Minority government: Why Carney's Liberals will need help to pass laws
It took some time, but CBC has finally made a call.
Mark Carney's Liberal Party won a minority government in the Canadian election on April 28, according to our projections.
That means he will need help from other political parties to pass laws.
While it was clear on election night that the Liberals had won, it took a while to determine the final seat count.
The final seat count is what determines whether a political party has won the majority — or most of — the available 343 seats.
In this case, the Liberals didn't quite get there.
It took time for the CBC to make the final decision because people who work for Elections Canada were still counting ballots on Tuesday and some races were too close to call.
Here are the projected results as of 4 p.m. ET on April 29, according to CBC:
Why did it take so long?
According to Elections Canada, there are several reasons it took so long to count all of the ballots.
The high number of people who showed up to vote, combined with an increase in the number of people voting by mail (special ballot) and in advance polls, meant that officials needed more time to complete the count.
At about 4:30 a.m. ET on April 29, elections staff stopped counting ballots. They started again later that day.
WATCH — Here's how Canadian elections work
What's a minority?
There are two types of governments in Canada: majority or minority.
A majority government happens when a political party wins the majority of seats in the House of Commons. For this election, a party needed at least 172 of the 343 seats available.
The Liberals formed a minority because they won fewer than 172 seats.
As of 4 p.m. ET on April 29, the Liberals had only won 169, according to CBC projections.
Justin Trudeau wins minority government in 2021
In order for a government to stay in power, it needs the majority of members of Parliament (MPs) to support it.
A minority government doesn't have enough of its own MPs to do this, so it has to make compromises and work with other parties.
For example, if the ruling party wins 169 seats, it needs to convince at least three MPs from other political parties to support it in order to stay in power.
On the flip side, in a majority government, the ruling party has enough seats to make decisions without having to gain favour from members of other parties.
Student voters also choose minority
Kids who participated in the CIVIX Student Vote also elected a minority government.
The Conservative Party won the most seats making Pierre Poilievre prime minister in the student mock election.
Watch this video to see the CIVIX Student Vote in action. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
Check out the chart below to compare the results of the Student Vote to the adult vote.
(Graphic design by Philip Street/CBC)
Have more questions? Want to tell us how we're doing? Use the 'send us feedback' link below. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
With files from: Peter Zimonjic/CBC
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada News.Net
4 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Trump slaps tariffs on key allies as global trade talks intensify
WASHINGTON, D.C.: With the clock ticking toward a self-imposed trade deal deadline, U.S. President Donald Trump has announced steep tariffs on dozens of countries, escalating his efforts to reshape the global trade landscape. Through an executive order issued this week, Trump imposed new import duties ranging from 10 percent to 50 percent on goods from 69 trading partners, including Canada, Brazil, India, Taiwan, and Switzerland. The tariffs will take effect in seven days, just ahead of the August 1 deadline. The measures include a 35 percent tariff on many Canadian goods, 50 percent for Brazil, 25 percent for India, and 20 percent for Taiwan. An exception has been granted for shipments already in transit. Goods from countries not listed will face a blanket 10 percent U.S. import tax, potentially more in the future, Trump indicated. "Some trading partners, despite having engaged in negotiations, have offered terms that, in my judgment, do not sufficiently address imbalances," the executive order stated, adding some also failed to align with U.S. economic and national-security priorities. Markets reacted with relative calm, a contrast to the selloff that followed Trump's earlier tariff threats in April. Still, stocks and equity futures edged lower in Asian trading. The administration says additional trade deals are in the works as part of a broader strategy to close trade deficits and support U.S. manufacturing. Canada was hit particularly hard. Trump raised tariffs on Canadian goods tied to fentanyl-related enforcement to 35 percent, up from 25 percent, claiming Ottawa had "failed to cooperate" on narcotics enforcement. "Canada has been very poorly led," Trump told reporters. Canada's government has not yet responded, but it previously contested the basis for such tariffs. Mexico, meanwhile, received a reprieve. Trump granted a 90-day delay on new 30 percent tariffs for most Mexican non-automotive and non-metal goods covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), following a call with President Claudia Sheinbaum. "We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow," Sheinbaum posted on X, calling the call with Trump "very good." However, U.S. tariffs on Mexican steel, aluminum, copper, and non-USMCA-compliant autos remain in place. India now faces a 25 percent tariff following stalled negotiations over agricultural market access. Trump also raised concerns about India's purchases of Russian oil. Talks are ongoing, but New Delhi has pledged to protect its farm sector. The news triggered backlash from India's opposition and a drop in the rupee. Brazil was hit with a 50 percent tariff amid tensions over the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally. Still, specific sectors such as energy, aircraft, and orange juice were spared. Commerce Department data showed that tariffs may already be driving up prices: home furnishings rose 1.3 percent in June, recreational goods 0.9 percent, and clothing and footwear 0.4 percent. Meanwhile, Trump's legal justification, using the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, faced tough questioning in federal court. Judges appeared skeptical that trade deficits and fentanyl enforcement constitute emergencies under the law. Following preliminary progress in earlier talks, China now has until August 12 to finalize a broader tariff agreement with Washington.
