
Two men convicted of sexually assaulting woman in hotel; judge rejects consensual sex defence
The first man, 50, was an ex-colleague of the victim. He was convicted of one charge each of molestation, sexual assault and obstructing justice.
The second man, 51, had been friends with the first accused for about 20 years and they had previously engaged in a threesome together. He was convicted of six charges including rape, sexual assault, possessing an intimate image and obstructing justice.
The pair, both foreign nationals, cannot be named due to a gag order by the court preventing the publication of key information including their professions, nationalities and other details that might identify the victim.
The woman had passed out after drinking with the two men, both veterans in her industry, on Feb 26, 2023. This was after the ex-colleague invited her to his hotel room ahead of a planned dinner that never happened.
THE WOMAN'S ACCOUNT
The woman testified that she had agreed to go up to the hotel room to drop off some sparkling water her ex-colleague had asked her to buy.
She also saw it as a networking opportunity. When she got there, she was offered alcohol and drank it while having casual conversation such as chatting about hawker places in Singapore.
She said she was asked to drink her glass of gin mix in a "bottoms up" fashion to catch up since the two men had already been drinking all afternoon.
When she did so, the older man told her: "When you bottom up, if you don't look the person into the eye, you'll have seven years' bad sex."
The woman testified about feeling surprised at this as it was the first time she heard such a thing. She described feeling uncomfortable when the discussion turned sexual and she was asked intimate questions about her boyfriends past and present.
She said she did not leave the room as she thought it would be impolite, and did not see any risk of harm as she had a prior professional and amicable relationship with one of them.
As the drinking went on, her ex-colleague said the restaurant they had booked for dinner had probably given the reserved table away. She said they could go elsewhere but preferred to go to the original eatery.
Around this time, the woman said the men asked her "white wine or red wine?" before plying her with alcohol.
After this, her hands started shaking from the amount of alcohol she had consumed and she vomited on the bed before losing consciousness. She began drifting in and out of consciousness and this was her last clear memory.
She next remembered vomiting into the sink before sexual acts occurred. She recalled saying "no, no, no" many times but could not move or open her eyes.
When she woke up at about 7.45am on Feb 27, 2023, she found blood stains on her underwear and felt weird, suspecting she had been raped. She went to a hospital to get herself medically checked and the hospital later lodged a police report.
The prosecution had argued at trial that the two men sexually assaulted the victim knowing full well that she did not consent.
The older man took a photo of the woman while she was naked, and without her knowledge, and the two men conspired to obstruct justice by deleting incriminating messages, said the prosecution.
The men had admitted to the sexual acts in video-recorded interview statements to the police, and forensic evidence supports the victim's account, said the prosecutors.
They added that the men had offered no explanation why the woman would otherwise have accused them of rape.
JUDGE ACCEPTS VICTIM'S ACCOUNT
The men contested the charges, but Justice Hoo Sheau Peng found that the prosecution had proved its case, in a judgment released on Tuesday (Jul 22).
She found the victim firm in her evidence, providing a textured narration of events and not attempting to embellish evidence for bits she found "patchy".
Justice Hoo agreed with the prosecution that the woman's conduct at the time was consistent with her account.
First, after fully regaining consciousness and forming the view that she had been raped, the victim checked the bin for condoms and repeatedly asked one of the men what had happened.
When she returned to the hotel room, she searched online for what to do if she had been raped, the legal consequences of rape, as well as the police's phone number in Singapore.
She also visited the hospital once she could to make sure her body was "alright" and made a conscious effort not to wash up in order to preserve evidence.
She also tried arranging to meet her ex-colleague to hear his explanation of the night's events.
Justice Hoo said the woman's actions all cohere logically with her account of the events, and this is significant as it strikes at the defence's arguments that the woman's account was reconstructed and not based on her recollection.
The woman's evidence also cohered with other evidence such as the statements of the two men, closed-circuit television footage from the hotel and the woman's medical examination.
MEN'S ACCOUNTS "INCREDIBLE": JUDGE
In contrast, Justice Hoo found the ex-colleague's account of the sexual activities "incredible". The man had said that not a single word was uttered by any of them throughout the long series of acts, despite saying earlier that the trio had engaged in a "hearty and long conversation".
Justice Hoo also found the deleted texts the ex-colleague had sent to his accomplice an indication of his guilt.
She found that the accomplice had shown himself "not to be a credible witness", saying his account of events in a few instances "was simply beyond belief".
After the incident, the ex-colleague made Google searches on his laptop for prompts including "do fingers in (vagina) leave dna", "what leaves dna in vagina after sexual activity" and "does shower after sex reduce dna testing".
The accomplice had also performed searches online after the incident, such as "trick questions in rape cases" and "polygraph test tips", and visited a webpage titled "Interview Strategies for Sexual Assault and Rape Investigations".
"These online searches betray the accused persons' guilty minds," said the judge, adding this was further evidenced by their "incredible explanations for the searches".
The victim's ex-colleague was represented by a team from Withers KhattarWong led by Mr Chenthil Kumarasingam, who argued that the acts had occurred with the victim's consent, or that the man was mistaken as to the consent.
Mr Kumarasingam had argued that if the woman felt uncomfortable when the conversation turned sexual, she would have said so or left the room.
Justice Hoo said this ignores the seniority of the two men in the profession in relation to the victim. It also ignores the fact that her ex-colleague was formerly her superior, and that she respected him and treated him as an elder member in a family.
The older man was defended by Mr Eugene Thuraisingam and Mr Johannes Hadi. Mr Thuraisingam argued that the victim was not unconscious during the sex acts. Instead, she was conscious and consented to the acts, but could not remember doing so due to partial alcohol-induced memory loss.
Both men's defence teams argued that the woman had forgotten about the consent she had given to the sexual acts due to the alcohol she had consumed.
