logo
How India's Op Sindoor and Israel's Op Rising Lion were similar

How India's Op Sindoor and Israel's Op Rising Lion were similar

India Today26-06-2025
A tenuous ceasefire holds for now between Israel and Iran after a 12-day war that began with Israeli jets striking Iranian nuclear sites. Israel's Operation Rising Lion came just weeks after India's Operation Sindoor. There are similarities on the ground and the way both countries crossed lines that were never crossed before.India's May 7 aerial attack on terror camps in Pakistan came after Pakistani and Pakistan-trained terrorists killed 26 civilians in Pahalgam, south Kashmir. Israel sent jets to target nuclear facilities inside Iran, a country whose leadership has threatened the very existence of the Jewish nation.While the India-Pakistan mini-war lasted for three days before the Pakistani DGMO sued for peace, the Israel-Iran war continued for 12 days. The damage to civilian infrastructure in the military conflict in the recent Middle East conflict was massive too.There are sharp contrasts in how both the operations were carried out, and in how the US engaged militarily by sending its B-2 stealth bombers. But the parallels between India's Op Sindoor and Israel's Op Rising Lion are remarkable too.1. INDIA, ISRAEL JETS STRUCK INSIDE ENEMY TERRITORY"India attacked terrorist camps and military infrastructure inside Pakistan using the Indian Air Force (IAF). Israel did the same inside Iran, using the Israeli Air Force (IAF) on a far bigger scale," defence expert Sandeep Unnithan tells India Today Digital.In India's case, this was the first time that its fighter planes hit targets in the heart of Pakistan -- in Punjab -- since the 1971 Indo-Pak War. Unlike Israeli fighters, Indian jets didn't cross over into Pakistan.Both the Indian and the Israeli air forces used precision-guided munitions to carry out the attacks."Obviously, the recent 88-hour India-Pakistan conflict was much more limited than the 12-day Israel-Iran conflict, but in terms of messaging there's a strong parallel," reads a post on X by author-columnist Sadanand Dhume.In both cases, says Dhume, "...One side (India, Israel) crossed previously uncrossed red lines, and inflicted much more damage than the other".2. THE IRAN, PAKISTAN N-FACTORThe nuclear factor is also common in both operations."Nuclear-armed Israel attacked Iran to prevent it from getting nuclear weapons. India attacked nuclear-armed Pakistan, and called out Pakistan's nuclear blackmail," explains Unnithan.With Operation Sindoor, India called out Pakistan's nuclear bluff and exposed the narrative that it was the nuclear weapons that prevented an all-out war between the two countries. The N-tag couldn't prevent the 25-minute operation when Indian fighter jets struck inside Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir.Israel's operation, later joined in by the US, was targeted at keeping Iran away from nuclear weapons.Though President Donald Trump claimed that Iran's sites targeted by the US had been "totally destroyed", American media outlets, quoting intel reports, said the setback was temporary.By targeting the Nur Khan airbase in Chaklala, India signalled it could decapitate Pakistan's nuclear command centre."Pakistan's deepest fear is of its nuclear command authority being decapitated. The missile strike on Nur Khan could have been interpreted... as a warning that India could do just that," The New York Times quoted a former US official familiar with Pakistan's nuclear programme as saying.3. IRAN, PAKISTAN AIR DEFENCES PUT OUT OF ACTIONAfter Pakistan targeted Indian defence and civilian areas, India retaliated and put its air defence and air bases out of action.Pakistan's China-made air defence systems failed miserably, and India used its indigenous BrahMos missiles to turn Pakistani military runways into Swiss cheese.By neutralising the air defence system at Lahore, India opened the skies over the Pakistani capital, showing it could strike at will.Israel didn't just indicate, but put Iranian air defences completely out of action. That was also the reason why the American B-2 bombers could go on a 37-hour mission to strike targets inside Iran.4. PAKISTAN AND IRAN'S PROXIESThere are similarities even in the pain points of India and Israel.Since the time it was created, Pakistan has tried to bleed India through proxy terror groups. Israel, too, has been a victim of Iran's non-state actors."India has accused Pakistan of rearing non-state actors like LeT and Jaish-e-Mohammed. Israel has accused Iran of rearing anti-Israeli proxies like Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis," says Unnithan.If the Pahalgam terror attack, carried out by The Resistance Front (a front for the LeT) made India carry out Op Sindoor, it was the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack in which over a thousand people were killed in Israel triggered the fresh cycle of violence that culminated in Operation Rising Lion.advertisementFrom tackling the proxies, both India and Israel went full hammer against the states sponsoring them.It was a doctrinal shift for India, while for Israel, it was a continuation of the 'Begin Doctrine' -- the willingness for anticipatory strikes against Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) capacities in perceived hostile nations.5. THE CEASEFIRE, TRUMP AND WARNING OF MORE ACTIONPresident Trump jumped to declare that his administration had brokered a truce between India and Pakistan, like he did in the case of Iran and Israel.India has rejected the claims, and said it was a call from the Pakistani DGMO on the afternoon of May 10 that led to the ceasefire.In the case of Iran and Israel, Trump's claims of a ceasefire was left in tatters after Iran fired missiles into Tel Aviv after the US President's claims of a truce and Israel said it would retaliate.Even in the India-Pakistan mini-war, Pakistan breached the ceasefire in the initial hours, sending in swarms of drones.The similarity in both operations continues despite the ceasefire pacts.India has asserted that Operation Sindoor hasn't ended, but remains suspended."The enemy [Pakistan] should not be under any illusion... Operation Sindoor is not over yet," Prime Minister Narendra Modi, adding that India's response to terror attacks would be decisive and uncompromising.Operation Sindoor is the new normal, as India would be treating any terror attack as an act of war against India.When asked on June 25 if the US would strike again if Iran rebuilt its nuclear enrichment programme, Trump responded by saying, "Sure", reported Reuters."Iran will not enrich -- the last thing they want to do is enrich," he said.Tehran insists on its right to a peaceful civilian nuclear programme.From the triggers to how they were carried out to the messaging, there are similarities in both India's Op Sindoor and Israel's Op Rising Lion.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BRICS' declaration likely to include Pahalgam attack
BRICS' declaration likely to include Pahalgam attack

