China slams US exit from Unesco, says not a move by a ‘responsible major country'
'This is not the action that a responsible major country should take,' foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said.
'China has always firmly supported the work of Unesco,' he added.
The United States said yesterday it would quit Unesco, best known for establishing world heritage sites, claiming it was biased against Israel and promoted 'divisive' causes.
US President Donald Trump also ordered the country's withdrawal from Unesco 2017 during his first term. President Joe Biden later reestablished membership.
This latest withdrawal will take effect in December 2026.
Since taking office, Trump has indicated he would pull the United States out of several multilateral institutions—including the World Health Organization and the Paris climate agreement—and has launched punishing trade tariffs against allies and foes alike.
China, meanwhile, has sought to promote itself as a responsible major power by expressing support for the United Nations and other international bodies.
'This is already the third time that the US has withdrawn from Unesco, and it has long been in arrears with its membership fees,' Guo told reporters Wednesday.
'We call on all countries to reaffirm their commitment to multilateralism and take concrete actions to support the international system with the UN at its core,' he said. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
29 minutes ago
- The Star
Analysis-Rwandan rebels' fate clouds Trump's vision for mineral-rich Congo
(Reuters) -Moves to end fighting in eastern Congo that are essential to U.S. President Donald Trump's plans for a mining bonanza in the region are meant to get underway by Sunday, but the future of a small rebel group has emerged as one of the major obstacles. A U.S.-brokered peace agreement signed last month by the Congolese and Rwandan foreign ministers was designed to halt violence that escalated this year with a lightning advance in the Democratic Republic of Congo by M23 rebels. Rwanda denies allegations from the U.N. and Western governments that it is fighting alongside the M23 rebels to gain access to Congo's minerals. Rwanda says its troops are there to tackle what it describes as an existential threat from thousands of Rwandan Hutu rebels known as the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR). Security experts and diplomats say the FDLR, which includes remnants of Rwanda's former army and militias that carried out the 1994 Rwandan genocide, boasts only a few hundred combatants and is not a significant battlefield force. But the peace agreement explicitly requires Congo to "neutralise" the FDLR as Rwanda withdraws from Congolese territory, underscoring the group's importance to the fate of Trump's diplomacy. Both the Congolese operations against the FDLR and the Rwandan withdrawal are supposed to start by Sunday and conclude by the end of September. U.N. experts said in a report this month that Rwanda, along with M23, is trying to seize control of mineral-rich territory. Kigali responded that the presence of the "genocidal" FDLR "necessitates the defence posture in our border areas". The U.N. experts also accused the Congolese military of relying on the FDLR in its fight against M23. A spokesperson for Congo's government did not respond to a request for comment on that question, but Kinshasa has said it is on board with ensuring any threat posed by the FDLR is "definitively eradicated", including by voluntary disarmament. It has also accused Rwanda of using the FDLR as a pretext for deploying on Congolese territory. Congolese researcher Josaphat Musamba said it was not possible for Congo to rid the region of FDLR fighters given that M23 holds much of the territory where the FDLR now operates. "It would be feasible if the Rwandan-backed rebellion were not active and threatening to conquer other territories," said Musamba, a Ph.D. candidate at Ghent University who is from eastern Congo and studies the conflict there. Jason Stearns, a political scientist at Simon Fraser University in Canada who specialises in Africa's Great Lakes region, said lack of progress against the FDLR could be cited by Rwanda as a reason to keep its troops deployed in eastern Congo past September, throwing off Washington's timeline. "It would be fairly easy for Rwanda to claim that Congo is not abiding by its side of the deal - that its operations against the FDLR are not serious enough, have not been successful enough - and therefore to drag its feet," Stearns said. A spokesperson for Rwanda's government did not respond to a request for comment on its approach to the FDLR. Rwandan President Paul Kagame said on July 4 that Rwanda was committed to implementing the deal, but that it could fail if Congo did not live up to its promises to neutralise the FDLR. APPEAL TO TRUMP Trump said on July 9 the Congolese and Rwandan presidents would travel to the United States in the "next couple of weeks" to sign the peace agreement. They are also expected to sign bilateral economic packages that would bring billions of dollars of investment into countries rich in tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper, lithium and other minerals. There has been no further word on a date. While Washington has hosted negotiations between Congo and Rwanda, Qatar has hosted separate direct talks between Congo and M23. On Saturday the two sides agreed to sign a separate peace deal by August 18. M23 currently has no concrete plans to withdraw from the territory it controls. The FDLR has urged Trump not to green-light a Congolese offensive against it. A July 2 letter to Trump from Victor Byiringiro, the FDLR's acting president, said attacking the FDLR would jeopardise the safety of Congolese civilians as