logo
Dr Iqbal Survé: The Struggle Doctor Who Became a Global Voice for Justice and Transformation

Dr Iqbal Survé: The Struggle Doctor Who Became a Global Voice for Justice and Transformation

IOL News16-07-2025
In a world where leadership often falters, Dr Iqbal Survé emerges as a beacon of hope, advocating for economic justice and a new vision for South Africa. How does his journey redefine the essence of true leadership?
Image: Independent Media
In a world choking on crisis and crippled by false messiahs, principled leadership has become the rarest currency. Dr Iqbal Survé is not a politician, nor does he play to galleries. He is a product of the Struggle, a doctor of the people, and one of the few post-apartheid figures who understood early that freedom without economic justice is a betrayal. In an era where ego masquerades as leadership, Dr Survé represents something dangerously uncommon, clarity of purpose, moral courage, and the spine to act when it matters most.
South Africa, like much of the world, is trapped in a leadership vacuum, where opportunism has replaced vision, and moral conviction has been traded for political convenience and infighting, staggering youth unemployment, and a stalled economy have bled South Africa of its promise and left public trust in ruins. In such a climate, surrendering to despair becomes the easy choice, the default setting. But Dr Iqbal Survé refuses that descent. His life stands as a defiant counter-narrative, one that rejects passivity, demands purpose, and redefines what post-liberation leadership should be: morally unshakable, future-focused, and anchored in the real work of rebuilding a broken nation
Having witnessed apartheid's brutality up close, treating the tortured, the broken, the forgotten, Dr Iqbal Survé didn't retreat when political freedom was declared. He understood that the real struggle was only beginning. So, he pivoted with fierce intent toward economic justice, stepping into the lion's den of capital and building an empire not for ego, but for empowerment. At just 34 years old, he listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE), a bold move that defied the racial and financial barriers of the time.
He built Sekunjalo Investment Holdings into a multi-billion-dollar African group with more than 200 investments across 40 countries. Yet it is not the size of the portfolio that commands attention, it is the intent behind it. Dr Survé has consistently championed what he calls a 'gentler capitalism,' a value-driven model that puts people before profits, purpose before power.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
This approach challenges the extractive nature of global capitalism. It questions models that prioritise short-term shareholder gains over long-term societal health. In a country still scarred by the legacy of racial capitalism, his commitment to broad-based economic participation is a quiet revolution. He has opened doors where others have built walls.
We live in a nation where just a handful of families control the economy, banking sector, and dominant media platforms, relics of an economic apartheid that never truly ended, Dr Survé's call for redistributive justice is both radical and necessary. He does not seek to dismantle South Africa's economy, but to democratise it. And that, in today's captured system, is a subversive act.
Internationally, Dr Survé's leadership has been just as resolute. As Chair of the BRICS Business Council and a member of the World Economic Forum since 2007, he has emerged as a global voice for equity, sovereignty, a multipolar world order and speaks for a shared humanity. He is trusted by leaders like Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin, and Lula da Silva, Dr Survé represents the values of a post-colonial Global South still fighting for economic inclusion and narrative sovereignty.
In a world where history is repackaged by the powerful and truth is filtered through profit-driven newsrooms, Dr Iqbal Survé's Independent Media is more than a business, it's a frontline trench in the battle for memory. It defies corporate capture. It disrupts the comfort of revisionist lies. It insists that African voices narrate African realities, unfiltered, unbought, and unapologetic. In today's information war, that's not just journalism. That's resistance.
There's a heavy price for speaking truth in a country where power protects itself. Dr Survé has been dragged through courtrooms, vilified in headlines, and targeted by institutions. Yet, he does not run. He does not flinch and he refuses to be controlled. Because for him, leadership is not about safety, it's about standing guard over the soul of a nation, even when the cost is personal.
That, perhaps, is what truly separates him in this era of global chaos and moral exhaustion. While others chase power, he restores dignity. While many hoard influence, he builds people and his life's work is carved from conviction. It's what happens when intellect serves integrity, when global insight walks hand-in-hand with local accountability, and when legacy is defined not by how much you take — but by how deeply you give.
When Dr Survé spoke recently at a Cape Town conference about the Freedom Charter and Cuba's historic solidarity, it wasn't nostalgia, it was a moral intervention. He didn't invoke the past to romanticise it, but to remind this country of what it once stood for. His call was clear: South Africa needs a new national dialogue, not one choreographed by elites or boxed in by race and ideology, but one built around jobs, justice, and dignity. The basics. The non-negotiables.
In a country still haunted by unfinished freedom, Dr Survé stands as a reminder that freedom is not a destination but a practice, one that demands leaders with memory, backbone, imagination, and moral clarity. In an era that rewards populism over principle, we need leaders that offer a different path: one where values matter, where vision is bold, and where service is sacred.
South Africa stands at yet another turning point, and this time, slogans won't save us. We will rise or we will break, depending on whether our leaders have the spine to build with both heart and intellect. This country doesn't need empty charisma. It needs conviction. Leadership that doesn't just uplift, but lays the bricks for a future that works — for everyone.
* Adri Senekal de Wet is the Editor-in-Chief of Independent Media.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

