Latham, Northwestern seek fees from conservative group in bias case
March 27 (Reuters) - (Billable Hours is Reuters' weekly report on lawyers and money. Please send tips or suggestions to D.Thomas@thomsonreuters.com, opens new tab)
Northwestern University and its lawyers at Latham & Watkins have asked a judge to award them attorney fees after a conservative group dropped its lawsuit over Northwestern law school's hiring practices and refiled a new one minutes later.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
Northwestern said in a Tuesday court filing, opens new tab that the "procedural gymnastics" by Faculty, Alumni, & Students Opposed to Racial Preferences (FASORP) violated a federal rule against "such manipulative tactics." FASORP is represented by prominent conservative attorney Jonathan Mitchell and by America First Legal, which was founded by Stephen Miller, a senior adviser to President Donald Trump.
FASORP sued Northwestern in July, claiming its law school discriminates against white men in faculty hiring and in the selection of articles that appear in its flagship law review. FASORP dismissed, opens new tab its own lawsuit on January 31, and then refiled it minutes later, opens new tab on February 1, according to Northwestern.
"FASORP's continued gamesmanship to pursue that effort should not continue unless and until it reimburses Defendants for their costs and fees -- which are but a fraction of the toll that this unwarranted litigation has imposed," Northwestern said.
A spokesperson for Northwestern did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Mitchell and FASORP's other lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests.
The university's filing accused FASORP of trying to dodge a potentially adverse ruling on its bid to add a Title VII claim to its original lawsuit. A hearing on the matter was scheduled for February 5, before FASORP dismissed its original suit on January 31. FASORP's February 1 lawsuit includes a Title VII claim.
Northwestern did not specify how much in fees it is seeking, but the school said it wants to be reimbursed for its work in litigating FASORP's bid to amend its complaint, and for its motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which was also pending.
The Evanston, Illinois-based school accused FASORP of trying to "malign five Black professors at Northwestern as unworthy of their appointments to the law faculty," while also targeting certain faculty members and students.
-- A federal judge in San Francisco on Wednesday sanctioned, opens new tab a Houston-based patent lawyer known for filing hundreds of lawsuits a year for his failure to follow court rules for out-of-state attorneys.
William Ramey and two lawyers at his law firm, Ramey LLP, were ordered to pay $64,121 after U.S. Magistrate Judge Peter Kang found that Ramey and his colleagues "repeatedly and knowingly" broke rules governing admissions for non-local lawyers.
Kang, in a 44-page order, said Ramey and his firm have a "long history of repeated instances of rules violations and noncompliance." Kang said he has found at least 56 civil lawsuits where Ramey appeared as a lawyer on the case as an out-of-state attorney, but he filed a pro hac vice application in just 10 of those cases.
"It is clear that the conduct at issue in this case is not due to excusable neglect or oversight," Kang said.
Ramey did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The sanctions came in a patent infringement case Ramey's client, Koji IP, filed against the American branch of semiconductor manufacturer Renesas Electronics. Koji voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit against Renesas less than a month after it was filed. Kang noted that Ramey and Koji filed — and voluntarily dismissed — two earlier lawsuits against Renesas.
A spokesperson for Renesas declined to comment.
-- Lawyers who secured more than $319 million in cash settlements for some 200,000 current and former students suing 17 major U.S. colleges over financial aid said they have invested nearly 128,000 hours into the antitrust litigation. Litigation continues against five schools.
Attorneys from three firms — Gilbert Litigators & Counselors; Berger Montague and Freedman Normand Friedland — this week asked a U.S. judge, opens new tab in Chicago to approve an additional $11.75 million in fees for their work, which would push their total compensation so far above $106 million.
-- Plaintiffs lawyers at The Rosen Law Firm and Glancy Prongay said they will ask a U.S. judge to award them up to $6.7 million in fees from a $20 million securities class action settlement with Live Nation.