well as more than 200,000 Rwandan refugees. In written responses to questions from Reuters, FDLR spokesperson Cure Ngoma said only "a frank, sincere, and inclusive dialogue among Rwandans" could bring peace, though Rwanda has repeatedly ruled out such talks with the group. Trump expects Congo and Rwanda to abide by the peace deal "which will foster lasting stability and prosperity in the region," Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson, said in response to Reuters questions about the FDLR's future. "All armed groups must lay down their arms and work within the framework of the peace process." The fighting has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands more this year, while escalating the risk of a return to the kind of full-scale regional war which led to the deaths of millions of Congolese in 1998-2003. (Reporting by Sonia RolleyAdditional reporting and writing by Robbie Corey-BouletEditing by Philippa Fletcher)
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
White House unveils artificial intelligence policy plan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The White House released an artificial intelligence (AI) policy plan on Wednesday spelling out priorities for the U.S. to achieve "global dominance" in the sector. U.S. President Donald Trump's plan calls for open-source and open-weight AI models to be made freely available by developers for anyone in the world to download and modify. The plan also calls for the Commerce Department to research Chinese AI models for alignment with Chinese Communist Party talking points and censorship. As previously reported by Reuters, it adds the federal government should not allow AI-related federal funding to be directed toward states with "burdensome" regulations. (Reporting by Chris Sanders, writing by Maiya Keidan)
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Bessent says US, China to discuss tariff deadline extension
US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said today trade with China is in 'a very good place'. (EPA Images pic) WASHINGTON : US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said today that he will meet his Chinese counterpart next week in Stockholm and discuss what is likely to be an extension of an Aug 12 deadline for a deal to avert sharply higher tariffs. Bessent told Fox Business Network's Mornings With Maria programme that trade with China was in 'a very good place' and the meetings in Stockholm would take place next Monday and Tuesday. 'I think we've actually moved to a new level with China, where it's very constructive and… we're going to be able to get a lot of things done now that trade has kind of settled in at a good level,' Bessent said. Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson confirmed in a post on X that Sweden will host the US-China trade talks early next week. 'It is positive that both countries wish to meet in Sweden to seek mutual understanding,' Kristersson said. China's embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment to confirm the planned meetings and Chinese participants. Since mid-May, Bessent has met twice with Chinese vice-premier He Lifeng in Geneva and London to work out and refine a temporary trade truce that dialled back duelling triple-digit retaliatory tariffs that threatened to cut off all trade between the world's two largest economies. US trade representative Jamieson Greer, commerce secretary Howard Lutnick, China's commerce minister Wang Wentao and chief trade negotiator Li Chenggang also participated in those talks. In talks so far, China has agreed to end its export ban on rare earth metals and magnets to the US, while the US agreed to restart shipments of semiconductor design software and production materials, as well as commercial aircraft engines and other goods to China. But the two sides set a 90-day deadline to resolve deeper issues, including US complaints about China's state-led and subsidised export-driven economic model that has created excess manufacturing capacity in China that is flooding world markets with cheap goods. China denies that it subsidises its industries and attributes their export success to innovation. Tariffs could snap back to 145% on the US side and 125% on the Chinese side without a deal or negotiating extension. 'We'll be working out what is likely an extension' at the Stockholm talks, Bessent said, adding that US officials would discuss other issues, including reducing China's over-reliance on manufacturing and exports. 'Hopefully we can see the Chinese pull back on some of this glut of manufacturing that they're doing and concentrate on building a consumer economy,' Bessent said. Russian oil sanctions He said he also wants to issue warnings to China about continuing to buy sanctioned Russian and Iranian oil and China's efforts to aid Russia's war against Ukraine. Bessent said that there was bipartisan support in the US senate for legislation aimed at imposing tariffs of 100% on goods from countries that continue to buy Russian oil, namely China and India. 'I'm going to be in touch with my European counterparts. The Europeans that have talked a big game about sanctioning Russia, and it'll be very important for the Europeans to also be willing to put on these high level of secondary tariffs for sanctioned Russian oil.' He said that the US was poised to announce 'a rash of trade deals' with other countries, and Japan could be among these despite an election setback for Japan's ruling party and difficult negotiations. 'I wouldn't be surprised if we aren't able to iron out something with Japan pretty quickly,' Bessent said. Nonetheless, he said that for most countries, tariffs would 'boomerang' back towards April 2 levels from the current 10%, but negotiations on trade deals could continue.