G20 development leaders gather in Kruger for landmark meeting
G20 development leaders gather in Kruger for landmark meeting

The Citizen

time42 minutes ago

  • The Citizen

G20 development leaders gather in Kruger for landmark meeting

Mpumalanga proudly hosted a landmark global event, welcoming one of the key pillars of the G20 to African soil for the first time. The continent's inaugural G20 Development Working Group (DWG) Ministerial Meeting was held at the Skukuza Safari Lodge in the Kruger National Park from July 24 to 25. The meeting was led by South Africa's delegation, represented by Minister in the Presidency for Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, Maropene Ramokgopa, and Deputy Minister Seiso Mohai. Convened under the theme of South Africa's G20 presidency, 'Solidarity, Equality and Sustainability', the gathering brought together ministers responsible for development, senior officials from G20 member and invited countries and heads of international organisations. ALSO READ: Mpumalanga fresh produce market 'a white elephant' – DA spokesperson In her opening remarks, Ramokgopa highlighted the significance of hosting the DWG ministerial meeting on African soil, and emphasised the need for collective action to address global challenges. 'The challenges we face – from climate change and fragile supply chains and persistent inequality – cannot be solved in isolation. South Africa's G20 presidency is not just about hosting meetings. It's about shifting the centre of gravity in global dialogue, placing people and planet at the heart of development,' she said. Ramokgopa added that the meeting had achieved several landmark outcomes.'From tackling illicit finance to advancing inclusive social protection, these agreements reflect not only what we stand for, but what we stand to gain when we act together.' ALSO READ: Samsung Reveals Top 10 Schools Progressing to Finals of 2025 Solve For Tomorrow STEM Competition The Mpumalanga premier, Mandla Ndlovu, said the meeting also served as part of the build-up to the G20 Summit, scheduled for November. 'With our province's economy rooted in agriculture, mining and tourism, hosting events of this magnitude delivers a significant financial injection – stimulating local economic activity and creating much-needed jobs,' Ndlovu said. He added that the conversations held during the meeting would help shape global policy and place South Africa firmly in the historical spotlight, as the decisions taken here would resonate far beyond its borders.

What will our government try to tax next?
What will our government try to tax next?

The Citizen

time2 hours ago

  • The Citizen

What will our government try to tax next?

