logo
A Texas bill targeting squatters would also hurt renters, leaving some homeless

A Texas bill targeting squatters would also hurt renters, leaving some homeless

Yahoo23-04-2025
Texas legislators wanting to get tough on squatters may, in the process, negatively impact some of the millions of legitimate renters in the Lone Star State.
More than 11 million Texans are renters. Renters and their families comprise more than 37% of the population. In 2023, approximately 400,000 families, or 3.5% of Texas renters, faced eviction.
According to the Eviction Lab at Princeton University, there are approximately 291,290 renter households in Travis County. Of those, approximately 13,384, or 4.6%, were the subject of an eviction filing in the last year. Similar Texas statistics illustrate possible renter peril statewide.
Texas rules require that an eviction hearing or trial be held in as little as six days after the tenant is served with a petition. Two bills making their way through the Texas Legislature would cut that time to just four days in an expedited process and allow a landlord to ask a judge to award back rent without evidence of the debt.
Proponents of House Bill 32 and its companion bill, SB 38, claim the bills target squatters. The Texas Apartment Association, a trade association of the rental housing industry, maintains the bill would close loopholes exploited by squatters and make removing them easier and less expensive.
But squatters are not tenants. They are trespassers — people who occupy dwellings without permission of the owner. The number of Texas squatters is unknown, but according to the National Rental Home Council, in 2024 there were just 475 in the Dallas-Fort-Worth area, or less than 0.1% of occupants in rental housing.
Yet the so-called anti-squatters bill would also apply to the 99.9% of people in rental housing who occupy their homes by virtue of a written or oral lease. It would almost certainly increase evictions across the state, cause housing instability and negatively impact tenants' physical and mental health.
Current Texas law already provides a fast track for landlords, requiring a tenant to appear before a judge more quickly than in any other type of civil matter. Typical response time in justice courts is 14 days. The law already gives tenants only six to 10 days to respond after being served with the petition, enabling a judge to quickly determine who is entitled to the premises and how much money, if any, a tenant may owe.
Reducing response time to four days means a tenant served with eviction papers on a Thursday night would have to respond in writing to the court by the following Monday.
Even when alternative housing can be found, tenants who are unable to respond in time are likely to find that the court has entered a judgment for back rent that is just like any other court judgment to collect a debt.
We understand Texas landlords face a growing problem with squatters, and we believe the Texas Legislature should explore all available options. Any relief should be targeted to address the harm caused by the 0.1% of occupants of rental housing characterized as squatters. The Legislature could easily limit the bills' expedited process to squatters and even provide more stringent criminal penalties.
Regardless of what course the Legislature chooses, it should not come at the expense of the due process rights of 11 million Texas tenants by giving them only four days to respond to an eviction suit.
Mary Spector is a law professor and associate dean for experiential learning, and Julie Forrester Rogers is a Provost Faculty Research Fellow and law professor at the Dedman School of Law at SMU. Spector directs the Civil/Consumer Law Clinic and teaches and researches consumer law. Rogers teaches and researches property and real estate law.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: A Texas bill targeting squatters would ensnare legal renters | Opinion
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘This breaks my heart': Texas lawmakers react to deadly flooding
‘This breaks my heart': Texas lawmakers react to deadly flooding

