FDA requires updated warning about rare heart risk with COVID shots
Myocarditis, a type of heart inflammation that is usually mild, emerged as a complication after the first shots became widely available in 2021. Prescribing information from both Pfizer and Moderna already advises doctors about the issue.
In April, the FDA sent letters to both drugmakers asking them to update and expand the warnings to add more detail about the problem and to cover a larger group of patients. While the FDA can mandate label changes, the process is often more of a negotiation with companies.
Specifically, the new warning lists the risk of myocarditis as 8 cases per 1 million people who got the 2023-2024 COVID shots between the ages of 6 months and 64 years old. The label also notes that the problem has been most common among males ages 12 to 24. The previous label said the problem mostly occurs in 12- to 17-year-olds.
The FDA's labeling change appears to conflict with some prior findings of scientists elsewhere in the U.S. government.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention previously concluded there was no increased risk of myocarditis detected in government vaccine injury databases for COVID-19 shots dating back to 2022. Officials also noted that cases tend to resolve quickly and are less severe than those associated with COVID-19 infection itself, which can also cause myocarditis.
The FDA announcement came as new vaccine advisers appointed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. met to debate the continuing use of COVID-19 vaccines for key groups, including pregnant women. It's the first meeting of the CDC advisory panel since Kennedy abruptly dismissed all 17 members of the group, naming a new panel that includes several members with a history of anti-vaccine statements.
The FDA's label update is the latest step by officials working under Kennedy to restrict or undercut use of vaccines. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary and a top deputy recently restricted annual COVID-19 shots to seniors and other Americans at higher risk from the virus. They've also suggested seasonal tweaks to match the latest circulating virus strains are new products that require extra testing.
Outside experts said the new warning is the wrong approach.
'They are right to suggest that we need to consider myocarditis risks associated with the vaccine, but what they propose is exactly the wrong solution,' said Dr. Robert Morris, a public health specialist at the University of Washington. 'We should be investigating who is prone to myocarditis to see if we can predict and mitigate that risk.'
Makary and several other FDA officials gained prominence during the pandemic by suggesting the federal government exaggerated the benefits of COVID-19 boosters and downplayed serious side effects, including myocarditis.
Before joining the government, Makary and two of his current FDA deputies wrote a 2022 paper that said mandating booster shots in young people would cause more vaccine-related injuries than prevented hospitalizations from COVID-19 infections. The conclusion contradicted that of many leading vaccine and public health experts at the time, including at the CDC.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
30 minutes ago
- Newsweek
The Bulletin June 21, 2025
The rundown: The issue of animal testing is something most Americans agree on: it needs to change and gradually be stopped. Since President Donald Trump began his second term, his administration has been making moves to transform and reduce animal testing in country. Find out what steps are being taken. Why it matters: In April, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said that its animal testing requirement will be "reduced, refined, or potentially replaced" with a range of approaches, including artificial intelligence-based models, known as New Approach Methodologies or NAMs data. The Trump administration's efforts to tackle the issue of animal testing appear to be a step in the right direction, according to experts who spoke with Newsweek. Read more in-depth coverage: Over 300 Animals Removed From US Safari After Decade of Red Flags TL/DR: Millions of animals each year are killed in U.S. laboratories as part of medical training and chemical, food, drug and cosmetic testing. What happens now? A Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) official told Newsweek: "The agency is paving the way for faster, safer, and more cost-effective treatments for American patients.' Deeper reading How Animal Testing in US Could Be Transformed Under Trump
Vox
an hour ago
- Vox
Ultra-processed foods: A patriotic American tradition!
