
Sussan Ley needs bold thinking to modernise the Liberals. She should look to David Cameron's Tories
Smashed in three general elections by Tony Blair's New Labour, Cameron's party had 198 MPs, but only 17 were women and just two came from multicultural backgrounds. There were more people named David in the shadow cabinet than women.
'We were the oldest political party in the world – and we looked it,' Cameron said years later. The Tory grandee Michael Portillo went further, warning the parliamentary party was 'reactionary and unattractive to voters'.
Cameron took action. He put a freeze on candidate selection and introduced a priority list to be considered by local branches conducting preselections. Half of the names on the so-called 'A-list' would be female, and a large number would be from minority backgrounds. Open primary contests were established, to include non-party members interested in standing for office.
Despite strong internal opposition, within five years, the A-list and rules that required gender parity among candidates being considered by branches led to a near quadrupling of women in parliament. After 10 years, multicultural representation within Conservative ranks had increased threefold. The wider UK parliament is significantly more diverse than Australia's.
The results were also noticed publicly. While the UK tabloids regrettably labelled women recruited to the party 'Cameron's Cuties', a new generation of senior Tories arrived – including the first Muslim woman to sit in cabinet, Sayeeda Warsi, home secretary and conservative favourite Priti Patel, and female prime ministers including Theresa May and Liz Truss. The party has since been led by Rishi Sunak and Kemi Badenoch.
As she starts to pick up the pieces from the 3 May electoral drubbing suffered by the Coalition here in Australia, newly elected opposition leader Sussan Ley could do worse than look to the Tories for a way forward.
The A-list was not a magic bullet – among those elected for the Conservatives at the 2024 UK election, 76% were men and only 12% were ethnically diverse. But bold thinking is clearly needed as the Coalition faces the strong likelihood of at least two more terms in opposition.
Labor takes great pride in the fact women outnumber men in the caucus in 2025, but the party first put in place quotas for preselection way back when Paul Keating was in the Lodge. In 1994, women made up just 12.5% of the caucus as the ALP national conference in Hobart thrashed out a proposal by the activist Sheila O'Sullivan calling for women to make up at least 35% of candidates in winnable seats by 2002.
After her victory over Angus Taylor this week, Ley said she would bring a fresh approach to the job. The first woman to lead the party and the first to lead a federal opposition, Ley insists the Liberals 'must respect, reflect and represent modern Australia'.
As party activist and former staffer Charlotte Mortlock has pointed out, the average Liberal member is a bloke in his 70s, while the average Australian voter is a 37-year-old woman. Worse, Mortlock warned quality female candidates were forced to sell a bad message to voters and paid the price themselves. To that end, Ted O'Brien, the new deputy Liberal leader, has said he mourns for the 28 women who stood for the Liberals and lost.
Fortunately for Ley, some of the work has already been done – and some in the party are rejecting the usual conservative pushback against change.
A review of the Liberals' 2022 defeat, led by the Victorian senator Jane Hume and the former Liberal director Brian Loughnane, found that a majority of women across age segments preferred Anthony Albanese and Labor, while the opposition's two-party preferred vote was weakest among women aged 18-34.
The review warned the Liberals had failed to attract new members in the numbers needed to campaign effectively, pointing to multicultural communities, women and anyone under 40.
It called for a much larger number of strong female candidates contesting key winnable seats, and for internal mechanisms to recruit and build up women who might otherwise not consider standing for parliament. Hume and Loughnane recommended a target of 50% female representation in Liberal parliamentary ranks within 10 years, or three terms.
Hume has led on this herself, helping to establish the Dame Margaret Guilfoyle Network, charged with boosting female representation. But the kinds of targets the review recommended don't have the force of set quotas and can be routinely ignored.
The review also proposed a special outreach program for culturally and linguistically diverse communities, including Chinese Australians, and for better campaign tools to win over multicultural voters. The Liberals could do a lot more to tap into Australia's naturally conservative south Asian and east Asian diaspora, and to recruit quality candidates from other culturally diverse places. The reviewers should speak to Liberal Jason Wood and defeated MP Keith Wolahan about this challenge.
Surely the first step of this year's postmortem must be careful analysis of where these ambitions from 2022 have yet to be met, and where they were quietly ignored.
Liberals including Simon Birmingham, Fiona Scott, Maria Kovacic and Linda Reynolds have all urged quotas be put in place to address the diversity problem now. The Sky News host Peta Credlin, however, on Thursday argued that the way back for the Liberals is better policy to fight Labor, rather than quotas she said would 'force' the party to install women candidates. Credlin is married to Loughnane.
