Homeless Population Declines in Los Angeles for a Second Straight Year
The results of the regional count, conducted in February, were viewed as generally positive news in the nation's second-largest city, which saw a spike in homelessness after the Covid-19 pandemic and has been vexed by a severe housing shortage.
Even with the declines, more than 72,000 people remain homeless in Los Angeles County, a sprawling and fragmented metropolis with a population of about 10 million people.
In particular, the number of people sleeping in vehicles, abandoned buildings, sidewalk camps and other places unfit for habitation declined from the year before by 9.5 percent in Los Angeles County and by 7.9 percent in the City of Los Angeles.
Over two years, the count showed that unsheltered homelessness fell cumulatively by 14 percent in Los Angeles County and by a record 17.5 percent in the city, as thousands of people moved indoors.
Local officials attributed the trend to a regionwide barrage of initiatives and to billions of dollars in public spending over the past several years, including countywide taxes to help fund affordable housing and a state of emergency on homelessness declared by Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles after her 2022 election.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Players' associations urge Congress to reject proposed bill granting NCAA antitrust exemption
Players' associations for the NFL, NBA, Major League Baseball, NHL and MLS issued a joint statement Monday urging Congress to reject proposed legislation that would grant the NCAA and its members an antitrust exemption to address NIL issues. The statement was in response to the Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements (SCORE) Act, introduced last week by members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. A markup on the bill is scheduled for Tuesday morning. Advertisement In their letter, the players' associations warned that an antitrust exemption would permit the NCAA and its members to 'collude to harm athletes.' 'Whatever progress the athletes have made has been a result of their use of the antitrust laws,' they wrote. 'The SCORE Act would take that weapon away from them.' The proposed legislation from seven Republican and two Democratic sponsors prevents athletes from obtaining employment status and mirrors many of the terms from the recent House vs. NCAA settlement. It would officially end most administrative restrictions on athletes' NIL compensation, but it allows schools and conferences to establish what is and isn't permissible. Should the federal legislation pass, it would override current state NIL laws, which vary from state to state. Earlier Monday, two members of Congress from the state of Washington, Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, and Republican Rep. Michael Baumgartner, issued a similar statement urging the House committee to delay the markup until there are significant changes. Advertisement 'The bill appears to be a product of the richest conferences to cement into place the current power structure in college athletics that would leave only the wealthiest schools able to compete at the highest levels of college athletics,' the statement said. All of the Power 5 conferences previously issued a statement endorsing the SCORE Act. 'In the absence of federal standards, student-athletes and schools have been forced to navigate a fractured regulatory framework for too long,' they wrote. 'Following the historic House settlement, this bill represents a very encouraging step toward delivering the national clarity and accountability that college athletics desperately needs.' Advertisement Last week, the NCAA said in a statement that it 'has made long overdue changes, mandating health and wellness benefits and ushering in a new system for Division I programs to provide up to 50 percent of athletic department revenue to student-athletes, but some of the most important changes can only come from Congress.' 'This bill reflects many student-athletes' priorities, and the NCAA is committed to working with Congress to build a bipartisan path forward that ensures the long-term success of college sports and the ongoing opportunities they provide to young people,' wrote Tim Buckley, the NCAA's senior vice president of external affairs. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey also praised the bill Monday. 'I think what's happening in college athletics is a nonpartisan issue, but using the typical nomenclature, to have members of both of our major political parties willing to step out and introduce the SCORE Act, is a positive step,' he said. The players' associations' letter noted that only two industries in the United States have antitrust law exemptions: railroads and Major League Baseball (partially). Advertisement 'The NCAA should not have a blank check to impose (its) will on the financial future of over 500,000 college athletes,' they wrote. This article originally appeared in The Athletic. College Football, Men's College Basketball, Women's College Basketball, College Sports 2025 The Athletic Media Company
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
APS board unanimously approves special election for building referendum
