Revealed: Birmingham's pest control costs soar as bin strikes continue
It was on 11 March 2025 that all-out industrial action kicked off after pay talks between bin workers and the city council broke down. Unite the Union bosses have claimed that changes to how rubbish is collected will mean that 170 workers will face an annual pay cut of £8,000 – figures that Birmingham City Council disputes. They aren't the only figures that council chiefs aren't sure about: they have not yet managed to tally up the total sum of the strikes – from dealing with missed bin collections to paying for clean-up operations – and they don't know how many people have been affected, or which areas have been most impacted.
A whopping £90,767.20 was splurged on pest control services in Birmingham this March, while over the Easter weekend alone there 376 complaints of rats
But costs are creeping up: a Freedom of Information request by the Taxpayer's Alliance shows that a whopping £90,767.20 was splurged on pest control services in March this year – taking the total spend for 2024/25 to over £416,000. Since then the council has noticed a rise in reports of rats: over the Easter weekend 270 people complained about the pests in their gardens while, alarmingly, 106 people reported rodents inside their houses. In fact, Birmingham City Council has received more than 11,000 complaints since the start of the year. While some of these predate the industrial action, the council says it responded to 75 per cent of those received with an apology and, er, suggestions about other ways to dispose of waste. Steerpike can't imagine this will have reassured the residents of the UK's Venice of the North…
Even more concerning are the potential health effects the abandoned waste could have on Brum's population: gastrointestinal disease from rotting waste, fires from residents burning rubbish, blocked emergency access due to waste build-up, the psychological impact of living in filthy conditions and even a risk of physical injury from the build-up and spillage of waste across the streets. Despite these rather grim-sounding risks, the council has officially rated them as 'tolerable' – despite declaring a multi-agency major incident. And the summer months look to bring more problems. 'Higher temperatures may putrefy waste, causing liquid run-off and increasing the risk of contamination,' the council admits. BCC also notes that people living in deprived areas – as well as children, disabled and elderly residents across the city – are at a greater risk of being affected by the adverse health consequences of the strikes. Cheery stuff, eh?
There doesn't look to be much let up soon, as Unite members overwhelmingly voted to continue strike action a fortnight ago. While Birmingham City Council claims it had made workers a 'fair and reasonable offer', frustrated residents are demanding it does more. Just yesterday, BCC's meeting had to be adjourned following three separate interruptions from the public gallery. Steerpike has approached the council for comment, while Joanna Marchong, the TPA's investigations campaign manager, said of the issue:
Families in Birmingham will be appalled by the council's blatant disregard for their health and safety. Birmingham council is forking out hundreds of thousands of pounds on pest control while branding residents living amongst filth as 'tolerable'. After years of mismanagement, council leaders must focus on tackling bureaucratic waste so that they can get basic service delivery back on track for taxpayers.
Strong stuff. Will the council heed the warnings directed its way? Stay tuned…
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
5 days ago
- Scotsman
'Children with complex needs could miss out on a place at holiday hubs unless there is increased funding'
Children with complex additional needs are at risk of missing out on a place at Edinburgh's holiday hubs unless more funding is found, a councillor has warned. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The hubs,which provide respite for families of children with additional support needs during school holidays, were at the centre of a major row earlier this year when the city council was setting its 2025/26 budget. A plan to reduce funding for the holiday hubs was dropped, but an SNP bid to invest an additional £1m was defeated. Now council chiefs have announced a new set of criteria for access to the school holiday provision for children and young people with additional needs in the next academic year. The council said the new criteria would ensure that holiday support was directed to children and young people with the most complex needs. Parents protest at Edinburgh City Chambers in September 2024 over a proposed 50 per cent cut to the budget for school holiday care for children with disabilities. Picture: Lesley Martin/Lesley Martin Photography | Lesley Martin Photography Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But the council's SNP education spokesman Euan Hyslop said the failure to invest more in the hubs made it inevitable that some young people and their families would be disadvantaged. He said: "The SNP group welcomes some of the work that has gone into engaging with parents over the last couple of months to try and find a way forward. However, it's absolutely essential that these criteria are kept under review. "I've already heard from two parents very concerned that their children, both with complex additional needs, are now going to miss out because of a lack of clarity surrounding the application and weighting of the criteria.' He said parents were being asked to tick a box asking 'Are you in poverty?' 