logo
Changes to federal student loans leave aspiring medical students scrambling to cover costs

Changes to federal student loans leave aspiring medical students scrambling to cover costs

Miami Herald28-07-2025
CHICAGO - Twenty-year-old Eric Mun didn't want to believe it: Only one kid in the family could make it to medical school - and it wasn't going to be him.
Mun had done everything right. He graduated high school with honors, earned a scholarship at Northwestern University and breezed through his biology courses.
He immigrated to Alabama from Korea as a toddler. From the quiet stretches of the South, he dreamed of helping patients in a pressed white coat.
But dreams don't pay tuition. And with new borrowing limits, Mun's family can only support one child through school.
"My parents already implied that my older brother is probably going to be the one that gets to go," Mun said.
President Donald Trump's sweeping "big, beautiful" tax and spending bill, signed into law earlier this month, imposes strict new caps on federal student loans, capping borrowing for professional schools at $50,000 per year. The measure particularly affects medical students, whose tuition often exceeds $300,000 over four years.
Aspiring physicians like Mun have been thrown into financial uncertainty. Many members of the medical community say the measures will send shock waves through a system already laden with economic barriers, discouraging low-income students from pursuing a medical degree.
"It might mean there are people who want to be doctors that can't be doctors because they can't afford it," said Richard Anderson, president of the Illinois State Medical Society.
Before the passage of Trump's budget bill, the Grad PLUS loan program allowed graduate students to borrow their institution's total cost of attendance, including living expenses. The program was slashed as part of a broader overhaul to the federal student loan system.
Now, beginning July 1, 2026, most graduate students will be capped at $20,500 in federal loans per year, with a total limit of $100,000. Students in professional schools, like medical, dental or law school, will face the $50,000 annual cap and a total limit of $200,000.
Mun's parents work at an automobile assembly plant. Throughout high school, he knew he would have to rely on scholarships and federal loans to pay his way through college.
Mun's voice faltered. "I'm just trying to remain hopeful," Mun said.
Also folded into the bill: the elimination of several Biden-era repayment plans, cuts to Pell Grants and limits to the Parent PLUS loans program, which allows parents of dependent undergraduates to borrow.
Proponents of the Republican-backed bill said the curbed borrowing will incentivize medical schools and other graduate programs to lower tuition. The tuition of most Chicago-area medical schools is nearly $300,000 for four years, not including cost-of-living expenses.
Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine has a $465,000 price tag after accounting for those indirect costs, according to the school's website. Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science trails closely behind at nearly $464,000.
"One of the main concerns about the Grad PLUS program is money that is going to subsidize institutions rather than extending access to students," said Lesley Turner, an associate professor at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy.
Still, many medical professionals expressed doubt that schools will adjust their costs in response to the bill. Tuition for both private and public schools has been steadily climbing for decades, up 81% from 2001 after adjusting for inflation, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges.
There's some evidence that Grad PLUS may have contributed to those tuition hikes. A study co-authored by Turner in 2023 found that prices increased 65 cents per dollar after the program's introduction in 2006. There was also little indication that Grad PLUS had fulfilled its intended goal of expanding access to underrepresented students.
But Turner cautioned against the abrupt reversal of the program. After accounting for inflation, the lifetime borrowing limits now placed on graduate students are lower than they were in 2005, she said. Many students may turn to private loans to cover the gap, often at higher interest rates.
More than half of medical students relied on Grad PLUS loans, according to AAMC. The median education debt for indebted medical students is around $200,000, with most repayment plans lasting 10 to 20 years. The median stipend for doctors' first year post-MD was just $65,100 in 2024.
"I think for many reasons, it would have been reasonable to put some sort of limit on Grad PLUS loans, but I think this is a very blunt way of doing it," Turner said.
In a high-rise on Northwestern's downtown campus this month, 20 undergraduate students and alums from local colleges gathered for the Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative Fellows program. The eight-week summer intensive offers aspiring medical professionals a deep dive into cancer health disparities information and research. Participants like Mun have been left reeling after the flurry of federal cuts.
Alexis Chappel, a 28-year-old graduate of Northeastern Illinois University, watched her dad struggle with addiction growing up. She was deeply moved by the doctors who supported his recovery, and it inspired her to pursue medicine. But she has no idea how she'll cover tuition.
"I feel like it's in God's hands at this point," Chappel said. "I just felt like it's a direct attack on Black and brown students who plan on going to medical school."
Just 10% of medical students are Black and 12% are Latino, according to AAMC enrollment data. Socioeconomic diversity is also limited: A 2018 analysis found that 24% of students came from the wealthiest 5% of U.S. households.
Tricia Pendergrast, who graduated from Feinberg in 2023, relied entirely on Grad PLUS loans to fund her medical education. Juggling classes and clinicals, she had little money saved and no steady stream of income. Pendergrast was so strapped for cash that she enrolled in SNAP benefits - a program also cut under Trump's budget bill.
Now an anesthesiologist at University of Michigan Health, she's documented her concerns on TikTok for her 48,000 followers.
"It's not going to improve representation, and it's not going to improve access," Pendergrast said. "It's going to act as a deterrent for people who otherwise would be excellent physicians."
For low-income students, the application process is already fraught with economic obstacles, Pendergrast said. Metrics like GPA and the Medical College Admissions Test, or MCAT, are heavily weighted in admissions, and may disadvantage students from underresourced schools. Many students also lack mentorships or networks to guide them through the process, she noted.
"I think the average medical student is going to be richer and whiter, and not from rural areas and not from underserved communities," Pendergrast said.
The elimination of Grad PLUS loans comes amid a mounting nationwide physician shortage. A recent AAMC report predicted a shortfall of 86,000 physicians by 2036. Meanwhile, a significant portion of the workforce is poised to enter retirement: The U.S. population aged 65 and older is expected to grow 34.1% over the next decade.
The shortage is particularly concentrated in primary care. In practice, that means longer waiting times for patients, and an increased caseload on physicians, who may already suffer from burnout.
"If the goal is truly to make America healthy again, then we need to have a strong physician workforce … We should be coming up with ideas to make it more accessible for people who want to be doctors as opposed to hindering that," Anderson said.
Sophia Tully, co-president of the Minority Association of Pre-Med Students at Northwestern, said she and her peers have struggled to reconcile with a system that often feels stacked against them. The 21-year-old plans on taking an extra gap year before medical school in an effort to save money.
Tully summed up the environment on campus: "For lack of a better word, people are panicking."
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

American Eagle rallies as Trump touts Sydney Sweeney jeans ad
American Eagle rallies as Trump touts Sydney Sweeney jeans ad

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

American Eagle rallies as Trump touts Sydney Sweeney jeans ad

(Bloomberg) — American Eagle Outfitters Inc (AEO). shares surged after US President Donald Trump came out in support of a controversial ad from the company. Seeking Relief From Heat and Smog, Cities Follow the Wind Chicago Curbs Hiring, Travel to Tackle $1 Billion Budget Hole NYC Mayor Adams Gives Bally's Bronx Casino Plan a Second Chance The spot, with the actress Sydney Sweeney, is the 'HOTTEST ad out there,' Trump said in a social media post. He added American Eagle Jeans are 'flying of off the shelves.' Trump deleted an earlier post, in which he misspelled the actress' first name. The stock jumped as much as 16%, the biggest gain intraday since May 12. Through last week's close, the shares had declined 36% this year. The apparel retailer launched an ad blitz in July with the tagline 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans.' One of the campaign's videos plays on the same-sounding word 'genes' as Sweeney zips up her jeans and intones that 'genes are passed down from parents to offspring often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color.' 'My jeans are blue,' she adds, flashing her blue eyes at the camera. The video sparked a debate online about whether the focus on the genes of a White, blond woman conjured up the racist theory of eugenics. Other social media users have said critics are reading too much into the ads. AI Flight Pricing Can Push Travelers to the Limit of Their Ability to Pay How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off What's Really Behind Those Rosy GDP Numbers? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Trump wades into controversial ad campaigns: ‘Being WOKE is for losers'
Trump wades into controversial ad campaigns: ‘Being WOKE is for losers'

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump wades into controversial ad campaigns: ‘Being WOKE is for losers'

President Trump on Monday weighed in on the recent controversial ad campaign with actor Sydney Sweeney for American Eagle, arguing that the success of it is a sign that being 'woke is for losers.' 'Sydney Sweeney, a registered Republican, has the 'HOTTEST' ad out there. It's for American Eagle, and the jeans are 'flying off the shelves.' Go get 'em Sydney!' Trump said on Truth Social. The ad featuring Sweeney has caused backlash online, with critics claiming there are racist undertones surrounding the message that Sweeney 'has great jeans,' a riff on the idea of 'good genes.' American Eagle has defended the ad, saying it's only about 'jeans,' Bloomberg reported, and the company's shares rose when it was first released in July. The president on Sunday said, 'If Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic,' after BuzzFeed reported over the weekend that Sweeney has been registered to the Republican Party of Florida since June 2024. After his first mention on Sweeney, American Eagle stock climbed 14 percent. Trump, in his Truth Social post on Monday, added that Jaguar had a 'stupid' and 'seriously WOKE' ad from a year ago, pointing out the company's leader resigned after it. The British car company's CEO Adrian Mardell is set to resign, Reuters reported, and Jaguar ran an advertisement in 2024 that sparked criticism for being 'woke,' Fox Business Network reported. 'Who wants to buy a Jaguar after looking at that disgraceful ad. Shouldn't they have learned a lesson from Bud Lite, which went Woke and essentially destroyed, in a short campaign, the Company. The market cap destruction has been unprecedented, with BILLIONS OF DOLLARS SO FOOLISHLY LOST.' Trump said. And, he compared megastar Taylor Swift, who endorsed former Vice President Harris in last year's election, to Sweeney and said she is 'no longer hot.' 'Or just look at Woke singer Taylor Swift. Ever since I alerted the world as to what she was by saying on TRUTH that I can't stand her (HATE!),' Trump said. 'She was booed out of the Super Bowl and became, NO LONGER HOT. The tide has seriously turned — Being WOKE is for losers, being Republican is what you want to be.' The president has taken previous swipes at Swift, saying in May, 'Has anyone noticed that, since I said 'I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT,' she's no longer 'HOT?'' After the Sweeney advertisement, White House communications director Steven Cheung pointed to the backlash as an example of 'cancel culture run amok.' Vice President Vance also mocked critics in a recent interview, blaming Democrats for those who argue the commercial promotes eugenics.

Sydney Sweeney confirmed as Republican —jeans ad still triggering the woke
Sydney Sweeney confirmed as Republican —jeans ad still triggering the woke

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Sydney Sweeney confirmed as Republican —jeans ad still triggering the woke

Everybody is still talking about that Sydney Sweeney jeans ad. In fact, there's a new dynamic to this whole controversy, now that multiple news outlets have confirmed the actress is in fact a registered Republican. Sweeney has been registered as a Republican in Florida since June 2024. Why does this matter at all? Well, it really doesn't, except some liberals are probably treating this as evidence that the jeans ad really was promoting fascism or white supremacy, or something, now that they know Sweeney is a Republican. Here's the ad once more, if for some reason you've been living under a rock and have somehow missed the whole kerfuffle: Sydney Sweeney x American Eagle, oh my god. — Sydney Sweeney Daily (@sweeneydailyx) July 24, 2025 While there's absolutely nothing groundbreaking about using an attractive woman to sell a product — in particular clothing — some joy-killing liberals on social media reacted negatively to this ad, claiming that Sweeney's appeal to genetics is a racist dog-whistle. By calling attention to her blond hair and blue eyes, she was promoting the idea that blond haired, blued eyed white people represent the ideal beauty standard. Now, I know what you're about to say: Just because a couple of people were outraged about something doesn't mean this is really happening. It's wrong to impute the absurd opinions a few random internet account to a population or a movement at large. Just as it's wrong to accuse all Republicans of being racist just because one possibly rightwing X account was mad about a black actress being cast as the Little Mermaid, it's also wrong to say all liberals are triggered by this ad. It was just a few people … well, at least it was at first. Since then, major mainstream liberal commentators have weighed in, and you can no longer make the case that no real person was actually offended by the ad. The Washington Post published this headline: 'How American Eagle's Sydney Sweeney 'good jeans' ad went wrong,' which clearly gives credence to the idea that there's something sinister about the ad. Similarly, NBC News recognized that there's an outcry from irate woke liberals, writing 'American Eagle sparks backlash for touting Sydney Sweeney's 'great jeans.'' The Atlantic's article about the controversy laments that people are fighting about the ad, and especially that conservatives are championing it. But the writer essentially endorses the liberal freakout, writing that it's understandable why liberals would see this ad as part of an 'unbridled shift toward cultural whiteness.' And progressive commentator Marc Lamont Hill certainly seemed upset about the ad. Here he was on Piers Morgan: Marc Lamont Hill says that Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle ad pushes the idea that non-white people are 'less human.' This is truly insane. — Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) July 30, 2025 My point is that conservatives are being accused of making a mountain out of a molehill: 'There's a Woke War on Sydney Sweeney!' But if you look at what the progressive liberals are actually saying, it does seem to me like a lot of them were genuinely triggered by the ad. American Eagle, to its credit, isn't apologizing — it is standing by the ad. Done for now are the days where corporations would bend the knee to the offended wokesters. If anything, this controversy Is probably good for business, though I seriously doubt the company had any idea what was about to happen. That's because the concept of having good genes is not political. Genetics is real! And importantly, the concept of genetics can be separated entirely from the concept of race. Saying that this specific white woman has good genetic and pleasing aesthetic attributes does not mean that only white women have good genetics or pleasing aesthetic attributes. Just because beauty, intelligence, and other human traits are genetically inherited does not mean that they are racially exclusive. And of course, all human beings have equal worth and rights and dignity, regardless of whether they are attractive and intelligent. As for Sweeney being a Republican, I for one have gotten used to my politics not being well represented by actors and actresses in liberal Hollywood — but I can separate art and artist. Liberals should learn to do the same.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store