Woman allegedly assaulted daughter in-flight
Samantha Ann Dennis is charged with simple assault and interference with flight crew members and attendants, according to a nine-page federal criminal complaint filed April 3.
After Dennis' flight landed in Honolulu, her daughter was taken by ambulance to a hospital where state child welfare services workers assessed her and 'determined that she would be placed in foster care, ' where she remains, according to federal court documents.
An interview of Dennis at the airport was terminated because she appeared to be under the influence of drugs and /or alcohol, according to court records.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Lauren M. Nakamura is prosecuting the case.
On Tuesday the U.S. Attorney's Office withdrew a motion to detain Dennis without bail until trial. The U.S. Attorney's Office declined comment on the reason for withdrawing the motion.
Don 't miss out on what 's happening !
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It 's FREE !
Email 28141 Sign Up By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser 's and Google 's and. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.
Dennis is being represented by the office of the federal public defender.
On Nov. 4, state sheriff's deputies were called to the arrival gate for Hawaiian Airlines Flight 9 after receiving reports that 'a female passenger was being physically and verbally abusive to her minor daughter and had interfered with the duties of the flight crew members and attendants, ' according to an affidavit authored by a task force officer with the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
A flight attendant told investigators that during the the first two hours of the flight, four separate passengers came to her to report that a young girl 'was being verbally abused by her mother, Dennis.'
A fifth passenger told the flight attendant that they saw Dennis kick her daughter and tell her, 'You keep smiling like that, God is going to kill you.'
The flight attendant told investigators that Dennis' actions frightened her.
'We were 30, 000 feet in the air with no one to help if she (Dennis ) went crazy. I had anxieties because she was not completely there, and her actions were not that of a normal person, ' the attendant told investigators, according to court records.
Dennis allegedly threatened another passenger, the flight attendant told investigators. That passenger, an off-duty Long Beach, Calif., Police Department officer, helped restrain Dennis and 'placed her in handcuffs, and moved Dennis to a different seat.'
Dennis' behavior stopped flight attendants from offering water every 30 minutes for the remainder of the flight.
Another passenger told Dennis to lower her voice and asked her whether everything was OK, to which Dennis told the passenger she 'was trying to calm her daughter.'
'At this time, multiple passengers stood up and reported witnessing Dennis push (the girl's ) head against the window and verbally abuse her, ' according to the affidavit.
A flight attendant who had to sit next to Dennis and then later at the back to the plane with her daughter, told investigators that she felt 'alarmed and scared due to the number of passengers standing up in a darkened aircraft and yelling at Dennis '
to stop abusing her daughter.
There was the 'likelihood of a riot ' on board, and the attendant told federal law enforcement she had never experienced anything like that before.
On March 13 a child and adolescent forensic interview was done with Dennis' daughter at the FBI's Honolulu field office.
The girl told FBI agents that Dennis was 'drinking and started hitting her, kicking her, and hitting her head.' Dennis would not let her daughter talk and 'spoke for her.'
After the police officer handcuffed her mom and moved her to the back of the plane, the girl told FBI agents 'she was so scared she was shaking but calmed down after a while.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hunting show host banned for life from Kansas outdoors
WICHITA, Kan. (KSNW) — A Georgia man who hosts a hunting show has been banned for life from hunting or fishing in Kansas after illegally killing two deer, according to the United States Attorney's Office. Matt Jennings, 35, pleaded guilty to two federal charges after shooting antlered deer in Kansas in 2022 and then using illegal tags. He later featured the hunts on his show, The Game. Ava Jones completes final round of chemotherapy In one case, Jennings shot a deer near Florence using a tag that wasn't valid for that area. He then drove to Oklahoma and falsely registered the kill there. A week later, he killed another antlered deer near WaKeeney, violating Kansas law, which only allows one per season. Jennings was sentenced to five years of probation, ordered to pay $15,000 in restitution, a $10,000 fine, and give up the antlers. During his probation, he's also barred from hunting, fishing, or guiding in eight other states, including Oklahoma, Missouri, and Colorado. The case was investigated by state and federal wildlife officials and prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office in Wichita. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
USA Today
15 hours ago
- USA Today
Why Sophie Cunningham alleges a TikTok got her a WNBA fine
Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham alleges she got a $500 fine from the WNBA for roasting some of the league's officials on TikTok. "Cause there's not more important things to be worried about with our league right now," Cunningham sarcastically quipped on Twitter (X) on Wednesday with her allegation she got sent a $500 fine by the league for the attached satirical TikTok. WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert noted the widespread frustration with league officiating this season during All-Star weekend in Indianapolis. However, it certainly appears the league isn't cool with players or coaches mocking any of the refs on social media, as Cunningham's alleged fine shows. Cunningham's alleged fine is more of an annoyance than a major punishment, but the sensitivity over league personnel criticizing WNBA officials appears to be very real.