The Hill

timea day ago

  • The Hill

‘This breaks my heart': Texas lawmakers react to deadly flooding

Texas lawmakers on both sides of the aisle took a break from July 4th festivities Friday to respond to deadly flooding in the state's Hill Country area that has left at least 13 dead and more than 20 children missing. Rescue teams, both in helicopters and boats, continue to search for those unaccounted for following heavy rain in the Kerr County region of the Lone Star State, which is known for its many summer camps. Camp Mystic, a girls camp in the area, had over 20 children unaccounted for on Friday. A gauge on the Guadalupe River in Hunt recorded a 22-foot rise in the river level in two hours, the Associated Press reported. 'This breaks my heart. Please join me in praying for the families who've lost their loved ones and for the speedy recovery of those missing,' Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas) wrote online. 'Special thank you to the National Guard, first responders, law enforcement officers, and volunteers working to save lives.' Republican Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn were also quick to share their concerns and condolences on social platform X. 'Please pray right now for everyone in the Hill Country, especially Camp Mystic. Today, I've spoken with Gov Abbott, Lt. Gov Patrick, the head of TDEM & President Trump. Multiple helicopters are performing search & rescue,' Cruz wrote on X. 'President Trump committed ANYTHING Texas needs.' TDEM is the Texas Department of Emergency Management. 'Our prayers are with the families of those lost and those still unaccounted for in today's tragic flooding,' Cornyn said in his post. 'My friend, Kerr County Judge Rob Kelly says @TDEM is working with rescue teams and remains hopeful.' Rep. Chip Roy (R), who represents the state's 21st Congressional District, which includes the San Antonio region most affected by the storms, shared posts from others asking for prayers. Other lawmakers from surrounding districts issued statements, as well. Rep. Tony Gonzales, who represents Texas's 23rd Congressional District, wrote in a post online, 'My prayers are with our fellow Texans impacted by the devastating flooding throughout the Hill Country.' In the neighboring 11th District, Rep. August Pfluger (R) thanked those who offered their assistance as the floods wreaked havoc across the area. 'Thank you to the first responders across the district who mobilized immediately this morning, and to the countless other community leaders who have stepped in to help,' he wrote on X. 'As these floods continue, please stay safe everyone. We are praying for all affected.' 'Please continue to pray for those who are unaccounted for,' Pfluger added in a separate post. 'Our hearts go out to everyone affected by this terrible flood, especially the Camp Mystic family.' Rep. Vicente Gonzales called the weather incident 'tragic' while also thanking first responders for 'their bravery' amid tragedy. 'Lorena and I are heartbroken at the tragic flooding in Kerr County. We give our heartfelt condolences to the families of those lost, and pray for the safe recover of those missing,' he wrote. Gov. Greg Abbott (R) and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) said they notified the families of those who had missing children. The governor said earlier Friday that the 'immediate priority is saving lives.' Authorities have stressed that the situation is still developing, and the death toll could change. President Trump, who celebrated his Independence Day at the White House with a bill signing ceremony and picnic for military families, has been in touch with Texas officials. Patrick said the president offered to provide any assistance needed.

Trump's energy vow hits ‘big, beautiful' roadblock
Trump's energy vow hits ‘big, beautiful' roadblock