Despite the various taxes we pay, the government still can't get the job done properly. You've got to be ever so embarrassed when your country is on a taxing spree and still hasn't gotten to the Lebanese levels of creativity (they tried to tax WhatsApp once). What's strange is that our government seemingly wants more and more but we're getting less. There's a reason people have turned to solar and why people are using private refuse removal. When it was the duty of the governmental institution, they were pretty terrible at providing. Should we be punished further for that inadequacy? Thankfully, the courts in Gauteng thought not but what does it say for the authority to even try? It's pretty arrogant. 'Hey, we're not delivering. Give us more money so we cannot deliver some more, but better.' Even the English of it doesn't make sense. ALSO READ: Homeowners caught in solar registration grey zone At the same time, we're dealing with a bunch of corruption issues and while those implicated are laughing at the selected fall guy, they have the guts to think: 'Hmmmm a city cleaning levy sounds like a good idea.' Well, it's not a good idea. You're supposed to keep the city clean. It's part of your job. Rates and taxes are there for that and making use of the municipal services is what the public pays for. Take a moment to consider all the various taxes from fuel to VAT to income and if you're still holding on to your JSE shares after this tariff debacle, you're paying tax you didn't even know about on your dividends before the money reaches you. Sure, that goes to national and has different allocations but still, all that and the government can't even pick up the trash properly? That this is being proposed in different municipalities is an indication that there's a national discussion afoot and non-service clearly seems to be a national problem. So why can't they get the job done with the money they already have? Are things getting more expensive? Sure. We all feel that, but where we have to tighten our belts, those tasked with doing the job of budgeting, accountability and administration – otherwise known as governance – get away with putting on whatever fat they want and passing the costs onto ratepayers. That is quite a ridiculous notion so it's awesome that the court gave it the ridicule it deserved. ALSO READ: Court rules against City of Tshwane's cleaning levy It's easy to let these little things slip by as they creep up. What's a couple of hundred here and there? Thing is, for a country with exceptional unemployment and awful economic stagnation, a hundred bucks here is already a lot to ask for. Here and there will be debilitating to most. And government can argue it's targeting the people who buy houses in Cape Town for R150 million but then it needs to admit an even more embarrassing truth: the people who spend the big bucks on municipal rates can't even get the services they're paying for and need to fork out more on both tax and private service. C'mon. I know it's not a popular thing to be nice to the rich guys, but I don't think any municipal administrator will be satisfied if they order a bottle of Hennessy and are presented with a quarter full open bottle of Old Brown Sherry with lipstick marks on the tip, then told to pay an extra bottle kissing fee. ALSO READ: Court declares Joburg's non-sectional title refuse charge tariff unlawful This is exactly why subsidies, redistribution and ideals of transformation have to be strategically managed. Of course richer people take on more of the burden for the betterment of society, at least financially. That makes sense. What doesn't make sense is when you exclude them from that benefit by not offering the services that they pay for. You can't then be surprised when they opt out of the system. So, the government can't say it didn't see this coming. All it can say is that it was not prepared and had a hyperinflated sense of ego in this stupid game of chicken, expecting its public to just go along with its last-minute contingency.

Liberators in Dire Need of Political, Moral Cleansing
Liberators in Dire Need of Political, Moral Cleansing

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Liberators in Dire Need of Political, Moral Cleansing

