CIMA enhances CGMA Professional Qualification syllabus to align with modern finance
Craig Henery, ACMA, CGMA, CFO at DHL Express South Africa; Tariro Mutizwa, ACMA, CGMA, Vice President at AICPA & CIMA; Catherine Chettiar, FCMA, CGMA, Finance Senior Manager for Business Reform at Toyota South Africa; Stephen Flatman, M.Ed., Vice President of Education and Professional Qualifications, Management Accounting at AICPA & CIMA; and Grant Driver, Founder of Captivate International.
Image: Supplied
The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) has unveiled its CGMA Professional Qualification syllabus for 2026. This upgrade is designed to prepare students for the future of work and meet the growing expectations of modern finance professionals to be high-performance finance business partners capable of utilising technology and applying critical thinking skills.
The emphasis on finance business partnering and applied problem solving aligns with AICPA and CIMA's Future of Finance 2.0 research and the World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report 2025, which predict that combining technology and human insight will be crucial for career success in the knowledge economy and essential for future accounting and finance roles.
The upgraded syllabus enhances key competencies and behaviours such as finance business partnering, analytical thinking, and strategic planning while broadening its scope to include sustainability (e.g. green finance, environmental costing, and disclosures under IFRS S1/S2) and cutting-edge financial technologies (GenAI) content.
"With a focus on finance role simulations embedded in our Case Study exams, the CGMA Professional Qualification allows finance professionals to quickly develop and apply cognitive, digital, and technical skills needed as finance business partners. Our unique problem-solving educational approach helps them provide expert advice, support decision-making, and create value for organisations." commented Stephen Flatman, M.Ed. Vice President of Education and Professional Qualifications, Management Accounting at AICPA and CIMA.
'This year's update to the CGMA Professional Qualification syllabus sets it apart from traditional accounting and finance education, which still focuses heavily on preparing information, controls, and compliance – tasks increasingly automated by technology. The CGMA Professional Qualification is designed for the future of finance; created by finance professionals to equip future finance professionals with skills they need to be value creators,' added Andrew Harding, FCMA, CGMA, Chief Executive – Management Accounting at AICPA and CIMA.
'The updated CGMA Professional Qualification syllabus represents a significant advancement in the development of finance and accounting professionals across Africa. By integrating key competencies such as business partnering, analytical thinking, strategic planning, and sustainability, it ensures that our members and candidates are equipped with the expertise required to navigate the complexities of the modern business landscape. This evolution aligns with global industry demands, reinforcing our commitment to fostering highly skilled professionals who drive economic growth and corporate resilience' said Tariro Mutizwa, ACMA, CGMA, Vice President, Africa at AICPA and CIMA.
These changes do not impact learners taking CGMA exams in 2025. A Case Study and Objective Tests study support materials pack will be launched in October to help students prepare for the May 2026 CGMA exams. CIMA has also created over 50 hours of free study support materials to help candidates progress through exams and their journey to becoming CGMA designation holders.
Full details can be found on the CIMA website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
4 days ago
- The Citizen
South African Gen Zs and millennials are prioritising their happiness, survey finds
Now in its 14th year, the Gen Z and Millennial Survey has interviewed a total of 23 482 Gen Z and millennial Deloitte's Gen Z and Millennial Survey shows young professionals breaking away from traditional career paths to find satisfaction and happiness. Picture:An annual survey by Deloitte has revealed that South African Gen Zs and Millennials are ditching traditional ways of doing things as they prioritise their happiness. Now in its 14th year, the Gen Z and Millennial Survey has interviewed a total of 23 482 Gen Z and millennial respondents across 44 countries in North America, Latin America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific region. Of the 23 482 respondents, there were 512 from South Africa, comprising 304 Gen Z individuals and 208 millennials. The interviews were conducted between October and December last year. Gen Z is typically defined as someone born between 1997 and 2012, however, the Gen Z individuals interviewed for this survey were born between January 1995 and December 2006. Millennials are born between 1981 and 1996, but the respondents for this survey were born between January 1983 and December 1994. ALSO READ: Youth month: Young creators get a spot on the wall in Joburg Youth prioritising well-being According to the survey, 97% of Gen Zs and the same percentage of millennials in South Africa consider a sense of purpose to be very or somewhat important for their job satisfaction and well-being. Of the millennials, 73% say friends and family are the most critical factors in shaping their sense of identity. The number is 10% lower for Gen Zs. In the working environment, 15% of Gen Zs and 