How to Use Grammarly AI for Your Editing
Whenever I'm tasked with writing something, I rely on an in-house editor to help polish my work before it goes out. Is it a cheat? Absolutely not. But has artificial intelligence helped me become a better writer in the meantime? Definitely.
If you find yourself needing an objective perspective or a digital helping hand when tasked with writing an email, dissertation, screenplay or anything at all, I find Grammarly to be helpful. (I just looked up at the last two paragraphs I wrote and was met with a colorful array of red, yellow and blue lines underlining my syntax.)
Started in 2009, Grammarly is a Ukraine-founded cloud-based typing assistant. Besides adding colorful flair to your documents, Grammarly was built to check your spelling, grammar and punctuation, as well as your "clarity, engagement, and delivery mistakes." It can detect plagiarism, and suggests edits to errors.
Grammarly is available in Free ($0), Premium ($12/month) and Business ($15/month) versions. I've used Grammarly Business for clients and Grammarly Free on my own. For basic editing and education purposes, the Free version will certainly suffice. It's available as a download to desktop, mobile or browser (via extension).
Like any new addition, Grammarly takes time to integrate with your system fully. When it first loads, there can be a bit of a delay in its use. You may find other programs running slowly. Regarding that, I want to note Grammarly's settings: You can decide which programs the AI tool is used for, so if you don't want to use Grammarly in emails, you can switch the tool off, temporarily or permanently. This can help with any delays while using other programs.
Since 2009, quite a few Grammarly competitors have launched, including ClickUp (2017), WordTune (2020), ProWritingAid (2013), and Lavender.ai (2020) -- an extension of Sorter (2020), not to be confused with Lavender.
Something that sets Grammarly apart from its competitors is its early implementation of generative AI, with an assistant that's "up to speed on your context and preferred writing style."
I downloaded the tool almost two years ago, 13 years after launch. To get the most out of it, I recommend implementing it into three areas: your writing platform of choice -- mine is Google Docs -- emails and Instagram.
If you use the social media tool for business (or want help crafting quicker social media posts), you can turn to Grammarly's AI Instagram Caption Generator to create captions in seconds.
For example, I was looking for help crafting a digestible caption without much voice. I inserted a book highlighting the history of society's response to bodies into the Instagram Caption Tool. This is what it came up with:
It also can customize your profile options for tone, formality, and professional relevance. For instance, I was working on copy for a podcast client who specifically wanted their brand identity to sound romanticized and old-fashioned. So, I set "the voice" to exactly that. Read: Renaissance, fluffy, old-fashioned, frank.
On a personal level, I customize the voice when sending emails regarding negotiation, or harder-to-articulate business conversation. For something like this, I click the "improve it" button to help increase the confidence in my voice. Consequently, my words are improved, all with the help of generative AI.
Grammarly is touted as one of the most advanced AI writing tools available -- and so far, I have no reason to believe otherwise.
For more AI tips, check out how to use Midjourney to create custom wedding invitations and how to use ChatGPT to write a cover letter. For news and hands-on reviews of gen AI tools ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini and more, check out CNET's AI Atlas hub.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kremlin says Europe will feel the recoil from its 'illegal' sanctions on Russia
MOSCOW (Reuters) -The Kremlin said in remarks published on Sunday that the tougher the sanctions imposed on Russia by Europe, the more painful the recoil would be for Europe's own economies as Russia had grown resistant to such "illegal" sanctions. Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 triggered a wave of Western sanctions on Russia and it is by far the most sanctioned major economy in the world. The West said that it hoped its sanctions would force President Vladimir Putin to seek peace in Ukraine, and though the economy contracted in 2022, it grew in 2023 and 2024 at faster rates than the European Union. The European Commission on June 10 proposed a new round of sanctions against Russia, targeting Moscow's energy revenues, its banks and its military industry, though the United States has so far refused to toughen its own sanctions. Asked about remarks by Western European leaders including French President Emmanuel Macron that toughening sanctions would force Russia to negotiate an end to the war, the Kremlin said only logic and arguments could force Russia to negotiate. "The more serious the package of sanctions, which, I repeat, we consider illegal, the more serious will be the recoil from a gun to the shoulder. This is a double-edged sword," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told state television. Peskov told state television's top Kremlin correspondent, Pavel Zarubin, that he did not doubt the EU would impose further sanctions but that Russia had built up "resistance" to such sanctions. President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that any additional EU sanctions on Russia would simply hurt Europe more - and pointed out that Russia's economy grew at 4.3% in 2024 compared to euro zone growth of 0.9%.