(From left) Swapo president Nutembo Nandi-Ndaitwah, ANC president Cyril Ramaphosa and former Frelimo president Joaquim Chissano at a working dinner held at Mahlamba Ndlopfu, Pretoria on July 26, 2025. The ANC hosted a Liberation Movements Summit in Ekurhuleni, Gauteng on July 25-27, 2025. Image: GCIS Zamikhaya Maseti The ruling African National Congress convened a landmark Liberation Movements Summit from 25 to 27 July 2025, gathering six Southern African liberation parties including MPLA (Angola), SWAPO (Namibia), FRELIMO (Mozambique), ZANU PF (Zimbabwe), and CCM (Tanzania) to deliberate on the theme: 'Defending the Liberation Gains, Advancing Integrated SocioEconomic Development, Strengthening Solidarity for a Better Africa.' Conspicuously absent, however, was Zambia's United National Independence Party (UNIP), the liberation movement led by the late President Kenneth Kaunda. This party offered refuge to the exiled leadership of the African National Congress and embraced thousands of young South Africans who crossed borders to join the national liberation struggle against apartheid. The ANC, as a liberation movement, had its headquarters in Lusaka under the protection of UNIP, and the Zambian people sustained its operational lifeline. The organisers of the summit have not explained this omission, and it stands as a glaring historical oversight in any attempt to reconstruct the liberation narrative of Southern Africa. Any honest retelling of Southern Africa's liberation history is incomplete without recognising Zambia's indispensable role, under the leadership of the United National Independence Party (UNIP) and President Kenneth Kaunda. While not always armed with material abundance, Zambia carried the weight of regional liberation with unmatched moral clarity and unwavering solidarity. Lusaka was not just a geographical refuge for exiles; it was the beating heart of a pan-African revolutionary conscience, hosting the ANC's headquarters, training camps, political schools, and underground logistics. The Zambian people paid a heavy price, including economic sabotage, border raids by the apartheid regime, and relentless pressure from the West. Yet Kaunda's government never wavered. It chose principle over profit, and African unity over diplomatic convenience. That such a pivotal liberation movement was absent from this summit should not be taken lightly; it reflects a growing trend of selective memory that must be confronted if we are to truly reclaim and revitalise the liberation legacy. The summit made several significant resolutions. It reaffirmed support for the liberation of Western Sahara, condemned all forms of foreign domination and neocolonial interference, and called for deeper ideological and practical cooperation between liberation movements. The parties committed to revitalising South–South solidarity, advancing youth mobilisation and political education, and accelerating regional economic integration through shared development frameworks. In addition, the summit called for party-to-party diplomacy beyond state platforms, recognising the strategic value of liberation movements coordinating across borders to influence global governance, trade, and peace agendas. These resolutions, if translated into action, could mark a turning point, shifting these movements from commemorators of the past to architects of the African future. This was not a nostalgic gathering of revolutionaries trading memories over aged slogans. It was a solemn reaffirmation of purpose, a strategic recalibration of the post-colonial project amidst a volatile global order. What emerged was clear: the legacy of liberation is not a finished chapter; it is an unfinished struggle, and those who led us into freedom must now lead us into transformation. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The liberation movements in the Southern African region have not been able to dogwatch one another, to speak frankly, honestly, and without diplomatic pretence. At no point did SWAPO, FRELIMO, CCM, or MPLA rise with principled courage to say, for instance, to President Robert Mugabe, how you are governing Zimbabwe is unjust and unsustainable. The ANC, however, attempted what it called quiet diplomacy in Zimbabwe, urging the Zimbabwean leadership and people to resolve their problems internally and to avoid relying on externally imposed solutions. Unfortunately, that quiet diplomacy did not yield the desired results. The suppression of opposition parties and the stifling of democratic space persisted. This absence of honest, fraternal correction among liberation movements has weakened the moral centre of the liberation tradition itself. One hopes that this revived Party-to-Party diplomacy will correct that historical failure. It must not be reduced to celebratory declarations and performative solidarity. It must have political dog watching as a central tenet, a principled, fraternal mechanism through which liberation movements hold one another to the revolutionary values they once embodied: honesty, people-centred governance, democratic integrity, and moral courage. Not loyalty to incumbency, but loyalty to the people. The liberation movements must be brave enough to confront the objective reality of the evaporation of the liberation heritage. The fact of the matter is that across the African continent, the very parties that ushered in political freedom, that dismantled colonial rule, and held the dreams of the masses, are no longer the governing parties. In Ghana, the Convention People's Party (CPP) of Kwame Nkrumah, the first to proclaim African independence, has faded into political obscurity. In Zambia, UNIP, once the bastion of Southern African solidarity under Kenneth Kaunda, has been swept aside. In Kenya, KANU (Kenya African National Union), the liberation party of Jomo Kenyatta, has long ceded power. Here at home, the ANC of Nelson Mandela, once the symbol of global moral authority, has been partially dislodged from power. It now governs in coalition with its ideological and historical adversaries, a profound moment that should signal not a tactical adjustment, but a generational reckoning. The liberation movement, as we know it, stands at a precipice. The question these Parties must collectively ask is not cosmetic or electoral, it is existential: Why has this occurred? Why have the liberation movements, once cherished as the custodians of the people's hopes, been relegated to electoral decline, coalition compromise, and in some cases, outright irrelevance? And more importantly, what should be their collective response to this objective reality of downward swings, fractured mandates, and the political displacement of liberation itself? This is no longer a theoretical concern. It is an urgent summons for introspection, ideological recalibration, and coordinated strategic renewal across the continent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store