Tesla Q2 Deliveries Fall Drastically Year-Over-Year
According to Tesla's official numbers, it delivered 384,122 vehicles in Q2, a roughly 14% drop compared to the 443,956 vehicles it delivered in Q2 2024. That's also about 18% lower than the 466,140 deliveries we saw in Q2 2023. That also brings Tesla's deliveries through the first half of the year to 720,803, marking a drop of more than 13% compared to the 830,766 deliveries Tesla managed through the first half of 2024. H1 deliveries in 2023 were 889,015, meaning 2025's deliveries were a full 19% lower than they were two years ago.
Of course, since this is Tesla we're talking about, the news that Tesla's declining sales have continued will actually make the stock price go up. It may not make sense, but hey, that's just business, baby.
Read more: The 2025 Land District Might Kick Off A New-Era Of American Moto
The Cybertruck Won't Save Tesla
The Model 3 and Model Y continued to dominate Tesla's sales numbers, accounting for 373,728 of Q2's 384,122 deliveries. That means Tesla only delivered 10,394 examples of the Model S, Model X and Cybertruck. Granted, the Model S and X are ancient and still expensive, so you wouldn't expect them to sell well, but even if 10,000 of those deliveries were Cybertrucks, that works out to roughly 40,000 Cybertrucks a year. It wasn't too long ago that Tesla was telling us it would sell 250,000 Cybertrucks a year, but I'm sure it's fine. That's probably fine, right?
Another potential problem for Tesla is that it's also sitting on a lot of inventory. While it only delivered 384,122 vehicles in Q2, it actually built 410,244. That's an extra 26,122 vehicles just sitting there, waiting to be sold. That alone isn't automatically concerning, but Tesla also produced 25,934 more vehicles than it delivered in Q1 of this year, which could be a sign that Tesla is overproducing compared to demand. With Model 3 and Model Y, that isn't as much of a red flag since sales numbers are still pretty high, but Tesla also says it built an extra 3,015 "other models," which definitely seems like a problem when it only delivered 10,394. As unpopular as those models are, the extra units are probably going to take a long time to sell, and Tesla has to find somewhere to store them until they do.
Of course, Tesla CEO Elon Musk will tell you that vehicle sales don't matter now that Tesla is an AI and robotics company that's totally about to solve autonomy for real this time. Sure, the robotaxi rollout is going terribly, but just you wait. It's definitely going to happen. Until then, we're just going to wait until Tesla's earnings call on July 23.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tesla facing potential major statewide ban on all sales: 'Not capable'
The California Department of Motor Vehicles moved one step closer to enacting a staggering 30-day ban on Tesla vehicle sales, vigorously arguing during a weeklong hearing that the company misled consumers over the capabilities of its "Full Self-Driving" and "Autopilot" technologies, with deadly results, Business Insider reported. "These labels and descriptions represent specifically that [Tesla]'s vehicles will operate as autonomous vehicles, which they could not and cannot do," said Rob Bonta, the California attorney general, per The News Wheel. What's happening? In 2022, the California DMV filed a formal accusation alleging that Tesla "made or disseminated statements that are untrue or misleading, and not based on facts, in advertising vehicles as equipped, or potentially equipped, with advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) features." Specifically, the DMV accused Tesla of using names and messaging that strongly indicate its cars can operate fully autonomously without the need for human monitoring or intervention. "But vehicles equipped with those ADAS features could not at the time of those advertisements, and cannot now, operate as autonomous vehicles," the accusation said. After years of delay, in mid-July, the DMV finally got the chance to make its case before an administrative judge, arguing that Tesla advertised its driver-assist features as if they offered full autonomy while saying otherwise in the fine print. In making its case, the DMV cited Tesla's own ads, including one stating, "The system is designed to be able to conduct short and long-distance trips with no action required by the person in the driver's seat." "To me, 'Autopilot' means it can drive itself or do things on its own," testified Melanie Rosario, commander-sergeant of the DMV Valley Area Command, per Business Insider. Lawyers for Tesla argued that the company never claimed its vehicles could operate fully independently of a human operator. "Cars with Full Self-Driving capabilities are currently not capable of driving themselves," Matthew Benedetto, an attorney representing Tesla, said during the hearing, Business Insider reported. Do you think Tesla can bounce back from its recent struggles? Yes It depends on Elon's actions I don't think it's struggling Nope Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. What would be the implications if Tesla sales are banned in California? The hearing came at a crucial time for Tesla, as the company's recent sales slump continued through the second quarter of 2025. In the period from April through June, the