Anthony Koch: Sometimes, war is the answer
The American Civil War was not the result of insufficient compromise. It was the inevitable clash between two incompatible moral orders. No committee could reconcile slavery with freedom. The matter had to be settled by force.
Article content
And the 20th century speaks even louder. The Second World War resulted from the failure to confront aggression when it was in its infancy. Peace in our time gave us war in our streets. Hitler was not appeased, he was emboldened. And when the reckoning finally came, it did not arrive through dialogue. It arrived through tanks, fleets and firebombs. It arrived because it had to.
Article content
Diplomacy, in truth, does not substitute for war. It follows it. Negotiation is not what ends conflict. Victory is. The treaties of Westphalia, Versailles and Camp David did not avert war, they formalized its outcome. Even today, peace agreements only work when enforced by the fear of what happens if they collapse. As Machiavelli warned, 'War cannot be avoided; it can only be postponed to the advantage of others.'
Article content
Article content
We may prefer the language of compromise, but the world often speaks another tongue. As Thucydides wrote, 'The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.' That is not an endorsement, it's a warning. Those who forget it do not abolish war, they only ensure that when it comes, it comes on someone else's terms.
Article content
Even now, the pattern repeats. The rise of revanchist powers — Russia, Iran, China — was not provoked by the West being too forceful. It was enabled by the West being too timid. Russia did not invade Georgia, Crimea and Ukraine because NATO expanded. It did so because the West shrank.
Article content
Iran did not radicalize because it was cornered, but because we left its ambitions unchecked. And China threatens Taiwan not because it's afraid of war, but because it no longer believes the West is willing to fight one.
Article content
Israel's recent campaigns against Iran and Hezbollah offers a current, unmistakable example. For years, western commentators wrung their hands about the risks of escalation. But a low-intensity, perpetual and asymmetric war was already being fought. Iran had been waging it with drones, rockets and proxies.
Article content
Article content
It was only when Israel struck back with precision and force, eliminating key Iranian military leaders and humiliating Hezbollah's command structure, that the region began to shift.
Article content
Suddenly, even hostile actors started co-operating, allowing Israel to use their airspace and shooting down Iranian missiles, to contain further escalation. Why? Because war, judiciously applied, imposed clarity where diplomacy had only bought delay.
Article content
War, in such cases, is not madness. It is realism. It is not cruelty. It is consequence. And those who think it's obsolete are not pacifists — they are amateurs.
Article content
The anti-war camp today is full of high-minded rhetoric and low-grade intellect. Its adherents conflate comfort with virtue, safety with wisdom. But the iron law of history is simple: peace must be secured, not assumed. And where irreconcilable visions of power and order collide, war is not a detour, it is the road itself.
Article content
Article content
Article content
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
7 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Canadians with an X gender marker will now have to select male or female on Nexus travel cards after Trump order
Canadians renewing their Nexus travel cards or applying for new ones to make it easier to cross the border to the U.S. must now say if they are male or female, even if they are transgender or non-binary. The change follows U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order that says the American government will now only recognize the male and female sex. U.S. passports and other identity documents are no longer issued with an X gender marker. Immigration lawyers said Canada's decision to force non-binary or trans Canadians to choose a male or female gender designation for Nexus raises human-rights concerns and could prompt a court challenge in Canada on constitutional grounds. The Nexus program is jointly managed by the Canada Border Services Agency and U.S. Customs and Border Protection and is designed to speed up border crossings between the two countries for low-risk, preapproved travellers. Holders of Nexus cards, which are valid for five years, can generally get through security checks more swiftly. The U.S. is continuing to recognize Canadian passports with an X gender marker, the U.S. government has confirmed. The CBSA said that valid Nexus cards with an X held by Canadians will also still be recognized. But when Canadians apply to renew their card or apply for a new one, they can no longer choose an X as their gender marker. 'New applicants are able to apply using a passport with the 'X' gender identifier, however they will be required to select 'male' or 'female' for the purposes of their NEXUS membership,' CBSA spokesperson Rebecca Purdy said. Judge halts deportation of non-binary American in ruling after Trump's gender edicts Sarah Mikhail of Smith Immigration law, which specializes in LGBTQ immigration, said it is 'very troubling' that Canada is implementing the policy. 