logo
Rising African star is Kremlin-backed revolutionary capitalising on anti-West sentiment

Rising African star is Kremlin-backed revolutionary capitalising on anti-West sentiment

Yahoo18-05-2025
When Capt Ibrahim Traore met Vladimir Putin across a broad Kremlin table last week, many in Russia or indeed Europe may have been unaware who this charismatic young visitor in a red beret and battle dress was.
In swathes of Africa however, with help from Russia, his face and name have recently been unavoidable, particularly on social media.
The youngest leader on the continent after a 2022 coup brought him to power in Burkina Faso, he is seen by many disillusioned youth as a messianic figure following in a line of African revolutionaries.
His message of self-reliance and independence from the West, particularly from France, the former colonial ruler, has resonated with frustrated young people across Africa looking for political saviours.
At the age of 37, Mr Traore is also a far cry from the continental caricature of a doddering octogenarian ruling over a population where the average age is still in the teens.
Some even see him as a reincarnation of Thomas Sankara, the Burkinabe Marxist and pan-Africanist revolutionary who ruled for four years in the 1980s.
Yet analysts and diplomats say while his burgeoning reputation is rooted in genuine disillusion with Africa's leadership and his desire for more equal relations with the West, it is also allegedly being expertly boosted and burnished by a Russian disinformation campaign.
The barrage of propaganda is aimed at building him up as an anti-Western icon and at distracting attention from Burkina Faso's dire security situation, which neither Mr Traore, nor his Russian backers have been able to fix.
His personality cult has in recent weeks been pushed into overdrive by a deluge of social media propaganda, often misleading, portraying him as a fearless reformer who defied Western powers and reclaimed his country's dignity.
This potent online myth-making has secured his place as a pan-African hero for many who contrast his vigour with the shortcomings of their own leaders.
'The rise of Traore is certainly making a lot of African leaders very uncomfortable,' says Ryan Cummings, a director of Signal Risk.
Mr Traore took power after a 2022 putsch capitalised on popular anger at the failure to deal with a bloody Islamist insurgency.
His junta quickly pivoted to kick out French troops and embrace Russia, alongside Mali and later Niger, creating a belt of pro-Kremlin military governments in the Sahel.
Moscow has agreed to provide mercenaries, arms and expertise, in return for access to the region's natural resources, notably gold.
Among the advantages of being aligned with Russia, is also access to the Kremlin's disinformation expertise, which has seemingly been put at the service of building Mr Traore into an African icon.
Widely shared posts have made misleading claims such as he has paid off the country's sovereign debt, that there are mass marches in the West in support of the Sahelian regimes, that Donald Trump has paid homage to Mr Traore's leadership, or that Burkina Faso has independently developed Africa's first electric cars.
In some of the most audacious propaganda released earlier this month, deepfake AI videos purportedly show stars including Beyonce and Rihanna singing anthems in his honour.
One ballad appears to show the Crazy in Love singer urging God to protect Mr Traore and relating how he 'kicked out the soldiers from the old regime,' and 'told the West we reclaim the dream'.
Credit: @LilR3Vi / YouTube
'The propaganda is utterly overwhelming and, while it's sometimes organic, the vast majority of it is intimately tied to Russia and potentially several of Moscow's Latin American allies,' says Will Brown of the European Council on Foreign Relations.
'The object is pretty clear – it's an anti-Western, anti-democratic agenda which glorifies strong man military leadership among a core base of disaffected youth.
'I think it's also increasingly about spreading anti-Western sentiment and hostile information through African diaspora populations.'
The military ruler has quickly become an icon beyond Burkina Faso's borders, used to chastise other leaders.
Last month, Hilda Dokubo, a Nigerian actress and politician, said: 'Ibrahim Traore is all the proof Nigerians need to know that a country takes the shape of its leadership and that Nigeria is where it is because of the wickedness of her leaders.'
Yet the sheen of Mr Traore's image contrasts with the reality of his junta and the terrible security conditions in the country.
Despite his pledge to tighten security, his forces are estimated to control as little as 35 per cent of the country, with jihadist groups like Jama'at Nasr al-Islam wal Muslimin (JNIM) besieging towns.
Data from the US-based Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project show that while 2,894 people were killed by both government and armed groups during the year before the 2022 coup. That number has reached 7,200 in the last year.
His regime is accused of abuses against civilians and cracking down on the media.
Militants launched a string of attacks on May 11 as Mr Traore made his way back from his meeting with Putin.
JNIM, a West African affiliate of al-Qaeda, said it had overrun an army base in the northern town of Djibo. It was impossible to verify claims that 200 soldiers had been killed, but satellite pictures showed widespread damage.
His military weakness may ultimately make him vulnerable to another coup and may be the reason Russia is making so much effort to build up his image.
Mr Cummings said: 'Traore is being propped up because he is the most vulnerable [of the Sahel junta leaders] to being overthrown.'
For all his anti-colonial rhetoric, he may also have traded one domineering partner for another.
He said: 'Preferential treatment that was being given to France is now just being given to Russia.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Great Realignment
The Great Realignment