Economic Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

BRICS' declaration likely to include Pahalgam attack

New Delhi: The BRICS summit leaders' declaration on July 7 under Brazil's presidency could include references to the Pahalgam attack and global terror infrastructure, people aware of the development told ET. This will be a boost for India, which is trying to rally the international community toward joint action on terrorism. ET has learnt that after intense negotiations in the run-up to the summit, the BRICS grouping — Brazil, Russia, India, Russia, China, South Africa, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Ethiopia and Indonesia — has agreed to include most of India's references to the Pahalgam terror attack in the leaders' statement. An official of one of the BRICS member states, who did not wish to be named, said that the group has always found a mechanism to arrive at a consensus and produce a common language or approach on critical issues like terrorism. Another official said BRICS is working on a formulation that conveys its stance on international the recent defence ministers' meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), only one country blocked any reference to the Kashmir terror attack, external affairs minister S Jaishankar had remarked, without naming Pakistan. India did not sign the joint statement and, therefore, the document could not be Minister Narendra Modi, who will reach Rio de Janeiro for the BRICS summit on July 5 — his third stop in the five-nation tour — will emphasise the need for a strong anti-terror formulation by the BRICS in his interventions at the summit, ET has learnt. India will take over the BRICS presidency from Brazil after the Rio Summit. In June, the parliaments of BRICS nations had strongly condemned the Pahalgam terrorist attack and agreed to cooperate on a policy of zero tolerance against terrorism. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla had led the Indian delegation to the 11th BRICS Parliamentary Forum in Brasilia on June 4-5. Besides the Pahalgam terror attack, India's leadership in the BRICS Startup Forum is also likely to be adopted by the leaders. The BRICS Startup Forum aims to promote cross-border collaboration among the member nations through entrepreneurial activities. The BRICS Startup Knowledge Hub was launched on January 31 this year as part of the Startup Forum. The BRICS Startup Knowledge Hub (microsite) is the first-ever BRICS Startup Knowledge Repository, which lays the foundation for multilateral cooperation and engagement among the BRICS countries to develop startup ecosystems. The Knowledge Hub will serve as a one-stop gateway to the BRICS startup ecosystem, offering valuable insights into the entrepreneurial landscapes of the member countries. Besides the BRICS summit, Modi will make a state visit to Brazil, and the two nations are expected to conclude several pacts, including in the areas of defence and is likely to meet other BRICS leaders on the sidelines of the summit, including from South Africa, Indonesia, the UAE, Ethiopia and possibly Iran, besides the BRICS partner countries.

BRICS' declaration likely to include Pahalgam attack
BRICS' declaration likely to include Pahalgam attack

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

BRICS' declaration likely to include Pahalgam attack

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel New Delhi: The BRICS summit leaders' declaration on July 7 under Brazil's presidency could include references to the Pahalgam attack and global terror infrastructure, people aware of the development told will be a boost for India, which is trying to rally the international community toward joint action on terrorism. ET has learnt that after intense negotiations in the run-up to the summit, the BRICS grouping — Brazil, Russia, India, Russia, China, South Africa, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Ethiopia and Indonesia — has agreed to include most of India's references to the Pahalgam terror attack in the leaders' official of one of the BRICS member states, who did not wish to be named, said that the group has always found a mechanism to arrive at a consensus and produce a common language or approach on critical issues like terrorism. Another official said BRICS is working on a formulation that conveys its stance on international the recent defence ministers' meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), only one country blocked any reference to the Kashmir terror attack, external affairs minister S Jaishankar had remarked, without naming Pakistan. India did not sign the joint statement and, therefore, the document could not be Minister Narendra Modi, who will reach Rio de Janeiro for the BRICS summit on July 5 — his third stop in the five-nation tour — will emphasise the need for a strong anti-terror formulation by the BRICS in his interventions at the summit, ET has will take over the BRICS presidency from Brazil after the Rio June, the parliaments of BRICS nations had strongly condemned the Pahalgam terrorist attack and agreed to cooperate on a policy of zero tolerance against terrorism. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla had led the Indian delegation to the 11th BRICS Parliamentary Forum in Brasilia on June 4-5. Besides the Pahalgam terror attack, India's leadership in the BRICS Startup Forum is also likely to be adopted by the leaders. The BRICS Startup Forum aims to promote cross-border collaboration among the member nations through entrepreneurial activities. The BRICS Startup Knowledge Hub was launched on January 31 this year as part of the Startup BRICS Startup Knowledge Hub (microsite) is the first-ever BRICS Startup Knowledge Repository, which lays the foundation for multilateral cooperation and engagement among the BRICS countries to develop startup ecosystems. The Knowledge Hub will serve as a one-stop gateway to the BRICS startup ecosystem, offering valuable insights into the entrepreneurial landscapes of the member the BRICS summit, Modi will make a state visit to Brazil, and the two nations are expected to conclude several pacts, including in the areas of defence and is likely to meet other BRICS leaders on the sidelines of the summit, including from South Africa, Indonesia, the UAE, Ethiopia and possibly Iran, besides the BRICS partner countries.