Politico

time3 days ago

  • Politico

Trump's energy vow hits ‘big, beautiful' roadblock

Congressional Republicans may have helped President Donald Trump follow through on major campaign promises with passage Thursday of the budget reconciliation bill. But the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' may also violate one of Trump's major campaign pledges: to slash Americans' electricity bills. An analysis from Princeton University's Rapid Energy Policy Evaluation and Analysis Toolkit predicts that the bill will result in Americans paying $28 billion more a year in energy prices by 2030 and $50 billion by 2035. That translates to $280 more a year for the average household by 2035. Trump promised he would halve energy bills during his first year. So far, that hasn't happened. The U.S. Energy Information Administration said this spring that retail electricity prices were set to rise faster than inflation through 2026. The president has little power to reduce your utility bill. The price you pay depends on factors including the generation mix, fuel costs and how much infrastructure is being built. But Trump's actions aren't doing much to help. The megabill will require wind and solar projects to either start construction within a year of passage or enter service by 2027 to get tax credits. That means less wind and solar being built, wiping away a cheap new source of power for an already strained grid. The Princeton analysis says that the megabill could result in some planned wind and solar additions being replaced by geothermal energy and gas plants with carbon capture, which would be more expensive and take longer to build. Those estimates — which have not been peer reviewed — are relative to what Trump could do on his own with executive action. They align with other projections for Republican policies, like a spring study from NERA Economic Consulting that found that repealing clean energy tax credits would raise the average retail electricity price by nearly 7 percent by 2026. In an hourslong speech on the House floor, Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries called the bill an 'extraordinary and unprecedented assault on clean energy and cheaper energy.' In a statement to Power Switch, the White House said the 'Panicans should trust President Trump,' pointing to the nation's lowest gasoline prices since 2021. 'The same 'industry experts' who suddenly care about energy prices supported Joe Biden's Green New Scam — a $15 billion tax hike on Americans to fund radical climate initiatives,' said It's Thursday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Jason Plautz. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to jplautz@ Programming note: We'll be off Friday, but we will be back in your inboxes on Monday, July 7. Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Zack Colman breaks down how the megabill could cause U.S. emissions to increase. Power Centers EV charging funds freed, for now Fourteen states are eligible to receive federal funds for electric vehicle charging stations after the U.S. attorney general declined to appeal a court order this week, David Ferris writes. The states were part of a coalition that sued over the Trump administration's freezing of the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program, which aimed to build EV chargers every 50 miles on major highways. The Federal Highway Administration said in a statement that it 'still can appeal the preliminary injunction and is currently coordinating its legal strategy with the Department of Justice.' Science, reconsidered The Trump administration's push for a new 'gold standard' for federal science protocol runs the risk of elevating fringe climate theories, Scott Waldman writes. At issue is an Office of Science and Technology Policy memo with directives that have been used to attack research, experts say. OSTP Director Michael Kratsios, who authored the memo, wrote that its goal is to 'ensure the United States continues as the global leader in rigorous, evidence-based science.' It's not easy being green Teresa Ribera has spent the past seven months quietly defending the European Union's ambitious climate targets amid a changed political reality in the bloc, Karl Mathiesen and Zia Weise write. Ribera runs the EU's green and competition policy, and her influence showed this week when the bloc pitched cutting its emissions 90 percent by 2040. It included a contentious proposal for countries to use international carbon credits toward their goal. But in the end it was a victory for Ribera in her quest to defend Europe's Green New Deal. In Other News Side by side: How do coal and solar stack up aesthetically? Take a look. What sales slump? Tesla had another dismal quarter of sales, but CEO Elon Musk has already moved on. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. Last week's heat dome contributed to the deaths of at least three workers as the Occupational Health and Safety Administration considered protections for them. The Department of Energy halted its first-ever efficiency rule for manufactured homes that was set to take effect July 1. The Missouri attorney general is looking to block a transmission line that would move renewable energy across the Midwest. That's it for today, folks. Thanks for reading, and have a great long weekend!

Nevada Democrat says Trump megabill could push gamblers ‘into the black market'
Nevada Democrat says Trump megabill could push gamblers ‘into the black market'

The Hill

time3 days ago

  • The Hill

Nevada Democrat says Trump megabill could push gamblers ‘into the black market'

Democratic Rep. Dina Titus (Nev.) said on Wednesday that the GOP megabill backed by President Trump will have an adverse impact on gamblers due to its tax provisions. The big, beautiful bill text would strike previous deductibles by 10 percent, according to the senate passed version. The 90 percent deduction cap would require someone who wins $100,000 and loses $100,000 to pay $10,000 in taxes, despite their profit loss. 'It pushes people into the black market if they don't do regulated gaming because they have a tax disadvantage, and the black market doesn't pay taxes, isn't regulated, doesn't help with problem gaming, so it's bad for the industry as well as for the player,' Titus said during a Wednesday appearance on NewsNation's 'The Hill.' The Nevada lawmaker said the House approved GOP legislation was 'bad enough for my constituents.' She said the newly added language 'adds insult to injury' in a bill that would strike health care provisions, Pell grants and renewable energy measures. 'There's still a bias against gaming. And we found it and thought, well, this is not good for people who enjoy coming to Las Vegas to gamble. We're not talking about only professional poker players,' Titus said. 'We're talking about, you know, the average people who want to play a game of poker or pull a slot machine handle.' Titus said all would be impacted. Professional poker player Phil Galfond echoed her concerns. 'This is really bad. Whether you're a poker player, [Daily fantasy sports] player, a sports better, any kind of gambler – professional or recreational – but especially professional. And even if you are an operator in one of these areas. It's quite scary,' Galfond said in a Tuesday video on X. 'Completely untenable. You can't be a professional gambler in the U.S. if this goes through. And that will have a ripple effect on industries that depend on professionals,' he added. Professional player Doug Polk urged Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) to strike the clause from the bill. 'Chip, I am in your district. There is a provision in the Senate version that will kill professional gambling. This will negatively impact THOUSANDS of Texans,' Polk wrote in a Tuesday post on X. 'Please look at this and help remove this senseless provision.' Titus said she's going to try to get it taken out and added that if it doesn't go back to the House Rules Committee for review, she'll introduce a separate bill to address the revision.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store