20% of millennials in South Africa are no longer working in the industry or career path they originally intended. The job market conditions and availability are the main reasons why Gen Zs (56%) and millennials (58%) change career paths. Only 11% of millennials and 31% of Gen Zs change careers because they want more flexible hours. ALSO READ: Entrepreneurship a solution to youth unemployment – but there are challenges Education Results indicate 23% of Gen Zs and 21% of millennials in South Africa say they decided not to pursue higher education. Compared to the global numbers, Mzansi youth seem to have a greater appetite for education than their counterparts, as 31% of Gen Zs and 32% of millennials globally decided not to pursue higher education. One of the biggest reasons why most South African youth do not pursue higher education is financial constraints. This applies to both Gen Z and millennials. Finances are such a significant factor in South Africa that 60% of Gen Zs and 57% of millennials cited the high cost of tuition fees. According to the survey, 30% of Gen Zs and 29% of millennials in South Africa say they have already completed GenAI training, while 46% of Gen Zs and 48% of millennials in say they plan to complete training within the next 12 months. 'As the case for GenAI gains traction and the race for investment in technology to enable business efficiency is in full swing, it is important to ask ourselves what the differentiators of business in the future will be,' said chief people officer at Deloitte Africa, Lungile Mahluza. 'Critical thinking, problem-solving, adaptability and other soft capabilities may just be the differentiator. Organisations need to keep this in mind when developing workforce models for the future.' ALSO READ: Trombonist Siyasanga 'Siya' Charles excited to come back home for the National Arts Festival Big concerns The biggest concern for South African youth is unemployment, with the cost of living following close behind. Only 28% of Gen Zs are concerned with crime and personal safety, while millennials aged 30 and above are at 30%. One of the stark differences between the two age groups is how Gen Z (18%) is more concerned about its generation's mental health, while 22% of millennials are more concerned about corruption in business and politics. NOW READ: Is your smartphone screen glitchy or acting up? Try these tips
The Citizen
4 days ago
- The Citizen
Media24 takes a knock
The changes in its operations led to a significant decline in Media24's revenue and earnings. South Africa's largest media company, Media24, has reported a decline in revenue and earnings for the year ended March 2025. This follows the discontinuation of most of Media24's printed newspapers. These included Beeld, Rapport, City Press, Daily Sun, and Soccer Laduma, as well as the digital PDF editions of Volksblad and Die Burger Oos-Kaap. Parent company Naspers released its financial results on Monday. The global technology giant said it has also divested both its logistics operations, called M24 Logistics and On the Dot. Media24 realigns media operations The financial results also stated that the company has realigned its media operations to focus on two digital news brands, News24 and Netwerk24, by closing the digital content hub SNL24, divesting community newspapers and soccer titles, and transitioning the Sunday newspapers Rapport and City Press into digital-only brands, residing at Netwerk24 and News24, respectively. Naspers stated that Media24 is a leading digital media group in South Africa, with interests in digital news media, magazines, newspapers, book publishing, and television content production. 'It publishes several magazines and two newspapers and reaches 1 million average daily unique browsers, generating 9.7 million average daily pageviews across its digital platforms.' ALSO READ: Big news play: Media24 sells On the Dot, shifts to digital-first focus Media24 declines in revenue The changes have led to a significant decline in revenue and earnings for Media24. Revenue declined by 17% from $175 million (R3.199 billion) in 2024 to $141 million (R2.577 billion) in 2025. 'Trading results were eroded by the financial impact of the redesign, as well as an investment in foundation-phase schoolbook submissions to the South African Department of Basic Education,' read the results. Looking ahead Naspers said Media24 has established a strong base for AI use, with early outputs, enhanced by launching a GenAI circle, training sessions, and editorial workshops, which are focused mainly on back-end operations in its media divisions. 'These ranged from content summaries, translations and transcriptions to creating audiobooks, copy-editing, the creation of visuals, launching the contextual targeting tool Match24 for advertisers, and incorporating an AI-driven 'story sentiment' tracker to enhance brand-safe advertising, all under close human supervision. 'Looking forward to the financial year 2026, we remain committed to the valuable role we play in our society and democracy at large, while building a sustainable future for Media24 as a profitable digital media business focused on content production for news, television and books.' NOW READ: Media24 sells On the Dot, shifts to digital-first focus
Daily Maverick
16-06-2025
- Daily Maverick
Crossed Wires: Artificial Intelligence reality check – not as smart as it thinks it is
