NGT asks authorities to specify deficiencies in implementing Ganga Action Plan in Bengal
The NGT, while reviewing the status of Ganga pollution control measures in West Bengal, noted that partial action has been taken in the state to control the flow of polluting materials into the river, but untreated sewage continues to flow into it from several drains.
Noting that several sewage treatment plants are either non-functional or not meeting the standards, the principal bench of the NGT, headed by chairman Justice Prakash Shrivastava, held that there are gaps in data, project execution and water quality.
The NGT directed that the deficiencies and gaps noticed from disclosure made in reports of the state and the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) be 'responded to' by way of affidavit by the chief secretary of West Bengal, the director general of National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG) and CPCB before the next hearing for the state on October 8.
The NGT said that the report submitted by the West Bengal government states that drains having significant flow are discharging a large pollution load and for these drains, DPR (detailed project report) is still under preparation and timelines are uncertain.
The NGT said that a rejuvenation plan should be executed to ensure prevention of discharge of sewage and sullage into storm water drains and canals and accordingly create centralised and decentralised sewage treatment facilities.
The CPCB report said that out of 42 sewerage treatment plants (STP) in 30 Ganga front towns in the state, only 31 were operationaland only seven were complying with the standards and thus, untreated or partially treated sewage is being discharged.
The NGT noted that CPCB has not disclosed in its report the total installed treatment capacity of the 42 STPs and the extent of utilisation capacities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
36 minutes ago
- NDTV
3 Judges, 3 Cases, 2 Days: Supreme Court's 'Balance' Message On Free Speech
New Delhi: Three cases, three benches, two days -- the Supreme Court is sending a clear message: freedom of expression is not absolute; it must respect an individual's right to dignity and those misusing this freedom must face action. The top court's strong observations are significant in an era where social media has democratised public opinion, but made us vulnerable to virtual attacks and brutal trolling by strangers, often anonymous. Case 1: Article 19 vs Article 21 Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi today heard a case related to stand-up comics and podcasters, including Samay Raina, who are in trouble for controversial remarks in their shows. The influencers have been asked to respond to a petition that flagged their objectionable remarks on persons with disabilities. Sources said the court has taken serious note of these remarks. The top court also asked Attorney General R Venkataramani, appearing for the Centre, to prepare social media guidelines that balance freedom of speech and expression and rights of others. When Attorney General R Venkataramani said the proposed guidelines need to be discussed, Justice Kant said an open debate is needed. "There are many free advisors in the market. Ignoring them... the guidelines should be in conformity with constitutional principles balancing freedom and where the rights and duties start. We will have an open debate on such guidelines. let all stakeholders also come and give their viewpoints," he observed. "Suppose a race takes place between Article 19 and 21, Article 21 has to trump over Article 19," the court said. While Article 19 relates to freedom of expression, Article 21 pertains to the right to life. This is especially significant at a time when trolling and online attacks create mental stress and anxiety, and can also incite violence. The court noted that it needs to protect citizens' rights and ensure that nobody's dignity is violated. Case 2: 'Freedom Being Abused' A bench of Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Aravind Kumar was hearing a cartoonist's petition for relief after an FIR was registered against him for allegedly sharing objectionable content on Prime Minister Narendra Modi and RSS workers. "Log kisi ko bhi, kuch bhi keh dete hain (People say anything to anyone). We will have to do something about it)," the bench said. While granting relief to the cartoonist Hemant Malviya, the bench noted that if he continued to share offensive social media posts, the Madhya Pradesh government would be free to take action. Malviya was accused of hurting the religious sentiments of Hindus and disturbing communal harmony. When his counsel, Vrinda Grover, said that the cartoon could be said to be in "poor taste". "But is it an offence?" she asked. Justice Dhulia replied, "Whatever we may do with this case, but this is definitely the case that the freedom of speech and expression is being abused." Case 3: 'Who Wants State To Step In' On Monday, a bench of Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice KV Viswanathan was hearing a petition by Wajahat Khan, who filed a complaint against influencer Sharmistha Panoli in a hate speech case. Khan has now been arrested for his social media posts. He has said complaints have been registered against him in several states. He said these cases were in retaliation for his complaint against Panoli. Justice Nagarathna remarked that citizens must understand the value of freedom of expression. "...why can't the citizens themselves regulate themselves? Citizens must know the value of freedom of speech and expression. If they don't, then the State will step in and who wants the State to step in? Nobody wants the state to step in (sic)," she said. The bench remarked that reasonable restrictions on the right to free speech are needed and it cannot be a "100% absolute right". "Citizens are misusing this freedom. They just press a button and everything is posted online. Why are courts flooded with such cases? Why shouldn't there be guidelines for citizens?" he said. Focus On Free Speech Limits In Social Media Era Strong remarks by the top court judges in cases relating to freedom of speech suggest that the court may have decided, as a whole, to take a strong stand on objectionable social media remarks that often cite freedom of expression to seek legal relief. Earlier, in May, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai took note of objectionable social media posts targeting Justice Surya Kant. The Chief Justice had said the Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and