'What we're seeing here is an example of the wide reach of the discriminatory policies of the Trump administration targeting trans and non-binary people, now reaching and impacting Canadian citizens as well,' she said. Gemma Hickey, who is non-binary and was one of the first people in Canada to have X as their gender marker on their passport, said forcing non-binary people to choose a male or female gender to get a Nexus card has 'serious implications' for Canada's transgender community. The advocate questioned why Ottawa agreed to a policy that affects Canadians' human rights. 'Our lives are being impacted significantly since Trump came into office - even Canadians,' they said. 'It's putting people in an impossible position.' Between January, 2022, and March, approximately 550 Nexus applications were submitted with X as the gender identifier, the CBSA said. Canada's Nexus card policy change followed Mr. Trump's executive order that took effect in February, the CBSA confirmed. Immigration lawyer Maureen Silcoff said the policy meant that a non-binary traveller who wants a Nexus card 'either has to accede to the gender specification or they have to choose to be excluded from the Nexus option.' 'The U.S. policy is clearly at odds with the Canadian policy on gender identity,' she added. Yameena Ansari, who represents Hannah Kreager, a young transgender American woman who has lodged an asylum claim in Canada, said 'let's call this Nexus policy what it is – a rollback of the rights of non-binary Canadians – and it's unconstitutional." American transgender woman files asylum claim in Canada after Trump's edict on gender She said Section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees equal protection under the law without discrimination, including with regard to gender. 'The Canadian government forcing a non-binary individual to misgender themselves on a government-issued document flies in the face of Section 15 of the Charter, meaning that a person or organization could sue the government, asking for the Nexus policy to be struck down,' she said. E-mails between Global Affairs officials obtained in an access to information request by researcher Ken Rubin show that earlier this year public servants discussed whether to issue a travel advisory to Canadians with an X gender marker on the Nexus changes. But the current travel advisory to the U.S. does not mention the changes.
CBC
38 minutes ago
- CBC
McGill faculty challenge Quebec's Bill 89, arguing it violates constitutional right to strike
Four McGill University faculty associations representing more than 500 academics have filed a court challenge against Quebec's Bill 89, arguing the provincial legislation violates the constitutional right to strike. The Confederation of Faculty Associations of McGill (COFAM) announced Tuesday that the groups filed an application for judicial review in Quebec Superior Court, seeking to overturn the law — declaring Bill 89 unconstitutional and invalid as of the date it was passed. The bill was adopted May 29. It gives the provincial labour minister broad powers to restrict strikes deemed harmful to the population. "This legislation represents a frontal attack on workers' fundamental rights," said Evan Fox-Decent, a law professor and president of the Association of McGill Professors of Law, in a COFAM news release. Fox-Decent notes the Supreme Court of Canada's 2015 ruling in Saskatchewan Federation of Labour, which found the right to strike has been recognized as the "irreducible minimum" of freedom of association. "Bill 89 attempts to overturn this constitutional protection," he said in the news release. Barry Eidlin, vice-president of the Association of McGill Professors of the Faculty of Arts, said in the news release that the law risks allowing the government to impose service requirements on universities during labour disputes, threatening academic independence. "As university faculty, we have a particular responsibility to defend constitutional rights and the rule of law," says Eidlin, who specializes in labour movements. In an interview with CBC News, Eidlin says this law is dangerous from a labour relations perspective because it "erodes the very foundation on which collective bargaining occurs in Quebec." For meaningful bargaining to exist, the parties need to be on a level playing field, he said. Employers have many tools at their disposal to leverage their power over workers, while workers have only tool at their disposal — the power to collectively withhold their labour, he explained. Taking away that leverage skews the playing field in favour of the employers. "It removes the incentive of the employer to actually reach an agreement, because they know they have a trick up their sleeve," said Eidlin, adding that employers can drag out their process until the employees are ordered back to work. The four associations involved in the legal challenge include the Association of McGill Academic Staff of the School of Continuing Studies, the Association of McGill Professors of the Faculty of Arts, the Association of McGill Professors of Education and the Association of McGill Professors of Law. "This is about protecting fundamental labour rights for all Quebec workers," says Margaret Levey, president of the continuing studies association, in the news release. Back in February, when Quebec Labour Minister Jean Boulet tabled Bill 89, he said such as the labour conflict that lasted years and It caused major delays on mourners being able to bury their loved ones. He also cited the hypothetical situation of an education strike preventing services to children with special needs. Boulet said strikes involving ferries, food transportation and school transit in Quebec were other examples that led his office to draft the bill.
