
The G7 - Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States - was holding its first summit since the re-election of Trump, who openly questions longstanding US alliances.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent remained to represent the United States at the summit, where discussions have also concentrated on Trump's attempts to radically overhaul the world's trading system.
Trump has vowed to slap sweeping tariffs on friends and foes alike on July 9, although he has postponed them once.
The US president, speaking to reporters on his way back from the summit, complained that the European Union was not yet offering a "fair deal" on trade.
"We're either going to make a good deal or they'll just pay whatever we say they will pay," he said.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she still hoped for a negotiated solution and talks were "intense and demanding."
Trump's negotiators have already sealed a deal with Britain and, outside of the G7, reached an agreement to lower tariffs with rival China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
44 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
Putin's oil and gas man joins secretive Antarctic Treaty meeting in Milan
The Russian official — until recently in charge of the firm that has stitched together vast maps of South Pole hydrocarbons — is helping negotiate Putin's 'scientific' interests at the prestigious diplomatic gathering in Milan. It may not be insignificant that Russia's delegation at the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM) in the Italian fashion capital includes Pavel Lunev. Until April 2023, Lunev had been head of the Russian state firm responsible for mapping Antarctica's oil, gas and other minerals — at least since the region's mining ban entered into force in 1998. That firm is owned by Rosgeo — the Kremlin's mineral explorer. Indeed, Lunev would land a weighty promotion after Rosgeo's seismic survey ship had once more headed via Cape Town to the Antarctic seabed in the austral summer of 2023 for another season of 'scientific research'. That event sparked environmental protests at the port city's V&A Waterfront — one of South Africa's most popular tourist destinations — and a letter of demand by 29 South African groups, which called on Pretoria to intervene. Pretoria's answer at the time? The Russian state mineral explorer was free to pursue its interests under the treaty's 'freedom of scientific investigation' principle — also allowed by the region's mining ban. Moscow's response? Giving Lunev a top job in Antarctica: that is, heading the Russian Antarctic Expedition, the state agency that executes Moscow's operational interests in the frigid southern frontier. Who is Pavel Lunev? A trained palaeontologist with tousled hair and a smile fit for the cover of Outside magazine, Lunev now appears in a suit and tie in a Russian press statement on the delegation's work in Milan — wearing a look that says, 'I'm not outside right now.' Lunev previously told Daily Maverick that geological and geophysical surveys by Rosgeo's Polar Marine Geosurvey Expedition (PMGE) was 'no different from the work conducted by other members' signed up to Antarctica's environmental laws. Indeed, some of PMGE's work includes standard sciences such as glacial evolution. The Rosgeo subsidiary had also probed 'the glacial processes, dynamics and evolution of the ice sheet, and the stages of Antarctic glaciation' and 'the nature and foundation of the Earth's crust', said Lunev. However, recent developments also involve: A July 2024 Russian-Chinese Antarctic geology paper that suggests nothing about prospecting, but appears in the state mining journal. Paper author Professor German Leitchenkov, a PMGE collaborator who has extensively researched Antarctica's mineral 'potential', presented his research on sub-ice sampling at an international Antarctic science conference held in Chile in August 2024; PMGE's stated goals up to at least 2030, which include identifying the Southern Ocean's 'mineral raw material potential'; A 2022 PMGE petroleum geology paper, which describes the 'high oil and gas potential' in the D'Urville Sea off East Antarctica; A February 2020 Rosgeo statement, which used Cape Town port to announce 70 billion tons of hydrocarbons off East Antarctica (500 billion barrels or 15 times global annual oil consumption); and … Documented claims betraying the Russian state's geopolitical motivations: 'The works of the PMGE aimed at studying the geological structure and mineral resources of the Antarctic are of geopolitical nature. They ensure guarantees of Russia's full participation in any form of possible future development of the Antarctic mineral resources — from designing the mechanisms for regulating such activities up to their direct implementation,' PMGE revealed in 2017. Leitchenkov's joint paper in a July 2024 edition of the Russian state journal, the 'Exploration and Protection of Mineral Resources'. (Image: Screenshot) Westminster releases findings on Russian hydrocarbon surveys Meanwhile, Westminster's newly released findings on the UK's Antarctic interests, issued this month, devote a section to 'commercial mining' and the Russian activities uncovered by Daily Maverick. According to the report, 'the Russian state-owned vessel [Akademik] Alexander Karpinsky has conducted seismic surveys in Antarctic waters, identifying potential hydrocarbon reserves estimated at 70 billion tonnes' — an activity that 'raised serious concerns' during the inquiry. In addition to findings published in October 2021 and May 2022, in May 2024 Daily Maverick also revealed that the Karpinsky had spent six summers since 2011 surveying for oil and gas in an area counterclaimed by Argentina, Chile and the UK. Asked to explain the Russian activities during Westminster's May 2024 inquiry, UK Polar Regions head Jane Rumble claimed that 'Russia has been tackled on this before and, in fact, has assured the ATCM on multiple occasions that this is a science programme, so we'll keep it under review'. Just, in fact, two 'assurances' The June 2025 inquiry findings quote Rumble's claim. However, the ATCM database contains no record of any government, including Rumble's, 'tackling' Russia 'on this' matter. As for 'multiple assurances', Russia had offered just one by the time Rumble made her claim. It was offered nearly a quarter of a century before at the 2002 Warsaw ATCM — where the Russian delegation did argue scientific intent in a draft document published by Daily Maverick. Yet, this draft