Hamilton Spectator
6 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
For Mark Carney, every decision has trade-offs — but that's not slowing him down
OTTAWA—If there is a Carney 'doctrine' taking shape more than 100 days into the prime ministership of Mark Carney, maybe it is this: get it done, and damn the details. A few short months ago, Carney was blunt: 'I am a pragmatist above all. So when I see something that's not working, I will change it.' That's what the former central banker and UN climate finance envoy said when he captured the Liberal party leadership to replace Justin Trudeau. He went on to win the 2025 federal election on his outsider's pitch to rescue the economy from the threat of Donald Trump's tariff war. Pragmatism was how he justified abrupt domestic moves: ditching the consumer carbon tax, reversing capital gains tax hikes, and lowering income taxes while jamming 'nation-building' red-tape-cutting bills through Parliament to juice the economy. Pragmatism helps explain why, in his single mandate letter to cabinet ministers, Carney told them, 'We must redefine Canada's international, commercial, and security relationships.' But in an era where Trump is the one defining Canada's closest relationship, it's not clear if Carney's pragmatism can win over the U.S. president's chaos. On Friday, the unpredictable Trump cancelled talks towards a new deal with Canada, angry at Canada's deadline Monday for Big Tech giants to pay a digital services tax. Retroactive to 2022, it would collect $2.3 billion at first, and about $900 million yearly after that. Small potatoes compared to what Carney has already put on Canada's tab. In hopes of getting along with Trump, Carney in the past week promised to ramp up Canada's spending, along with NATO allies — all under intense pressure from the U.S. president — to a whopping $150 billion a year on military and related spending, a level almost unthinkable last year, as he vows to shift Canadian economic and security ties away from America towards Europe and beyond. In a spate of a few weeks, Carney signed what he calls a new economic, security and defence partnership with the European Union, increased aid to Ukraine, hosted a G7 summit where he offered backing of Trump's leadership efforts to end the Russia-Ukraine war and left a wide open runway for Trump to handle the Iran-Israel conflict as he saw fit. Carney defended his vow to lead where the U.S. does not, telling CNN it should be seen as a 'positive' not a negative reaction 'against' the U.S. or Trump. 'The way we would like to lead, the way European Union would like to lead, a number of Asian countries as well, is in a positive respect. If the U.S. is pulling back from multilateralism, as it is with respect to trade … effectively U.S. trade policy is now bilateral — if the U.S. is pulling back, there are others of us who do believe in multilateralism,' the rule of law, 'fair and open' trade, and in defence co-operation, said Carney. 'Do something,' seems to be the Carney mantra, said Kerry Buck, a former Canadian ambassador to NATO who welcomed the prime minister's commitment hit the new NATO military spending goal of five per cent of GDP. Although Justin Trudeau eventually committed to reaching the old NATO two per cent target at the end of last year's summit, he did so without a clear plan and with a 2032 timeline that was 'clearly going to damage our bilateral relations with the U.S. under Trump, where we're very vulnerable on trade,' said Buck, speaking before Trump's move Friday. In contrast, two weeks ahead of this week's NATO summit Carney accelerated action, said he'd hit two per cent this year, and at the summit adopted the bigger five per cent goal by 2035 with no hesitation. ' It was smart transactionally to do that. And I think in terms of content, it was also necessary,' Buck said. Others wonder how Carney is going to pay for it all. Questions remain about how the government will reach its two per cent promise this year, with the independent Parliamentary Budget Officer saying it can't verify Carney's plan to hit the old target. 'Some might start to think that he has a guns-before-butter kind of approach to foreign policy … a muscular foreign policy focused on defence,' but Buck said Carney had no choice, given it was 'our most vulnerable point' with the U.S. in ongoing trade talks. Forget the 'peace dividend' that Canada and other western allies hailed at the end of the Cold War, welcoming the ability to spend less on the military and more on social welfare systems. Now Carney and the other leaders challenged by Trump are embracing what NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called a 'defence dividend,' claiming that spending five per cent of GDP on defence will create 'an engine of growth for our economies, driving literally millions of jobs on both sides of the Atlantic.' Carney echoed the claim, acknowledging higher military spending may one day entail federal spending trade-offs or sacrifices, but for now, 'more of it will help build our economy at the same time as it improves our defence. And we'll get the benefits.' There is more continuity than many think between Trudeau and Carney: Carney continued the imposition of counter-tariffs against the U.S. that Trudeau launched. But he has withheld tit-for-tat retaliation against the 50 per cent steel and aluminum penalties Trump levied pending the outcome of trade talks. Carney has continued Trudeau's staunch support for Ukraine and its