How To Become a Millionaire While Working at McDonald's
Find Out:
Read Next:
In July 2024, McDonald's released a statement that all hourly employees earn more than the minimum wage, but it didn't clarify the exact amount. To determine what it would take to retire with $1 million from working at McDonald's, using the minimum wage as a guide is a safe approach.
In 2025, the federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour, which means states with no minimum wage law, like Alabama, Mississippi and South Carolina, must pay workers at least that amount. States like California and New York have very high minimum wages, ranging from $15.50 to $16.50, to match their high costs of living.
This experiment will show how someone making the federal minimum wage could potentially have $1 million when they retire at 65.
How Can You Become a Millionaire on Minimum Wage?
If you have a job that pays $7.25 per hour, your annual salary would be $15,080, assuming you work 40 hours a week. If you didn't spend a dime and saved your entire salary, it would take you over 66 years to accumulate $1 million. However, it's not impossible to become a millionaire because of compound interest.
Compound interest is the interest received from both the initial principal and the interest previously earned on it. For example, if you invest $100 and earn 7% interest over a year, you'll earn $7 and end up with $107 at the end of the year. If you leave your investment as is, you'll then earn 7% interest on $107, which is your initial investment and what you earned in interest. For your second year, you'll earn $7.49, and you'll enter your third year with $114.49. This might seem like a small amount, but the longer your investment earns interest, the larger the amount you receive each year.
Putting money into a Roth individual retirement account after receiving a paycheck allows you to grow your money over time without paying capital gains tax on your profits. Assuming you earn a consistent 7% annual interest with a 3% rate of inflation, you can retire with $1 million if you begin investing $250 a month, or $3,000 annually, between the ages of 18 and 65. Your investment would break down like this:
19 years old: Interest – $112.57, Total – $3,112.57
25 years old: Interest – $1,671.13, Total – $26,936.38
35 years old: Interest – $6,188.83, Total – $95,992.47
45 years old: Interest – $15,075.82, Total – $231,836.43
55 years old: Interest – $30,231.65, Total – $499,062.07
65 years old: Interest – $66,947.71, Total – $1,024,735.36
Learn More:
Can Your Mindset Make You Rich?
Investing $250 a month while working a minimum-wage job would be extremely challenging, amounting to almost 20% of your pretax salary. However, it's also unlikely that someone who starts a minimum wage job at the age of 18 would continue to work in the same role without a salary increase for the following 47 years.
Financial psychologist Brad Klontz believes that when it comes to wealth, it's all in our heads. Instead of focusing on money itself and how much you have now, taking a broader approach and planning for the future can make you wealthy no matter what you earn. While putting 20% of your income toward retirement may be unrealistic, adopting a rich mindset and investing even a small amount in your future early on will put you in a significantly better financial position.
More From GOBankingRates
Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard
4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years
3 Reasons Retired Boomers Shouldn't Give Their Kids a Living Inheritance (And 2 Reasons They Should)
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: How To Become a Millionaire While Working at McDonald's
擷取數據時發生錯誤
登入存取你的投資組合
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Institutional investors have a lot riding on Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT) with 82% ownership
Key Insights Institutions' substantial holdings in Vertiv Holdings Co implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 46% ownership Insiders have been selling lately This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. Every investor in Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 82% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 4.7% last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 51% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Vertiv Holdings Co, beginning with the chart below. View our latest analysis for Vertiv Holdings Co What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vertiv Holdings Co? Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. We can see that Vertiv Holdings Co does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Vertiv Holdings Co's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.9% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.9% and 2.1% of the stock. A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. Insider Ownership Of Vertiv Holdings Co While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Vertiv Holdings Co in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$162m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. General Public Ownership The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. Next Steps: It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Vertiv Holdings Co better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Vertiv Holdings Co is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about... Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's How Much You Must Make To Afford a Home in the West's Most Livable Cities