Atlantic

time37 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

The Great Realignment

The American president wrote, 'Vladimir, STOP!' on his Truth Social account in April, but the Russian president did not halt his offensive in eastern Ukraine. The Ukrainian president called for an unconditional cease-fire in May, but the Russians did not agree to stop attacking Ukrainian civilians from the air. Donald Trump repeatedly promised, during his campaign, that he would end the war 'in one day,' but the war is not over. Instead, the Russian invasion of Ukraine does not merely continue. It accelerates. Most evenings, Russian troops hit Ukrainian apartment buildings, factories, infrastructure, and people, using ever more drones and missiles. On the ground, Ukraine's top commander has said that the Russians are preparing a new summer offensive, with 695,000 troops spread across the front line. Russian soldiers also continue to be wounded or killed at extraordinary rates, with between 35,000 and 45,000 casualties every month, while billions of dollars' worth of Russian equipment are destroyed every week by Ukrainian drones. The Russian economy suffers from high inflation and is heading for a recession. But Vladimir Putin is not looking for a cease-fire, and he does not want to negotiate. Why? Because he believes that he can win. Thanks to the actions of the U.S. government, he still thinks that he can conquer all of Ukraine. Putin sees what everyone else sees: Slowly, the U.S. is switching sides. True, Trump occasionally berates Putin, or makes sympathetic noises toward Ukrainians, as he did last week when he seemed to express interest in a Ukrainian journalist who said that her husband was in the military. Trump also appeared to enjoy being flattered at the NATO summit, where European leaders made a decision, hailed as historic, to further raise defense spending. But thanks to quieter decisions by members of his own administration, people whom he has appointed, the American realignment with Russia and against Ukraine and Europe is gathering pace—not merely in rhetoric but in reality. Just this week, in the middle of the worst aerial-bombing campaign since the war began, the Trump administration confirmed that a large shipment of weapons, which had already been funded by the Biden administration, will not be sent to Ukraine. The weapons, some of which are already in Poland, include artillery shells, missiles, rockets, and, most important, interceptors for Patriot air-defense systems, the ammunition that Ukrainians need to protect civilians from missile attacks. Trump had suggested that he would supply Ukraine with more Patriot ammunition, which is an American product. 'We're going to see if we can make some available,' he said after meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky last week. But what he says and what his administration actually does are very different. Pentagon spokespeople have explained that this abrupt change was made because American stockpiles are insufficient, an excuse disputed both by former Biden-administration officials and by independent policy analysts. But whether true or false, this reasoning doesn't matter to the Russians, who have already interpreted this change as a clear signal that American support for Ukraine is ending: 'The fewer the number of weapons that are delivered to Ukraine, the closer the end of the special military operation,' the Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. To be clear, by 'the end of the special military operation,' he means the defeat of Ukraine. At the same time, and with much less publicity, the U.S. is essentially lifting sanctions on Russia. No such formal announcement has been made. But the maintenance of sanctions requires constant shifts and adjustments, as Russian companies and other entities change suppliers and tactics in order to acquire sanctioned products. During the Biden administration, I spoke several times with officials who followed these changes closely, and who repeatedly issued new sanctions in order to counter them. As The New York Times has reported, the Trump administration has stopped following these shifts and stopped imposing new sanctions altogether. This, the Times writes, allows 'new dummy companies to funnel funds and critical components to Russia, including computer chips and military equipment.' In addition to taking Russia's side in the kinetic war and the economic war, the U.S. is realigning its position in the narrative war, too. During the Biden administration, the State Department's Global Engagement Center regularly identified Russian disinformation operations around the world—exposing misleading websites or campaigns secretly run or directed by Russian operatives in Latin America and Africa, as well as in Europe. Trump appointees have not only dissolved the center; they also baselessly and bizarrely accused it of somehow harming American conservatives, even of having ' actively silenced and censored the voices of Americans,' although the GEC had no operations inside the U.S. At the same time, cuts to USAID and other programs have abruptly reduced funding for some independent media and Russian-opposition