embattled president Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Carney backs a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, a ceasefire in Gaza, and went so far as to sanction two Israeli cabinet ministers. Like Trudeau, Carney believes government has a role and responsibility to address climate change. That Carney has moved swiftly on foreign and defence files is partly due to the flow of the international summits that coincided with his first two months after winning the April 28 election. It's also due to the urgency of the threat posed by the 'tariff' president in the White House. Carney, though, has a view of the larger global economic imbalances and the roles of China and the U.S. in those imbalances, that he shares with leaders like France's President Emmanuel Macron, and as they try to persuade Trump to drop tariffs, Carney seeks to position Canada's critical mineral, AI and quantum computing sectors for a world in which those imbalances continue. Janice Gross Stein said it is too early to describe a Carney 'doctrine' but it's clear 'the fundamental thing for him is that he, like everyone, is defining a path to dealing with a very different United States.' Carney is of necessity pursuing a new more predictable economic and security deal with the U.S. at a time of crisis , 'but it's an eyes-open arrangement,' Stein said. 'Yes, we need to diversify our partnerships — that's not a new idea in Canadian foreign policy … and yes,' Carney is focusing especially on Europe and like-minded states, and NATO, 'but that's built in to dealing with the more demanding United States.' Stein sees a pragmatic streak too in Carney's overtures to countries like China, India and Saudi Arabia. Carney identified China as the biggest threat to Canada's national security during the federal election. But in office, he's taken steps to thaw relations and ease Beijing's penalties on Canadian agricultural products. At the same time he is moving to block Chinese steel dumping via higher tariff rates against transshipment countries — in line with U.S. concerns. He rolled out a G7 welcome mat to India's Narendra Modi as a criminal investigation struggles to probe India's role in the killing of a Canadian Sikh in Surrey. And Carney invited Saudi Arabia Crown prince Mohamed bin Salman, the kingdom's de facto ruler, who declined to attend, in a week where the Saudi regime executed a journalist. Those three countries, China, India and Saudi Arabia are key economic players that are ignored at Canada's peril, said Stein. 'Where he's a pragmatist is in the recognition that every decision has trade-offs. You cannot make it a high priority to diversify your partnerships when you are the smaller next-door neighbour to a country that you are sending 75 per cent of your exports to and buying 75 per cent of everything that you buy in defence from that one country, which is the United States, and then continue to exclude others in the international community.' In parallel, said Stein, Carney is acting to ensure that Canada's economy is 'fit for purpose.' The bill to fast-track 'nation-building' development projects is part of that effort, as is his move to do 'important' consultation with Indigenous groups, but done simultaneously with other reviews, 'not sequentially,' she said. Carney is 'connecting defence, foreign policy to the Canadian economy because that's his comfort zone,' said Margaret McCuaig-Johnston, a senior fellow in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa. But she worries the emphasis on 'pragmatic' sends the wrong signal to countries like China, India or Saudi Arabia which will interpret it to mean Canada is ready to overlook human rights concerns in favour of doing business. Jonathan Berkshire Miller, director of foreign affairs, national defence and security policy at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, said Carney is necessarily focused on 'two imperatives: mending the relationship with the United States and diversification from it.' And while Carney's experience gives him credibility in Washington 'where he is well known among economic and diplomatic elites,' Trump's second term makes traditional diplomatic approaches 'increasingly unrealistic,' he said. There is an inevitable geographic and economic reality, he said in a written response to the Star. 'America remains Canada's largest trading partner.' So rather than a drastic shift or severing of ties, he said, 'Expect, instead, a policy of pragmatic hedging: building multilateral ties while trying to be on balanced terms' with who is in the White House. For now, Carney may have some latitude, he believes. Increased defence spending can bring Canada greater strategic autonomy on Arctic sovereignty, cybersecurity and intelligence sharing. The narrow question is 'one of political will' where the requirements for sustained federal spending 'and public support' will be the big test, he said, particularly in an era where 'fiscal retrenchment' (Carney has vowed to bring the operating budget into balance) and 'domestic political division are the contemporary realities.' The broader question is whether Carney's pragmatic approach can secure both.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
These 3 ‘Top Pick' Defense Stocks Pack a Punch, Says Stifel
