LIC Ranks 4th In Top 10 List Of Most Valuable Indian Brands For 2025
Mumbai: The government-owned insurance giant Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) ranked 4th among the 10 most valuable brands in India, according to the Brand Finance India 100 report for 2025.
The report notes that LIC's 2025 brand value stood at $13.6 billion, up 35.1 per cent from its 2024 brand value of $10.07 billion.
LIC reigns supreme among the top brands ranked in the Indian insurance sector. The public sector giant claimed the position of the world's third strongest insurance brand, ranked by Brand Finance's 2025 Global Insurance 100 report, achieving a BSI score of 87.9/100. Based on Brand Finance's market research data, LIC is perceived as a brand with high familiarity and appeal in its home market, alongside its sustained AAA brand strength rating.
Back in the list of top 10 firms by market capitalisation, LIC stands at the 8th spot with a market capitalisation of Rs 5.98 lakh crore, backed by a 38 per cent year-on-year growth in its Q4FY25 consolidated net profit at Rs 19,039 crore compared with Rs 13,782 crore in the year-ago period. The state insurer announced a final dividend of Rs 12 per equity share for the financial year ended March 31.
The India 100 2025 by brand value list is based on an assessment of over 200 Indian brands, spanning many sectors, including IT services, hospitality, automotive, pharma, tyres, and retail. The methodology takes into account the latest available audited financials of companies.
LIC reported a 13.79 per cent year-on-year increase in group premium for May this year. For the first two months of the financial year 2025-2026, group premium grew 13.66 per cent, according to data compiled by the Life Insurance Council.
In May 2025, LIC collected Rs 14,374.87 crore in group premiums, up from Rs 12,632.26 crore in May 2024. The overall new business premium grew 10.27 per cent from Rs 16,690.39 crore in May 2024 to Rs 18,405.04 crore in May this year. The overall life insurance industry garnered Rs 30,463.20 crore, marking a 12.68 per cent rise over Rs 27,034.14 crore collected in the same month last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
29 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Time to polish our public sector ratnas: Creating an Indian sovereign wealth fund to recast jewels
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Traditional Routes of Privatisation: Limited Success Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Learning from Singapore: The Temasek Model A Case for India's Temasek: Transforming NIIF Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Model: Ownership Transfer, Commercial Management A Pragmatic, Politically Smart Path (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of .) In May 2020, as part of the Atmanirbhar Bharat package, the Indian government unveiled a bold new Public Sector Enterprise (PSE) policy. Building on that announcement, the Union Budget of February 1, 2021, laid out a detailed blueprint, categorising sectors into two:Strategic sectors, where the government would retain only a bare minimum presence, andNon-strategic sectors, where all Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) would be privatised or marked a tectonic shift in India's approach to public sector enterprises- a clear intent to significantly reduce the government's footprint in business. While implementation is underway, progress has been uneven. This note proposes a bold, agile framework to fast-track the privatisation India has predominantly relied on strategic sales since the 1991 liberalisation era divesting 50% or more equity along with management control. However, another way of privatisation is public market offerings i.e. selling shares of CPSEs to retail and institutional investors. This method was famously deployed by Margaret Thatcher's UK government during its privatisation drive of British Telecom, British Gas, and British India, the strategic sale model has yielded mixed results. The successful sale of Air India came after years of delays. Meanwhile, marquee targets such as BPCL, Shipping Corporation, and IDBI Bank have faced hurdles. BPCL's disinvestment , announced in 2019, was shelved in 2022 as bidders withdrew, the government decided to hit pause to the disinvestment: a prudent decision prioritising value over sales are often complex, politically sensitive, and time-consuming, limiting their effectiveness as the default path to third approach is Singapore's model: move the ownership to an SWF, then sell faced a similar challenge as India in the 1970s, dozens of government-owned enterprises across critical sectors, struggling under state management. The solution was to create Temasek Holdings, the Sovereign Wealth Fund of Singapore which was established in 1974 as a professionally run, wholly government-owned investment company. Temasek operates with full autonomy, managed by an independent board of professionals and free from political interference. It holds and grows equity in state-owned enterprises on commercial principles. Many of these entities are now listed and globally competitive, contributing to a portfolio exceeding US$301 India is not Singapore, the core principle of insulating commercial decisions from political control is powerful and has attempted some separation by routing disinvestment decisions through DIPAM. However, this still functions within the government's bureaucratic framework. What India truly needs is a Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) that can own and manage public assets is where the National Investment and Infrastructure Fund (NIIF) enters: India's quasi-sovereign investment vehicle, created in 2015, where the government holds a 49% stake. With assets of over $5 billion across infrastructure, growth equity, and fund-of-funds, NIIF already has the structure to become India's Temasek saw potential in NIIF, investing $400 million in 2018. It now needs a wider mandate that would allow it to become the Indian government could begin by transferring its stakes in select PSEs to NIIF, receiving fund units in exchange. The state would retain economic interest