logo
Third round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks take place

Third round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks take place

SBS Australia2 days ago
Peace talks between Russia and Ukraine have resumed in Istanbul for a third round, amid cautious hopes for progress, ongoing prisoner swaps, and growing discontent at home in Ukraine. But despite some gestures of goodwill, the path to peace remains elusive. The delegations met once again inside Istanbul's ornate Ciragan[[See-ra-GAN]] Palace, as Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan opened the day's talks. He thanked the leaders involved, including Presidents Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskyy for enabling the talks, and praised U-S President Donald Trump for backing the process. "We have gathered for the third round of direct talks between Russia and Ukraine, hosted by Turkey. Our goal is to end this bloody war that has a high cost as quickly as possible. We extend our gratitude to Mr. (Russian President Vladimir) Putin and Mr. (Ukrainian President Volodymyr) Zelenskyy for demonstrating their will to make these talks possible, to Mr. (US President Donald) Trump for supporting the process that led to an end to the war, and to all other leaders who have directly or indirectly supported the talks." Russia and Ukraine delegations last met face to face seven weeks ago. While those rounds led to prisoner exchanges, they didn't deliver a breakthrough. This time, Ukraine is pushing harder for a full and unconditional ceasefire, something it says is essential for any real diplomacy. Representing Ukraine at the talks, National Security and Defence Council Secretary Rustem Umerov lays out Kyiv's position. "Ukraine keeps insisting on a full and unconditional ceasefire as the necessary basis for effective diplomacy. We are ready for a ceasefire now and to start substantive peace negotiations. And it is up to the other sides to accept this basic step towards peace." And there's another priority: a summit between resident Zelenskyy and President Putin. Mr Zelenskyy wants the two leaders to meet directly to put an end to Europe's largest war since the Second World War. But Moscow says not so fast. Vladimir Medinsky, the head of Russia's delegation says meeting only makes sense after an agreement is already worked out. 'In order for such a meeting (between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy) to take place, it is necessary to work out the terms of the agreement in advance, to understand what to discuss at this meeting, and in fact, at this meeting it is necessary not to discuss the agreement, but to put a period, to sign. You know, as we say, the end crowns the work. A meeting in order to discuss all this from scratch again makes no sense.' Still, there have been signs of limited cooperation. President Zelenskyy announced that more Ukrainian prisoners of war have returned home, many of them ill or severely wounded, some held in captivity for more than three years. Footage released by the Ukrainian presidential press service shows them stepping off buses, draped in flags, chanting 'Glory to Ukraine!' And Russia, too, says it's ready for more swaps. But there are disagreements over the fate of civilians, especially children. Mr Medinsky claims many listed Ukrainian children were never in Russia and may now be scattered across Europe. It's a sensitive topic, with human rights groups urging transparency and speed. But while Kyiv navigates war and diplomacy, tensions are rising at home. For the first time since Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, anti-government protests have erupted, not over the war itself, but over a controversial anti-corruption law. In the western city of Lviv, around 1,500 demonstrators gathered, many of them young, many of them angry. They accused the government of undermining the very institutions Ukraine needs to align with the European Union. The law, signed by President Zelenskyy, gives the president greater control over the bodies that investigate corruption. Yana, a protestor, says it's a step backwards. 'And I don't like that the government is now taking away this opportunity from us, our future, which we are actually fighting so hard for, gnawing away at Russia. I want us all to be in the European Union, that's why we are here.' Critics say weakening anti-graft watchdogs risks alienating key Western allies. As one protester put it, Ukraine can't afford to lose support at such a critical phase of the war. Mr Zelenskyy responded by convening top anti-corruption officials. He promised a new plan to protect the autonomy of watchdogs with proposed legislation expected within two weeks. In his nightly address, the president acknowledged the backlash, saying Ukraine must strengthen the rule of law. "We agreed that the heads of these institutions will jointly propose an action plan – a plan of concrete steps that can strengthen the rule of law in Ukraine. Of course, everyone has heard what people are saying these days – what they are saying on social media, to each other, on the streets. It's not falling on deaf ears. We've analysed all the concerns, all the aspects of what needs to be changed and what needs to be stepped up."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defence, Foreign Ministers sign new 50-year UK-Australia ‘Geelong Treaty' military pact
Defence, Foreign Ministers sign new 50-year UK-Australia ‘Geelong Treaty' military pact

News.com.au

time5 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Defence, Foreign Ministers sign new 50-year UK-Australia ‘Geelong Treaty' military pact