Nod at key DU meeting to course on ‘Sikh martyrdom', credits through online platforms leads to objections
Nod at key DU meeting to course on ‘Sikh martyrdom', credits through online platforms leads to objections

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Nod at key DU meeting to course on ‘Sikh martyrdom', credits through online platforms leads to objections

A slew of curriculum changes were approved on Saturday at the Academic Council (AC) meeting of the University of Delhi amid a sharp dissent from a section of faculty over content control, outsourcing of credit hours, and the shifting locus of teaching authority. Among the key decisions was the approval of a new general elective course titled 'Sikh Martyrdom in Indian History (c.1500–1765)' to be offered by the Centre for Independence and Partition Studies (CIPS). The course aims to critically explore the development of Sikhism and the historical context of martyrdom under Mughal rule, covering key figures such as Guru Arjan Dev, Guru Tegh Bahadur, and Banda Singh Bahadur. The nod, however, faced immediate criticism from some members of the council. AC member and history professor Maya John called its academic positioning 'highly objectionable.' 'The offering of this course by the CIPS is itself concerning,' she said, objecting that it will be taught outside the History department. John further flagged the absence of clarity on where and how the 60-hour course will be taught, given that students enrolled in various colleges will be selecting it as a generic elective. Calling for scholarly rigour, John said: 'I strongly recommend the inclusion of primary readings like the Zafarnama, Aurangzeb's Will, the writings of Bhai Mani Singh, and works by scholars such as Yoginder Sikand, K.S. Duggal, G.S. Chabra, and Hardip Singh Syan.' She urged that the course be suitably modified and taught by trained historians. Another agenda item that was criticised was the formal adoption of a provision allowing undergraduate and postgraduate students to earn up to 40% of their credits through online platforms such as SWAYAM and MOOCs. SWAYAM has been developed by the Indian government to provide free online courses. While the move aligns with UGC guidelines and aims to offer flexibility and multidisciplinary access, it drew strong opposition from several faculty members. 'The award of 5% credits through Swayam and MOOCs will gravely jeopardise the integrity and academic standards of DU's UG and PG programmes,' said John. 'It will contribute to endemic flux in teaching workloads, diminish meaningful student-teacher engagement, and compromise classroom instruction,' John added. Echoing these concerns, the Academic for Action and Development, Delhi Teachers' Association, the university teacher body, said in a statement: 'What's more alarming is that institutions may allow up to 40% of the total courses in any semester to be offered online. Courses taught in classrooms for decades will now be shifted online. And with that shift, teachers will slowly be pushed out of the system, silenced by screens, replaced by portals.' The Council also approved the implementation of the fourth year of UG programmes under the Undergraduate Curriculum Framework (UGCF) 2022. Students in their final year will now have the option to pursue one of three tracks — Dissertation, Academic Projects, or Entrepreneurship. Faculty members, regardless of whether they hold a PhD, will be eligible to supervise, provided they have relevant expertise. An Advisory Committee for Research (ACR) will oversee project allocations. In a relief, the Council also passed a resolution allowing students admitted in the 2016–17 academic session an extension of two additional years to clear backlogs. This was done in view of course restructuring during the transition from CBCS to UGCF, which reportedly left several students behind schedule. 'Those who have fallen behind by one year in the final stage of CBCS will be able to avail this benefit,' the resolution noted. DU's Skill Enhancement Courses (SEC) also saw new additions. Students will now be able to take up radio jockeying as a course. The curriculum will include training in voice modulation, studio operation, scripting, anchoring, and music curation. Students will be given exposure to mock studio sessions and interactions with professionals. Meanwhile, Vice Chancellor Yogesh Singh directed that pending bills related to paper checking be cleared urgently. 'All departments should submit the bills soon and ensure payment without delay,' he instructed the Examination and Finance branches. A condolence resolution was also passed in memory of late Professor P C Joshi, former Pro-Vice Chancellor and Acting VC of DU.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store