Justice Hoo rejected this, finding the victim to be an unusually convincing witness, and that there was clearly no valid consent on her part to any sexual activity.
She also rejected the men's respective accounts of the events surrounding the sex. She said the accounts were "replete with issues" and that the men had failed to show that the woman validly consented to, or appeared to have consented to the acts.
There was no valid consent, or possible appearance of consent, to the sexual activities, she concluded.
The men will be sentenced at a later date.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
40 minutes ago
- Straits Times
China denies supplying new weapons to Cambodia in Thai border conflict
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Col Siwat Rattan-anant (left), Thai Army Assistant Military Attaché and Acting Defence Attaché at the Royal Thai Embassy in Beijing, meeting China's Senior Col Sheng Wei on July 25. BANGKOK - China has officially denied recent allegations that it has supplied any military weapons or support to the Cambodian Armed Forces amid the current Thai-Cambodian border conflict . All items in the Cambodian armoury originate from past military cooperation agreements, and no new military support has been provided, said China. On July 25 at 2.45pm (3.45pm Singapore time), Col Siwat Rattan-anant, Thai Army Assistant Military Attaché and Acting Defence Attaché at the Royal Thai Embassy in Beijing, held an urgent meeting with the Office of International Military Cooperation (OIMC) of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) of China. The meeting took place in the OIMC Reception Room in Beijing. Representing China was Senior Col Sheng Wei, Deputy Director of the Asia Division, OIMC. The Thai side officially submitted a report titled: A Clash Incident on the Thailand-Cambodia Border' to China. In response, the Chinese side emphasised: 'Since tensions began along the Thailand-Cambodia border, China has not provided any military equipment to Cambodia for use against Thailand. All Chinese military hardware currently possessed by Cambodia is the result of historical cooperation projects. Please do not believe fake news generated by malicious actors.' The Chinese delegation requested that this clarification be communicated to the Thai public in the interest of maintaining regional stability and trust. THE NATION/ASIA NEWS NETWORK Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Almost half of planned 30,000 flats in Tengah to be completed by end-2025: Chee Hong Tat Asia Death toll climbs as Thai-Cambodia clashes continue despite calls for ceasefire Multimedia Lights dimmed at South-east Asia's scam hub but 'pig butchering' continues Singapore Black belt in taekwondo, Grade 8 in piano: S'pore teen excels despite condition that limits movements Asia Where's Jho Low? Looking for 1MDB fugitive in Shanghai's luxury estate Asia Thousands rally in downtown Kuala Lumpur calling for the resignation of PM Anwar Life SG60 F&B icons: Honouring 14 heritage brands that have never lost their charm Business Can STI continue its defiant climb in second half of 2025?


Independent Singapore
3 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
1,300 names and addresses leaked from traffic police records after ransomware attack; SPF, CSA say no signs of further data exposed
Photo: Depositphotos/monsit SINGAPORE: About 1,300 names and addresses believed to be from traffic police records were leaked online on July 18, though there is 'no indication' that any other information was published, the Singapore Police Force (SPF) and Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSA) said on Thursday (July 24). In a joint statement, the agencies said the incident was the result of a ransomware attack on printing vendor Toppan Next Tech Pte Ltd (TNT), first reported on April 6, 2025. The traffic violation information provided by the police to TNT for printing and bulk mailing purposes included names, addresses, NRIC numbers, and details of the offences. The names and addresses are believed to have been leaked at the time. 'Police will be notifying affected persons individually as a matter of priority,' the statement said. As a precautionary measure, SPF and CSA advised those affected to remain vigilant by monitoring their personal accounts for any suspicious activity, including potential phishing attempts or unusual communications. They added that any such activity should be reported immediately to 1800-255-0000 or via . The agencies also said that the traffic police's systems were not breached and that they are working with TNT to strengthen their cybersecurity measures. /TISG Read also: Fraud and scams driven by generative AI are now among the biggest cyber threats in the financial sector Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only) () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });


CNA
6 hours ago
- CNA
Bus driver who dated girl, 13, gets jail and caning for statutory rape
SINGAPORE: A 26-year-old bus driver who was introduced to a 13-year-old girl on his route later entered into a relationship with her. The girl later lodged a police report saying the man had engaged in sex with her multiple times. The man, now 30, was sentenced to eight years' jail and six strokes of the cane on Friday (Jul 25). He pleaded guilty to one count of statutory rape, with another six charges taken into consideration. All parties cannot be named due to a gag order protecting the victim's identity. The court heard that the man was a bus driver with SMRT in 2021. The victim took his bus to school every morning. In November 2021, the girl joined an interest group on Instagram and was introduced to the offender. They followed each other on Instagram and began chatting. About a week into their daily chats, the offender asked the girl out on a date. She agreed as she had developed feelings for him, the court heard. They began going out together. On Dec 9, 2021, the offender rented a car and drove the girl to a multi-storey car park. They had sex, and the offender drove the girl home. During their relationship, the pair met almost every day after the bus driver's shift. This went on until early 2022, when they broke up. Throughout this time, the victim was 13 years old and the driver was twice her age. Sometime between February 2022 and April 2022, the victim's aunts noticed a change in her behaviour. They spoke to her and she told them that the offender had had sex with her in a rented car. The aunts wanted to lodge a police report, but the girl begged them not to. It was only in around June 2022 that the girl called one of her aunts and asked to be taken to lodge a police report. The victim's mother was only informed about what had happened a day before the report was lodged. Prosecutors sought eight to nine years' jail and six strokes of the cane, noting that there were four other similar charges taken into consideration. However, they noted that the offender pleaded guilty early, cooperated and was relatively young at the time of the offence. For statutory rape, an offender can be jailed for up to 20 years and fined or caned.