The entertainment giant agreed to settle a shareholder lawsuit accusing it of making misleading statements about industry competition and compliance with antitrust laws, artificially boosting its stock price. Live Nation denied any wrongdoing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Palestine Action documentary brought forward due to ban
The online release of To Kill a War Machine was brought forward to this week after it emerged that the Home Office is going to proscribe Palestine Action after activists from the group broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and spray-painted two military planes red. Days after the incident, the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, said the 'disgraceful attack' was 'the latest in a long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'. A draft of a proscription order against Palestine Action will be presented to parliament on Monday. READ MORE: Met police drops second terror charge against Kneecap The ban under terror laws would make it a criminal offence to belong to or support the group and would be punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The film's directors have been scrambling to take legal advice and fear they will end up being in breach of counter-terror laws if they continue distributing their documentary, according to the Guardian. Showings of the film have been lined up across Britain in the coming days and weeks but plans to ban the group have cast doubt over whether the screenings can go ahead. To Kill a War Machine was made available to watch online on Tuesday and has been downloaded by people from all over the world. However, its London-based directors, Hannan Majid and Richard York, are concerned that Britain could end up being the only place in the world where people would not be able to see the film. 'We've operated around the world and have a lot of experience of regimes telling us what we can and can't do,' Majid told the Guardian. 'We've had authorities in Bangladesh telling us we shouldn't even be editing footage of garment workers and activists advocating for their rights, and we've been followed by the police in Cambodia, but we have never encountered anything like this in Britain.' Majid has been working with York since 2006 through their production company, Rainbow Collective, which focuses on documentaries about human rights issues and have collaborated with organisations including Amnesty International. To Kill a War Machine took six months of work and was made independently by the filmmakers from Palestine Action. The documentary uses real-time bodycam and phone footage that the group had put into the public domain. In the film, activists are seen smashing and occupying weapons factories across the UK while explaining their motivation for their actions, which they view as legitimate in the face of alleged war crimes in Gaza. (Image: @IMDmilo) There are also interviews with two activists from Palestine Action, Sohail Sultan and Joe Irving, both of whom were acquitted of charges of causing criminal damage. However, the move by the UK Government to proscribe Palestine Action means there are now questions looming over whether the documentary and events, including a London premiere on July 18, can be continued after the group is banned. 'We set out to make this film in a completely legitimate and legal manner, as we have done with other films. It's been certified by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) and it is good to go but now we are being advised that the curtailing of Palestine Action could have a major knock-on effect for us as it could become not only illegal for others to voice support for them but also for us, as film-makers, to distribute this film,' said York. Majid added: 'People are still excited and there has been a tremendous outpouring of support on social media. 'Hopefully we can still go ahead with much of our plans, but we have had to rush things forward and do the digital release this week rather than waiting for September and try to build on the awards we have already picked up. 'That all changed on Monday night and there has been a spike as soon as we put it online.' The filmmakers are having discussions with distributors in the UK and the US about the potential risks of showing the film. 'On the basis of some of our legal advice, we may not even be able to distribute it in other countries and territories if the film is seen as being somehow in support of a group which is proscribed. We are still hoping to be able to show it in cinemas within the law,' said York. They are also considering whether they will have to withdraw submissions for a range of international film festivals.