expression, but this right comes with reasonable restrictions. NDTV spoke to Solicitor General Tushar Mehta on this subject. "Internet as a medium of communication is totally different and distinct from conventional media through which freedom of speech has been exercised so far. The anonymity involved and the rapid global reach and the potential to cause severe personal and societal damage through misuse of social media require a totally different judicial treatment." The Centre's top lawyer said traditional jurisprudence developed for print and electronic media in earlier decades cannot be used to address the challenges posed by social media. "Social Media platforms monetise the addictive nature of the human race and arrogantly refuse to even recognise reasonable restrictions, much less follow even statutory regulations. This results in dangerous consequences. I am sure our judiciary will suitably respond by giving meaningful interpretation to the reasonability of restrictions, as is being done in other countries. Every nation is grappling with this menace. I am sure India will lead in giving a solution to the world through a landmark judgment," Mr Mehta said.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Seeman moves Madras High Court for re-issue of lost passport
Naam Tamilar Katchi (NTK) leader S. Seeman (60) has approached the Madras High Court against the refusal of the Regional Passport Office (RPO) in Chennai to reissue his lost passport citing a number of criminal cases pending against him as per local police report. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, on Tuesday (July 15, 2025), directed a central government counsel to take notice on behalf of the RPO and accepted a request made by a Tamil Nadu government advocate to grant time till July 22 for filing a status report on behalf of the Inspector of Neelankarai police station in Chennai. In his affidavit, the petitioner stated that he had been facing motivated criminal cases since 2008 and yet he had been visiting many foreign countries to meet the Tamil diaspora. When the RPO refused to reissue Seeman passport with additional pages in 2013, he had approached the High Court and obtained a favourable order. However, when he planned to visit some neighbouring countries in September 2024, he learnt to have lost his passport somewhere. Immediately, a police complaint was lodged and a Lost Document Report (LDR) was obtained on October 10, 2024. Thereafter, he applied for reissuance of the passport in November 2024. The RPO on January 31, 2025 refused to reissue the passport, the petitioner complained and contended he was not facing any serious charges and there was no likelihood of him absconding or evading the course of justice. Mere pendency of a few 'motivated criminal cases' could not be a reason to deny passport, he said.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Space-starved HC looks to IT Park for expansion
1 2 Chandigarh: In a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana high court, grappling with a space crunch due to rising load on existing buildings, has asked the Chandigarh administration to explore providing an alternative site for the high court in the IT Park area within the city. HC has made these observations after noticing that the proposed land to the HC in Sarangpur village may not be viable due to vehicular congestion in that area. The IT Park is close to the existing premises of HC. "UT administration is further directed to explore searching an alternative site for construction of new building for the High Court in IT Park area within Chandigarh. The said direction is being given since 15 acres of land allotted to the high court and the additional 33 acres of land proposed to be allotted to the HC in Sarangpur village may not be practical since access to the village is restricted and often blocked by the traffic congestion at PGIMER square," the HC has observed in its order released on Monday. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sanjiv Berry passed these orders while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Vinod Dhatterwal of the Punjab and Haryana high court Employees Association and others. The petitioner in this case had submitted that the existing building/premises of the HC is not able to bear the load, as there is hardly any space to accommodate more than five lakh judicial files which are pending in the HC. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Get ₹2Cr life cover@ ₹700 p.m. ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan Get Quote Undo by Taboola by Taboola The matter has now been adjourned for Aug 1 for further hearing. Around 10,000 lawyers, around 3300 court employees, around 3000 advocates' clerks, employees of advocate general offices of Haryana and Punjab, security personnel, unaccountable number of litigants and other employees of different departments are visiting HC daily. With nearly 10,000 cars and thousands of two wheelers, the existing building/premises of the HC is not able to bear this load. Even a multilevel parking constructed with the budget of around Rs 976.75 lakhs in 2011 is not sufficient to reduce vehicular congestion in HC complex. Even the HC needs additional courtrooms to meet the sanctioned strength of 85 judges. At present, the courtrooms for the judges are less than the requisite numbers. Verandah to be completed by Aug 25 During the hearing of the matter, the UT administration sought extension of time for construction of verandah in front of the chief justice's courtroom. Senior standing counsel for UT administration assured that revised drawings of the said verandah have been finalized and the construction work shall be completed by Aug 25. On UT's assurance, the bench refrained from passing any directions. Kutcha parking The HC has been informed that revised drawings relating to land scaping of kutcha parking were prepared and are in the process of being revised and the said work shall be completed within one week and submitted to the high court for approval. "Let revised drawings of landscaping of kutcha parking be filed within one week as assured before the building committee of the HC which is requested to approve the same as expeditiously as possible after considering the suggestions of the Bar," the HC has observed. Building at Sector-17 With regard to the allotment of building in Sector-17, Chandigarh for administrative branches of the HC, the UT administration assured that furnishing work of four floors of the said building including basement shall be completed and the same shall be handed over to the HC.