Jul. 14—In a unanimous vote, the Austin Public Schools Board on Monday night voted in favor of a two-question special election this November for a referendum to support building upgrades in the district. Voters will head to the ballot to answer the first question of the building referendum, which is not to exceed $54.7 million and that will be spread across eight buildings in the district. This money will go toward upgrades in each building that will include — among other things — safety, security and accessibility improvements. The second question authorizes $12 million for renovation of the 50-year-old Bud Higgins Pool at Ellis Middle School. This second question relies on the passing of the first question. In total, the district is asking voters to approve a total of $66.7 million. "I think if we can proactively take care of our buildings and make them functional and prepared for the next couple of decades, I think that would be a good investment on the community's part," said Board Chair Carolyn Dube. Board member Peggy Young agreed and added that this was the time to do it rather than kicking the can down the road. "The longer we postpone the more expensive it's going to be," Young said. "These are things that keep our buildings together. We have to be really good at telling folks that these repairs have to be done." READ MORE: APS considers possible referendum for November If passed, the impact to an average home worth $200,000 would increase by about $16. While board members were clearly in agreement about the need for the referendum, it didn't mean there weren't concerns ranging from the timing of bringing this election forward this year to how to get the word out. In particular, some board members referenced the current morale issues that have dominated discussions earlier this summer. "My concern is it's been a rough three or four months for the district, the board, the administration," said Board Member Don Leathers. "We need to do our darndest to win over the sliver of people that are a little bit mad at me and a little bit mad at you." Leathers also pushed for a unified effort to get the word out what the district was attempting to do, referencing a survey conducted early in the process that showed a willingness among community members to consider the questions. Cece Kroc on the other hand said she was worried about this being the only ballot item. "It could bring out more people that say, 'I don't want to pay any more,'" Kroc said. "I believe in the needed money, but there are concerns." However, conversations eventually returned to a will of avoiding postponing the referendum on the grounds of changing and likely rising costs of construction as well as a concern of what happens if the referendum doesn't pass. "My concern is if it doesn't pass we don't have $64 million sitting there in our general fund," Dan Zielke said, explaining that difficult discussions could arise in regard to possible cuts within the district. "If we have to spend this money, it comes from a different source." "What happens if this doesn't pass?" he added.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pentagon inks contracts for Musk's xAI, competitors
The Pentagon announced contracts on Monday with multiple leading US artificial intelligence firms including Elon Musk's xAI, which has faced intense scrutiny in recent days over anti-Semitic posts by its Grok chatbot. Each of the contracts to xAI, Anthropic, Google and OpenAI have a ceiling value of $200 million, the Pentagon's Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO) said in a statement. The awards will enable the Department of Defense "to leverage the technology and talent of US frontier AI companies to develop agentic AI workflows across a variety of mission areas," it said. The contract with xAI comes just days after the company was forced to apologize again for controversial posts by its Grok chatbot. After an update on July 7, the chatbot praised Adolf Hitler in some responses on the X social media platform, denounced "anti-white hate," and described Jewish representation in Hollywood as "disproportionate." xAI apologized for the extremist and offensive messages, and said it had corrected the instructions that led to the incidents. The release on Wednesday of Grok 4, the latest chatbot version, was almost met with scrutiny after it appeared to consult Musk's positions on some questions it was asked before responding. The contract between xAI and the Department of Defense comes even as Musk and President Donald Trump have publicly feuded in recent weeks. Musk, a top backer of Trump's most recent presidential campaign, was entrusted with managing the new agency known as DOGE to massively slash government spending under the current administration. After ending his assignment in May, the South African-born entrepreneur publicly criticized Trump's major budget bill for increasing government debt. The president and the businessman engaged in heated exchanges on social media and in public statements before Musk apologized for some of his more combative messages. - 'Critical national security needs' - The government and the defense sector are considered a potential growth driver for AI giants. Musk's xAI announced on Monday the launch of a "Grok for Government" service, following a similar initiative by OpenAI. In addition to the Pentagon contract, "every federal government department, agency, or office (can now) purchase xAI products" thanks to its inclusion on an official supplier list, xAI said. Meta meanwhile has partnered with the start-up Anduril to develop virtual reality headsets for soldiers and law enforcement. OpenAI had previously announced in June that it had secured a Defense Department contract with a ceiling of $200 million. "Establishing these partnerships will broaden DoD use of and experience in frontier AI capabilities and increase the ability of these companies to understand and address critical national security needs with the most advanced AI capabilities U.S. industry has to offer," said the CDAO statement on Monday. tu-gw-des/sla
