Texas outpaces job growth nationwide, Gov. Abbott commends economy
Over the last 12 months, Texas has led the nation in job creation, with 198,300 nonfarm jobs added. Based on June data, Texas set new records with the number of Texans working and the size of the labor force in the state.
'Thanks to the strength of the Texas economy, more Texans are working than ever before,' said Governor Abbott. 'While we pause to celebrate job gains over the year, we also recognize the strength of Texans throughout this disaster and the outpouring of support from our fellow Americans over the last two weeks.'
Data about June employment from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Texas Workforce Commission shows that:
Texas reached a new high with the largest labor force ever in the state's history at 15,850,100.
Texas reached a new high for Texans working, including self-employed, at 15,210,500.
The unemployment rate in Texas dropped to 4.0% over the month of June.
Texas added 198,300 nonfarm jobs from June 2024 to June 2025, more than any other state and growing at a faster annual rate than the nation as a whole.
To see the stats for Texas cities, check out the report from the Texas Workforce Commission.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
27 minutes ago
- Business Wire
New Report Reveals Lack of Understanding is Holding Back Wider U.S. Crypto Adoption
MIAMI--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Today, the National Cryptocurrency Association (NCA), a nonprofit organization dedicated to helping Americans understand and use crypto with confidence, released insights from a Harris Poll survey of Americans who do not hold any crypto. The 2025 Crypto Confidence Pulse showed that despite its growing visibility, lack of understanding is the primary reason that four out of five U.S. adults do not yet hold any crypto. NCA had previously conducted the largest ever survey of Americans that do hold crypto and found that the majority of them believe that crypto has had a positive impact on their lives. This latest survey finds that those who have yet to dip their toes into crypto are hesitant for a variety of reasons: Nearly 90% said they are not knowledgeable about buying, using, selling or trading crypto and almost half (49%) cited lack of understanding of how crypto works as the biggest barrier to entry Trust is another blocker: 43% are concerned about security and fraud with 36% lacking trust in crypto platforms and exchanges There's also confusion around crypto's core feature, namely that it has no central actor: 41% say they don't know who or what is 'backing' crypto assets Overall, only 18% say they are likely to acquire crypto in 2025 "Crypto's biggest barrier is comprehension,' said Stuart Alderoty, President of the NCA. 'For most Americans, crypto still feels confusing. Nearly one-quarter of non-holders said they would use crypto if they could pay for goods and services with digital assets, but they already can do these things (and more) – they just don't realize it. This is a call to action that we must demystify the technology and build trust through education, which is our mission at the NCA.' The report identifies five distinct personas among non-holders, from Curious and Cautious to Trendwatchers, Traditionalists and Skeptics. While each group varies in demographics and motivation, common themes emerge: unfamiliarity, fear of scams, and a perceived lack of practical use cases: Fewer than one in five see crypto as a secure or good long-term investment Over half of respondents find researching crypto 'overwhelming' Only 14% have ever discussed crypto with family or friends – but those who did are more open to using crypto Despite increased visibility, literacy around crypto fundamentals remains limited. While only 14% of non-holders believe crypto is a scam and just 10% see it as a passing fad, misperceptions about fraud, hacking, and not knowing who or what is 'backing' crypto assets continue to shape public perception. In reality, just 3% of holders reported negative experiences with crypto, and of these, less than a third had experienced fraud or security breaches personally – that's less than 1%. To respond to these concerns, the NCA is launching a new video series to provide clear, fact-based answers to common crypto questions and myths. These resources are part of the organization's broader effort to increase understanding and build confidence through accessible, trustworthy information. As for reaching non-holders, opportunity exists. Nearly one in three have considered using crypto, and 34% are interested in learning more, especially if information is simplified and tied to tangible benefits. When looking at those interested in learning more, we heard that: While the industry is still fairly nascent, one in two worry they may have missed the boat on crypto Despite this, 68% are curious about using crypto but are not sure where to start The majority (80%) see crypto as a legitimate financial asset Almost half (42%) of this cohort are likely to acquire or use crypto in 2025 About the National Cryptocurrency Association The National Cryptocurrency Association (NCA) is a 501(C)(4) organization dedicated to educating consumers about how to engage with crypto. Crypto is positively impacting the lives of millions of Americans but misinformation has held back those who stand to benefit. The NCA is here to help people make sense of crypto by sharing the stories of real people and businesses using crypto, providing educational resources to navigate the hype and confusion, and offering guidance and support through partnerships and services. Methodology The research was conducted online in the United States by The Harris Poll on behalf of The National Cryptocurrency Association among 2,000 non-cryptocurrency holders. The survey was conducted May 22, 2025 through May 30, 2025. Data are weighted where necessary by age, gender, race/ethnicity, region, education, marital status, household size, employment, household income, and political party affiliation to bring them in line with their actual proportions in the population. Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have agreed to participate in our surveys. The sampling precision of Harris online polls is measured by using a Bayesian credible interval. For this study, the sample data is accurate to within ± 2.9 percentage points using a 95% confidence level. This credible interval will be wider among subsets of the surveyed population of interest. All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use probability sampling, are subject to other multiple sources of error which are most often not possible to quantify or estimate, including, but not limited to coverage error, error associated with nonresponse, error associated with question wording and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments.
