&w=3840&q=100)
Decoded: What are Epstein files and why is Trump admin not releasing them?
This comes at a time when Trump is facing criticism over his administration's role in the Epstein probe, which he has called a 'hoax'. Taking to social media platform Truth Social, he called it 'Jeffrey Epstein Hoax' and blamed the 'Lunatic Left' for misleading his supporters.
What is the Epstein case?
In 2006, Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy American financier, was charged with sex offences after the parents of a 14-year-old girl informed the police that Epstein molested their daughter at his Florida home. A report by The New York Times mentions, Epstein paid teenage girls money to perform sexual acts, and also used his one-time girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, to recruit and manage his stable of victims.
An investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Florida police led to Epstein's indictment in the same year. In 2008, he pleaded guilty to two felony charges, which included soliciting a minor, under a plea deal that allowed him to avoid federal prosecution and much harsher prison time.
In 2019, he was arrested again by the federal agents in New York and was accused of trafficking girls, some as young as 14 years old, and engaging in sexual acts with them. According to an AFP report, prosecutors alleged that Epstein worked with associates and employees to ensure a 'steady supply of minor victims to abuse'.
Epstein denied the charges filed against him. On August 10, 2019, while awaiting trial in custody, he was found dead in his jail cell, having died by suicide.
Maxwell, Epstein's one-time girlfriend, is serving a 20-year prison sentence and was jailed in 2022 for helping him abuse girls. She revealed details of his connections with some prominent figures like Britain's Prince Andrew and former US president Bill Clinton. Both have denied any wrongdoing.
Conspiracy theories in the Epstein case
Media reports suggest that authorities are deliberately hiding details in the Epstein file case to protect rich and powerful people, including Trump. A central theory in the case involves the alleged existence of a client list naming individuals who may have committed offences in connection with Epstein. However, the Trump administration has maintained that no such list exists.
Citing an unsigned memo last week, The New York Times report states that the US Justice Department and the FBI said that the Epstein files did not contain the kind of evidence that would justify investigating other people. The video recordings of child sexual abuse material found by investigators were not, as some have suggested, videos that Epstein recorded of crimes by himself or his friends, but material he downloaded, Attorney General Pam Bondi said.
Donald Trump's role in the Epstein case
Media reports suggest that Trump and Epstein were friends for years; they saw each other frequently at high-society parties in Florida and New York. Trump was dragged into the controversy after his former ally, Elon Musk, accused him of being in the Epstein files.
In a 2002 interview with New York magazine, Trump spoke highly of Epstein and called him a friend whom he had known for 15 years. He added, 'It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.'
Trump has dismissed the controversy as 'sordid and uninteresting'; however, until Wednesday, the US President had not gone so far as to distance himself from some of his staunch supporters, who continue to demand more information related to the case.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
'$9bn gone': PBS, NPR defunded! Trump's public broadcasting budget axe gets Congress' green light
Congress approved a White House request to claw back $9 billion for foreign aid and public broadcasting, after Republicans bowed to President Donald Trump in an unusual surrender of congressional spending power. The House's 216-213 vote early Friday sent the package to Trump for his signature. Two Republicans, Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Michael Turner of Ohio opposed the measure. The Senate approved the package in a predawn 51-48 vote the day before, overcoming the objections of two Republicans, Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who argued that their party was ceding Congress' constitutional control over federal funding. The bulk of the funds targeted -- about $8 billion -- was for foreign assistance programs. The remaining $1.1 billion was for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which finances NPR and PBS. Show more Show less


Indian Express
5 minutes ago
- Indian Express
El Salvador to send detained Venezuelans to Caracas in prison swap for Americans, sources say
El Salvador's government will send detained Venezuelans to Caracas in exchange for Americans held in Venezuela, two US government officials told Reuters on Friday. One of the officials said El Salvador would send 238 Venezuelans held in its maximum security CECOT prison to Caracas and that the Venezuelan government would release five US citizens and five US permanent residents to American custody. The second official confirmed the exchange was taking place and said the figures appeared to be close to what was expected. Venezuela's Communications Ministry and El Salvador's presidency did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The US State Department declined to comment. The White House and the US Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The Venezuelans were sent to El Salvador in March after President Donald Trump invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to swiftly deport alleged members of the Tren de Aragua gang without going through normal immigration procedures. Family members of many of the Venezuelans and their lawyers deny they had gang ties, and say they were not given a chance to contest the Trump administration's allegations in court. Venezuela's government has always decried the CECOT detention of its citizens as a violation of human rights and international law. But the government's critics say the country holds activists and opposition figures in similar conditions in Venezuela.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
5 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump administration rejects WHO pandemic amendments, blasts global interference
Trump on returning to office on January 20 immediately began the withdrawal of the United States from the UN body, but the State Department said the language last year would still have been binding on the United States read more President Donald Trump's administration said Friday the United States was rejecting changes agreed last year for the World Health Organization on its pandemic response, saying they violated US sovereignty. Trump on returning to office on January 20 immediately began the withdrawal of the United States from the UN body, but the State Department said the language last year would still have been binding on the United States. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, who is a longtime critic of vaccines, said that the changes 'risk unwarranted interference with our national sovereign right to make health policy.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We will put Americans first in all our actions and we will not tolerate international policies that infringe on Americans' speech, privacy or personal liberties,' they said in a joint statement. Rubio and Kennedy disassociated the United States from a series of amendments to the International Health Regulations, which provide a legal framework for combatting diseases, agreed last year at the World Health Assembly in Geneva. The amendments included a stated 'commitment to solidarity and equity' in which a new group would study the needs of developing countries in future emergencies. The amendments came about after the Assembly failed at a more ambitious goal of sealing a new global agreement on pandemics. The potential treaty had drawn fierce criticism from mostly conservative voices in the United States, Britain and other countries suspicious of global efforts on disease and of vaccines. The United States, then under president Joe Biden, took part in negotiations but said it did not reach consensus as it demanded protections for US intellectual property rights on vaccine development. But Rubio's predecessor Antony Blinken welcomed the amendments as progress when he convened a meeting on global health in September with counterparts mostly from other developed countries but also India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In their rejection of the amendments, Rubio and Kennedy also said that the changes 'fail to adequately address the WHO's susceptibility to the political influence and censorship – most notably from China – during outbreaks.'