covers health for Vox, guiding readers through the emerging opportunities and challenges in improving our health. He has reported on health policy for more than 10 years, writing for Governing magazine, Talking Points Memo, and STAT before joining Vox in 2017. Eating a hot dog on July Fourth isn't just traditional. It's patriotic. From iconic red, white, and blue rocket pops (hello, Red Dye 40!) to nitrate-loaded hot dogs and the all-day parade of sugary drinks and alcohol, this quintessential American holiday is a celebration of freedom — and, often, dietary chaos. And yet these days, many of us seem to be having second thoughts about the American diet. Our food is too processed, too loaded with dyes and preservatives. The country's obesity and diabetes epidemics, which have led to an explosion in the diagnoses of related chronic health conditions, have put the issue front and center, with much of the blame being placed on what we eat and all of the additives and preservatives it contains. About half of US adults believe food additives and chemicals are a large or moderate risk to their health — higher than the perceived risks of infectious disease outbreaks or climate change, according to a recent poll from Ipsos, a global market research firm. We all worry about microplastics, nitrates, food dyes, and ultra-processed foods. And US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has made improving Americans' diets and our food supply a top priority. It's a policy emphasis that's popular with the public: Two-thirds of US adults believe artificial dyes and pesticides make our foods unsafe to eat — and these are opinions that transcend political leanings, according to Ipsos. Related 40 maps that explain food in America And regardless of our entrenched food system, people are trying to make healthier decisions in their daily lives: 64 percent of US adults say they pay more attention to food labels than they did five years ago, according to the public health nonprofit NSF International. But we are frustrated: Only 16 percent of Americans say they find claims on food labels trustworthy. It may sound unbelievable on a holiday when Americans will gladly stuff their faces with ultra-processed junk while wearing flag-laden paraphernalia, but these days, many of us actually wish the products in our grocery stores looked a little more like the ones across the Atlantic. Just 37 percent of American adults said in the NSF International survey that our food labeling was better than in other countries. Most Americans say they want changes to how foods at our grocery stores are labeled. American food really is different from what can be found in Europe, both in its substance and in its packaging. But while we're probably not doing any favors to our health by consuming ultraprocessed foods loaded with artificial ingredients that are banned elsewhere, the biggest source of our health woes isn't necessarily these artificial dyes and preservatives. It's the cholesterol and saturated fat in that hot dog, the sugar in that lemonade, and those ultra-processed potato chips. Americans consume about twice as much sugar as other rich countries do on average, eat more ultra-processed foods, and consume more trans and saturated fats than Europeans. We also eat enormous portions, and calories, no matter where they come from, are a big part of the problem. Americans are generally in poorer health than our peers in Europe, and US life expectancy continues to trail behind other wealthy countries. Rich Americans actually fare worse than poor Europeans, according to one study. A new era of American greatness starts at the picnic table this July Fourth. Yes, we ostensibly rebelled against an English monarchy in order to be able to do whatever we want, even eat whatever we want. But if we want to catch up to our European rivals again in how healthy we feel, how productive we are, and how long we live — we need to take a closer look at the stuff we're putting in our bodies. American food really does have different stuff in it Doctors widely agree that ultra-processed foods and food additives are bad for children's health. Yet they have become more and more readily available over the decades: One 2023 study found 60 percent of the food that Americans buy has additives, a 10 percent increase since 2001. Kennedy, the head of the Department of Health and Human Services, the country's top health agency, has made overhauling US food production a top priority. His department's recent MAHA report highlights steps taken by other countries, including France and the Nordic countries, to discourage people through their dietary guidelines from eating ultra-processed foods. The report lists several additives and artificial ingredients that are permitted in American food but are banned or heavily restricted across the pond. Kennedy suggests that the US should follow suit. So where might we begin? Let's start with Red Dye 40, the color additive found in foods such as Froot Loops and M&Ms that has been linked to hyperactivity in children and, according to some animal studies, has been shown to accelerate tumor growth in mice. The US has not placed any special requirements on Red Dye 40, aside from its listing alongside other ingredients. But the European Union has required a clear warning label on any food with the dye, and some countries (including Germany, France, and Denmark) have banned it outright. A similar warning could be adopted here. There are other additives casually lurking in American foods that have been restricted in other countries. Here are a few: Titanium dioxide: Another food coloring that can be added to candies like Skittles and coffee creamers for a bright white effect. The EU banned it in 2022 because of Another food coloring that can be added to candies like Skittles and coffee creamers for a bright white effect. The EU