Iranian-American group slams arrests of Iranian immigrants in the US
The National Iranian American Council (NIAC) on Thursday called on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to end its "outrageous targeting of individuals on the basis of their Iranian heritage" after an increase in the number of Iranian immigrants taken away to detention centers for deportation.
'In the wake of U.S. military strikes on Iran on Saturday, the Department of Homeland Security has engaged in racial profiling and indiscriminate mass arrests of Iranians across the country, all under the guise of 'national security,'" NIAC said in a statement.
Fox News reported that more than 130 Iranian nationals have been detained in the past week, with 670 Iranians now held in ICE custody nationwide.
'As with all broad and racially motivated enforcement actions, everyday people suffer the most. Among those targeted is 64-year-old Donna Kashanian of Louisiana, who has lived in the United States for 47 years and is married to an American citizen," the statement continued.
'Like many Iranian Americans, those arrested often came to the U.S. in search of opportunity and freedom from an authoritarian government. Now, their mere identity now appears to be grounds for arrest in the so-called 'land of the free'".
NIAC said it is demanding ICE release "all those who are being unjustly detained".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gulf Today
15 hours ago
- Gulf Today
California residents fearful amid immigration raids
Jackie Ramirez has always been aware of the colour of her skin. There was the school crossing guard who nicknamed her 'morenita,' little brown girl. The uncle who affectionately called her 'paisita,' a country girl. But never has skin colour felt so top of mind than this month, as immigration agents have descended on Southern California, conducting hundreds of arrests. Videos and stories have circulated of people arrested at car washes. Agents picking up street vendors without warrants. A Latino US citizen was asked what hospital he was born in. The heightened fear that kicks in for those 'driving while Black' is widely known. But the recent immigration sweeps have underscored how much of an issue skin colour — and all the circumstances that attach to it — is for Latinos as well. Ramirez was born and raised in East Los Angeles. Her mother was born in Mexico; her father is of Mexican descent. 'You're scared to be brown,' said Ramirez, a Los Angeles radio host for 'The Cruz Show' on Real 92.3. 'You're scared to look a certain way right now.' The Department of Homeland Security has denied that agents are racially profiling. Agency spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin has called claims of people being targeted because of skin colour 'disgusting and categorically FALSE.' But that hasn't quelled concerns that darker-skinned people will be more likely to be stopped by immigration enforcement agents. Latino parents are warning their US citizen children to be careful when they leave the house. Some have taken to carrying their passports in their pockets. Workers at a coffee shop in Santa Ana tell customers, 'Se cuiden' — take care of yourselves — and ask loved ones to text when they get home. Even light-skinned Latinos have expressed concerns. Franchesca Olivas, 24, recently drove two hours from Hemet, in Riverside County, for a protest in downtown LA. She said she drives her dad around 'because he's full Mexican, and I'm half-white,' and he's fearful of getting stopped. 'I'm a white-passing, third-generation Latina and I'm scared,' Taylor Tieman, a lawyer from Los Angeles' South Bay area posted on Instagram Threads. 'To my brothers and sisters — I'm so sorry. This country is failing you.' In another post that has since garnered more than 8,000 likes, Nico Blitz, Ramirez's fiance, who is Filipino American, stressed the impact of the raids across racial and ethnic lines. 'Filipinos — your legal status doesn't mean you're not brown, especially in the eyes of ICE,' Blitz, a DJ host on 'The Cruz Show,' posted. 'This fight isn't exclusive to Latinos and Black people.' Studies show that skin colour has long affected the lives of Latinos — and others — in the US. Among the disadvantages linked to having darker skin are less income, lower socioeconomic status and more health problems. A majority of US Latinos — 62% — surveyed by Pew Research Center in 2021 said they felt having a darker skin colour hurt their ability to get ahead. And 57% said skin colour shapes their daily life experiences a lot or some, with about half saying discrimination based on race or skin colour is a 'very big problem' in the US. But amid President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, skin colour has added another layer of fear. In January, Native Americans alleged that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were harassing tribal members. A letter sent by nine congressional Democrats to Trump stated they had heard 'several concerning reports' regarding the detention and harassment. 'Native American Tribal members are United States citizens. Stopping people because of what they look like — with dark skin, Asian, Latino or Native American characteristics is never acceptable,' the letter stated. 'ICE's dangerous behavior of harassing American citizens, seemingly only due to the way they look, is unconstitutional and un-American.' This year, ICE agents mistakenly detained a deputy US marshal in Tucson, Arizona, because he 'fit the general description of a subject being sought by ICE,' according to a statement from a US Marshals Service spokesperson. The agency did not identify the deputy US marshal or what description he fit. The deputy US marshal's identity was confirmed by other law enforcement officers 'and he exited the building without incident,' the statement read. As immigration agents increased the pace of arrests across Southern California in early June, LA County Supervisor Hilda Solis released a statement informing constituents that people were being targeted 'based on their skin colour and the type of work they do.' Solis, whose mother immigrated from Nicaragua and her father from Mexico, said she's 'never felt so under siege.' 'It is an attack, not just on our immigrant community, but (on) people of colour,' Solis said in an interview. 'I know there are many people, including folks I'm associated with, friends, colleagues, who have families who are mixed status, and people are petrified to even show up to work, to send their kids to school. And this is harming our economy.' Solis noted that during the height of the COVID pandemic, Asians were being targeted based on how they looked. 