Toronto Sun
9 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
EDITORIAL: Justice system not above criticism
The exterior of the Ontario Court of Justice in downtown Windsor is shown on April 22, 2021. Photo by Dan Janisse / Windsor Star A country where the decisions of judges and prosecutors can never be criticized is a country that is not a democracy. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Every Canadian citizen — not just politicians and media commentators — has the right to publicly agree or disagree with decisions made by judges and prosecutors. As long as they do not threaten their safety and are critical of their decisions, as opposed to personal attacks on those delivering them, they are legitimate forms of public expression and debate. Last week, the president of the Ontario Crown Attorneys' Association said 'attacks' by 'politicians, media and members of the public' in the context of two high-profile criminal cases were 'affronts to the rule of law.' This was in reference to the Crown's submissions for sentences for Freedom Convoy organizers Tamara Lich and Chris Barber on mischief charges, and the fallout from the acquittal of five former junior hockey players on charges of sexual assault. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. No doubt many agreed with Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, who tweeted on X in response to the Crown's submission to sentence Lich and Barber to seven and eight years respectively: 'Let's get this straight: while rampant violent offenders are released hours after their most recent charges and antisemitic rioters vandalize businesses, terrorize daycares and block traffic without consequences, the Crown wants seven years prison time for the charge of mischief for Lich and Barber.' Poilievre's tweet failed to note the final decision on sentencing will be made by a judge. Others will argue his argument is misguided. But it was hardly an attack on the rule of law. A similar controversy erupted in the wake of the decision by Ontario Superior Court Judge Maria Carroccia to acquit five former junior hockey plays of sexual assault in the Hockey Canada trial. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Her ruling prompted public reactions from high praise to scathing criticism for the judge — much of it from lawyers — but all of it fair comment, as long as it did not stoop to threats or attacks on the judge's character. In our view, robust public debates about the decisions made in our courtrooms do not undermine the rule of law in Canada. To the contrary, they contribute to how our laws evolve over time and are a measure of our commitment to democracy. Read More Toronto Blue Jays Toronto & GTA Columnists Toronto & GTA Columnists
Winnipeg Free Press
9 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Winnipeg students hope to develop Canada-EU AI literacy
A duo of local students has won a trip abroad to pitch diplomats on their made-in-Manitoba plan to bolster artificial intelligence literacy in Canada and the European Union. The University of Manitoba's Divya Sharma and Emily Katsman were named winners of the 2025 Schuman Challenge last week. 'It's a little bit surreal. I'm still taking it in,' said Katsman, noting the 20-somethings are the first Manitobans to enter the foreign policy competition put on by the EU Delegation to Canada. 'We are a province that has a lot of talent, but we sometimes get overlooked — especially when it comes to these high-level government and political competitions and policy settings.' The national contest calls on undergraduate students to brainstorm ways to strengthen the relationship between their home country and the EU. AI was the theme of this year's event, the third of its kind, which drew a total of 19 submissions from across the country. Sharma, 20, and Katsman, 21, were recognized for their proposal to create a Canada-EU roadmap for AI literacy in post-secondary education. 'By working together, Canada and the EU can create the shared infrastructure, standards, and trust needed to shape an AI-literate generation. One that will fuel future breakthroughs in health, climate, defence, and the digital economy,' they argued in a nine-page essay. 'From classrooms to NATO command centres, students in Canada and the EU must speak the same digital language.' Their recommendations to make that happen? Launch a joint AI literacy taskforce, standardized educator certification initiative and a research and student exchange program. 'AI is the future. There's no turning back,' Sharma said. Katsman echoed those comments. However, despite Canada's reputation as a world leader in AI research excellence, local universities have shied away from embracing the technology in classrooms due to plagiarism concerns, she noted. Their essay deemed this situation 'Canada's AI paradox,' and argued the lack of AI integration on post-secondary campuses is a major issue for the workforce and innovation at large. Canadian students are not being prepared to use AI tools effectively or responsibly — a stark contrast to what's happening in Estonia, they argued. Estonia's 'AI Leap' pilot aims to equip 20,000 high school students in northern Europe with lessons on how to use AI tools. A total of 3,000 teachers in that country are receiving training to leverage the technology for educational purposes this fall. Policymakers are working with Anthropic and OpenAI, alongside other partners, to create a related curriculum and workshops. Wednesdays Sent weekly from the heart of Turtle Island, an exploration of Indigenous voices, perspectives and experiences. Sharma and Katsman suggested Canada and the EU learn from Estonia and develop a roadmap accordingly. The U of M students are slated to visit Brussels in the fall to share their ideas with European leaders. Katsman said they are hopeful they will meet Kaja Kallas, who resigned as Estonia's prime minister last year to join the EU government. EU representatives visited Winnipeg in April on a 'Team Europe mission' to the Prairies. Maggie MacintoshEducation reporter Maggie Macintosh reports on education for the Free Press. Originally from Hamilton, Ont., she first reported for the Free Press in 2017. Read more about Maggie. Funding for the Free Press education reporter comes from the Government of Canada through the Local Journalism Initiative. Every piece of reporting Maggie produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