media. The planned cuts to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, if not stopped by the courts, will destroy one of the few outside sources of information that reaches Russians with real news about the war. Should all of these changes become permanent, the U.S. will no longer have any tools available to communicate with the Russian public or counter Russian propaganda, either inside Russia or around the world. Listen: Trump's betrayal of Ukraine Inside the United States, Russian propaganda is most loudly and effectively promoted by appointees of the U.S. president. Steve Witkoff, the real-estate developer who became Trump's main negotiator with Russia despite having no knowledge of Russian history or politics, regularly echoes false Russian talking points and propaganda. He has repeated Putin's view, which he may have heard from the Russian president himself, that 'Ukraine is just a false country, that they just patched together in this sort of mosaic, these regions.' Witkoff has also seemed to agree with Putin that Ukrainian territories that voted for independence from Moscow in 1991 are somehow 'Russian.' By accepting disputed claims as fact, Witkoff is also helping Putin continue his war. In order to keep Russians onboard, to create divisions among Ukraine's allies, and maybe even to build doubts inside Ukraine itself, Putin needs to portray the Ukrainian cause as hopeless and to describe the Ukrainian 'demands' as unreasonable. He has to hide the most basic facts about this war: that he began it, that he has killed hundreds of thousands of people in pursuit of it, and that his goal, again, is to destroy or decapitate all of Ukraine. Witkoff helps make these falsehoods easier to sustain, in Russia, in the U.S., and in Europe. Add all of these things together, and they are something more than just a pattern. They are a set of incentives that help persuade Putin to keep fighting. Sanctions are disappearing, weapons are diminishing, counterpropaganda is harder to hear. All of that will encourage Putin to go further—not just to try to defeat Ukraine but to divide Europe, mortally damage NATO, and reduce the power and influence of the United States around the world. Europe, Canada, and most of the rest of the democratic world will continue to back Ukraine. As I have written before, Ukrainians will continue to innovate, to build new kinds of automated weapons, new drones, new software. They will continue to fight, because the alternative is the end of their civilization, their language, and, for many of them, their lives. The Ukrainians could still win. A different set of American policies could help them win faster. The U.S. could still expand sanctions on Russia, provide ammunition, and help the Ukrainians win the narrative war. The administration could stop the fighting, the missile attacks, and the lethal drone swarms; it could stop the pointless deaths that Trump has repeatedly said he opposes. By choosing to back Russia, the U.S. will ensure that the war continues. Only by backing Ukraine is there hope for peace.

Russia Hits Ukraine With Record Air Barrage Hours After Trump-Putin Call
Russia Hits Ukraine With Record Air Barrage Hours After Trump-Putin Call

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Russia Hits Ukraine With Record Air Barrage Hours After Trump-Putin Call

Russia attacked Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities on Friday with the largest number of drones and missiles launched in a single barrage so far in the war, according to Ukraine's air force, just hours after a phone call between President Trump and President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia. The assault left Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, wrapped in smoke from fires early Friday, though the authorities reported little damage and it was not immediately clear what had burned. Officials said residential buildings had been damaged in five neighborhoods. Russia has been ramping up drone attacks in recent months with record numbers launched almost weekly. The attacks, as happened Friday, typically combine exploding drones, cruise and ballistic missiles, and decoys intended to confuse or overwhelm Ukraine's air defenses. Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin spoke by phone shortly before the air-raid alerts went off in Kyiv. After the call, Mr. Trump told reporters, 'I didn't make any progress with him at all.' There was no clear link between the timing of the air assault and the call, which was at least the sixth between Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin this year, given the frequency of the large-scale aerial attacks. Friday's attack was also the first large-scale volley from Russia since the Trump administration said this week that it would withhold some of the air defense missiles and other weapons that the United States had promised to the Ukrainian military. Those supplies were expected in the coming weeks or months. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Trump, disappointed by call with Putin, to speak with Zelenskiy on Friday
Trump, disappointed by call with Putin, to speak with Zelenskiy on Friday

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump, disappointed by call with Putin, to speak with Zelenskiy on Friday

By Gram Slattery, Dan Peleschuk and Dmitry Antonov WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said early on Friday he came away disappointed from a telephone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin because it does not appear the latter is looking to stop Russia's war against Ukraine. U.S. attempts to end Russia's war in Ukraine through diplomacy have largely stalled, and Trump has faced growing calls - including from some Republicans - to increase pressure on Putin to negotiate in earnest. After speaking to Putin on Thursday, Trump plans to speak to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday, he said in remarks to reporters on his return to Washington from a trip to Iowa. "I'm very disappointed with the conversation I had today with President Putin, because I don't think he's there, and I'm very disappointed," Trump said. "I'm just saying I don't think he's looking to stop, and that's too bad." The two leaders did not discuss a recent pause in some U.S. weapons shipments to Kyiv during the nearly hour-long conversation, a summary provided by Putin aide Yuri Ushakov showed. Within hours of their concluding the call, an apparent Russian drone attack sparked a fire in an apartment building in a northern suburb of Kyiv, Ukrainian officials said, indicating little change in the trajectory of the conflict. In Kyiv itself, Reuters witnesses reported explosions and sustained heavy machine-gun fire as air defense units battled drones over the capital, while Russian shelling killed five people in the east. "I didn't make any progress with him at all," Trump told reporters on Thursday. Zelenskiy told reporters in Denmark earlier in the day that he hopes to speak to Trump as soon as Friday about the pause in some weapons shipments first disclosed this week. Speaking to reporters as he left Washington for Iowa, Trump said "we haven't" completely paused the flow of weapons but blamed his predecessor, Joe Biden, for sending so many weapons that it risked weakening U.S. defenses. "We're giving weapons, but we've given so many weapons. But we are giving weapons," he said. "And we're working with them and trying to help them, but we haven't (completely stopped). You know, Biden emptied out our whole country giving them weapons, and we have to make sure that we have enough for ourselves." The diplomatic back-and-forth comes as low stockpiles have prompted the U.S. to paused shipments of certain critical weapons to Ukraine, sources told Reuters earlier, just as it faces a Russian summer offensive and growing attacks on civilian targets. Putin, for his part, has continued to assert he will stop his invasion only if the conflict's "root causes" have been tackled, making use of Russian shorthand for the issue of NATO enlargement and Western support for Ukraine, including the rejection of any notion of Ukraine joining the NATO alliance. Russian leaders are also angling to establish greater control over political decisions made in Kyiv and other Eastern European capitals, NATO leaders have said. The pause in U.S. weapons shipments caught Ukraine off-guard and has generated widespread confusion about Trump's current views on the conflict, after saying just last week he would try to free up a Patriot missile defense system for use by Kyiv. Ukrainian leaders called in the acting U.S. envoy to Kyiv on Wednesday to underline the importance of military aid from Washington, and caution that the pause in its weapons shipments would weaken Ukraine's ability to defend itself against Russia. The Pentagon's move has meant a cut in deliveries of the Patriot defense missiles that Ukraine relies on to destroy fast-moving ballistic missiles, Reuters reported on Wednesday. Ushakov, the Kremlin aide, said that while Russia was open to continuing to speak with the U.S., any peace negotiations needed to happen between Moscow and Kyiv. That comment comes amid some signs that Moscow is trying to avoid a three-way format for possible peace talks. The Russians asked American diplomats to leave the room during such a meeting in Istanbul in early June, Ukrainian officials have said. Trump and Putin did not talk about a face-to-face meeting, Ushakov said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store