Los Angeles Times
16 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump's top federal prosecutor in L.A. struggles to secure indictments in protest cases
To bystanders at the federal courthouse in downtown Los Angeles, it sounded as though U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli would not take no for an answer. A prosecutor had the irate Trump administration appointee on speaker phone outside the grand jury room, and his screaming was audible, according to three law enforcement officials aware of the encounter who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals. The grand jury had just refused to indict someone accused of attacking federal law enforcement officers during protests against the recent immigration raids throughout Southern California, two of the officials said. It was an exceedingly rare outcome after a type of hearing that routinely leads to federal charges being filed. On the overheard call, according to three officials, Essayli, 39, told a subordinate to disregard the federal government's 'Justice Manual,' which directs prosecutors to only bring cases they can win at trial. Essayli barked that prosecutors should press on and secure indictments as directed by U.S. Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi, according to three officials. Court records show the reason for Essayli's frustration. While his office has filed felony cases against at least 38 people for alleged misconduct that either took place during last month's protests or near the sites of immigration raids, many have already been dismissed or reduced to misdemeanor charges. The three officials who spoke to The Times on the condition of anonymity said prosecutors have struggled to get several protest-related cases past grand juries, which need only to find probable cause that a crime has been committed in order to move forward. That is a much lower bar than the 'beyond a reasonable doubt' standard required for a criminal conviction. Five cases have been dismissed without prejudice — meaning they could be refiled — and records show nine have been filed as misdemeanors, which do not require a grand jury indictment to proceed. In some cases, prosecutors reduced charges against defendants to misdemeanors after repeatedly falling short at the grand jury stage, according to three federal law enforcement officials. Essayli declined to be interviewed for this article. A statement provided by his office on Tuesday accused The Times of spreading 'factual inaccuracies and anonymous gossip,' but offered no specifics or further comment in response to questions. 'The U.S. Attorney's Office will continue working unapologetically to charge all those who assault our agents or impede our federal investigations,' the statement said. Legal experts said Essayli's low number of indictments raised concerns about the strength of the cases he is filing. Carley Palmer, a former federal prosecutor in L.A. who is now a partner at Halpern May Ybarra Gelberg, said the grand jury's repeated rejection of cases was 'a strong indication that the priorities of the prosecutor's office are out of sync with the priorities of the general community.' Essayli has won indictments in some serious cases, including two where defendants are accused of throwing or planning to throw Molotov cocktails at L.A. law enforcement officers, and a case where defendants allegedly fired a paintball gun at federal police. But in total, he has only secured seven indictments, which usually need to be obtained no later than 21 days after the filing of a criminal complaint. Three other cases have been resolved via plea deal, records show. High-ranking Justice Department officials have repeatedly praised his work. 'My friend, U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, is a champion for law and order who has done superlative work to prosecute rioters for attacking and obstructing law enforcement in Los Angeles,' Bondi said in a statement to The Times. But legal experts and some of Essayli's own prosecutors say he's stretching legal limits to serve as Trump's attack dog in L.A. 'It's just generally a culture of 'if Bill asks you to jump, you ask how high,'' said one prosecutor who feared retaliation. 'Any case he wants to charge, find a way to make it a yes.' Questions about Essayli's effectiveness come at a critical time for the former California Assembly member. Bondi appointed him in early April, giving him 120 days to serve as interim U.S. attorney until receiving Senate approval. If he is not confirmed by then, a panel of federal judges will have the opportunity to appoint him — or someone else — to the position. Democratic Sens. Adam Schiff and Alex Padilla of California raised concerns about Essayli's leadership of the office in interviews with The Times, and a direct approval from the bench is no sure thing. Earlier this month, a federal judicial panel blocked Trump's choice for U.S. attorney in upstate New York after the time limit for Senate confirmation had expired. On Tuesday, another judicial panel declined to appoint New Jersey's interim federal prosecutor, Alina Habba, one of Trump's former personal lawyers. Bondi, however, decried the judges for going 'rogue,' fired their choice for U.S. attorney and reappointed Habba. Legal experts say the move is unprecedented. Meghan Blanco, a former federal prosecutor in L.A. who serves as defense counsel to one of the protesters who is facing charges, said the cases are faltering in part because of unreliable information provided by immigration agents claiming to be victims. 'Frankly, they're not deserving of prosecution,' she said. 