while stepping away from operational PSEs would then be run under professional governance standards, free from day-to-day political interference. Over time, NIIF could gradually dilute its stake in these enterprises in the market when conditions are favourable creating a steady revenue stream for the government, rather than volatile, one-time government could begin with minority stakes transfer, building credibility and demonstrating value creation, and eventually reduce its holding below 51% as per Atmanirbhar Bharat stealth-privatisation model i.e. first shifting ownership to NIIF, then progressively privatizing, shields the process from political turbulence while ensuring the commercial interests of the state are provides PSEs with the time, autonomy, and resources to restructure and become market-ready, aligning with the 2021 policy objective of one strategic PSE per Thomas Jefferson aptly put it, 'That government is best which governs least.' It's time we let our Ratna shine with the polish of professionalism, and free them from the weight of the state's hand.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bengaluru auto overcharging row: Transport Minister slams app-based 'loot', vows permit cancellations for 'daylight robbery'
Karnataka Transport Minister Ramalinga Reddy has directed the Transport Commissioner to take strict action against autorickshaws in Bengaluru, including those operating via mobile apps, for charging passengers more than the government-fixed fares. He called the practice 'daylight robbery' in a letter dated June 28. The minister said that if any autorickshaw driver is found overcharging or cancelling rides when commuters refuse to pay extra, their permit should be cancelled and a police case should be registered immediately. Citing specific examples, Reddy referred to fare data from June 18. 'Rapido Auto App charged Rs 100.89 per km, while Auto O App charged Rs 184.19 for a 4 km ride,' he said, calling this 'unforgivable'. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo As per government rules, the official meter fare in Karnataka is Rs 30 for the first 1.9 km and Rs 15 for each additional kilometre. However, complaints about overcharging and ride refusals have continued to flood in, the minister added. Reddy said that although the Transport Department has taken action earlier, tougher and more effective steps are now needed. He also attached commuter-provided screenshots as evidence and asked the department to create a detailed action plan. Live Events 'It has been directed to immediately prepare an effective action plan to protect the public and take stern action against auto drivers and owners found guilty,' he said. Inputs from TOI
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trade fallout: India's ban on Pakistan-origin cargo at ports triggers spike in freight costs, delays for Islamabad
Representative image India's ban on ships carrying goods originating in or exported from Pakistan has led to a sharp rise in freight charges and longer shipping times for Pakistani importers, Dawn newspaper reported, citing industry officials. The ban, imposed on May 2, 2025, following the Pahalgam terror attack, prohibits both direct and indirect movement of Pakistani goods through Indian ports. As per news agency PTI, this comprehensive restriction has not only impacted maritime logistics but also prompted intensified enforcement by Indian agencies to detect violations. 'Mother vessels are not coming to Pakistan due to this Indian action, which delays our imports by 30 to 50 days,' said Javed Bilwani, president of the Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry, in comments reported by Dawn. He said importers now rely on feeder vessels, resulting in increased transportation costs. Exporters, too, confirmed a spike in logistics expenses, especially in insurance costs. 'There is no significant impact on exports, except for a rise in insurance costs. Shipping charges had already gone up even before the escalation,' said Aamir Aziz, a textile exporter, as cited in the Dawn report. Pakistan's export sector, which heavily depends on imported raw materials for value addition, now faces added operational difficulties. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trending in in 2025: Local network access control [Click Here] Esseps Learn More Undo With Islamabad already restricting non-essential imports to manage its forex reserves, supply chain disruptions caused by the Indian ban carry broader economic implications. The Indian government's stance has been reinforced through multiple enforcement drives. In one such action, the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) launched 'Operation Deep Manifest' to target illegal imports of Pakistani goods routed through third countries like the UAE. The finance ministry said that so far, 39 containers carrying over 1,100 metric tonnes of goods valued at Rs 9 crore have been seized under the operation. These goods were falsely declared as UAE-origin but were found to have originated from Pakistan, transshipped via Dubai. The DRI discovered money trails and financial links connecting Indian importers with Pakistani entities, and arrested one of the partners of a trading firm involved in the operation. According to the ministry, this complex modus operandi was designed to obscure the true origin of the goods using a web of intermediaries in Pakistan and the UAE. The crackdown is part of broader national security operations such as 'Operation Sindoor', aimed at tightening border trade oversight in response to regional threats. India had already raised import duties on Pakistani goods to 200% after the 2019 Pulwama terror attack. Since then, formal trade relations have remained frozen. Bilateral trade between the two countries dropped from $2.41 billion in 2018 to just $1.2 billion in 2024, as per PTI. Pakistan's exports to India declined sharply from $547.5 million in 2019 to only $480,000 last year. The government maintains that the trade restrictions are critical to safeguarding India's national and economic security and preventing misuse of trade channels. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
