Who is Mathura Sridharan? Ohio's new Indian-origin solicitor general trolled for wearing ‘bindi'
Sridharan is Yost's pick for Ohio's 12th solicitor general. Announcing her appointment in a post on X, Yost called her brilliant and said that she will serve the state well.
Also read: Indian family met with car crash around 5 miles from West Virginia destination: Tracing their journey
'Mathura is brilliant… she won her argument at SCOTUS last year. Both the SGs she worked under (Flowers & Gaiser) recommended her. I told her when I originally hired her I needed her to argue with me. She does… All the time! Excited to promote her. She will serve Ohio well,' he said in a post on X.
However, Sridharan was at the receiving end of racist trolling over her being an Indian and also wearing a 'bindi'.
'Why would you select someone who isn't an American for such an important role?' read one reply.
'Well the dot is discreet, but ultimately still visible,' said another, seemingly pointing to her 'bindi' as the dot.
Who is Mathura Sridharan?
Mathura Sridharan is an Indian-origin American lawyer who is currently serving as the deputy solicitor general at Ohio's attorney general's office.
She has been promoted by the state's attorney general Dave Yost to serve as Ohio's 12th solicitor general.
Before this, Sridharan has also served as the Director of Ohio's Tenth Commandment Centre at the state's attorney general's office for over two years.
As the director of Ohio's Tenth Amendment Center, Sridharan initiated and directed 'suits to defend Ohioans against unlawful federal policies and to preserve separation of powers between the federal and state governments,' according to The Federal Society, a group of 'conservatives and libertarians dedicated to reforming the current legal order'. Sridharan is one of the contributors of the society, according to their website.
Before joining the Ohio Solicitor's Office, Sridharan clerked for Judge Steven J Menashi of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Judge Deborah A Batts of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, says The Federal Society's website.
Sridharan went to the prestigious Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) to pursue Bachelor of Science in electrical engineering and computer science and also studied economics in 2008. She also did her Masters from MIT in the same streams.
Later, in 2015, Sridharan studied law at the New York University School of Law and graduated in 2018.
Dave Yost defends Mathura Sridharan
After Sridharan faced flak post her appointment for being Indian and wearing a 'bindi', Yost defended her and said the comments that assert that Mathura is not American are 'incorrect'. He added that if Sridharan's complexion or her name is bothering someone, the problem is with them and not her.
'A few commenters have asserted incorrectly that Mathura is not American. She is a United States citizen, married to a US citizen, and the child of naturalized US citizens. If her name or her complexion bother you, the problem is not with her or her appointment,' he wrote in a post on X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
13 minutes ago
- India.com
Can A Country Survive Without America? These Nations Already Already Do Without U.S. Ties
New Delhi: The global order has long revolved around the United States. Its economic weight, military power and diplomatic reach have shaped how countries operate. But a handful of nations have taken a different path. They have either walked away from Washington or never entered the room. And despite years of pressure, sanctions and isolation, they continue to function. Among them, Iran stands out. For decades, Tehran has maintained one of the most antagonistic relationships with Washington. The rift deepened after the Islamic Revolution of 1979, which led to sweeping sanctions that strangled its economy. But Iran did not collapse. Instead, it shifted its focus inward, developed its oil and gas sector and invested in domestic industries. It strengthened ties with countries like Russia, China and Turkey to keep its economy running. In 2024, U.S. President Donald Trump intensified tariff threats against several countries. India found itself on Washington's radar. He accused New Delhi of buying large quantities of crude oil from Russia and selling it in global markets at a profit. He announced a 25% tariff on Indian trade and lashed out on Truth Social, claiming New Delhi had no concern for the war in Ukraine. India issued a strong rebuttal. Responding to the threat, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) made it clear that India would act in its national interest. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal explained that India had to turn to Russian oil because European suppliers had redirected their energy exports in the aftermath of the Ukraine conflict. At that time, Washington had supported India's decision. 'This is not a matter of choice. It was a response to the global market's limitations,' he said and pointed out the irony that countries that continue to criticise India are themselves engaged in trade with Russia, even when they face no strategic compulsion to do so. This debate has brought up a question: can a nation survive without engaging with the United States? Are there countries that have built an economic and political existence independent of American support? There are. Iran, Cuba, North Korea and Venezuela have managed to chart out such paths. Their experiences are far from smooth. Each of them has faced significant hardships. Still, they have not collapsed under pressure. Instead, they have sought out new alliances, developed local industries and found ways to adapt. After decades of sanctions, Iran signed a 25-year strategic agreement with China. The deal covers Chinese investments in Iran and steady oil purchases. Tehran also expanded military and economic ties with Moscow. Its domestic defence and technology sectors have grown despite external isolation. Its missile and drone programmes are homegrown. The country's education and healthcare systems, while strained, continue to function. Cuba has followed its own model. Since the 1960s, it has faced stringent U.S. sanctions. After embracing communism under Fidel Castro, the country was cut off from American trade. But it built a healthcare system that earned global praise. Cuban doctors and vaccines have been exported to countries across Latin America and Africa. Its tourism and biotechnology have brought in revenue. Partnerships with Russia, Venezuela and other regional allies have helped it remain afloat. North Korea offers a different case. There are no direct economic ties between Pyongyang and Washington. The two countries remain adversaries. Under Kim Jong Un, North Korea has prioritised its nuclear weapons programme and missile development. It has relied heavily on China for energy, food and essential supplies. Russia has also provided limited support. Despite economic difficulties, North Korea has continued to function under its rigid political system. Venezuela, too, has faced American sanctions, especially targetting its oil exports. But Caracas responded by strengthening its ties with Iran, China and Russia. It used its vast oil reserves as leverage, exchanging energy for investment and support. Each of these countries has followed a different model. Some turned to authoritarianism, while others leaned on regional alliances. But all have demonstrated that an economic existence without the United States, while difficult, is not impossible. These examples do not suggest that global engagement with Washington lacks value. The United States remains the world's largest economy and a central force in international diplomacy. But these nations show that with the right strategies, strong internal planning and alternative partnerships, survival outside the American orbit is not only possible, but it is already happening.