If there's one thing that the ongoing wars in Ukraine and the Middle East can show us, it's that the techniques and tools of warfare are changing. While Napoleon's 'big battalions' still have an advantage, Stalin's 'quantity over quality' no longer holds. The armies of tomorrow will need the best weapons and the best technology, and plenty of both. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter That shift is already underway, according to Stifel analyst Jonathan Siegmann, who sees the defense sector approaching a pivotal transformation. 'We believe the defense industry is at the start of a period of considerable change,' Siegmann opined. 'Credible US deterrence is dependent on affordably evolving our weapon systems, recapitalizing the defense industrial base, and transforming government contracting. The defense industry of tomorrow will be faster moving, more fragmented, and less dependent on centralized planning. There is bipartisan political and industry support for transforming the acquisition process. While prior reforms have been underwhelming, we expect the geopolitical environment, outside capital, and the disruptive administration to catalyze greater changes today.' Looking ahead, Siegmann sees clear winners emerging, noting: 'We believe equity markets will increasingly reward the companies that can profitably invest in the growing areas of defense. We believe low-cost mass production, asymmetric weapons, software-enabled capabilities, and on-shoring will be the key differentiators.' These points lead Siegmann to select three defense stocks as his top picks right now. He's far from the only analyst positive on these names; according to the TipRanks data platform, Wall Street is bullish on all three. Here are the details. CACI International (CACI) First on our list is CACI International, one of the multitude of information and technology contracting firms that operate in the Beltway region of Maryland and Northern Virginia, surrounding Washington DC. CACI is based in Reston, a Virginia suburb that is well known as a home for many contractors with close ties to the Federal establishment – and CACI is exactly that. The company's work is wide-ranging; CACI provides expertise in the tech and national security fields, and especially in technology applicable to national security. The company works with a multitude of government agencies and is well known for its connections with the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, and the various Intelligence Community entities. As for actual services, CACI provides a variety of solutions in enterprise IT, cybersecurity, military mission support, applied engineering, and data management. CACI is even known as a provider of mission operations support for the space program. CACI is capable of providing outsourced services in everything from HR to financial oversight to supply chain management, and can act as an independent watchdog for government departments. CACI has also developed expertise in AI, taking advantage of the AI boom to develop new services for its clientele. The company is recognized as a leader in the application of AI and deep learning to the defense industry, and has proven able to meet rapidly evolving needs in a cost-effective manner. This company's last set of financial results covered fiscal 3Q25 (March quarter). CACI reported $2.17 billion at the top line in the quarter, beating the forecast by over $36 million and growing 16% year-over-year. The $6.23 non-GAAP EPS was 63 cents per share better than had been anticipated. The company generated $187.9 million in free cash flow, up 84% year-over-year. The company reported a work backlog of $31.4 billion as of March 31, up 9.8% y/y. That backlog presents the starting point for Siegmann's coverage of this stock. As he writes, 'CACI International's focused bidding strategy has built a high-quality backlog which we believe can sustain MSD% growth and higher margins. CACI's acquisition strategy is consistent and well-executed. We expect CACI to continue executing M&A transactions and increase their exposure to new defense tech areas. Our Buy rating reflects CACI's premium valuation being justified through its ongoing financial outperformance, growing exposure to growth vectors in new defense, and strong M&A history.' Siegmann backs up that Buy rating with a price target of $576, a figure that points toward an upside of 24% on the one-year horizon. The Strong Buy consensus rating here is based on 10 analyst reviews, with a 9 to 1 split favoring Buy over Hold. The shares are currently trading for $465.37, and they have an average price target of $536.25, implying a 15% upside by this time next year. (See CACI stock forecast) Teledyne Technologies (TDY) Next on our list of Stifel defense picks is Teledyne Technologies, a company that is more than just a defense firm. Teledyne acts as a technology and service provider across a wide range of industries, including defense and aerospace, but also including such industrial essentials as factory automation, environmental monitoring, electronics design, deepwater oil and gas exploration, and even medical imaging and pharmaceutical research. Teledyne offers its customers a large variety of practical products, from digital imaging sensors and cameras capable of working in visible, infrared, and X-ray light spectra, to marine monitoring and control instrumentation, to aircraft information management systems, to more defense-oriented electronics and satellite communication subsystems. The company also develops and provides precision-engineered systems on order for the defense, space, environmental, and energy sectors. The company provides these products and services