also refuses to rule out 'utilisation of the Antarctic mineral wealth' which may only occur 'in the indefinitely remote future'. Russia delivered one additional 'assurance' — on 24 May 2024, but only after Rumble had delivered her testimony on 8 May. A media firestorm erupted after Rumble's testimony, capped by Chilean president Gabriel Boric twice tweeting that Santiago would defend its claimed territory against oil exploitation. So, not everyone has approached Russia's self-declared interests in Antarctic oil and gas like a geopolitical wet-floor sign. In February 2024, Washington — the treaty depositary — placed the Karpinsky under energy sanctions. And the US delegation had led an initiative reaffirming Antarctica's mining ban at the 2023 ATCM in Helsinki, Finland. Ukraine, immediately after the 2024 ATCM in Kochi, India, said Russia was blocking environmental initiatives, which 'once again confirms that the true intentions of its presence in Antarctica is mining'. Russia also reaffirmed the ban in Helsinki and Rumble, in her inquiry defence, said that 'there isn't any evidence that would point to a breach of the treaty. You would need different equipment between surveying and actual exploitation. There is not a shift to it, but, yes, we are watching it very closely.' Rumble has not responded to queries sent since last year. This is 'manifestly prospecting … what the Russians are doing' Some experts disagree that the act of putting a symbolic signature on the reaffirmation of the mining ban refutes the documented reality of Rosgeo's activities. Westminster's inquiry findings, in fact, point out that the 'Article 7' mining ban 'prohibits 'any activity relating to mineral resources, other than scientific research''. While the ban does not define a 'mineral resource' activity, the inquiry findings do. 'Any activity relating to mineral resources,' the findings say, 'includes prospecting, exploration and exploitation for commercial purposes'. And it is Antarctic governance expert Professor Alan Hemmings, of New Zealand's University of Canterbury, who told Daily Maverick in a recent webinar that the 'Karpinsky has been engaged in what is manifestly mineral prospecting'. Hemmings explains: 'Article 7 prohibits mineral resource activities, and mineral resource activities were defined in an earlier treaty that didn't enter into force quite carefully. And among the things that constitute mineral resource activities was prospecting. 'That's what the Russians are doing.' Why is Russia in Milan? It is unclear what submissions the Russian delegation will be making at this year's ATCM, which concludes on Thursday, 3 July. Yet, since the details of these 'prospecting' activities have not been tabled at any ATCM, it is highly unlikely that Moscow's envoys are now in Milan to formally discuss that contentious matter. The agenda remains opaque because the meeting has been a closed-door event since the treaty was signed in 1959 and that is why the press is stopped from reporting on the live substance of the 10-day talks. This year, the Russian statement from Milan says, the discussions are expected to focus on matters such as science and tourism. Lucia Sala Simeon, the only journalist reportedly at 30 minutes of the 'public' opening plenary, noted that she was briefly allowed into the venue. 'I was accompanied by a member of staff — who kept a close eye on me,' notes the Milan-based reporter. 'I was the only journalist there.' She added: 'I had to leave the room and was escorted out; in the next few days, I would no longer be allowed inside the venue, not even in the lounge. So, I'll be staying outside in the garden, like a homeless [person].' Italy, South Africa — reactions, non-reactions Italy's foreign ministry has not responded to Daily Maverick's multiple queries first sent August 2024. Treaty party South Africa, under a revamped 'conservation'-focused delegation, in an interview said Pretoria's 'non-aligned' stance was an advantage in negotiating with the most obstructive actors at the consultative table. Thus, Russia and China, which have — among others — used their vetoes to block an emperor penguin rescue plan at recent ATCMs. South Africa says it supports emperor penguin protection. 'We want a much more active engagement with the Russian and Chinese delegations,' said South Africa's lead negotiator, Ashley Johnson. 'Perhaps we can edge them closer to a conservationist approach.' Rosgeo's defence of its activities, shared with Daily Maverick in October 2021, can be read here. However, Russian authorities have not responded to our repeated attempts to reach them since Lunev's most recent response in May 2022. The Russian delegation did not respond to queries on Sunday. DM
TimesLIVE
6 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Trump wins as Supreme Court curbs judges, but may lose on birthright citizenship
The US Supreme Court's landmark ruling blunting a potent weapon that federal judges have used to block government policies nationwide during legal challenges was in many ways a victory for President Donald Trump — except perhaps on the very policy he is seeking to enforce. An executive order that the Republican president signed on his first day back in office in January would restrict birthright citizenship, a far-reaching plan that three federal judges, questioning its constitutionality, quickly halted nationwide through so-called 'universal' injunctions. But the Supreme Court's ruling on Friday — while announcing a dramatic shift in how judges have operated for years deploying such relief — left enough room for the challengers to Trump's directive to try to prevent it from taking effect while litigation over its legality plays out. 'I do not expect the president's executive order on birthright citizenship will ever go into effect,' said Samuel Bray, a Notre Dame Law School professor and a prominent critic of universal injunctions, whose work the court's majority cited extensively in Friday's ruling. Trump's executive order directs federal agencies to refuse to recognise the citizenship of children born in the US who do not have at least one parent who is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident. The three judges found that the order likely violates citizenship language in the US constitution's 14th amendment. The directive remains blocked while lower courts reconsider the scope of their injunctions, and the Supreme Court said it cannot take effect for 30 days — a window that gives the challengers time to seek further protection from those courts.
