Irish parents share their top concern for the summer holidays
A survey has revealed that 80% of mums and dads see cost as the biggest barrier to keeping their children entertained during the break.
New findings, commissioned by Rowntree's, also highlights unpredictable weather and work commitments as major challenges. A survey has revealed that 80% of mums and dads see cost as the biggest barrier to keeping their children entertained during the school holidays. Pic: Getty Images
The research comes as Rowntree's teams up with Kids Pass to offer family-focused savings this summer.
Beyond financial concerns, 75% of parents worry about their ability to keep their children entertained while 65% point to a lack of local activity options as a source of frustration.
Despite the challenges, families are gearing up for a summer packed with outings. Beyond financial concerns, 75% of parents worry about their ability to keep their children entertained while 65% point to a lack of local activity options as a source of frustration. Pic: Getty Images
The survey also revealed that families typically spend €77 per child on summer activities with a third of parents estimating that their total spend exceeds €100 per child.
Speaking about the research, Maria McKenna, Confectionery Marketing manager, Nestlé Ireland, said 'With cost a concern and the busy pace of family life, we know that planning affordable, quality time together during the summer can be a challenge. That's why we're delighted to team up with Kids Pass to offer a little extra support for families trying to make the most of the summer break. Each Rowntree's sharing pack offers parents and guardians discounts at a huge number of locations across Ireland, helping everyone create memorable moments together this summer.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Train derailment kills three in Germany
Three people have been killed and several others were injured when a regional passenger train derailed in a wooded area in southwestern Germany, police said. About 100 passengers were aboard the train, when the incident occurred at around 6:10 pm (5:10pm Irish time) near the town of Riedlingen in Baden-Wuerttemberg state. Contacted by AFP, police initially said four people had been killed before correcting their statement to three victims. Authorities declined to elaborate on the number of injured or how seriously hurt they were, but tabloid Bild cited emergency workers saying there were 50 injured. German rail operator Deutsche Bahn confirmed several deaths and numerous injured. It added that two train carriages had derailed "for reasons yet unknown". Authorities were currently investigating the circumstances of the incident, the operator said, and traffic had been suspended over a 40km stretch of the route. German media reported that a landslide might have caused the incident as severe storms swept through the region, according to weather services. The passenger train was travelling from the German town of Sigmaringen to the city of Ulm when it derailed in a forested area. In a post on social media, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz expressed his condolences to the families of those killed. He added that he was in close contact with both the interior and transport ministers, and had asked them to "provide the emergency services with all the support they need". Footage from the scene showed yellow-and-grey-coloured train carriages lying on their sides, as firefighters and emergency services tried to get to the passengers. According to local TV station SWR, helicopters arrived shortly after the incident to transport the injured to hospitals in the area, and emergency doctors from nearby hospitals were alerted. German transport is regularly criticised by passengers for its outdated infrastructure, with travellers facing frequent train delays and various technical problems. The government has pledged to invest several hundred billion euros over the next few years, in particular to modernise infrastructure. In June 2022, a train derailed near a Bavarian Alpine resort in southern Germany, killing four people and injuring dozens. Germany's deadliest rail incident happened in 1998 when a high-speed train operated by state-owned Deutsche Bahn derailed in Eschede in Lower Saxony, killing 101 people.
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
From boycotts to barcodes: How supermarket choices still shape the world
Collective action in the supermarket can influence world events. Dunnes Stores workers boycotted South African oranges in the 1970s. The strike made international headlines and led the Irish government to ban fruit and vegetables from South Africa. Prior to the strike the workers had known little about South Africa, but were persuaded by Nimrod Sejake, a trade unionist from South Africa exiled in Ireland, that South Africa was like a pint of Guinness: A small number of whites at the top and all the black people underneath. People can now take collective action by using apps. Scan a barcode and the app may tell you whether the product you want to buy has been ethically produced. I was recently made aware of a missed scan or misinformation on one of these boycott apps. That gave rise to a question about the country of origin of a citrus fruit and the information contained on the label. It's remarkable how much information can be derived from a small tag or label attached to a net of oranges, and I'm going to use oranges as an example. The shopper had scanned the label on a net of oranges in to an app, which read the label and reported that it was an unrelated product, a bar of chocolate. Because the bar code didn't match the product that had been scanned, the shopper felt there was something nefarious about the oranges, which were labelled as Egyptian. There are two questions: Do the boycott apps work, and can we rely upon the labels in the supermarket? Boycott apps scan a product's bar code and identify the brand, manufacturer, or parent company. Based on this, they tell you whether the product aligns with or violates ethical, political, or environmental criteria. Most of these apps do not have access to a full bar code registry, so they rely on crowdsourcing databases, open-product databases, and public company information. Larger organisations and