through four business divisions: instrumentation, digital imaging, aerospace & defense electronics, and engineered systems. Together, these divisions brought the company $1.45 billion in revenue during 1Q25, up 7.4% year-over-year and some $10 million above the forecast. The firm's non-GAAP EPS came to $4.95, 3 cents per share better than had been estimated. Checking in with Stifel's Jonathan Siegmann again, we find the analyst upbeat about this company's fundamentally sound position. Siegmann writes of the stock, 'Teledyne is an attractive portfolio of niche digital imaging, instrumentation, and aerospace & defense businesses unified by specialized advanced technology, high barriers to entry, and high reliability products. Teledyne's longer-cycle businesses (anchored by defense) are currently due to accelerate from their substantial backlog increase at the same time as their shorter-cycle businesses are stabilizing and poised to return to growth. Margins are expected to further expand from operational improvements and mix.' This name gets a Buy rating from Siegmann, whose $626 price target suggests the shares have an upside potential of 23.5% over the next 12 months. While Teledyne only has 5 recent analyst reviews, they are all positive – making the Strong Buy consensus rating unanimous. The shares have a trading price of $506.67 and an average target price of $576.20, together indicating room for a 14% upside for the stock this coming year. (See TDY stock forecast) AeroVironment (AVAV) We'll finish in the world of applied robotics, a field that has found plenty of practical applications in the world's military establishments. AeroVironment is a well-known developer and manufacturer of drones – unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and uncrewed aircraft systems (UASs) in more technical jargon – and also produces several lines of unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) and high-altitude pseudo-satellites (HAPS). These vehicles, whether autonomous or remote-operated, are designed to provide military users with strong reconnaissance capabilities, while loitering munition systems (LMSs) can provide offensive and defensive fire support over the battlefield. The key to this company's success is its focus on providing 'solutions that work,' with battle-tested vehicle designs capable of meeting battlefield needs on land, sea, and air. The company understands that military applications have no margin for error, and that every system must work right the first time; this understanding lies behind AeroVironment's commitment to high quality at every stage of product development and testing, from putting together prototypes to marketing field-deployable systems. In recent weeks, AeroVironment has announced several new contracts, in line with the company's constant push to maintain and expand its business. In mid-May, the company landed a new contract with the Netherlands to modernize that country's fleet of Puma UAS vehicles. Also in May, AeroVironment received a $5.1 million contract from the US Army to use the company's Tomahawk Grip TA5 as a dismounted common controller for human-machine teams. And in mid-June, AeroVironment and Denmark entered into an agreement to expand allied UAS systems in Europe. Perhaps most importantly, on May 1, AeroVironment completed its $4.1 billion merger with BlueHalo. This move expanded the company's portfolio and its ability to deliver proven unmanned vehicle systems across all realms. Earlier this week, AeroVironment released its financial results for fiscal 4Q25 as well as the full fiscal year 2025. For the quarter, the company's revenue came to $275 million, up almost 40% and described by the company as 'record fourth quarter revenue.' At the bottom line, AeroVironment's non-GAAP EPS of $1.61 was up from $0.43 in fiscal 4Q24. For the full year, the company reported revenue of $821 million, up 14% from fiscal 2024. The stock surged following the readout, bringing AVAV's year-to-date gains to 77%. In his coverage for Stifel, Siegmann lays out the reasons to get behind this firm. He writes, 'AeroVironment is a leader in several key areas in new defense, namely loitering munitions (Switchblade family of drones) that we believe will be critical as the entire industry undergoes a transformation. The company's recent merger with BlueHalo provides exposure in space, counter-drone, and missiles, all of which are priorities for the DoD. We anticipate a steep ramp in organic EBITDA in the legacy AVAV portfolio and BlueHalo. Our Buy rating reflects AeroVironment's positioning as a pure-play new defense tech company with rapidly growing sales and earnings driving increased investor enthusiasm and multiple expansion.' Along with the noted Buy rating, Siegmann puts a $240 price target on this stock, although the recent uptick has taken the stock well beyond that figure. The Wall Street consensus on AVAV is a unanimous Strong Buy, based on 6 recent positive analyst reviews. However, the gains have taken the shares 19% above the $220 average price target. It will be interesting to see whether analysts increase their price targets or lower their ratings shortly. (See AVAV stock forecast) To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks' Best Stocks to Buy, a tool that unites all of TipRanks' equity insights. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analysts. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment. Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue