The Supreme Court's latest case on religion in school could have far-reaching consequences
There's seemingly no end to religious objections that one could make to various topics. That's relevant because the Supreme Court is hearing arguments Tuesday from Maryland parents who want to keep their elementary school kids from instruction involving gender and sexuality that they say bucks their beliefs.
Technically, the plaintiffs of various faiths aren't trying to control what gets taught or to ban books. Rather, they're asking for notice and a chance to opt their kids out of certain instruction, in this case sparked by books featuring LGBTQ characters.
So, what's the problem with that? After all, the Montgomery County school system previously allowed such 'opt-outs.'
Lawyers for the school system told the justices that growing opt-out requests prompted three related concerns: 'high student absenteeism, the infeasibility of administering opt-outs across classrooms and schools, and the risk of exposing students who believe the storybooks represent them and their families to social stigma and isolation.'
They said the implications of the parents' position are drastic, accusing them of trying to 'unsettle a decades-old consensus that parents who choose to send their children to public school are not deprived of their right to freely exercise their religion simply because their children are exposed to curricular materials the parents find offensive.'
Outside briefs from school groups highlight the potential impact beyond the particular facts of this case.
One of them tells the justices that the idea behind keeping kindergartners from the books at issue here 'will also apply to the parents of a high-school or middle-school student who wish to prevent their ninth grader from being exposed to evolution or their sixth-grader being exposed to any pictures of girls who are not wearing a hijab.' Likewise, another brief lists an array of objections lodged around the country to various topics, such as interracial marriage, feminism, yoga, Earth Day, community service, magic, witches, wizards, evolution, vaccinations and more.
Still, the parents say they face an 'impossible choice': subject their children to instruction against their beliefs or lose out on public education. They're represented by a religious liberty group and backed by the Trump administration. Representing the school system is WilmerHale, one of the law firms targeted by the administration's revenge orders. The firm has fought back on First Amendment grounds, thus far successfully. The parents in Tuesday's case, called Mahmoud v. Taylor, cite the amendment's religious freedom guarantee.
That atmospheric element aside, religious claims have broadly fared well at the Roberts Court. And this latest case has the makings of one that could garner at least a majority of the justices' sympathies.
Ultimately, it could wind up being not so much whether the religious side wins but where the court draws the line. That line-drawing consideration is an important one in many appeals but especially so here. Tuesday's hearing could shed light on what the court will do as the term nears its unofficial end, when the court usually publishes its final rulings by July.
Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration's legal cases.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bill Maher Knows Trump's Losing 'Credibility' When These Supporters Smell ‘Bulls**t'
Bill Maher weighed in on President Donald Trump losing control over a particular section of his MAGA fanbase amid the Jeffrey Epstein scandal during his Friday night opening monologue on 'Real Time With Bill Maher.' 'The interesting part of this is that Trump's QAnon base, who are always about the pedophiles — oh boy, are they serious about the pedophiles — they may be turning on Trump on this one,' Maher said. 'They really wanna see what's in these files.' Trump and his administration have been embroiled in controversy and backlash from his supporters for weeks following the Department of Justice's memo stating Epstein died by suicide in prisonand did not have a so-called 'client list.' 'Trump was hyping the Epstein files for so long. This was the conspiracy that we had to get to the bottom of, and now his horrible creation has turned on him,' Maher said. 'It's like if Elon Musk got run over by a Cybertruck.' For weeks, the president has provided conflicting information about his friendship with Epstein during his attempts to distance himself from the disgraced financier and sex trafficker. On Friday, Maher suggested the president knows he's losing 'credibility' when even his QAnon supporters, 'the people who believe in chemtrails and Jewish space lasers and [that] the Democrats eat babies,' are turning on him. 'When that crowd says, 'I smell bullshit,' you're in trouble,' Maher told a laughing audience. Related... Bill Maher Scoffs At 'No Kings' Protests, Even Though Trump 'Is Acting A Little King-Like' Bill Maher Unveils New Trump-Musk 'Couple Name' As Their Bromance Combusts Bill Maher Blames Diddy Accuser For Not Coming Forward Sooner
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
TikTok can shape America's next generation and Beijing knows it
If Washington doesn't act urgently, content pushed by TikTok and consumed by young Americans will result in future U.S. leaders unwittingly parroting China's talking points, advocating warped views and, most dangerously, acting in ways that are in Beijing's interests but undermine U.S. national security. There is admittedly no 'smoking gun,' but TikTok represents a highly plausible vector of intelligence collection. ByteDance, TikTok's parent firm, claims it is committed to U.S. national security, but is legally bound to cooperate with the Chinese Communist Party. The People's Republic of China almost certainly uses TikTok, at a minimum, as a collection platform to monitor public opinion. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. and TikTok agreed in January 2023 to maintain all U.S. data within the U.S., but there are concerning reports of leaks. With 170 million U.S. users, TikTok provides Beijing with real-time, granular insight into American public opinion. That real-time data collection would prove enormously useful, for instance, in assessing U.S. willingness to fight in a hypothetical conflict over Taiwan. But the challenge from TikTok with America's youth is not just collection, but influence. Early evidence suggests this is already underway. A Rutgers study found TikTok suppressed unfavorable accounts of sensitive topics, including Tibet, Tiananmen Square, Uyghur rights and Xinjiang. 'Heavy' users expressed elevated positive attitudes toward China's human rights record and greater interest in traveling to China. Given that the company's black box algorithm thwarts independent verification, we likely have seen only the tip of the iceberg of Beijing's efforts to sway the U.S. public. The algorithm could convulse U.S. domestic politics by sowing discord and highlighting divisions, an outcome that serves Beijing's interest in undermining U.S. cohesion and painting D.C. as an unreliable partner. Indeed, rather than bolstering one candidate or another, TikTok may act as an anti-incumbent tool. In the 2024 election, TikTok contributed to President Biden's low approval ratings, according to one Democratic strategist. In that election, President Trump's support among 18-29-year-olds, which disproportionately comprises TikTok's user base, rose by seven points from 2020. And yet, by April, only three months into office, Trump's support among young people has declined markedly — by up to 27 points. While there are admittedly many variables at play, TikTok can amplify alienation and short-term sentiment swings. Whatever one's politics, it's dangerous for China to retain levers that can subtly shape American public opinion, especially by amplifying dissatisfaction. It's worth noting that as Beijing uses tools to manipulate the U.S. public, especially its youth, it's taking meaningful steps to protect its own young people. Douyin, the version of TikTok used in China and also owned by ByteDance, is required by authorities to enforce a 'youth mode,' limiting users under 14 to app usage for just 40 minutes a day. It also locks them out between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. daily. The contrast is stark: China exports attention-fracturing content while shielding its own youth from it. China's use of TikTok may allow it to influence mass and elite opinion. And in fact, TikTok may be uniquely effective at influencing elite views, by enabling microtargeting. Given TikTok's effectiveness and deniability, as well as Beijing's determination to supplant the United States, Chinese security services are likely tweaking TikTok's algorithms to micro-target key users. Chinese security services can directly shape TikTok's algorithm — rather than merely exploit one built by others — giving it a deniable, end-to-end influence over what users see. Crucially, any elite-focused information operation via TikTok would be even more difficult to detect in the unclassified domain than efforts to shape mass public opinion because of how narrow and precise the targeting would be. For far too long, U.S. leaders on both sides of the aisle have failed to take action against the platform. And the reported decision by President Trump to tell U.S. companies they can ignore the law barring American companies from engaging with TikTok represents a new and immediate danger to U.S. national and economic security. At a minimum, it is imperative to ensure the U.S. is not allowing companies or individuals to engage with TikTok so long as its algorithm is controlled by a Beijing-linked company. But U.S. policymakers need to go even further and consider, for example, more ambitious measures such as national limits on short-video screen time for minors. The status quo is incomprehensible and dangerous: Young Americans are being asked to unwittingly face off against an algorithm that may be a tool of Chinese intelligence services. Allowing this dynamic to persist risks eroding the cognitive, civic and strategic foundations of American leadership. Jonathan Panikoff is a senior fellow in the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center and the former director of the Investment Security Group, overseeing the intelligence community's CFIUS efforts at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Joseph Webster is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and editor of the independent China-Russia Report.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Resetting Asia's Apparel Map With a New World Sourcing Order
Although the key apparel sourcing countries of Bangladesh, Cambodia, Sri Lanka and Thailand won a reprieve with the steep drop in the imposed tariff numbers in president Trump's missive close to midnight on Thursday, manufacturers from the region largely reacted Friday with a cautious, 'Lets wait and watch' attitude. Thailand and Cambodia were both assigned a 19 percent tariff—down sharply from the original April rates of 46 and 47 percent, respectively—putting them on par with Indonesia's revised rate announced in July. More from Sourcing Journal Trump Announces Dozens of New Reciprocal Tariff Rates Trump Tariffs Face Sharp Scrutiny in Appeals Court Global Air Cargo Growth Stalls as Tariffs Hammer North American Airlines Among the other countries down to 19 percent are Pakistan, Philippines and Malaysia. Bangladesh and Sri Lanka now face 20 percent, down from the earlier 37 percent and 47 percent and now comparable to that for Vietnam's 20 percent announced in July. The greatest relief manufacturers in sourcing countries from Cambodia to Thailand, Bangladesh to Sri Lanka told Sourcing Journal was that with this new reset on tariffs 'it was perhaps a relatively level playing field after all.' President Trump announced an extra week for the tariffs to go into effect, on August 7. Regional analysts echoed the cautious optimism suggesting that 'negotiations weren't quite done yet' and there might still be room to bring the rates lower. For many in countries like Bangladesh and Cambodia, there was a sense of deep relief that factory shutdowns and mass job losses might now be averted. 'We're relieved for the time being—because our tariff, and those for competing countries, is now similar, and in some cases lower. It would have been better if it was 15 percent, though,' Mahmud Hasan Khan, president of the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) told Sourcing Journal. He added that buyers had begun reviving frozen orders, eager to restock ahead of the coming season. 'They don't want their racks empty.' Home to a $40 billion apparel export sector, Bangladesh's garment industry contributes more than 80 percent of the country's total export earnings, employing around 4 million workers. Asked if negotiations would go on in the coming days, he observed, 'We have to continue—maybe not in a formal sense but we have to continue working towards it. At this time, we are congratulating our government and those in the frontline for negotiating, and we have also been involved behind the scenes. We would like to focus on business now—it doesn't depend only on tariff—there are a lot of things that affect business—gas prices, interest rates, labor laws, law and order and the political situation—tariff is only one component.' Economists have begun weighing the long-term implications of the new tariff landscape. Mustafizur Rahman, distinguished Fellow at the Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD), a leading think tank in South Asia in Dhaka observed, 'One way to look at it is that the tariff for Bangladesh is down from 35 percent to 20 percent. But it's still an additional cost burden. The relief for Bangladesh is that it is at least on par with Vietnam. From a competitive standpoint, that levels things.' However, he cautioned that trade-offs remain unclear. 'We know what we've received, but due to a non-disclosure clause, we don't yet know what we've given in return. While the apparel sector will benefit, it is important to know how the country itself will fare.' According to media reports, Bangladesh is expected to buy 25 Boeing aircrafts, increase wheat imports from the U.S., and amend labor laws by reducing the threshold for workers to form unions—from 30 percent to 20 percent. These developments have offered some reassurance following industry concerns raised after the 2025 Fashion Industry Benchmarking Study released by the U.S Fashion Industry Association (USFIA) earlier this week, which indicated that U.S. fashion executives plan to increase sourcing from Indonesia, India and Cambodia over the next two years, driving by a desire to diversify and mitigate risks. With India still facing 25 percent tariffs, down only by 1 percent from the earlier announcement of 26 percent – the rest of the region appears to be at an advantage. Ken Loo, secretary general of Cambodia's Textile, Apparel, Footwear and Travel Goods Association (TAFTAC), echoed regional sentiment. 'We're glad the rate has come down,' he said. 'We have no idea how this will impact buyers sourcing decisions and consumers yet. Everyone is adopting a wait-and-see approach. It is fortunate that we are all in the same ballpark. We will continue to work with the government to introduce measures that will reduce the cost of doing business and improve our competitiveness,' he added. Emerald Am, chairperson of the European Chamber of Commerce in Cambodia Garment and Manufacturing Committee said that the new rate restored the confidence and signaled a step toward renewed bilateral cooperation for manufacturers, giving them breathing room and an opportunity for brands to reinvest in Cambodian supply chains. According to media reports Cambodia will buy Boeing 737 Max aircrafts along with eliminating import tariffs, bringing them to zero. Sun Chanthol, deputy prime minister also observed that Cambodia agreed on improving labor standards and import inspection systems and U.S. concerns over non tariff barriers. Sri Lankan manufacturers likewise expressed relief at the 20 percent rate, with the Joint Apparel Association Forum (JAAF) stating it 'preserved the competitiveness of Sri Lanka's apparel industry in the key U.S. markets.' Roughly 40 percent of Sri Lanka's $4.8 billion apparel exports go to the United States. Meanwhile, government heads across the region have been much more vocal about the impact of the reduced tariffs, congratulating themselves, and claiming success. Muhammad Yunus, head of Bangladesh's interim government, described it a 'decisive diplomatic victory.' Malaysian trade and industry minister Zafrul Abdul Aziz said, 'This decision by the United States reflects the strong and enduring economic ties between our two nations.' Cambodian prime minister Hun Manet described it as a 'a great victory for Cambodia. This is great news for the people and the economy of Cambodia to continue to develop our nation,' he noted, referring to his phone call with President Trump last week. 'He told me that will make Cambodia happy (will make you happy). Today, his excellency decided to reduce the tax rate on goods imported from Cambodia to the United States to 19 percent'. Others also noted the reduction in tariffs to be 'a sign of friendship and partnership.' 'The announcement of the 19 percent tariff rate reflects the strong friendship and close partnership between Thailand and the United States. It helps maintain Thailand's competitiveness on the global stage, boosts investor confidence, and opens the door to economic growth, increased income, and new opportunities for the country,'' Thailand's deputy prime minister and finance minister Pichai Chunhavajira noted in a post on Friday. 'The outcome of this negotiation signals that Thailand must accelerate its adaptation and move forward in building a stable and resilient economy, ready to face global challenges ahead,' he said. The sticking point for much of the region remains the issue of transshipment of goods, with its 40 percent levy—with much of the region intrinsically dependent on China in a variety of ways, how this point will be interpreted—and enforced—remains unclear, as do the final levy of tariffs on China which are still under discussion. 'There are many more unanswered questions,' said one Cambodian manufacturer, speaking anonymously. 'Will this change again in one week?' He admitted that many in the industry remained confused. 'But in a way, it feels like a reset button. We're all back in the same game again—and that's a relief.'
