How proposed federal SNAP cuts would harm New Hampshire
Right now, the federal government pays for 100 percent of the state's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, formerly known as 'food stamps' – $154 million in fiscal year 2024, according to the
Get N.H. Morning Report
A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox.
Enter Email
Sign Up
People with low income who are eligible get a benefits card, and they can use money loaded onto the card toward the cost of groceries each month.
The bill would require states to pay 5 percent to 25 percent of those benefits, and states that made more errors, such as overpayments or underpayments, would have to pay a higher percentage.
Advertisement
In 2023, New Hampshire's error rate was 12.53, according to the
But Laura Milliken, executive director at New Hampshire Hunger Solutions, said it's very unlikely New Hampshire would be able to come up with that kind of money.
'There's no question that there would be cuts,' she said.
Milliken's organization estimates that tens of thousands of Granite Staters would lose access to SNAP if the federal proposal is approved.
The federal spending bill would also require states to pay 75 percent of the administrative costs of SNAP, up from 50 percent. In 2023, the overall cost of administering SNAP in New Hampshire was $22 million, according to the
'It's just so disturbing at a time when the cost of living is squeezing us all,' Milliken said of the proposed federal cuts. 'SNAP has been our country's first line of defense against hunger for 60 years. We should be strengthening those programs, not taking them away.'
This article first appeared in Globe NH | Morning Report, our free newsletter focused on the news you need to know about New Hampshire, including great coverage from the Boston Globe and links to interesting articles from other places. If you'd like to receive it via e-mail Monday through Friday,
Amanda Gokee can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
Nebraska Republican booed over Medicaid cuts during town hall
Rep. Mike Flood (R-Neb.) was interrupted by boos and chants of 'tax the rich' while defending the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' and its impact on Medicaid during his Monday town hall in Lincoln, Nebraska. As Flood discussed the bill's changes to Medicaid — which includes the largest cuts to the program since it began in the 1960s — the crowd erupted in boos. 'So here's a question,' Flood said in response to the crowd. 'Do you think that people who are 28 years old that can work and refuse to work should get free healthcare?' Attendees replied with cheers and shouts of 'yes.' 'I don't think that the majority of Nebraskans agree with you,' Flood said in response. Flood also asserted that the spending bill 'protects Medicaid for the future,' which was met with boos from the crowd. At another point during the town hall, an attendant asked, 'Why did you cut SNAP and health care research?' 'We do not have unlimited money in the United States,' Flood said in response, garnering more boos and shouts from the attendees. Flood, who was recently elected chair of the Republican Main Street Caucus in the House, was also previously interrogated over the GOP's spending bill and its proposed changes to Medicaid during a town hall in May after the bill passed the House. At the May town hall, Flood received sharp pushback from the crowd after he said the language of a provision in the bill — which he voted for — was 'unknown' to him and that he was not in favor of it. The provision aimed to restrict federal judges' ability to hold government officials in contempt when they violate a court order.
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Nebraska Republican Loudly Booed Over SNAP Cuts At Town Hall
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Nebraska Republican Mike Flood's town hall got off to a rocky start on Monday evening as he faced anger and pushback from the crowd over many of the Trump administration's policies. The event, held in Lincoln, Nebraska, erupted into boos and yells within minutes of Flood taking to the stage as he addressed President Donald Trump's spending bill. "There's been a lot of misinformation about the bill," Flood began, before the crowd erupted, shouting, "Liar!" The representative was later asked why the administration had cut SNAP benefits and health care research. "We do not have unlimited money in the United States," Flood responded before his voice was drowned out by the loud boos from the crowd. This is a breaking news story, updates to follow.
The Hill
7 hours ago
- The Hill
RFK Jr. ‘reviewing' ouster of preventive task force members
Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said Monday he is 'reviewing' whether to remove all members of an influential advisory committee that offers guidance about preventive health services. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is composed of medical experts who serve four-year terms on a volunteer basis. They are appointed by the HHS secretary and are supposed to be shielded from political influence. The task force reviews reams of scientific evidence to make recommendations on services such as cancer screenings, HIV prevention medications and more. It makes its recommendations using a grading scale, and ObamaCare requires insurers to cover services the task force recommends with a 'grade' of A or B at no cost to patients. The Wall Street Journal first reported late last month that Kennedy was considering firing the panelists because they were too 'woke.' During a press conference about the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Kennedy did not deny that removing the members of the task force was under consideration. 'The task force has done very little over the past five years, and we want to make sure it is performing, and it is approving interventions that are actually going to prevent the health decline of the American public. And it hasn't,' he said. 'We're looking at the personnel and we're making the decision now, but no decision has been made.' Kennedy's office abruptly postponed the July meeting of the task force, alarming some Democrats and public health leaders. The discussion on removing the entire task force comes on the heels of a Supreme Court decision in June originally focused on a recommendation to cover certain HIV-prevention drugs. The ruling asserted Kennedy has the power to hire and dismiss panelists at will, as well as to potentially delay or veto the recommendations they issue — something no prior administration has done.