CBC
38 minutes ago
- CBC
Young people more prone to believe in conspiracies, research shows
Hillary Clinton had Jeffrey Epstein killed. Barack Obama was not born in the United States. The pharmaceutical industry was responsible for the spread of COVID-19. These are all conspiracies with no basis in fact, says University of Ottawa professor Daniel Stockemer — but his research shows that theories like them are gaining traction among young people. In fact, people younger than 35 are more likely to believe in conspiracy theories than other age groups, according to a recent study by Stockemer and co-author Jean-Nicolas Bordeleau that surveyed more than 380,000 people internationally. The research was recently published in the journal Political Psychology. "Conspiracy theories are now for everyone," Stockemer told CBC Radio's All In A Day, noting that between 20 and 25 per cent of the population believes in one. "But the young are slightly more likely to believe in them." If the problem isn't addressed, Stockemer said he expects the "democratic backsliding" he's seen all over the world to continue. "If we don't have a young population that stands up for the values of democracy ... who else will?" Why do young adults believe conspiracies? There are many reasons why young people are particularly susceptible, Stockemer said — including the fact the political world has become more divided and chaotic. "Right now, we're in a world of polarization," he said. "There is no compromise, no middle ground." Compounding that effect, Stockemer said, is that young people are being "alienated" from politics as mainstream politicians largely ignore their concerns — including during the last federal election. "The leaders didn't even come to the [University of Ottawa] to have a talk or anything," he said. "And then we wonder why young people have a higher tendency to go the populist or conspiracies route." Then there's technological leaps like the internet, smart phones and social media, Stockemer said, which allow conspiracy and misinformation to spread, especially among young people. The internet also potentially exposes them to every unfortunate incident that happens in the world, said Carmen Celestini, who teaches at the University of Waterloo and studies disinformation, extremists and conspiracy theorists. "That fear and that perpetual sense of disaster can lead people to believe in conspiracy theories," said Celestini, noting she wasn't surprised "even a little bit" by Stockemer and Bordeleau's findings. Influencers who tote extremist views and conspiracies also give their viewers someone or something to blame, she added. No 'quick fix' Widespread conspiracies and the problems inherent to the internet will require a "global response," said Celestini, one that will involve talking about the fears and emotions that led people to these conclusions. "It really is [about] having that transparent talk with your child about what it is that they're feeling, why they might believe some of these ideas and where the emotions behind it come from," she said. Stockemer said there's no "quick fix," but improving civic education and better regulating misinformation online would help. "To bring [young people] back, we need to also include them within the democratic politics much more than now," he said. And there could be immense consequences, he added, if we continue to neglect the susceptibility of young people to conspiracy theories. "Over the past 10 years, the number of democracies has declined [and] long-standing democracies like the United States [and] India are in serious danger of falling," he said. "If we continue the path we are continuing, I don't know how long some established democracies will survive. … And I think that's one of the far-reaching lessons from my research."