If you're thinking of heading west and looking for affordable, livable locales, Oregon may be worth a look. Also See: Learn More: The Beaver State boasts six of the 10 best blends of livability and affordability in the Western U.S., based on a recent GOBankingRates analysis of data from AreaVibes, Sperling's BestPlaces and other sources. Before you pack your bags, though, it's worth learning how much you would need to make to afford a home. Here's GBR's full list, along with the minimum salary required for homeownership, median household income and some additional information about each location. Kaysville, Utah Livability score: 89 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $69,593 Median household income: $128,996 You'll find Kaysville in northern Utah, about 20 miles north of Salt Lake City. A single-family home in Kaysville is worth about $650,000. Living costs will run you about $5,800 a month. Check Out: Find Out: Orem, Utah Livability score: 89 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $59,815 Median household income: $81,292 Orem is located just north of Provo and about 40 miles south of Salt Lake City. Only about 10 percent of Orem's 97,000+ residents are age 65 or older. You'll spend just shy of $5,000 a month on average for living costs here. Discover More: Raleigh Hills, Oregon Livability score: 89 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $92,776 Median household income: $109,306 Raleigh Hills is a suburb of Portland with about 7,000 residents. Single-family homes aren't cheap here, with average values approaching $1 million. An average monthly mortgage here will run you about $5,700. Beaverton, Oregon Livability score: 89 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $65,363 Median household income: $94,279 Beaverton is located about 10 miles west of Portland and has about 100,000 residents. Beaverton's average monthly cost of living (around $5,400) places it in the middle of the pack among AreaVibes' most livable cities. Single-family homes in Beaverton are worth $565,000 on average. Gladstone, Oregon Livability score: 89 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $62,124 Median household income: $90,395 Another Portland suburb, Gladstone is located about 12 miles to the south. About a fifth of Gladstone's 12,000 residents are 65 and older. Gladstone is somewhat less expensive than some other Portland suburbs, with average single-family homes valued at $514,000 and average monthly living costs coming in around $5,200. Central Point, Oregon Livability score: 90 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $52,234 Median household income: $80,450 Central Point is located in southern Oregon, a few miles northwest of Medford. With average monthly living costs around $4,300, Central Point is significantly less expensive than many options in the Portland area. See More: Lafayette, Colorado Livability score: 90 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $75,764 Median household income: $110,431 Lafayette sits about 25 miles north of Denver. Single-family homes in Lafayette are worth $731,000 on average, with monthly mortgages around $4,300. Battle Ground, Washington Livability score: 90 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $68,256 Median household income: $100,185 Battle Ground is located near the Washington-Oregon border, about 25 miles north of Portland. Average monthly mortgages in Battle Ground are less than $3,600, and average monthly living costs are about $5,700. On average, single-family homes here are worth just over $600,000. Milwaukie, Oregon Livability score: 91 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $61,690 Median household income: $82,422 Milwaukie is a suburb of Portland with about 22,000 residents and average monthly mortgages of around $3,000. Single-family homes in Milwaukie are worst just over $500,000. Sherwood, Oregon Livability score: 92 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $72,351 Median household income: $110,616 You'll find Sherwood about 20 miles southwest of Portland. Sherwood is a somewhat young city, with less than 11% of its 21,000 residents aged 65 or older. Homes here are worth around $660,000 on average. Monthly living costs will run you about $6,000. Editor's note: Photos are for representational purposes only and might not reflect the exact locations listed. Methodology: For this study, GOBankingRates analyzed cities across the United States with the highest livability scores, as sourced from AreaVibes. The 30 most livable cities in each state were identified. To qualify for this study, each city had to have all data points available and a total population of at least 5,000. All relevant data was sourced from the U.S. Census American Community Survey, Sperling's BestPlaces, the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey, Zillow Home Value Index and Federal Reserve Economic Data. All data was collected on and is up to date as of May 14, 2025. More From GOBankingRates 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on Here's How Much You Must Make To Afford a Home in the West's Most Livable Cities Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Those who invested in Opera (NASDAQ:OPRA) three years ago are up 329%
It might seem bad, but the worst that can happen when you buy a stock (without leverage) is that its share price goes to zero. But if you buy shares in a really great company, you can more than double your money. For example, the Opera Limited (NASDAQ:OPRA) share price has soared 240% in the last three years. That sort of return is as solid as granite. It's also good to see the share price up 30% over the last quarter. But this could be related to the strong market, which is up 23% in the last three months. So let's assess the underlying fundamentals over the last 3 years and see if they've moved in lock-step with shareholder returns. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time. Opera became profitable within the last three years. Given the importance of this milestone, it's not overly surprising that the share price has increased strongly. The company's earnings per share (over time) is depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers). We know that Opera has improved its bottom line over the last three years, but what does the future have in store? It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on how its financial position has changed over time. What About Dividends? When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. In the case of Opera, it has a TSR of 329% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! A Different Perspective It's good to see that Opera has rewarded shareholders with a total shareholder return of 57% in the last twelve months. That's including the dividend. Since the one-year TSR is better than the five-year TSR (the latter coming in at 19% per year), it would seem that the stock's performance has improved in recent times. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Opera that you should be aware of before investing here. But note: Opera may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast). Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
