
Trump administration's pressure on GM produce underlines Indian farmers' predicament
For India, this presents a dilemma that has less to do with economics. Average soyabean yields in the US are more than 3.5 times that of India. That makes American growers much more cost competitive. Moreover, India imports close to 5 million tonnes (mt) of soyabean oil annually. From a domestic value addition standpoint, it makes sense to import soyabean itself, which can then be processed to yield both oil and the residual protein-rich cake or meal. The yield difference may be somewhat less for maize, where many Bihar farmers harvest almost the same per-hectare tonnage as their counterparts in Iowa or Illinois. But India's maize consumption is growing on the back of both feed and ethanol biofuel demand. Imports are going to be a practical necessity in both maize and soyabean meal, as rising incomes lead Indians to consume more dairy and other animal products that require these as key feed ingredients.
The problem is more political. Maize and soyabean are grown on areas of 12 million hectares and 13 million hectares respectively in the country. Given the sheer number of farmers involved, the government cannot be oblivious to their interests. But that's where policy own-goals have not helped either. GM technology has allowed US farmers to plant soyabean and maize varieties that can tolerate application of herbicides and resist deadly insect attacks. They are, therefore, able to harvest higher yields through better weed and pest control. Unfortunately, the same technology has been denied to Indian farmers, who are now expected to compete against imports from countries whose governments have not succumbed to Luddite interests. Blocking technology in the name of Swadeshi has led to India turning from a net exporter to importer of cotton. The Trump pressure is like adding salt to the wound.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
27 minutes ago
- Hans India
Elon Musk launches 'America Party' enters U.S. political scenario
In a bold move to disrupt the American political landscape, tech mogul Elon Musk announced the formation of a new political organization — the America Party. The announcement came just a day after President Donald Trump signed the controversial 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' which Musk strongly criticized. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom,' Musk posted on X (formerly Twitter), referencing a recent poll he conducted where nearly two-thirds of respondents supported the creation of a new political party. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' Musk, who was previously a significant donor and close supporter of Trump during the 2024 elections, has publicly parted ways with the president. As the former head of the now-disbanded Department of Government Efficiency, Musk had championed aggressive cost-cutting measures. His criticism of the new federal spending bill — which economists estimate will add $3.4 trillion to the national deficit over ten years — led to a sharp fallout with the Trump administration. Calling the bill 'debt slavery,' Musk accused both parties of operating under a single agenda. 'We live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' he wrote. The friction escalated when Trump retaliated with threats to cut federal funding to Musk's companies and hinted at the possibility of deporting the South African-born entrepreneur. The idea of launching a third party was once viewed as improbable for Musk, but the groundswell of public support via social media appears to have fueled his resolve. On July 4, Musk posted a poll asking users whether the U.S. needed independence from the entrenched two-party system. The results: 65.4% voted 'Yes.' With the formation of the America Party, Musk positions himself as a champion of fiscal responsibility and political reform — and potentially a formidable disruptor in the run-up to the next election cycle.


Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
Govt says there's no directive to block Reuters X handle in India
The Government of India has clarified that it has not issued any order to withhold the X account of the international news agency Reuters in the country. "There is no requirement from the Government of India to withhold Reuters handle. We are continuously working with X to resolve the problem," an official spokesperson said in a statement. This clarification comes after Reuters' X account was found to be withheld in India, prompting concerns over press freedom and censorship. Users attempting to access the handle were shown a notice stating that the account had been withheld "in response to a legal demand". Reuters confirmed the development earlier, saying it was seeking more information on why its handle was blocked in India. According to officials familiar with the matter, the only request for blocking Reuters' X account was issued on May 7, during Operation Sindoor launched against Pakistan following the massacre of 26 Indian tourists in Pahalgam in an Islamabad-sponsored terrorist attack. This was a part of a national security exercise. However, although several hundred accounts were blocked due to national security reasons, no action was implemented to block the Reuters handle on X despite the government order, the official said. It appears that X, owned by Elon Musk, may have mistakenly enforced the outdated order. "The issue is not relevant anymore. The government has reached out to X, asking them to explain the blocking and to lift the embargo," a senior official said. Reuters has not issued any public statement on the issue. Despite the block on Reuters' main and Reuters World handles, several affiliated accounts, including Reuters Tech News, Reuters Fact Check, Reuters Asia, and Reuters China, remain accessible within India.


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
BJP asks Karnataka CM to apologise for linking COVID vaccines with heart attacks as expert panel rejects claim
Synopsis Karnataka BJP demands an apology from Chief Minister Siddaramaiah for linking cardiac arrests in Hassan to COVID-19 vaccination. An expert panel found no evidence supporting the claim, attributing the rise in cardiac deaths to multifactorial risks. Union Minister Pralhad Joshi and BJP spokesperson Dr CN Ashwath Narayan criticized Siddaramaiah's remarks as baseless and aimed at discrediting Indian-made vaccines.