Ley herself has an incredible story to tell. Born in Africa to British parents, arriving in Australia as a teenage migrant, studying at university as a mature-aged student and raising her family in regional Australia, the Farrer MP might be as well placed as anyone to speak to voters who turned away from Peter Dutton or Scott Morrison.
Ley should style herself as a no-nonsense grandparent, out to get the job done and impress voters just enough to take another look at the Liberals.
One of the other silver linings from the Coalition's drubbing might also be that a new generation of talent – including Dave Sharma, Zoe McKenzie and Aaron Violi – now have a clearer path to senior roles. Tim Wilson and Bradfield candidate Gisele Kapterian will help inject badly needed energy in the months and years ahead.
Since her victory, Ley has promised to meet voters 'where they're at'. Right now, that almost certainly isn't a Liberal party branch meeting.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
4 minutes ago
- The Sun
Migrants blow kisses from hotel window as they film protesters clashing with police on streets below
MIGRANT hotel residents have been spotted laughing while they video protesters and counter-demonstrators clash. People believed to be asylum seekers inside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel, in Islington, waved and blew kisses at protesters in the street below. The protest outside the north London hotel was sparked today, while another demonstration will also take place in Newcastle outside The New Bridge Hotel. The Metropolitan Police said the display was organised by local residents under the banner "Thistle Barbican needs to go - locals say no". Online groups called Patriots of Britain and Together for the Children have voiced their support for the demonstration. A counter-protest, created by Stand Up To Racism, has also unfolded. On student involved said he wants migrants to "feel safe" in the UK. Pat Prendergast, 21, said: "I want people to feel safe. I think the (rival protesters) over there are making people feel unsafe. "I want to stand up in solidarity and say that, you know, we want people here. "We want migrants. We want asylum seekers." Meanwhile people against the hotel being used for migrants shouted "get these scum off our streets", while waving England flags. A large group of masked protesters dressed in black and chanted "we are anti-fascist". A man donning an England football shirt was also arrested by police after an aggressive altercation with officers. There were clashes before cops separate the two groups. Chief Superintendent Clair Haynes, in charge of the policing operation, said: "We have been in discussions with the organisers of both protests in recent days, building on the ongoing engagement between local officers, community groups and partners. "We understand that there are strongly held views on all sides. "Our officers will police without fear or favour, ensuring those exercising their right to protest can do so safely, but intervening at the first sign of actions that cross the line into criminality. "We have used our powers under the Public Order Act to put conditions in place to prevent serious disorder and to minimise serious disruption to the lives of people and businesses in the local community. "Those conditions identify two distinct protest areas where the protests must take place, meaning the groups will be separated but still within sight and sound of each other." In a statement, the organisers of the counter protest said: "Yet again far-right and fascist thugs are intent on bringing their message of hate to Newcastle. "They aim to build on years of Islamophobia, anti-migrant sentiment and scapegoating. "In Epping and elsewhere recently we have already seen intimidation and violence aimed at refugees, migrants and asylum seekers. "Newcastle, like the rest of the North East, has a well-earned reputation for unity in the face of those who seek to divide us. "Whatever problems we face, racism and division are not the answer." is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video. Like us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.


Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Police clash with protesters as hundreds of far-right supporters and counter-demonstrators confront each other
Police clashed with demonstrators at a far-right protest in as rival groups faced off. Hundreds gathered outside Manchester Piccadilly station in Manchester on Saturday as supporters of far-right group Britain First prepared to march into the city. The rally saw crowds waving Union Jacks and St George's flags as they lined the streets. But they were met by counter-protesters organised by Stand Up To Racism, who staged a demonstration opposite the anti-immigration group. Manchester City Council said Greater Manchester Police had a 'robust operational plan' in place to manage the protests, with a focus on public safety and maintaining order. The council said a number of 'regular' protests are also expected on Saturday, adding some 'may occur across multiple locations in the city centre'. MANCHESTER: Protesters clash with police during a far-right protest MANCHESTER: Some demonstrators were arrested by police MANCHESTER: Crowds were meeting outside Manchester Piccadilly railway station before a planned march towards Manchester city centre MANCHESTER: Hundreds gathered in Manchester city centre as far-right demonstrators confronted counter protesters MANCHESTER: Leader of Britain First Paul Golding, pictured, at the Britain First March MANCHESTER: Counter protestors also showed up in Manchester today MANCHESTER: In total, hundreds of people packed Manchester city centre MANCHESTER: A group of protesters are seen holding St George and Union Jack flags MANCHESTER: The far right protesters were confronted with counter-demonstrators Police lined up to separate the two groups during the protest in Manchester Greater Manchester Police said in a statement: 'We respect and facilitate the right to lawful protest. 'As ever, appropriate plans will be put in place with the organisers and local partners to minimise disruption for those who live, work, and visit our city centre.' This is not the only demonstration happening this week. As previously reported, anti-migrant demonstrators faced off against anti-racism counter-protesters this evening outside a hotel on the south coast used to house asylum seekers. Protesters gathered outside the Royal Beach Hotel in Southsea, Hampshire, on Friday waving flags and calling for the hotel's closure. Anti-migrant demonstrations have taken place across the South of England today, in locations including Portsmouth, Southampton and Bournemouth. All the protests are taking place at locations where the government are housing migrants while their asylum applications are processed. SOUTHSEA: Protesters wave flags as they call for the Royal Beach Hotel to be closed to asylum seekers SOUTHSEA: Anti-migrant demonstrators face off against protesters from Stand Up to Racism outside the Royal Beach Hotel in Southsea, Hants, this evening, Friday 1st August 2025. SOUTHSEA: Counter-protesters from Stand Up to Racism Portsmouth staged an event at the same location 'to show friendship and solidarity with refugees' In Southsea, counter-protesters from Stand Up to Racism Portsmouth staged an event at the same location, holding signs reading 'Refugees welcome'. The day of protests on the south coast follows similar recent unrest in Epping, where a series of demonstrations have taken place calling for the closure of The Bell Inn, a hotel used on and off for the last five years as accommodation for asylum seekers. A ring of steel was also erected around The Britannia International Hotel, a luxury four-star lodging in London's Canary Wharf that has been converted to house migrants, following sweeping protests. An Epping-style protest to stop migrants being housed above a town's shops took to the streets on Wednesday in Waterlooville, Hampshire - as thousands of locals warned of 'mayhem' if the plans go ahead.

The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
Talks held over making Trump first US president to be given Freedom of the City of London
Your support helps us to tell the story Read more Support Now From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference. Read more Talks have been held over giving Donald Trump the Freedom of the City of London during his state visit in September, in a highly symbolic move. According to a source, the proposal to give President Trump the honour was made because it would give the Corporation the opportunity to meet the US leader and make the case for free trade and against tariffs at the ceremony. It would also be a way of marking the UK receiving the first of the Trump trade deals with questions still over tariffs on steel. The president would helicopter in from Windsor Castle to the US ambassador's Winfield House residence in Regent's Park for the ceremony. The Independent was told: 'It would be an important honour for the president just as our countries prepare to mark the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence next year. President Donald Trump ( REUTERS ) 'More importantly it would be the perfect opportunity for the City to address the importance of free trade and the issues of tariffs. 'The symbolism of being allowed to herd your sheep across the bridge and not pay taxes is very important all things considered.' But while the president was understood to be keen on the idea of receiving the honour, the Freedom Applications Sub (Policy & Resources) Committee chaired by Sir William Russell, half brother of the actor Damian Lewis, has not been persuaded. According to sources the sub committee was warned that the award would be 'too controversial'. The Corporation rarely gives government leaders the honour and had to withdraw it from Myanmar'ss Aung San Suu Kyi after criticism of her government being involved with persecution of the Rohingya. However, the official explanation is that President Trump has not been in government long enough. A spokesperson said: 'By convention, only Heads of State or Government who have served a minimum of seven years in office are eligible to be considered for the Honorary Freedom. 'The decision to grant the Honorary Freedom rests solely with the Court of Common Council – our highest decision-making body – not with any individual elected member.' The last head of government to be awarded the Honorary Freedom was Baroness Margaret Thatcher, who was recognised after serving 10 years as prime minister. The Honorary Freedom has never been awarded to a sitting US president, although Dwight Eisenhower received it after the Second World War for his role as commander in chief of the allied forces. According to a source, the City may change its mind if there is a request from the government which has not been made yet. It means that the US president is facing a second snub in his state visit. It follows a decision not to ask him to address a joint sitting of the Houses of Parliament with the state visit happening the day after parliament rises for the conference season recess. This is despite the fact that when Pope Benedict came on a state visit in 2010 he was given the honour of addressing Parliamentarians in Westminster Hall even though it was the day after recess had begun. Trump's state visit - the first time an individual has been granted a second state visit - will take place between 17 and 19 September. It will include a state banquet hosted by the King with the president staying at Windsor Castle.