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
‘Bombs went through like butter' Trump declares as he rips critics who claim US attacks didn't destroy Iran nuke sites
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) DONALD Trump has celebrated his blitz on Iran again as he described US bombs as going through enemy nuclear sites "like absolute butter". The proud president has been on a week long victory lap since he dropped 12 30,000lb bunker busting bombs on Tehran. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 7 Donald Trump has celebrated his blitz on Iran again as he described US bombs as going through enemy nuclear sites 'like absolute butter' Credit: Fox 7 The Fordow plant before and after the the US bombed the site Credit: Reuters 7 The moment the missile hit the earth in the test footage 7 The US joined Israel on decimating Iran's key nuclear facilities on June 21. Trump hailed the strikes at the time and said they obliterated their targets as planned despite some claiming the hits were less successful than first thought. Three sites were reportedly hit including the main target - the Fordlow nuke plant. Tehran has admitted since that Operation Midnight Hammer and the joint Israeli attacks did cause "excessive and serious" damage. read more in Donald Trump WARPED CROWD 'Death to America' chants ring out at funeral for Iran top brass killed in war Speaking this morning with Fox News' Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures, Trump said the bombs easily performed as expected. He explained: "The bomb went through it, like it was butter, like it was absolute butter. "It was obliterated like nobody's ever seen before. And that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions at least for a period of time." Trump also hit out again as those who had tried to say his strikes have only set back Iran's nuclear development program a few months rather than years. A leaked Defense Intelligence Agency report first casted doubt on President Trump's "obliterated" claim. The report, published by CNN and The New York Times, claimed they did not destroy Iran's nuclear capability by any genuine means. White House fuming over top secret leak on Iran nuke site bombing as Don attends key summit Others had speculated online that Iran had been trying to remove the enriched uranium from the base so they could rebuild their operations once the US left. The preliminary report even stated that Iran had managed to shift much of the uranium safely out - a claim Trump and US officials vehemently deny. Responding to those claims, a defiant Trump said: "A lot of people have said, well, 'do you think they're going to start again?' "I said, the last thing they want to do right now is think about nuclear. They have to put themselves back into condition, in shape." The war in the Middle East lasted just 12 days as it quickly turned into a major conflict when Trump decided to strike the Iranian nuclear sites. The attacks helped to end the war, according to Trump, with both Israel and Iran quickly declaring they had won the fight afterwards. Iranian Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, 86, claimed victory over Israel and America despite his country being hammered for almost two weeks. The supreme leader ludicrously claimed Iran had almost crushed Israel and the government in Tel Aviv was on the verge of collapse. That's despite the IDF controlling the skies over Tehran, assassinating dozens of top generals and nuclear scientists, and destroying dozens of valuable missile batteries in just 12 days of fighting. Even with a ceasefire being agreed upon, Trump made it clear he would "absolutely" consider bombing Iran again if it was ever needed. He told reporters in the White House he would "without question" attack the country if US intelligence pointed towards Iran enriching uranium to concerning levels. It comes as Iran held a funeral for the commanders wiped out in the war. The event was severely plagued by "Death to America" chants and the burning of Israeli flags across the day. 7 Trump sat in the Situation Room of the White House a day before the US strikes Credit: AFP 7 Trump had posted this Truth shortly after launching the strikes Credit: Truth Social
NBC News
5 hours ago
- NBC News
Over a third of people on sinking Tuvalu seek Australia's climate visas
More than one-third of the people in the tiny Pacific nation of Tuvalu, which scientists predict will be submerged by rising seas, have applied for a landmark climate visa to migrate to Australia, according to official figures. Tuvalu's ambassador to the United Nations, Tapugao Falefou, told Reuters on Sunday he was 'startled by the huge number of people vying for this opportunity', and the small community was interested to learn who the first lot of climate migrants would be. Tuvalu, one of the countries at greatest risk from climate change, which experts say is boosting sea levels, has a population of 11,000 on its nine atolls scattered across the Pacific between Australia and Hawaii. Since applications for Australia's visa lottery opened this month, 1,124 people have registered, with family members bringing the total seeking the visa to 4,052 under the bilateral climate and security treaty. Applications close on July 18, with an annual cap of 280 visas designed to ensure migration to Australia does not cause brain drain from Tuvalu, officials said when the treaty was announced in 2023. The visa will allow Tuvalu residents to live, work and study in Australia, accessing health benefits and education on the same basis as Australian citizens. 'Moving to Australia under the Falepili Union treaty will in some way provide additional remittance to families staying back,' Falefou said. By 2050, NASA scientists project daily tides will submerge half the main atoll of Funafuti, home to 60% of Tuvalu's residents, where villagers cling to a strip of land as narrow as 65 feet. That forecast assumes a 1-metre rise in sea levels, while the worst case, double that, would put 90% of Funafuti under water. Tuvalu, whose mean elevation is just 6 feet 7 inches, has experienced a sea-level rise of 6 inches over the past three decades, one and a half times the global average. It has built 7 hectares (17 acres) of artificial land, and is planning more, which it hopes will stay above the tides until 2100.