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
The Great State Government Return-to-Office U-Turn
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) banned remote work for state employees in March. By June, he was signing a bill that allowed it again. This stunning reversal in just three months tells you everything you need to know about the new reality of government work. The Texas about-face isn't an isolated incident. It's part of a fascinating pattern playing out in state capitals across America, where rigid return-to-office mandates are collapsing under the weight of economic reality and employee resistance. What started as executive orders demanding compliance has evolved into nuanced negotiations that treat office attendance as currency. California's Gavin Newsom escalated from two-day to four-day office requirements, only to watch unions trade away salary increases to keep their flexibility. Indiana's new governor included 'limited exceptions' in his return-to-office order from Day 1, signaling that negotiation had always been the endgame. The numbers driving these reversals are impossible to ignore. When California saved $700 million by downsizing office space and Texas discovered that remote work actually boosted productivity while slashing turnover, the economic argument for forcing everyone back to their desks evaporated. This transformation reveals a new playbook in which location has become as negotiable as salary. The speed of Texas's reversal deserves closer examination. When Abbott issued his executive order in March banning telework for state agencies, he positioned it as a matter of principle. State workers needed to be in state buildings, he said, serving Texans directly. The rhetoric was forceful, the timeline immediate. Yet within weeks, the facade began cracking under operational strain. State agencies that had already downsized their physical footprints suddenly faced the prospect of scrambling for office space. Parking lots that had been decommissioned would need resurrection. And employees who had restructured their lives around remote work began polishing their resumes for private-sector opportunities. The bipartisan rebellion that followed wasn't driven by ideology but by data. Texas's own productivity study showed that remote work hadn't just maintained service levels — it had actually improved them while dramatically reducing employee turnover. When Republican Rep. Giovanni Capriglione introduced House Bill 5196 to let agencies set their own remote policies, he wasn't making a statement about worker rights. He was acknowledging mathematical reality. Abbott's signature on the bill in June represents more than a policy reversal. It's an admission that top-down mandates can't override bottom-up economics. But while Texas stumbled into reversal through legislative intervention, California's governor appears to be playing a more sophisticated game. His journey from two-day office requirements to a four-day mandate might look like escalation, but the emerging pattern suggests something more strategic. When the Professional Engineers in California Government secured their one-year reprieve from the four-day requirement, they paid for it with salary concessions. Days later, the attorneys' union struck a remarkably similar deal. Newsom's mandate created leverage where none had existed before. SEIU Local 1000's lawsuit challenging the order cites the state's savings of 'at least $700 million' from office downsizing — money that would evaporate if 95,000 hybrid workers actually showed up four days a week. The California Department of General Services has shed 1.2 million square feet of Sacramento office space, a 14 percent reduction that represents real taxpayer savings. Reversing that efficiency would require a real estate shopping spree at precisely the moment California faces a $12 billion budget deficit. The genius lies in how the mandate functions as a negotiating tool. Unions that might have held firm on salary increases suddenly found themselves trading compensation for commute time. The Professional Engineers accepted mandatory unpaid time off that effectively negates their 3 percent raise for two years. In both cases, the unions prioritized flexibility over pay, revealing just how valuable remote work has become to their members. These reversals illuminate a broader transformation in how governments value physical presence versus actual productivity. When Gallup research indicates that flexible work arrangements can cut attrition by 50 percent, and when replacing skilled professionals costs between half and twice their annual salary, the mathematics of mandatory office attendance stop adding up. Indiana's new governor, Mike Braun, seems to be taking notes from both states with his executive order requiring state workers back by July 2025 but leaving 'limited exceptions' for ongoing negotiations. For public-sector unions, this new reality requires strategy. The California engineers and attorneys who accepted pay concessions to maintain remote work flexibility made a calculated bet that their members value time and autonomy over marginal salary increases. They are establishing that workplace flexibility has become a fundamental term of employment that can't be altered by executive fiat. The return-to-office reversals sweeping through state governments represent acknowledgments that the fundamental nature of work has changed. We are witnessing the emergence of a new employment paradigm where location flexibility has become as negotiable as wages and benefits. The smart leaders are those who recognized that physical presence has become a bargaining chip, valuable precisely because employees prize flexibility so highly. Rather than squander political capital on unenforceable mandates, they are trading flexibility for concessions that actually improve their states' fiscal positions. The organizations that thrive will be those that recognize flexibility not as a perk to be revoked, but as a strategic asset to be thoughtfully deployed. Disaster Avoidance Experts and authored the best-seller' Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams.'
