No way to restart Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant at present, IAEA chief says
KYIV (Reuters) -The idled Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant in Ukraine is not in a condition to be restarted at present, due to a lack of water for cooling and the absence of a stable power supply, the head of the UN's nuclear safety watchdog said on Tuesday.
Water would have to be pumped from the Dnipro River for the plant, which has not generated power for nearly three years, to restart, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi told Reuters.
The facility, located in Ukraine's southern Zaporizhzhia region and Europe's largest nuclear plant, was occupied by Russia in March 2022, shortly after it launched a full-scale invasion of its neighbour. Before the war, the plant generated a fifth of Ukraine's electricity.
Speaking in an interview in Kyiv, Grossi said the Russians had "never hidden the fact" that they want to restart the plant, but added they would not be able to do so soon.
The plant is less than 10 km (6 miles) from Ukrainian positions on the other side of the Dnipro River. It has six reactors, the last of which stopped generating electricity in September 2022.
The water level of its cooling pond, which sits on the southern bank of the Dnipro, dropped significantly in the summer of 2023 after the Kakhovka dam was destroyed downstream.
Nearby areas regularly come under artillery and drone bombardment, which has on occasion damaged the two remaining power lines supplying the electricity needed for the plant to cool itself, even in its dormant state.
Both sides accuse each other of being responsible for the attacks.
Greenpeace issued a report last week saying Russia was building a 90-km high-voltage power line to connect the power plant to its grid.
Grossi said the IAEA did not agree with that report's conclusions.
"There are some areas where there has been some work, but we do not have any concrete evidence that this is part of a concerted, orchestrated plan to connect the power plant in one sense or the other."
"We are not in a situation of imminent restart of the plant. Far from that, it would take quite some time before that can be done," Grossi said.
The plant's machinery would have to be thoroughly inspected before any restart, he added.
"You can imagine in such a huge piece of machinery, you have pumps, you have bolts, you have pipes, you have a number of things that may be suffering corrosion."
Grossi said that if enough water could be pumped in from the Dnipro River, all six of the plant's reactors could eventually be restarted, although "a number of things" would need to be done beforehand.
RUSSIAN TECHNICIANS
Ukraine has said that any attempt by Russian technicians to restart the plant would be dangerous because they are not certified to operate it.
Grossi said Russian nuclear staff were capable of conducting a restart, and that the issue of certification was a political rather than technical one.
"They are professionals -- they know what they are doing," he said.
Ukraine has also protested at the IAEA's monitoring mission to the plant accessing it via Russian-occupied territory.
Grossi said this was to protect the safety of his staff, and that at present he does not have the necessary guarantees from the Russian side to safely transit IAEA staff through the frontlines to Ukraine-controlled territory, as had been done several times in the past.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Graham, Blumenthal hail Trump's new Russia sanctions plan
Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who have been pushing for a Russia sanctions bill, on Monday hailed President Trump's threat of tougher sanctions on Moscow if Russian President Vladimir Putin doesn't wind down his country's attacks on Ukraine in the coming weeks. 'It is long overdue for the financial backers of Russia's atrocities in Ukraine to pay a price for buying cheap energy products and marking it up in order to benefit their economies. The days of doing this without consequences are coming to an end,' the senators said in a joint statement after Trump's remarks at the White House. 'The combination of more American-made, European-purchased weapons for Ukraine and tariffs on the financial backers of Putin's brutal war has changed the game.' Trump warned Russia on Monday that he's prepared to levy 100 percent secondary economic sanctions in 50 days, which would target other nations that do business with Russia. 'We're very, very unhappy with [Russia], and we're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in about 50 days,' Trump said during a meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. 'We are very unhappy — I am — with Russia.' Graham and Blumenthal have a Russia sanctions bill with more than 80 co-sponsors in the Senate. The latest version would empower Trump to impose a 500 percent tariff on imports from any nation that purchases Russian uranium, gas or oil. 'Finally, as President Trump indicated, we will join our colleagues in continuing to work with the White House on our bipartisan Russia sanctions legislation that would implement up to 500 percent tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil and gas, and do not help Ukraine,' the senators said Monday. 'The congressional legislation authorizing tariffs and sanctions would truly be a sledgehammer for President Trump to end this war, and it will allow for maximum flexibility to achieve that end.' 'The benefit of our approach is that it blends congressional authorization of tariffs and sanctions with flexibility for presidential implementation, making it rock solid legally and politically,' they added. Trump, who has previously praised Putin, has been expressing increasing frustration with Russia's leader over what he described as disingenuous efforts to end the conflict with Ukraine. Trump campaigned on brokering a peace deal between the warring rivals last year. He reiterated that position during Monday's White House meeting. 'I go home and tell the first lady, 'I spoke with Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.' She says, 'Oh really? Another [Ukrainian] city was just hit,'' Trump recalled. 'We're very, very unhappy with them and we're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days,' he said. 'Tariffs at about 100 percent.' The White House later clarified that Trump meant 'secondary sanctions' and not tariffs. 'You can do tariffs or you can do sanctions, those are both tools in his toolbox,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters after the president's remarks. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Speaker Johnson says he's open to Russia sanctions bill