EV maker's net income dropped 16% compared to a year prior, The Wall Street Journal reported. As the nation's most populous state, California represents a crucial market for EV makers. With Tesla registrations in the state already dropping more than 20% during the first quarter of 2025, per the California Energy Commission, a 30-day ban on sales could be tough for Tesla to bounce back from. The outcome of the DMV's accusation also has broader implications for the future of self-driving technology, how it operates, and who is legally responsible when it fails. Bryan Walker Smith, a member of the Society of Automotive and Aerospace Engineers who testified as an expert witness at the Tesla hearing, called the difference between driver-assistance technology and fully autonomous self-driving "a dam that separates the land from the sea." "Every driver needs to know without ambiguity or doubt or any confusion an answer to this basic question: am I driving?" Smith testified, per Business Insider. In the San Francisco Bay Area alone, Tesla autonomous-driving technology has been involved in several major incidents, including at least one fatal wreck. In 2018, Walter Huang, an engineer for Apple, died after his Tesla operating in Autopilot mode crashed in Mountain View, California. Later investigations revealed that Huang had complained about the Autopilot's performance prior to the crash, according to ABC-affiliate KGO. Another example came in 2022, when a Tesla came to an abrupt stop while driving at highway speeds on the Bay Bridge connecting San Francisco and Oakland, resulting in an eight-car pileup. The driver said the Tesla had been operating in "Full Self-Driving" mode at the time of the incident, per KGO. What's being done about the safety of autonomous vehicles? Tesla has made some improvements in the time since the aforementioned accidents, though improvements do not change whether the company was liable for those cases. With Tesla already having rolled out a test fleet of autonomous robotaxis in Austin, Texas, and seeking to soon do the same in San Francisco, observers of autonomous-vehicle technology are watching the California proceedings closely. In the absence of comprehensive federal regulation, autonomous vehicles in the U.S. largely have been regulated on a state-by-state basis, according to the law firm Frost Brown Todd. This patchwork regulatory framework is bad for companies, which require clear, consistent guidelines that they can design their technologies to comply with. It is also bad for consumers, many of whom may lack a clear understanding of what these technologies are capable of and what risks they entail. To help fill this regulatory void, you can use your voice and contact your elected representatives in Washington, telling them that you think developing federal safety standards for autonomous vehicles should be a top priority. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
"A Lot Of Us Can't Afford Groceries": People Are NOT Impressed By The News That Elon Musk Is On Track To Become The World's First Trillionaire
Editor's Note: While we can't endorse what X has become, we can bring you the worthwhile moments that still exist there, curated and free of the surrounding chaos. In case you want to feel worse about your bank account than you already do, Elon Musk is on track to become the world's first trillionaire in 2027. As a millennial with zero hope of buying a house near my friends and family, I know that's just what I want to hear about on a Monday morning: the rich growing absurdly richer. Like, so wealthy that it's difficult to even fathom. Related: According to Forbes, Elon's net worth currently sits at $412 billion, up a whopping $6.4 billion in the past trading day. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO remains the richest man in the world despite all the backlash he faced during his time with DOGE. Over the past year, several publications have reported the likelihood of Elon being the first to hit this disgusting milestone, but a recent, viral tweet has sparked further conversation. Understandably, the internet is not pleased. Many people pointed out that he has the means to solve world hunger and homelessness, but has not: Related: Others shared thoughts about us as a society... ...and their thoughts on capitalism: Related: Folks pointed out that people are struggling to buy groceries: Some focused on how ridiculous the idea of a trillionaire is: Related: This account suggested a wealth cap: And finally, this person summed it up perfectly: What do you think of all this? LMK in the comments below! Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Samsung Electronics shares fall 1% after rallying on Tesla deal
Seoul (Reuters) -Shares in Samsung Electronics fell 1% on Tuesday after the South Korean technology company staged a powerful rally in the previous session on news of a $16.5 billion deal to supply chips to Tesla. The deal could bolster the technology company's unprofitable contract business, but Samsung faces challenges in securing additional large customers, analysts said. Tesla CEO Elon Musk said late on Sunday that Samsung's new chip factory in Taylor, Texas, would make the auto company's next-generation AI6 chip, without elaborating on the timing of the production. Sign in to access your portfolio