Government Turns Clock Back On Pay Equity For Teachers
'The integrity of the pay equity process is now being undermined by political interference. Every step in this process has met legal and procedural standards, and was conducted in good faith under an agreement with previous governments.'
PPTA Te Wehengarua is deeply disappointed by the Government's decision, announced today, to push through changes to the pay equity process that undermine the integrity of teachers' long-standing and evidence-based pay equity claim.
'This claim has followed a robust and agreed process between all parties,' said PPTA Te Wehengarua President Chris Abercrombie. 'We've conducted more than 300 interviews with teachers and comparator roles across the sector, using a consistent, agreed-upon tool to gather data. That evidence has been through consultation with both teachers and principals. To have the Government now walk away from that work is nothing short of disgraceful.'
The Government's announcement comes with no attempt to engage in a fair public process. 'The Minister's decision to bypass the select committee stage shows a lack of confidence in the public's response. This Government knows New Zealanders value fairness—and it's clearly afraid to face the backlash,' said Abercrombie.
Chris Abercrombie said the move sends a disturbing signal in the lead-up to teacher collective negotiations. 'This Government has made a choice—a deliberate choice not to value work that is predominantly done by women. It's a message to teachers, many of whom engaged in the claim process in good faith, that their contribution doesn't count. It feels like we've been sent back to the 1950s.
'The integrity of the pay equity process is now being undermined by political interference. Every step in this process has met legal and procedural standards, and was conducted in good faith under an agreement with previous governments.'
'This isn't just about teachers. This is about whether Aotearoa New Zealand is committed to addressing the historical undervaluation of women's work. This decision breaks faith with that commitment.'
Chris Abercrombie said the implications would be felt beyond the pay equity process. 'At a time of ongoing teacher shortages, this sends the worst possible message about how we treat and retain our workforce. It's also a blow to the trust teachers have in a process that was supposed to deliver justice and fairness. Our members are rightly angry.
'When delivering last year's budget and its completely unaffordable tax cuts, the Finance Minister said that her coalition government represented 'the parties of the worker.'
'No Government that was for the worker would treat this pay equity process – a process which goes to the heart of treating workers fairly – with such contempt. It's mean-spirited, unfair and just plain wrong.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Emergency Management Minister on tsunami warnings
The Emergency Management Minister is pleased with Aotearoa's response to the tsunami warnings, but is expecting the text alert glitch to be taken seriously. Mark Mitchell spoke to Charlotte Cook.
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Health And Safety Regulations To Support Science And Technology
Hon Brooke van Velden Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden is consulting on proposed changes to health and safety regulations to better support innovation in New Zealand's science and technology sector. 'As part of the wider health and safety reforms, we're clearing the way for scientific progress by reducing complexity and making it easier to understand what's required,' says Ms van Velden. 'We've heard that the current regulations don't match what university laboratories do, creating unnecessary compliance challenges. Researchers and innovators need a system that supports their work, not one that stands in the way.' I am proposing a change that aims to match hazardous substances requirements for university laboratories as well as science and technology laboratories with their actual risk. Current regulations require flammable substance laboratories to be on the ground floor. However, universities often place them on upper levels to improve fire safety and security, keeping evacuation routes clear and limiting access to hazardous materials. This approach, supported by Fire and Emergency New Zealand, does not align with how the regulations are currently written. 'I'm developing these changes to ensure they are practical and effectively support New Zealand's science and technology sector. This includes assessing whether the current laboratory design and hazardous substances storage requirements work for their laboratories. 'We'll be consulting directly with the university laboratories and science and technology laboratories. I intend to complete these changes by mid-2026.' Another key change already being consulted on aims to remove regulatory barriers to the development and use of hydrogen technologies. 