logo
From safety first to Palestine first, Keir Starmer shows some leadership

From safety first to Palestine first, Keir Starmer shows some leadership

The Guardian2 days ago
What a difference a week makes. Last Tuesday, Keir Starmer batted away all invitations to recognise the state of Palestine. It wasn't happening. Keir was committed to being appalled by the situation in Gaza but not appalled enough to do anything about it.
He then received a letter from more than 250 MPs, including some cabinet ministers, later in the week begging him to recognise the state of Palestine. He still stonewalled. The time was not yet right.
Not even the opinion polls that showed most of the UK population supported the recognition of Palestine could move him. Keir knew best. Safety first. Don't do anything to rock the boat.
Few were expecting that much of the emergency cabinet meeting to discuss Gaza. Some slightly stronger words to reflect the level of feeling among some cabinet ministers maybe. But still leaving himself some wriggle room. A balancing act that was sure to leave almost everyone feeling unhappy.
But then the readout. The message was unequivocal. The UK was going to recognise the state of Palestine before the next meeting of the UN general assembly in September unless the Israelis got their act together and committed to a ceasefire, allowed substantial aid into Gaza, got serious about a long-term peace plan, withdrew from the West Bank and accepted a two-state solution.
Moments later, Starmer popped up in the Downing Street media room for a brief, five-minute statement to confirm the government's position. The time for action had come. No more equivocation or delay. It could be sooner, it could be later, but there was no way of blocking a Palestinian state. Hamas had to release the hostages and step aside. Benjamin Netanyahu had to act in good faith or accept the inevitable. The UK could no longer stand to one side and watch a humanitarian disaster unfold.
In a neat piece of timing, no sooner had Keir finished addressing the UK than David Lammy came on stage at the UN to repeat the message. The UK was done with pleading with both sides to act responsibly. The UN had passed resolution after resolution, demanding that the war in the Middle East come to an end and aid got through to a starving civilian population.
Enough was enough. Britain had played a unique role in the history of the area with the Balfour declaration and the creation of a Jewish homeland. But the UK had also made a promise to the Palestinian people that they should have the right to their own land and to live in peace. Now was the time to no longer pay lip service to the idea of a two-state solution and right the historical injustice.
'I feel the hand of history on our shoulders,' Lammy said in a deliberate echo of Tony Blair's words on the Northern Ireland peace process. The chamber broke out in spontaneous applause as he left the stage after confirming that the UK would recognise the state of Palestine in just over a month's time.
It was also a sign that Keir had played a blinder during his meeting with President Trump in Scotland the day before. That hadn't been the easiest day out for the prime minister. But Starmer has proved himself to be one of the best wranglers of The Donald on the world stage. Knowing when to keep his mouth shut and let Agent Orange just ramble.
A narcissist is always going to be greedy for attention and Keir had been happy to sit back and let Trump be Trump. Let him boast about having ended six wars – though weirdly The Donald had reined that back to just five in a media appearance on Tuesday. Almost certainly still five too many, but no one was counting. Let him indulge his own vanity. Give him the Nobel peace prize if he really wants it. There were bigger prizes on offer. And the biggest of them all had been Gaza.
There will still be some who think the UK could have reached this position weeks ago. But Keir was not bothered about them. He's a man who operates at his own pace and to his own lawyerly methods. Everything must be squared away. No surprises left.
This had been a good day for Starmer and the UK. A better day for the starving Palestinians. A day when a world leader had shown some leadership. Who would have thought?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of Gary Neville's money
The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of Gary Neville's money

Telegraph

time26 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of Gary Neville's money