Apple researchers' recent paper, The Illusion of Thinking, challenges the hype around AI, revealing its limitations in solving complex problems. If one is to believe Sam Altman and other AI boosters and accelerationists, the era of abundance is almost upon us. AI is about to relieve us all of drudgery, ill health, poverty and many other miseries before leading us to some promised land where we will shed our burdens and turn our attention to loftier concerns. Any day now. And so the publication of a paper by Apple researchers this month arrived as a refreshing dose of realism. It was titled The Illusion of Thinking and it broke the AI Internet. It concluded that ChatGPT-style GenAI models (like Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek and others) can only solve a constrained set of problems and tend to collapse spectacularly when complexity is introduced. The implications of the paper are clear – the underlying technologies that have so supercharged the AI narrative and fueled so much hyperbole have a long way to go before anyone attains the holy grail of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the imagined utopia of techno-optimists. For anyone with time and grit, here is the paper. One of the examples cited concerns the well-known 'Tower of Hanoi' problem, which involves stacking variously sized disks on a vertical rod. Any reasonably smart nine-year-old can find a solution, a very short computer program can describe the solution but, left to its own devices, GenAI cannot come up with a general solution to the problem. As more and more disks are added, the AI becomes a blithering idiot. It has no idea what it is doing. It is not able to 'generalise' from a few disks to many. This leads to the inescapable conclusion that, if a child or a very short algorithm can best the most advanced 'reasoning' models from ChatGPT and Claude, then we are far from AGI. No matter what Sam Altman says. It is not as if a whole slew of clever researchers are blind to this fact. There are some researchers busy trying to embed ethics and alignment into AI so that humans can survive its evolution without too much pain or possible extinction. There are some researchers who are taking what we have now and applying it to current real-world problems in science, education, healthcare or the sludge of institutional processes. And there are some who are saying: This version of AI, this 'deep learning' machine that has captured everyone's attention – it is simply not good enough. They are looking to invent something that breaks free of the constraints which Apple's paper so brutally highlights. There are some clever band-aids available to patch over the obvious weaknesses of current AI models, such as a widely used technique called RL (Reinforcement Learning), which boosts learning after the AI has been trained, but these partial fixes do not address the basic weakness of the core architecture – they address the symptoms and not the cause. It doesn't take an expert to know that humans learn in many different ways, all the way back to our warm launchpad in the womb. We have genetic programs gifted by our ancestors, we learn from our senses, we learn by example, we learn by trial and error, we learn by being taught by others, we learn by accident, we learn by intent, and then we also learn to reason, to generalize, to deduce, to infer. It is probably fair to say that we humans are learning machines – running all day, every day, from the moment of conception. Our learning may well be faulty, our memories inaccurate, our lessons sometimes haphazard, our failures manifold – but learn we do, always and forever. It is in this area that the current crop of AI techniques are exposed as having only a thin veneer of competence. Take ChatGPT, at least in its text version. It has learnt how to predict the next word from a historical store of human-created documents reduced to gigantic matrices of statistically related words. There is not much more to it than that, even though its usefulness has astounded everyone. But really, compare this with what our species does as we go about our daily business – learning, learning, learning, both to our benefit and sometimes to our detriment – all the time, unable to stop for even a microsecond. AI models are simply embarrassing next to that. Babies are smarter, primates are smarter. Dogs are smarter. The challenge of 'continuous autonomous learning' has yet to be met in current AI models. Before I go overboard about the absurdity of the AGI-is-nearly-here claim, I should throw some light on what has been achieved, especially via the GenAI technologies. These are sometimes confusingly called Large Language Models (they now go way beyond mere language). What they can do is truly unprecedented. I use them all day, every day. They are novel and brilliant assistants. They are much, much smarter or faster than I am at doing a whole slew of important things. But I am much, much smarter than they are when it comes to a huge number of other things. AGI, as now commonly defined, means the point at which AI equals (or betters) humans at all cognitive (as opposed to physical) tasks. I spend a large part of my day reading about the advances at the edge of this fabulous field, which is probably the most important technological development in human history. There is fabulous stuff coming down the line. A cure for cancer, perhaps. Infinite cheap energy. Healthy and long lives. But will it be better than humans at all cognitive tasks? Not today. Not this year. Not next year. Not until AI is spawned as we are and learns as we do. Like the witches riddle in Shakespeare's Macbeth, perhaps only when AI is of woman born. DM