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Albuquerque business owner found a ‘humane' way to deal with trespassers using his back door as a toilet
Petty theft, vandalism and yes, even people treating your back door like a public restroom are headaches business owners know all too well. But one Albuquerque entrepreneur is proving you don't need a big budget or a security team to fight back. Thierry Gonzalez, who runs a business in downtown Albuquerque, decided to take matters into his own hands after repeated incidents of people loitering, using drugs and relieving themselves behind his store. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it 'We've just had a lot of problems with people using our back door as a bathroom or a place to shoot up or whatever,' Gonzales told KOB 4. For less than $150, he built a high-impact deterrent using a Ring camera, PVC pipes, sprinklers and Wi-Fi solenoid valves to keep trespassers at bay. But is this DIY fix just clever or could it cause legal trouble in the long run? Spraying away trouble Gonzalez came up with a simple solution to the chaos outside his business. For three years, he's dealt with unsanitary and unsafe incidents — part of a growing issue in Albuquerque, where homelessness rose to 2,394 people in 2023. Rather than wait for things to get worse, he took matters into his own hands. 'If they don't leave, then we spray them with water. That just seems to be the simplest way, and it's a humane solution to getting someone to stop using our back door as a bathroom,' Gonzales said. Other business owners are now asking how they can set up similar sprinkler systems to protect their property. The problem isn't new in Albuquerque. In 2023, KRQE Investigates reported that a business on Central Avenue was dealing with the same issues of homelessness, drug use and human waste — all threatening its survival. 'I pick up out there the burnt tin foils that they're doing the drugs with. I probably can clean up 100 a day,' said Michael Spaeth, co-owner of Southwestern Minerals. 'The needles — I can probably pick up 25, 30 a week. It blows in from the alley. The whole yard is just covered with drug residue.' While local businesses are clearly struggling, questions remain about whether this approach is legal, and if it's a sustainable solution or just a temporary fix to keep the lights on. Read more: Americans are 'revenge saving' to survive — but millions only get a measly 1% on their savings. The legal solution Gonzalez says his creative setup is already making a difference. What used to be a twice-daily issue now happens only every other day. 'We can't depend on somebody else to handle the problem for us, and we're doing what we can to combat it on our own, but do it in a safe, you know, humane manner,' he said. Whether his method is legal, however, remains unclear. According to KOB 4, New Mexico law doesn't explicitly address tactics like Gonzalez's, putting it in something of a gray area. Mayor Tim Keller has acknowledged the challenges businesses face. In 2024, he announced the Metro Homelessness Initiative (MHI), a program aimed at addressing housing issues, connecting unhoused individuals with jobs and creating paths out of homelessness through its A Better Way Forward campaign. 'We're acting with urgency, but what the City can do alone is not enough. We are inviting service providers, the business community, and elected leaders to come to the table this fall, pool our resources and turn the tide on homelessness,' Keller said. Business owners dealing with similar problems are encouraged to reach out to local authorities or seek legal guidance. A little expert advice can go a long way in keeping things under control. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of 'massive unemployment' in the US due to the 'biggest change' in history — and says this 1 group of 'smart' Americans will get hit extra hard. Are you one of them? How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Solve the daily Crossword