United News of India
26 minutes ago
- United News of India
US federal court redirects border agents to stop deportations, overriding President Trump's asylum ban
Washington, Aug 5 (UNI) In an upset to US President Donald Trump's anti-immigration stance, a federal court has redirected American border troops to stop their deportation of migrants, ruling that presidential order could not be used to cut off humanitarian support for potential asylum seekers, two Department of Homeland Security officials told CBS News. Asylum and migration have been one of the cornerstones of the second Trump administration, with border agents allowed full hand to deport illegal migrants without valid permits. The move did indeed manage to curb immigration by a massive degree, particularly from the US-Mexico border, which recorded the lowest level of migration so far. The scale of deportations by the Trump administration has been unprecedented, with border agents not allowing any asylum seekers to enter in a bid to undo the damage caused by the alien 'invasion' under the previous Biden administration, where immigration was noted to be at its highest. On Friday, a federal appeals court lifted its pause on a lower judge's ruling that found Trump's decree to be in violation of US asylum laws. While the appellate court narrowed the lower court's order, saying that the POTUS' proclamation could be used to pause access to the asylum system, it also ruled the US government could not disregard other laws that bar officials from deporting migrants to places where they could be tortured or persecuted. Officials at Customs and Border Protection were instructed this weekend to halt deportations, thus effectively cancelling Trump's proclamation and to process migrants under the US immigration law, which affords foreigners on American soil the right to request humanitarian refuge, the two anonymous DHS officials said. While the court order could potentially reopen Washington's asylum system, it is unlikely to affect the status of those found crossing the southern border illegally. These people will likely remain detained while officials vet their claims. The Trump administration has largely stopped the practice of releasing migrants onto American soil while they await their court dates, limiting releases to cases involving extraordinary circumstances. The Justice Department could also try to get Friday's court order suspended by the Supreme Court, in a bid to revive the POTUS' asylum ban. In a statement to CBS News late Monday, CBP said Friday's court order affirmed "the President's authority to deny asylum to aliens participating in an invasion into the United States." CBP said the Trump administration is "committed to ensuring that aliens illegally entering the United States face consequences for their criminal actions." "This includes prosecution to the fullest extent of the law and rapid removal from the United States," the agency added. "CBP will continue to process illegal/inadmissible aliens consistent with law, including mandatory detention and expedited removal." UNI XC ANV GNK
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
SYL talks: Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann floats Chenab plan to resolve water dispute
Chandigarh: Punjab chief minister Bhagwant Mann on Tuesday urged the Centre to duly utilise water of the Chenab to resolve the long-pending water dispute between Punjab and Haryana by shelving the Satluj Yamuna Link (SYL) issue. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now After attending a meeting of Punjab and Haryana CMs called by Union Jal Shakti Minister C R Paatil over the SYL issue, Mann said that during the last meeting held on July 9, the Centre said that the with Pakistan had been suspended. This opens up a major opportunity for India to utilise water from the Chenab river, one of the western rivers earlier given to Pakistan under the treaty. Mann said the Centre should now divert Chenab's water to Indian dams like Ranjit Sagar, Pong, or Bhakra. To carry this extra water, new canals and infrastructure could be built in Punjab, he suggested. Mann said that such canals and infrastructure could be first used to meet the needs of Punjab, after which the water could be supplied to Haryana and Rajasthan through the same canal system. "Using Chenab water will reduce Punjab's dependence on groundwater, revive surface irrigation, and support the farming community. Waters of the western rivers should be allocated to Punjab on a priority basis," he said, adding that new storage dams upstream of existing Bhakra and Pong Dams in Himachal Pradesh should be constructed to significantly enhance the storage and regulation of western river waters. Batting for the shelving of the SYL canal issue, Mann said that the Sarda-Yamuna link for the transfer of surplus Sarda water to the Yamuna river and the diversion of Chenab water to the Beas river through the Rohtang tunnel should be done to eliminate the need for the SYL canal. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now According to him, the long-conceived project of the Sharda-Yamuna Link should be taken up on priority basis, and surplus water should be transferred to the Yamuna river at a suitable location. He said that the additional water made available could offset the balance water requirement of the state of Haryana from the Ravi-Beas system, apart from addressing the ever-growing drinking water requirement of Delhi and the availability of the Yamuna water to Rajasthan. Mann pointed out that the SYL canal was an "emotive issue" over which Punjab could have serious law and order issues, with Haryana and Rajasthan bearing the brunt too. SOME POSITIVE HEADWAY Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann said discussions took place in a good atmosphere. "The Supreme Court had said that if this issue can be resolved through talks, meetings should be held. We hope that some steps could be taken forward. There is no fight between the people of Punjab and Haryana. The issue has been politicised. Both chief ministers and the Jal Shakti Minister held the meeting, and some positivity has emerged from the discussion. A path forward can be created, for which a meeting will be held before the 13th... I hope I was successful in presenting Punjab's perspective, and I hope the Centre will consider it," said Mann. TAKES POT SHOTS AT CENTRE Taking pot-shots at the Centre, CM Mann said he hoped that the decision on the Indus Water Treaty would not be reversed. "I hope that US President Donald Trump doesn't post something on X (formerly Twitter) saying, 'I have revived the Indus Water Treaty.' The treaty should stay suspended as it will help Punjab get more water. Punjab has to use it to grow good and give it to the country." He was speaking to media persons after the Centre's meeting on SYL.