'We're planning to update the rules to support the safe development and use of hydrogen technologies in a way that's flexible, future-proofed, and internationally aligned.' Officials have already conducted targeted consultation, and now we're opening it more widely to ensure all interested stakeholders have the opportunity to share their feedback. Because the current safety requirements were not developed with hydrogen in mind, they are now preventing the safe development and use of hydrogen technologies. Key changes being consulted on include: Enabling the use of hydrogen storage containers that are already in common use overseas. Establishing safety requirements for cryogenic liquid hydrogen. Introducing safety requirements for hydrogen filling stations and dispensers. 'Hydrogen technologies could transform sectors from transport to manufacturing, and these changes will help unlock that potential by removing regulatory barriers.' These changes support the Government's 2024 Hydrogen Action Plan by creating an enabling regulatory environment for hydrogen development while maintaining safety. The changes are expected to be completed by mid-2026. 'Once agreed, these updates will remove unnecessary complexity and ensure the regulatory system better supports scientific research and emerging technologies,' says Ms van Velden. 'These changes will save time and costs for businesses and workers as we cut red tape to make it easier to do business. When our Kiwi businesses thrive, there are more jobs and lower prices for all New Zealanders.' Notes: · These changes are part of the wider health and safety reform, which delivers on the ACT-National Coalition Agreement commitment to reform health and safety laws and regulations. · A summary of all the changes and major milestones:
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
Balancing Risk With Overreach In Our Terror Laws
The government wants to tighten our terror laws, but critics fear it will mean a corresponding trampling of advocacy groups and free speech. The government is eyeing an overhaul of the country's terrorism legislation, which is necessary, it says, to keep New Zealanders safe in a rapidly evolving world and keep pace with modern threats. However, critics are warning that the move could come at a steep price, specifically a loss of civil liberties. The proposed changes, still in the closed-door consultation phase with a handpicked selection of groups and experts, would give police and intelligence agencies broader powers to intervene earlier, redefine what constitutes a "terrorist act" and expand preventative detention powers, all in the name of public safety. Today, The Detail spoke with Newsroom national affairs editor Sam Sachdeva and University of Waikato terrorism and firearms expert Alexander Gillespie about the potential changes to the Terrorism Suppression Act and how the government will balance risk without resorting to overreach. "What this is really about is are our current terror laws fit for purpose, and where do we draw the line between dealing with the very real threat that is posed by terrorist groups and terrorists, while still preserving the fundamental political freedoms and rights and liberties that all New Zealanders hold dear," Sachdeva told The Detail. He said critics, worried that those freedoms and rights are now at risk, are fired up. "Look, they are. We have seen the Council for Civil Liberties, [and] the Free Speech Union has now come out as well, expressing some concern about this. "So, it's early stages, but it seems like it's something that could quite easily animate or light a fire under a lot of these rights groups who are concerned." The terror law, enacted in 2002 following the 11 September terror attacks, allows governments to formally designate people or groups as terrorist entities, freezing their assets and making it illegal to financially support, recruit for, or participate in a designated terrorist entity. Minor changes were made after the 15 March terror attack in 2019 and the New Lynn Countdown Supermarket attack in 2021. Sachdeva said among the new potential changes are making membership of a terrorist entity a criminal offence, creating new offences to capture public expressions of support for a terrorist act or designated entities - including showing insignia - and modernising definitions for terms like "material support" to capture new online forms of support. Extending the renewal period for terrorist designations to five years, from three at present, is also being considered. The government said there will be safeguards and judicial oversight. The proposed changes are expected to go before Parliament later this year. Gillespie, speaking to The Detail from Vienna, where he is working on gun reforms, said the threat of a terror attack has long lingered in New Zealand, and while the likelihood of another attack will never be zero, the risk can be lowered. "Part of reducing that risk is making sure the law is as good as it can be. That the balance between civil liberties and risk is correct. And that we have proportionate penalties for those who are willing to advocate the use of violence against civilians to change policy. "I support looking at it... I think it's foreseeable that the tensions in our society are going to be around for the foreseeable future. And to make sure they are fit for purpose, because when I look back at recent times, our laws weren't fit for purpose, and now we need to be thinking, 'what more can we do?'." While the debate on security versus liberty and protection versus principle will undoubtedly continue, one thing is certain -in the fight against terror, New Zealand is searching for a line, but it will not be easy to draw. here.