'Now it's Latinos,' she said. On a recent weekday, Martin Chairez, a minister at a church in Santa Ana, was walking with his sons when he stopped to take photos of the National Guard troops posted outside the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and Courthouse in Orange County. He had taken his sons there to pray for the community. Chairez was born in the Mexican state of Nayarit and came to the US when he was 9. He was a so-called Dreamer, one of millions of immigrants brought to this country before they turned 16. And he benefited from the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which allowed such young people, who were undocumented, to work, travel and get higher education legally. Chairez has been married for 20 years, but he said his wife couldn't petition for him to obtain legal status until their 11th wedding anniversary. He's now a lawful permanent resident. While working as a director at a border programme in Tijuana, Chairez said, he saw asylum-seekers and refugees coming from Haiti, Ukraine, South America and Central America. 'It's quite revealing that no one from Ukraine, no one from Russia is being detained and deported — and they shouldn't be. They also came here fleeing war and seeking opportunity,' Chairez said, his hands on his hips. 'I think it's revealing that people from Central and South America are being targeted but people from Europe are not,' he said. 'And again, they shouldn't be, but neither should the people from South and Central America.' Chairez's wife is Black and his 14- and 12-year-old sons are biracial. When they get older and learn how to drive, he said, he'll have to have those conversations with them 'of what it means to drive while being a Black man.' 'Now that has extended, not just to those situations, but it's applying to almost every aspect of our lives,' he said. 'When we go to the grocery store, when we go shopping, when we're out here taking a walk, are we going to be targeted? It seems like we're now in a permanent posture of vulnerability, and that shouldn't be. That's not just.'


Sharjah 24
19 hours ago
- Sharjah 24
Iran holds state funeral for top brass slain in war with Israel
The proceedings started at 8:00 am local time (0430 GMT) in the capital Tehran as government offices and many businesses were closed on Saturday for the occasion. "The ceremony to honour the martyrs has officially started," state TV said, showing footage of thousands of people donning black clothes, waving Iranian flags and holding pictures of the slain military commanders. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, along with other senior government officials and military commanders, including Esmail Qaani, head of the Quds Force, the foreign operations arm of the Revolutionary Guards, also attended the event. Images showed coffins draped in Iranian flags and bearing portraits of the deceased commanders in uniform near Enghelab (Revolution) Square in central Tehran, where the march began.


Dubai Eye
20 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Trump victorious again as US Supreme Court wraps up its term
The US Supreme Court on the last day of rulings for its current term gave Donald Trump his latest in a series of victories at the nation's top judicial body, one that may make it easier for him to implement contentious elements of his sweeping agenda as he tests the limits of presidential power. With its six conservative members in the majority and its three liberals dissenting, the court on Friday curbed the ability of judges to impede his policies nationwide, resetting the power balance between the federal judiciary and presidents. The ruling came after the Republican president's administration asked the Supreme Court to narrow the scope of so-called "universal" injunctions issued by three federal judges that halted nationally the enforcement of his January executive order limiting birthright citizenship. The court's decision has "systematically weakened judicial oversight and strengthened executive discretion," said Paul Rosenzweig, an attorney who served in Republican President George W. Bush's administration. Friday's ruling said that judges generally can grant relief only to the individuals or groups who brought a particular lawsuit. The decision did not, however, permit immediate implementation of Trump's directive, instead instructing lower courts to reconsider the scope of the injunctions. The ruling was authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, one of three conservative justices who Trump appointed during his first term in office from 2017-2021. Trump has scored a series of victories at the Supreme Court since returning to office in January. These have included clearing the way for his administration to resume deporting migrants to countries other than their own without offering them a chance to show the harms they could face and ending temporary legal status held by hundreds of thousands of migrants on humanitarian grounds. The court also permitted to let Trump's administration withhold payment to foreign aid groups for work already performed for the government, allowed his firing of two Democratic members of federal labour boards to stand for now, and backed his Department of Government Efficiency in two disputes. "President Trump secured the relief he sought in most of his administration's cases," George Mason University law school professor Robert Luther III said. "Justice Barrett's opinion is a win for the presidency," Luther said of the decision on nationwide injunctions. Once again, as with many of the term's major decisions, the three liberal justices found themselves in dissent, a familiar position as the court under the guidance of Chief Justice John Roberts continues to shift American law rightward. The rulings in favour of Trump illustrate that "the court's three most liberal justices are proving less relevant now than at any earlier point in the Roberts Court with respect to their impact on its jurisprudence," Luther said. The cases involving Trump administration policies this year came to the court as emergency filings rather than through the normal process, with oral arguments held only in the birthright litigation. And those arguments did not focus on the legality of Trump's action but rather on the actions of the judges who found that it was likely unconstitutional. "One theme is the court's struggle to keep pace with a faster-moving legal world, especially as the Trump administration tests the outer boundaries of its powers," Boston College Law School professor Daniel Lyons said.