'The question that parents have and that the council is yet to answer is, will a child miss out on allocation as a result of not living in poverty despite having incredibly complex medical needs? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "Parents have achieved a lot in forcing the council to abandon the proposal first published last summer to cut this service altogether. There's agreement across parties now that there must be a place for this essential, lifeline service for years to come. 'However, if it is to meet the needs of all families and young people, councillors must face up to the reality that additional money needs to be allocated to the service." Children can get up to four weeks' holiday hub provision across the October break, February break, Easter and the Summer holidays. Applications for the next academic session, August 2025 to August 2026, are now open. The closing date for applications is 10 August 2025. The council insisted the new criteria would ensure that children with the most need would get places in the hubs. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Education convener James Dalgleish said the new criteria offered clarity to families of children with additional support needs who rely on holiday hub provision. 'Our focus over the past six months has been to secure a safe, achievable and sustainable way forward for holiday hubs, while also exploring how we can best meet the needs of some of Edinburgh's most vulnerable children, and their families. 'I want to thank all the parents and carers who have given up their time to share invaluable thoughts and views on holiday hub support. This is a positive step forward and my hope is that it offers reassurance to families as we look ahead to the new school year in August.'
The Sun
28-06-2025
- The Sun
I live in Britain's ‘WORST council house' with giant hole in ceiling, no carpet & disgusting graffiti daubed on walls
A MUM has said her family was left "terrified" after their council house ceiling started to cave in. Helen O'Kane's two young children were playing outside when the chaos unfolded at their home in Birmingham on June 19. 2 2 The mum's added that the gaff has been affected by a slew of other issues, making the family's living situation "depressing" and "horrible". She told BirminghamLive: "My youngest son is terrified of walking past. My oldest son is just as worried. "Even when I put them to bed at night, you can hear the floorboards creaking. "It's making me tired and sore, my eyes are itching because of the dust. It's depressing and you feel dirty. "I'm glad to have coffee mornings just to get out the house for a bit because it's horrible, I don't want to be here. "You've got no pride and it just gets you down. It doesn't do much for your confidence in life." A concern for the family is the cracked ceiling which is directly above the bedroom to four of her children. Before the ceiling started to collapse, Helen's boiler leaked last year, another issue on a house with a history. With graffiti on walls and wobbly floorboards, previous resident Dannii Canning referred to the "unliveable" property as an "absolute dump". 'The house was totally unlivable. I expected to replace some carpets or wallpaper, but nothing like that," Dannii said. Our posh village is now ghost town strewn with empty homes 'They can't expect someone to accept such a dump." Birmingham City Council paid the home a visit prior to the fateful incident and concluded that the property was safe and liveable. The mum flagged the issue with the home's ceiling again but said she was let down by the response. She added: "It's disappointing from the council. As a tenant, you just get used to it now. "You get a sense that you should be grateful because you have a roof over your head." A Birmingham City Council spokesperson said: 'We are aware of the ceiling issue at the property on Trescott Road and have been in contact with the resident. "A number of repairs have been raised this year, with significant work completed as recently as June to remove damaged plaster and make the area safe. 'The most recent visit took place on June 19, 2025, where the operative confirmed further plastering is required. "The area was made safe at that time, and a clean-up was carried out. "Follow-on repairs are currently scheduled for July, as the work requires a two-person team and a longer appointment slot. "We are actively exploring options to bring this date forward if possible. 'We will continue to monitor progress and work with our contractors to ensure the remaining repairs are completed as soon as possible.'