banned it in 2022 because of evidence it could affect the human body's genetic material, while the US continues to allow its use. Propyl paraben: This preservative is regarded as safe in the US, often This preservative is regarded as safe in the US, often added to mass-produced American baked goods such as Sara Lee cinnamon rolls or Weight Watchers lemon creme cake. But its use has been prohibited in the EU because of research indicating it could mess with hormone function. Butylated hydroxytoluene: Another preservative that's sometimes added to breakfast cereals and potato chips to extend their shelf life. It's generally regarded as safe for use in the United States despite evidence that it could compromise kidney and liver function and Another preservative that's sometimes added to breakfast cereals and potato chips to extend their shelf life. It's generally regarded as safe for use in the United States despite evidence that it could compromise kidney and liver function and concerns that it could cause cancer. In the EU, however, its use is subject to strict regulation. There are some artificial sweeteners, too — aspartame, sucralose, and saccharin — that are permitted in the US and the EU, but generally, Europe puts many more restrictions on unhealthy artificial ingredients than the US does. Kennedy is pledging he'll do something about it. His biggest win so far is securing voluntary commitments from food manufacturers to remove a variety of artificial dyes — yes, including Red Dye 40 — from their products before the end of 2026. If they fail to comply, he has suggested new regulations to put a limit on or outright prohibit certain substances of concern. But are these ingredients the most important problem with our July Fourth cookouts? They are part of the issue. But there's more to it. The real problem is the American diet, dyed or not Here's a revealing comparison: In 2018, the United States banned trans fats, an artificial ingredient derived from oils that has been linked to heart disease and diabetes — 15 years after Denmark did the same thing. For more than a decade, Americans kept eating a ton of trans fat — something that is so bad for you that it can simultaneously increase bad cholesterol while lowering good cholesterol. While that is probably not the entire reason that the US has double the obesity and diabetes rates as Denmark does, it is a telling example. A fatty and highly processed ingredient that is linked to two of the biggest health problems in the United States persisted for years in American food, long after the Europeans had wised up. It's a pattern that, across the decades, explains the enormous gulf between the typical American's diet and the Mediterranean diet that dominates much of Europe. During the 20th century, amid an explosion in market-driven consumerism, convenience became one of the most important factors for grocery shoppers. Americans wanted more meals that could be quickly prepared inside the microwave and dry goods that could last for weeks and months on a pantry shelf, and so these products gained more and more of a market share. But that meant that more American food products were laced with more of the preservatives and additives that are now drawing so much concern. Americans have also always eaten more meat, cheese, and butter, animal products high in saturated fats as opposed to the unsaturated fats that come from oils like olive oil and are more common in European diets, for years. Our meat obsession was turbocharged by a meat industry that tapped into patriotic sentiments about pioneering farms making their living off the frontier. Eating a diet with more animal products is associated with a long list of health problems, particularly the cardiovascular conditions that remain the biggest killers of Americans. Related What the MAHA movement gets wrong about meat We should push our policymakers to pass regulations that get rid of artificial additives, but that alone is insufficient. You can find too much fat and too much sugar around the picnic table. Some of it is unnatural, but plenty of it is. America has to figure out how to encourage people to eat low-fat, low-sugar, whole-food diets. That's the real path to better health. MAHA has some good ideas. Its emphasis on whole foods, not processed ones, is a step in the right direction. But Kennedy's prescriptions are contradictory: Kennedy wants to make it easier for people to find whole foods at their nearby store, while Republicans in Congress propose massive cuts to food stamps. Kennedy's MAHA report rails against the overuse of pesticides, but Trump's Environmental Protection Agency is rolling back restrictions on their use. Those contradictions are a reminder that, though Kennedy has shone a light on a worthwhile issue, we can't and we shouldn't expect the government to fix our food problems all on its own. This is America, after all, where we pride ourselves on individualism.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
A predictable day of 'horrific injuries': Doctors dread the Fourth of July