The Citizen
6 hours ago
- The Citizen
Iran voices ‘serious doubts' over Israel commitment to ceasefire
Iran demanded that the United Nations recognise Israel and the United States as being to blame for this month's war. Iran on Sunday said it was not convinced Israel would abide by a ceasefire that ended their 12-day war this week. The most serious escalation to date between the arch-foes erupted on June 13, when Israel launched a bombing campaign in Iran that killed top military commanders and scientists linked to its disputed nuclear programme. Israel said its aim was to keep the Islamic republic from developing a nuclear weapon — an ambition Tehran has consistently denied, insisting it has the right to develop nuclear power for civilian purposes like energy. The fighting derailed nuclear talks between Iran and the United States, a staunch ally of Israel's. 'We did not start the war, but we have responded to the aggressor with all our power,' Iran's armed forces chief of staff, Abdolrahim Mousavi, was quoted as saying by state television, referring to Israel. 'We have serious doubts over the enemy's compliance with its commitments including the ceasefire, we are ready to respond with force if attacked again,' he added, six days into the ceasefire announced by US President Donald Trump. ALSO READ: Iran says no plan for new US nuclear talks, plays down impact of strikes Deadly war In a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres published on Sunday, Iran demanded that the United Nations recognise Israel and the United States as being to blame for this month's war. 'We officially request hereby that the Security Council recognise the Israeli regime and the United States as the initiators of the act of aggression and acknowledge their subsequent responsibility, including the payment of compensation and reparations,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote in the letter. The United States joined Israel in its campaign during the war, carrying out strikes on three key facilities used for Iran's atomic programme. Trump has threatened further strikes should Iran enrich uranium to levels capable of manufacturing nuclear weapons. ALSO READ: US joins Israel-Iran conflict with overnight bombing campaign According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran had enriched uranium to 60 percent in 2021, well above the 3.67 percent limit set by a 2015 agreement from which the United States unilaterally withdrew in 2018. To make a weapon, Iran would need to enrich uranium up to 90 percent. Israel has maintained ambiguity about its own atomic arsenal, neither officially confirming nor denying it exists, but the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute has estimated it has 90 nuclear warheads. According to Iran's health ministry, at least 627 civilians were killed and 4,900 injured during the 12-day war with Israel. Retaliatory missile attacks by Iran on Israel killed 28 people, according to Israeli authorities. During the war, Iran arrested dozens of people it accused of spying for Israel, also saying it seized equipment including drones and weapons. Iran's parliament on Sunday voted to ban the unauthorised use of communications equipment, including tech billionaire Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet service, according to the official news agency IRNA. 'Unacceptable' An Israeli strike on Tehran's Evin prison during the war killed at least 71 people, Iran's judiciary said Sunday. The strike on Monday destroyed part of the administrative building at Evin, a large, heavily fortified complex in the north of Tehran, which rights groups say holds political prisoners and foreign nationals. According to judiciary spokesman Asghar Jahangir, the victims at Evin included administrative staff, guards, prisoners and visiting relatives as well as people living nearby. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said on Monday that detained French nationals Cecile Kohler and Jacques Paris, held at Evin for three years, were not believed to have been harmed by the Israeli strike, which he described as 'unacceptable'. On Tuesday, a day after the strike, the judiciary said that the Iranian prison authority had transferred inmates out of Evin prison, without specifying their number or identifying them. The inmates at Evin have included Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi as well as several French nationals and other foreigners. READ NEXT: Did the US strikes succeed, and how will Iran respond?