The Sun
25-06-2025
- The Sun
I have to knock down my swish bungalow because neighbours say it looks ‘alien' & breaches privacy… it's ridiculous
A DAD claims he faces homelessness after he was ordered to tear down a bungalow in his ex-wife's back garden in a planning row. Mark Jones, 55, spent £180,000 building the home in Sutton Coldfield but now has until the end of June to demolish the mini property. 5 5 5 He accused Birmingham City Council of "bullying" him and said he would move to Spain if it had to be bulldozed. He began the build without planning permission in March 2019, hoping his late father could move in. But his father died that October and Mark's daughter and her boyfriend used it during the pandemic before he moved in himself. But a neighbour had already complained and Mark was told by a council officer that he needed planning consent. Six years on, Mark, who initially believed he could build the bungalow under permitted development rules, has less than a fortnight to meet the demolition deadline having twice been refused planning permission and lost an appeal. He told BirminghamLive: 'We thought we could do permitted development, two bedrooms and a bathroom, and a dining room/living space. 'It was a separate building within the permitted development size. "But a planning officer came out and said I could not continue and needed planning permission." The planning officer initially came out in April 2019 - and the application was ultimately rejected in late 2019 and again in 2020. Mark added: "My dad died in October 2019. At the time, my daughter was training to be a paediatric nurse and moved into the bungalow with her boyfriend because of Covid. I came home to find my nightmare neighbour knocking down my DOOR – he claimed it was his right to do it 'We had a date to have the building down by March 14, 2022. We put our head in the sand.' Mark said he initially continued building despite his planning problems because his dad was gravelly ill and he was convinced he would eventually secure consent. His first application was rejected in October 2019, the same month he lost his father, because the "siting, design, appearance and plot layout would adversely affect the established mature character of the existing residential area". The development work continued with the roof and windows completed at the end of November. A second application - also refused - was submitted that month, for the retention of the bungalow with a kitchen/dining area, two bedrooms (both approximately 12 square metres), bathroom and a store. 5 5 There were three objections from residents raising parking issues, privacy and light concerns, and concerns from Walmley Ash Allotment Association. The residents said the building in a back garden was 'over-intensive', 'contrary to planning law' and would 'set a poor precedent for other home owners in the area'. Undeterred, Mark completed the internal works in June 2020 and appealed to The Planning Inspectorate. But in February 2021 inspector, Samuel Watson refused the 'backland' development. He said homes in Walmley Ash Road mainly featured undeveloped gardens and described the bungalow as 'alien '. In November 2021, Mark was told to take the bungalow down by March 14, 2022. He submitted a new permitted development certificate application for a single-storey outbuilding but that has yet to be decided. He said he was told even if it were granted, and he was convinced it should be, he would need to pull down the original bungalow and build it again. He said: 'We were told it's got to come down by the end of June.. The council is taking me to court. 'My ex-wife is a midwife and can't get a criminal record. The council is supposed to have done things it hasn't done." Mark added: 'It's bullying. It wants us to knock a house down that's perfectly reasonable. "From the street or a neighbour's garden, you wouldn't see anything. You can't see into windows. 'We back onto an allotment and I have offered to plant trees. There was a garage there before. 'The council made silly comments like it was not the right shape for the area. 'My dad was dying and the urgency was there. In all honesty, I wouldn't do it again.' 'Council should've put an enforcement notice to stop me building it' Mark claims the bungalow is "100 per cent within permitted development certificate limits" and pointed to the fact it doesn't have separate water or internet. He said: "We don't pay separate council tax. We can't have all three utilities until we have planning permission. 'Every single thing has been refused by Birmingham City Council. 'I don't want to knock it down. It's a waste of time and money. If I get the permitted development certificate, we are going to sell the house with an annex. 'The council should have put an enforcement on me to stop me building it. If I lose, I am moving to Spain and I will take the house down. 'Ultimately, I acknowledge I am at fault. However, I believe the council also bears significant responsibility due to the initial misguidance, followed by a severe lack of communication, support, and adherence to its own procedures.' A spokeswoman for Birmingham City Council said 'Mr Jones is currently in breach of the enforcement notice that was served to him in 2021, and we have given him ample time to comply with the notice by the end of June 2025. 'A decision will be made imminently on the lawful development certificate that Mr Jones has submitted, and a case officer will then be in contact with him to advise further.'