As a footballer Gary Neville was not known for his versatility. He was a one-club man who trundled up and down the right flank like a plough-horse. So it is heartening to see him switching things up politically. This week he became the latest Labour supporter to turn on them over tax. 'I honestly don't believe […] companies and small businesses should be deterred from employing people,' said Neville, who owns several businesses alongside his punditry gigs. 'So, I think the National Insurance rise was one that I feel probably could have been held back.' Leaving to one side the fact that Sky viewers might not mind living without his rabid commentary, there is a delicious schadenfreude in watching Neville, a noisy Labour fan, change tack. Last June, he even proved his commitment by taking Keir Starmer up the Langdale Pikes for a campaign interview, in what must have been the most tedious man-marking job of his life. Until recently Rachel Reeves has been blessed in her enemies. When she and Starmer broke a manifesto promise to whack farmers with inheritance tax, they couldn't have hoped for a better opponent than Jeremy Clarkson. Here was not some sympathetic turnip-tender on the breadline but a celeb who was on the record as saying dodging IHT was a reason he bought a farm. Number 10 must have rejoiced again in March when Alexander Armstrong, arguably the pre-eminent primetime posho, complained about VAT on private school fees. His quip that he was feeling 'extremely poor' did not land well with those who were actually feeling extremely poor. Now, even Labour's fans are rethinking. Neville was not the first. In February, the Iceland boss Richard Walker, who had supported Reeves' Budget, warned that, while it was right to look at 'levelling the playing field on tax', the Government had 'parked its tractor in the wrong place going after hard-working British farmers'. The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money. Even Gary Neville's. Lower the voting age? Here's a better solution Full credit to Jeremy Corbyn for waiting until Labour had said they would lower the voting age before announcing his new party. The Government thought letting 16 and 17-year-olds have a go at the ballot box might give them the edge in a few marginals. Instead, they might hand a sizeable bloc to Corbo and his band of plucky dreamers, not to mention the Greens and even Reform. Luckily for Keir Starmer I have a solution. Rather than lowering the voting age, he should introduce a cut-off. Many problems in the UK are, we're told, down to our limitless brigades of pensioners. As they don't have day jobs or Xboxes to occupy them, voting provides a welcome distraction. With gilded pensions and houses they bought for a shilling and sixpence, they vote to preserve their interests. But you have to reapply for your driving licence at 70, so why not your voting licence? A short quiz could determine eligibility: should we keep the triple lock? Should the winter fuel allowance be extended to summer? Is the PM too young? Are the policemen too young? Is the Pope too young? I can foresee objections, so how about a compromise: you have 50 eligible voting years in your life and you can choose when to use them. If you wanted to torch them on idealism at 16, you would be free to, but you wouldn't be able to defend your pension later. Either way, surely this would be the kind of bold move Starmer had in mind when he promised 'action, not words'. At least, that's what he told Gary Neville, on a hillside in Cumbria.

States of Alderney backs Guernsey Gaza statement
States of Alderney backs Guernsey Gaza statement

BBC News

time26 minutes ago

  • BBC News

States of Alderney backs Guernsey Gaza statement

The States of Alderney has said it endorses a compassionate message from the government of Guernsey in highlighting the humanitarian situation in the letter, Deputy Lindsay de Sausmarez said members were "profoundly concerned by the deaths and suffering of innocent civilians in Gaza".Alderney's States said it endorsed "the compassionate message from the government of Guernsey in highlighting the humanitarian situation in Gaza alongside the numerous other humanitarian crises in the world, and the commitment to upholding the principles of international law".Israel, which controls the entry of all supplies into Gaza, has blamed Hamas for any cases of malnutrition. The Guernsey letter was signed by 17 deputies pressuring de Sausmarez to write to UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. De Sausmarez said: "Members are deeply moved by the plight of people of all ages who are caught up in any conflict."The members hope that the global community soon finds and implements effective ways to protect civilians, alleviate human suffering and secure lasting peace."

Portugal makes cautious move towards recognising Palestinian state
Portugal makes cautious move towards recognising Palestinian state

Reuters

time30 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Portugal makes cautious move towards recognising Palestinian state

LISBON, July 31 (Reuters) - Portugal's centre-right government will consult the main political parties and conservative President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa about the potential recognition of a Palestinian state, Prime Minister Luis Montenegro said on Thursday. Unlike neighbouring Spain, whose leftist government recognised Palestinian statehood in May 2024 alongside Ireland and Norway and called on other EU countries to do the same, Portugal has taken a more cautious approach, saying it wanted to work out a common position with other EU countries first. French President Emmanuel Macron announced last week his country, a heavyweight in the EU, plans to recognise a Palestinian state, becoming the first major Western state to do so. His move came amid a rising global outcry over starvation and devastation in Gaza as Israel wages war against Hamas militants there. Britain and Canada have since said they could also recognise a Palestinian state. "The government decided to promote consultations with the president and the political parties represented in parliament with a view to consider the recognition of the Palestinian state in a process that could be concluded ... at the U.N. General Assembly in September," Montenegro said in a statement. About 144 of the 193 member states of the United Nations recognise Palestine as a state, including most of the global south as well as Russia, China and India. But only a handful of the 27 European Union members do so, mostly former Communist countries as well as Sweden and Cyprus. The U.N. General Assembly approved the de facto recognition of the sovereign state of Palestine in November 2012 by upgrading its observer status at the world body to "non-member state" from "entity".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store