Defence and Foreign Ministers from the United Kingdom and Australia have signed a new 50-year military pact designed to underpin Australia's acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines. The deal was signed in Geelong on Saturday, the hometown of Australia's Defence Minister, and dubbed 'The Geelong Treaty'. Officials from Australia and the UK have been forced to voice renewed enthusiasm for the AUKUS agreement, amid a US review of the deal. America's defence and foreign minister-equivalents have not been part of AUKUS meetings in Australia this week. Donald Trump and UK Prime Minster Keir Starmer and expected to meet in Scotland this week. At Geelong on Saturday, Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles said the new pact meant jobs and military security. 'It's a treaty which will last for 50 years,' Mr Marles said during a signing ceremony with his UK counterpart. 'It is a bilateral treaty which sits under the trilateral AUKUS framework, itself embodied in a trilateral treaty that was signed that I signed in Washington, DC., in August of last year. 'In doing this, AUKUS will see 20,000 jobs in Australia. It will see, in building submarines in this country, the biggest industrial endeavour in our nation's history, bigger even than the Snowy Hydro scheme,' Mr Marles said. 'In military terms, what it will deliver is the biggest leap in Australia's military capability, really, since the formation of the navy back in 1913.' Alongside Mr Marles, UK Secretary of State for Defence John Healey dubbed the Geelong Treaty a powerful agreement. 'It is a treaty that will support tens of thousands of jobs in both Australia and the UK,' Mr Healey said. 'It is a treaty to build the most advanced, most powerful attack submarines either of our nations have ever had. It is a treaty that will fortify the Indo-Pacific. 'It will strengthen NATO and we're the politicians signing it today; But this is a treaty that will define the relationship between our two nations and safeguard the security of our country for our children and our children's children to come. 'So this is a historic day.' The two ministers have been joined in a series of meetings by Foreign Minster Penny Wong and UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy this week. The treaty signing also comes as the largest British flotilla in 30 years arrives in Darwin, with the HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carrier docking in Darwin on Wednesday. It was the first time a British aircraft carrier visited Australia since 1997, and brought troops to take part in the massive Talisman Sabre exercises, which run annually across northern Queensland and PNG.

Jerome Powell fact-checking Trump has gone viral. What's the backstory of their feud?
Jerome Powell fact-checking Trump has gone viral. What's the backstory of their feud?

ABC News

time8 hours ago

  • ABC News

Jerome Powell fact-checking Trump has gone viral. What's the backstory of their feud?

It's been likened to a scene in comedy series The Office — US President Donald Trump being fact-checked by a disgruntled man in a suit and a hard hat. But there's more to awkward exchange than a new meme format. Here's the backstory of the video and why the pair's disagreement speaks to a serious issue in the US. That's Jerome Powell, the chair of the US Federal Reserve. The US Federal Reserve — which is often called "the Fed" for short — is the American equivalent to the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA). It's America's central bank, an institution tasked with regulating the finance sector, keeping the US economy in check and tackling inflation. And part of that role is setting the target range for what's called the federal funds rate — a figure that influences the interest rates US banks charge customers. The key thing about the Fed is that it's a separate entity from the US government, so it's not subject to the whims of whatever party is in power. Mr Trump and Mr Powell are touring the Federal Reserve Board building, which is currently undergoing renovations, in Washington DC. This tour came after Mr Trump's administration criticised the renovation project as "ostentatious". The long-running renovation project was originally costed at $US1.9 billion ($2.9 billion), but the Fed says that went to $US2.5 billion. During the tour, Mr Trump said the project's cost "went up a little or a lot" and was costing "about $US3.1 billion". But Mr Powell shook his head, saying he had not heard those figures from the Fed. Mr Trump then handed Mr Powell a piece of paper. "Are you including the Martin renovation?" Mr Powell said. "You just added in a third building, is what that is. That's a third building." "It's a building that's being built," Mr Trump said. "No, it was built five years ago," Mr Powell said. The awkward moment happened before a pack of reporters, so footage of the exchange quickly spread. Reposts of the video clocked up hundreds of thousands of views on X. Meanwhile, a frame of Mr Powell examining the figures became a meme format: And the virality of the moment was not helped by this interaction between the two: Mr Trump wants Mr Powell to lower the federal funds rate so that interest rates will go down in the US. In an Australian context, that would be equivalent to the prime minister asking the governor of the RBA to lower interest rates. Since April, Mr Powell has warned that Trump's policies, particularly on tariffs, could undermine the economy. He said the tariff levels were "significantly larger than anticipated" and that they could result in both lower growth and higher inflation. This would make it difficult for the Fed to react and prohibit a rate cut. In response, Mr Trump launched a tirade and called the chair a "major loser". During the heated exchange this week, Mr Trump pressed him again on lowering interest rates, telling him to "do the right thing" and slash them by 3 percentage points or more. Donald Trump has repeatedly suggested that he would "fire" Mr Powell. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which created the central bank, says that members of the Board of Governors, including the Fed chief, can be "removed for cause by the president". But the law does not define "cause" or lay out any standard or procedures for removal. No president has ever removed a Fed board member, and the law has never been tested in court. Several federal laws shielding members of other agencies from being removed by the president without cause say that "cause" can include neglect of duty, malfeasance, and inefficiency. If Mr Powell is fired and sues, those laws could be a guide for courts to determine if Mr Trump had cause to remove him. Last week, Mr Trump said Mr Powell had kept rates too high and would be out in eight months. "I think he's done a bad job, but he's going to be out pretty soon," he said. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Monday said the entire Federal Reserve needed to be examined as an institution and whether it had been successful. Mr Bessent, speaking with US media, declined to comment on a report that he had advised President Donald Trump not to fire Fed chair Jerome Powell. He said it would be the president's decision. But he said the institution should be reviewed, citing what he called the Fed's "fear-mongering over tariffs". He said that there had been little, if any, inflationary effect so far. Following his visit, the president walked back his comments and said that he would like the chair to resign but it would disrupt the markets if he were to remove him.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store