companies are easier to track than others, particularly when the bar codes are common internationally. For example, a can of popular cola has the same bar code no matter the country. Products that are produced and manufactured specifically for a supermarket are more difficult to track. Some retailers use brand-specific bar codes that only work in their own shop environments and do not transfer elsewhere. I visited five supermarkets belonging to the pillar retail brands in Ireland and examined each individual bar code on citrus fruit. That shopper was right: One specific net of oranges scans as a bar of chocolate from a competitor. However, of all the citrus fruit labels that I examined more than 50% are not contained within the boycott app that the consumer used. Remember, the apps rely on shoppers to upload this data to inform others. What about those labels that say that the product has come from Egypt? I visited many Irish supermarkets and examined more labels on oranges, lemons, and limes than I care to count, and one thing became apparent: All citruses sold in Ireland are clearly labelled with the country of origin. It's actually unsurprising that some of the oranges on our shelves come from Egypt, the fifth-largest producer of citrus fruit in the world and the largest in proximity to Europe — it produces more than Spain. Under EU regulations (No 1169/2011) the country of origin must be placed clearly on the product label. All the labels I examined stated where these citrus fruits had originated, whether it was Egypt or Spain, or beyond Europe and her neighbours, or as far afield as Argentina and Costa Rica. Also, did you know that any treatments applied to your fruit before it makes it to the supermarket shelves are now clearly disclosed on the labels? If you have looked closely at the labels on fruit lately you may have noticed some terms that may not be familiar to you. Thiabendazole, Pyrimethanil, and Imazalil are all fungicides and applied as a dip or a spray after harvest to reduce the growth of mould. You'd be familiar with this mould if you picked up an orange that may have sat in the fruit basket for too long and saw it had developed a green or blue mould and was exceedingly squishy. These fungicides are designed to keep your fruit fresher for longer and are highly regulated by the EU. The final treatment that you may see listed on the label is E904 — commonly known as shellac. Shellac is often used to glaze apples and citrus fruits to give them a shiny appearance and can extend shelf life. Any fruits that have been treated with this glaze are unsuitable for vegans, as shellac is a natural resin secreted by the lac insect. Vegan or not, we should all be washing our fruits before eating or even juicing them. BOYCOTT APPS Boycat and 'No Thanks' [ are the names of two ethical trading apps which many Irish consumers are using to check food producers to see if they are on a boycott list. An organisation may be placed onto a boycott list for being based in a particular country, but also having dubious equality or sustainability credentials. These apps enable consumers to make an informed choice when doing the shopping. Always read the label — and approach the retailer if you have any queries on provenance. If you believe that a retailer or trader has breached consumer law, you can always report your concerns to the CCPC by phoning their National Consumer Helpline on 01 402 5555 or emailing ask@ Read More Remember when a minister held Guinness 'hostage'? And other Irish food stories
RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Tariffs aren't good news but it could have been much worse
While the crucial US EU trade deal announced this weekend does bring certainty for businesses, there are significant drawbacks. Fundamentally, tariffs are negative for trade. The US is a significant export market for Ireland, and many sectors now face duties of 15% which did not exist last year. The biggest issue is pharmaceuticals, which are the largest Irish export to the US, valued at €44bn in 2024. In recent months US President Donald Trump had threatened enormous duties on drugs imported by America. He had ordered a national security investigation of the pharmaceutical sector. Last night, Tánaiste Simon Harris said his understanding was that after the investigation concludes the maximum tariff which could be imposed would be 15%. So, while the threat of more damaging duties is averted, pharmaceuticals made in Ireland may well face 15% tariffs in future, up from zero at present. Another key sector for Ireland is the manufacture of computer chips. Like pharmaceuticals it has been subject to a separate investigation by the Trump administration and faced the possibility of punitive tariffs, but it too could face a 15% tariff after the investigation ends. Last night, European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen said there was no decision yet regarding spirits exported to the US. This is critically important to Ireland's whiskey industry which has already seen several recent closures. There had been speculation that sector could have been part of a zero-for-zero tariff arrangement, but that is not yet agreed. Another important area for Ireland is aircraft leasing. Ms Von Der Leyen said last night that aviation would be part of a tariff-free arrangement. For other EU countries the massive duty of 27.5% which was imposed on European cars now falls to 15%. Some existing tariffs will be folded into that baseline 15%, meaning it would be an all-in tariff. For example, it is expected to include the existing "most favoured nation" duties of 4.8% which exist currently under World Trade Organization rules. The fact there is a deal at all avoids the threat of a prolonged tit-for-tat trade war. It means businesses can plan, investments can be made, and job-creating projects can proceed. But exporters are already seeking Government support as they navigate the new reality of the Trump administration's tariffs. The EU-US agreement is not a trade deal in the usual sense. Normally these pacts are negotiated over years and culminate in a document running to hundreds of pages. What was announced yesterday was the framework of a deal with much detail yet to be finalised. Yesterday wasn't the end of the negotiations, but it was a milestone.