Data shows several Americans died from fireworks injuries and more than thousands were injured last year. The Fourth of July is anything but celebratory in the Emergency Room. Every year, doctors amputate fingers and hands damaged by fireworks. They try to save eyes. And sometimes they have to deliver the worst news imaginable to loved ones. That's the warning – and the cold hard truth – from doctors who are bracing for another busy Independence Day. Dr. Nicolas Lee had already amputated the hands of two boys who lost them to firework injuries the week before Fourth of July. He expects to see many more in the coming week. "These are effectively bombs people are holding in their hands," said Lee, a professor of clinical orthopedic surgery at the University of California San Francisco who directs a hand reconstruction program. "We see hands and fingers blown off, groin injuries, facial burns and damage. I've had kids blow off their eyelids so they can't close their eyes." Even though fireworks are legal in much of the nation and sold widely, they are dangerous and deserve care and respect, said Dr. Jeffrey Goodloe. He's already seen burns, lacerations and hand injuries from people holding fireworks. "They're like military battle wounds," said Goodloe, an emergency room physician in Tulsa, Oklahoma who's also vice president for communication for the American College of Emergency Physicians. "These are horrific injuries. People just don't realize that even publicly available fireworks pack enough punch to rip a finger or a hand off." Last year, 11 Americans died from fireworks injuries and more than 14,700 were treated in emergency rooms, according to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. In more than one-third of cases, the injuries were burns to the hands and fingers or head, face and ears. It's not just big rockets that hurt people. Last year, there were an estimated 1,700 emergency room injuries that only involved sparklers. One wrong move can change a person's life – and those people tend to be young. Almost a quarter of injuries are among people between 15- and 24-years-old and most are men. "I don't remember ever having a woman, it's always been young men," said Lee. 'We're going to see a lot of people who completely changed their lives because they made one simple, bad decision and now either they've lost a hand, they've lost their eyes, they've lost another appendage, or worse,' said Dr. Arvin Akhavan, an emergency medicine physician at the University of Washington. What are the most common firework injuries? The most common injury these doctors see is to the hands. "I've seen a number of people where the firework went off in their hand while they were holding it. Either they didn't have time to set it down or they were thinking they were going to aim it. But it blew up," said Goodloe. The hand literally blows apart, said Lee. The joints, bones, ligaments and skin are disrupted or destroyed by the blast. The most common digit to lose is the thumb. "That's 40% of your hand function," he said. "If it's really bad, the hand looks like a starfish. The fingers, the thumb, all the joints are dislocated and it just splays out," Lee said. "We try to save as many fingers as we can, we try to at least give you something to pinch with," he said. "But sometimes it requires amputation." There are also often facial burns, lacerations and injuries as people peer at fireworks. It's not uncommon for people to lose an eye. "I would love to show you actual photos of what happens, but it's too gruesome," said Chelsea Boe, a hand and microvascular surgeon at the University of Washington in Seattle. There are also groin injuries, if people are either sitting while they're lighting the device, or if they drop it and the blast radiates up towards them. Some injuries are to the solid organs in the core or to the head. "There are people who try to launch them off the top of their head or their chest," Lee said. For people setting off fireworks near shorelines or beaches, Lee has also seen injuries from sand that's cast up by the strength of the explosion. "The sand becomes thousands of little projectiles. It can get embedded in your skin, in your eyes, in your face. It's like getting a tattoo," he said. "It's hard to get out – you can't make that many micro incisions. So often you just have to leave it in." Fireworks safety tips The doctors who spend thousands of hours trying to save fingers, hands, eyes and other damage wish – fervently – that people would take a moment to think before they touch fireworks. "It's gunpowder with a fuse. They go off with unbelievable force and it goes right through the tissues," said Boe. "A lot of time, it's unsupervised kids. Or it's young men and boys who get together with their friends," she said. "They may or may not be drinking or using other substances. They may not be making the best decisions." Here's a few important tips: The damage Lee sees in the operating room is awful – and unnecessary. "It's so devastating and these injuries are entirely preventable," he said. "I hope this (article) can help at least one person from suffering this way." Can fingers be re-attached? In the movies, a person might light a firecracker and blow off a finger cleanly. They stick it in a bucket of ice, race off to the hospital, and it all gets sewn back together. Reality is not so forgiving. "In very few cases, even with a very skilled hand surgeon, are you going to be able to reimplant a finger," said Goodloe. The injuries are rarely clean and neat and the amount of damage to the digit is considerable. "The reality is that when your finger gets blown off, you've permanently lost your finger," he said. When do firework injuries occur? While many injuries occur on the actual Fourth of July, the two weeks before the holiday and the two weeks after are very busy in emergency rooms, as people start to play with fireworks they've purchased or want to set off fireworks they had leftover from the holiday. "For hand surgeons, this is our holiday in the worst possible way," said Boe. It's even worse when the Fourth of July happens near a weekend, as it does this year, because people are more likely to make a weekend of it – and to party and drink. At the University of Washington, which is the main trauma unit for the Seattle region, they saw close to 50 people who required firework injury-related surgery in the four days after the Fourth. "We do a huge amount of preparation. We have extra teams available, extra operating rooms. We cancel elective surgeries, we try to have extra anesthesia teams available," she said. "It's almost like we're triaging for a mass casualty event."