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Wednesday left the door open to holding a vote on a bill to sanction Russia over its years-long battle against Ukraine. His comments came shortly after Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) indicated the Senate could vote on a Russia sanctions bill — led by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) — by the end of the month, and after President Trump said on Tuesday that he was looking at the legislation 'very strongly.' 'I don't know any details yet but I know there's an interest in that in the House side, so we'll have to see,' Johnson told reporters in the Capitol when asked about the Senate bill. 'Vladimir Putin has shown an unwillingness to be reasonable and to talk seriously about brokering a peace, and I think we have to send them a message, that's my view,' he added. Johnson had previously backed penalizing Russia as the conflict drags on, telling reporters last month: 'There's many members of Congress that want us to sanction Russia as strongly as we can … and I'm an advocate of that.' But his comments on Wednesday put the Senate's bill, which is veto-proof with more than 80 co-sponsors, on a potential path to President Trump's desk. Thune on Wednesday said the upper chamber has made 'substantial progress' on the Russia sanctions bill, adding that it could be ready to hit the floor in the coming weeks. 'We've also made substantial progress on Graham's overwhelmingly bipartisan Russia sanctions legislation to enhance President Trump's leverage at the negotiating table and to help end the bloodshed in Ukraine,' Thune said on the Senate floor. 'And Mr. President, I fully expect that that could be ready for floor consideration as early as this work period.' 'Senate Republicans are committed to working with the House and the White House to get this legislation through Congress and on to the president's desk,' he added. Discussion about passing the sanctions bill is heating up as Trump becomes increasingly annoyed with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Last week, he said he was 'very disappointed' with a conversation he had with Moscow's leader, adding: 'I don't think he's there.' 'I'm just saying, I don't think he's looking to stop, and that's too bad,' Trump said. Trump for months has sought to broker peace between Russia and Ukraine to no avail. On Tuesday, he reversed a decision by the Pentagon last week to pause some arms shipments to Ukraine, saying he wanted to arm Kyiv with 'defensive weapons because Putin is not treating human beings right.' He also said he did not know who at the Pentagon decided on the pause. Graham said the Senate bill includes a presidential waiver, which would give Trump more authority over the sanctions. He also noted that the Senate will look to penalize China, India and other countries 'that buy Russian energy products that finance Putin's war machine.' Support for Ukraine has been a prickly subject in the House GOP conference since Moscow launched its offensive in February 2022, with a number of hard-line conservatives vocally against sending additional money and support to Kyiv. In April 2024, however, Johnson oversaw the passage of roughly $61 billion in aid for Ukraine, a move that was celebrated by Kyiv's supporters in both parties. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.N. Nuclear Watchdog Chief Contradicts Trump's ‘Total Obliteration' Claim On Iran
Rafael Grossi, the head of the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, disputed President Donald Trump's assessment that Iran's missile sites were 'totally obliterated' by U.S. airstrikes earlier this month. In an interview with CBS' 'Face the Nation' broadcast on Sunday, Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said intelligence shows that Iran could have 'in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that.' Still, Grossi noted that the U.S. operation targeting three Iranian nuclear sites — Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan — did have an impact, but perhaps not one as decisive as Trump has suggested. 'It is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage,' he added. 'Iran has the capacities there; industrial and technological capacities. So if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again.' The White House has so far not addressed Grossi's comments. The president told Americans that 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated' by U.S. airstrikes launched on June 21 amid Tehran's 12-day war with Israel. He has since lashed out at journalists who reported on a preliminary U.S. analysis showing the strikes would merely delay Iran's nuclear program by months, threatening lawsuits against both CNN and The New York Times for reporting on the Pentagon report. CIA Director John Ratcliffe has since claimed Iran's nuclear program was 'severely damaged,' citing what he described as a 'body of credible intelligence.' Meanwhile, Grossi said it's possible that Iran may have moved some of its enriched uranium prior to this month's U.S. attack, stressing the need for transparency and nuclear inspectors to be allowed to resume their work in the country. 'Some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved,' Grossi said. 'So there has to be, at some point, a clarification. If we don't get that clarification, this will continue to be hanging, you know, over our heads as a potential problem.' Last week, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did not directly answer a question on whether the U.S. believed Iran had moved its enriched uranium ahead of the airstrikes. 'We're looking at all aspects of intelligence and making sure we have a sense of what was where,' he said after lashing out at the Fox News reporter who asked for clarity on the issue. While Grossi stressed the importance of striking a diplomatic solution on Iran's nuclear program, Trump said he is not currently talking to the country's representatives since the June 21 operation in a post on his Truth Social platform early Monday. Iran Releases Death Toll Of Israel's Evin Prison Attack As Officials Remain Suspicious Of Ceasefire Senate Votes Not To Rein In Trump's War Powers After Iran Strikes Senators Diverge Sharply On Damage Done By Iran Strikes After Classified Briefing