'What is being alleged isn't a federal crime, or it simply did not happen.' Blanco represents Jose Mojica, who was accused of pushing a federal officer in Paramount on June 7. According to an investigation summary of the incident reviewed by The Times, a U.S. Border Patrol officer claimed a man was screaming in his face that he was going to 'shoot him,' then punched him. The officer said he and other agents started chasing the man, but were 'stopped by two other males,' later identified as Mojica and Bryan Ramos-Brito. Blanco said she obtained social media videos showing no such chase took place and presented them at Mojica's first court appearance. The charges were soon dropped. 'The agent lied and said he was in hot pursuit of a person who punched him,' Blanco said. 'The entirety of the affidavit is false.' Felony charges against Ramos-Brito and two related defendants, Ashley and Joceline Rodriguez, were also dismissed, though prosecutors refiled misdemeanor cases against them. Christian Camacho-Cerna, the man who allegedly punched an agent, has been indicted. He has pleaded not guilty, with trial set for next month. Similar issues arose in the case of Andrea Velez, who was charged on June 25 with assaulting a federal officer. The criminal complaint alleged Velez, who is 4 feet 11 inches, stood in the path of an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer with her arms extended, striking his head and chest when they collided. Diane Bass, Velez's attorney, said the incident occurred when masked, unidentified men in plainclothes pulled up to question a downtown L.A. street vendor. Velez had just been dropped off for work when some of the masked men ran at her and one shoved her to the ground, Bass said. Velez, fearing she was being abducted, held up her work bag to shield herself. Bass requested body-worn camera footage and witness statements cited in the complaint. Soon after, she said, the prosecutor dismissed the case. One federal law enforcement official not authorized to speak publicly said concerns are growing among prosecutors about the accuracy of statements by federal immigration agents that serve as the basis of criminal charges. 'There are a lot of hot-headed [Customs and Border Protection] officers who are kind of arresting first and asking questions later. We're finding there's not probable cause to support it,' said the prosecutor who requested anonymity over concerns of repercussions. One case under close scrutiny is that of Adrian Martinez, a 20-year-old charged in a criminal complaint last month with conspiracy to impede a federal officer. Martinez said he was on a break from his job at Walmart when he spotted immigration agents chasing down a maintenance worker, and told them to leave the man alone. Video footage shows Martinez being thrown to the ground and shoved into a truck, which he said took him to a parking structure. Once there, Martinez said he was told he'd been arrested for assaulting a federal officer by striking an agent in the face and breaking his glasses. Martinez, who weighs around 150 pounds, said the agents arresting him pointed to the colleague he was being accused of attacking, who looked 'like a grizzly bear.' 'I don't even remember you,' Martinez recalled saying. 'It just seemed like they were trying to get me to say like, 'yes, you assaulted him,' but I knew I didn't.' The next day, Essayli posted a photo on X of Martinez, still in his blue Walmart vest. Martinez, he wrote, had been arrested 'for an allegation of punching a border patrol agent in the face.' The criminal complaint makes no reference to a punch and video taken at the scene does not clearly show Martinez strike anyone. Federal prosecutors instead charged Martinez with conspiracy to impede a federal officer, alleging he blocked federal law enforcement vehicles with his car and then later a trash can. Ciaran McEvoy, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office, previously told The Times that complaints do not always include 'the full scope of a defendant's conduct, or the evidence that will be presented at trial.' A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said the agency could not comment on cases under active litigation. 'Our officers are facing a surge in assaults and attacks against them as they put their lives on the line to enforce our nation's laws,' the DHS statement said. Charges against nonviolent defendants have repeatedly raised alarm bells among current and former federal prosecutors. In early June, union leader David Huerta was charged with conspiracy to impede a federal officer for allegedly interfering with immigration enforcement actions in the downtown L.A. garment district. Legal experts said Huerta's conduct did not appear criminal. 'Where do you draw the line between an organized protest and a conspiracy to impede?' Laurie Levenson, a former federal prosecutor and professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, asked last month. 'It'll actually be interesting to see if a grand jury indicts these cases.' Huerta has denied all wrongdoing and his attorney did not respond to a request for comment. A deadline of Aug. 5 looms for prosecutors to secure an indictment. Court filings show some prosecutors appear to be refusing to sign their names to contentious cases. An indictment returned against Alejandro Orellana — who is accused of conspiracy and aiding in civil disorder for passing out gas masks at a protest scene in early June — was only signed by Essayli and his second-in-command, Jennifer Waier, records show. Such cases are typically handled by rank-and-file assistant U.S. attorneys. In early May, when Essayli pushed to offer a lenient plea deal to L.A. County Sheriff's Deputy Trevor Kirk months after a jury convicted him of assaulting a woman during a 2023 arrest, several prosecutors refused to sign the document asking for the deal, and some later resigned. Times staff writer Kevin Rector contributed to this report.
