ELVIS in Space! Huntsville engineering company announces successful ISS mission
TBE announced Friday that the company successfully completed its role as Implementation Partner for the Extant Life Volumetric Imaging System (ELVIS) project.
The engineering company said the ELVIS program is a 'groundbreaking holographic microscope designed to study microbial life in space.' The ELVIS project was developed jointly with NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Portland State University.
ELVIS was launched to the ISS on April 22 aboard a SpaceX Dragon rocket and has been excelling since May 2.
'The ELVIS mission represents a major leap forward in our ability to study life in space,' Scott Hall, TBE President, said. 'We are proud to have played a key role in enabling this innovative research, which will deepen our understanding of cellular life beyond Earth.'
In the announcement, TBE listed out its contributions to the project:
Launch vehicle and ISS integration and verification
Engineering and design assistance
Interface and safety test support
System safety documentation (data packages, hazard reports, verifications)
Cold stowage integration
Operations planning support
TBE then said the ELVIS system completed its mission, with all operations finishing on June 6.
'All scientific objectives were successfully achieved. The hardware and biological samples are scheduled to return to Earth, where they will undergo transcriptomic sequencing and be compared with ground-based controls. Additionally, tracking of motile cells will help identify any changes in motility phenotypes or cell distribution within the sample volume, offering valuable insights into how microgravity affects microbial behavior.'
TBE
During its time in space, the ISS National Laboratory said ELVIS was going to focus its efforts on two Earth-based life forms: Euglena gracilis and Colwellia psychrerythraea.
Euglena gracilis is a microalga known and praised for its adaptability. Colwellia psychrerythraea, according to the ISSNL, is a bacterium that not only survives but thrives in frigid ocean waters.
ELVIS' objective went way beyond just observing these two Earth-based life forms; it tests their 'observable and genetic adaptations to microgravity,' ISSNL said.
'The successful operation of ELVIS in the demanding conditions of space not only paves the way for its use in off-Earth environments but also holds implications for enhancing biomedical and microbiological research on our planet,' Portland State University Physics Professor and principal investigator on the ELVIS project, Jay Nadeau, said.
You can learn more about the ELVIS project on the ISSNL website here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Interstellar Meteors Hit Earth All the Time but Still Elude Astronomers
Astronomers think small space rocks from beyond our solar system routinely strike Earth—but proving it isn't easy Aliens are visiting our solar system. Not little green men, sadly, but natural alien objects—cosmic bodies such as comets and asteroids born elsewhere in the galaxy that zip by the sun as they drift through the Milky Way. They're not so much visiting as just passing through. Though these objects were speculated to exist for a long time, we didn't know they were out there for sure until October 2017, when astronomers noticed a small body moving through space at exceptionally high speed. Observations over just a few nights showed it was moving far too quickly to be orbiting the sun and thus must have come from some other star. It was our first known interstellar visitor. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] Eventually designated 1I/'Oumuamua, it was 30 million kilometers from Earth and already outward bound from the solar system when it was discovered, offering scant time for follow-up studies. But then, less than two years later, a second such object was found, also moving far faster than usual. 2I/Borisov turned out to be a comet very similar to those we're familiar with, except for its trajectory, which clearly showed it came from interstellar space. And now a third such alien body is barreling through the solar system: 3I/ATLAS, moving so rapidly its path is barely bent at all by the sun's gravity as it zooms past. In science, one is an anomaly and two might be coincidence, but three is a trend. Clearly, objects like this are passing by on the regular. Roughly speaking, there could be ones 100 meters in size or larger passing through the inner solar system at any time. Given their speed and intrinsic faintness, though, they're difficult to detect. We also know that when it comes to things such as asteroids and comets, nature tends to make many more smaller ones than bigger ones. In our own solar system, for example, only a couple of dozen main-belt asteroids are bigger than 200 km wide, but more than a million are 1 km across or larger. This generalization should hold for interstellar interlopers as well. For every kilometer-scale one that we see, there should be far more that are smaller. In fact, there could be millions of sand-grain-sized alien objects whizzing past us right now. And we already know that they're out there: in 2014 astronomers announced they had found seven grains of cosmic dust brought down to Earth from the Stardust space probe, which was designed to catch material ejected from a comet. Also, embedded in some meteorites that have hit Earth are tiny bits of material, called presolar grains, that are so old they actually formed around other stars. They got here after being blown across the void of space into the collapsing cloud of gas and dust that formed the sun and planets 4.6 billion years ago. Larger material could be ejected from an alien planetary system if it's given a gravitational assist when passing by a planet there, or it could be torn away from its parent star by another star passing closely to that system. So it seems certain interstellar jetsam would occasionally hit our planet. Earth is a small target, but with so many galactic bullets, you'd think some would actually find their way to our planetary bull's-eye. The problem is detecting them. Every day Earth is hit by very roughly 100 tons of locally grown interplanetary debris—material ejected from asteroids and comets native to our solar system—which translates into billions of tiny specks zipping across our sky daily. Detecting the tiny fraction that have an interstellar origin is tough. And the difficulty is not just in the sheer numbers. It's in tracing the trajectories of that small handful across the sky back up into space to calculate their orbits. When an object such as a planet or an asteroid orbits the sun, we say it's gravitationally bound to our star. That orbit in general is an ellipse, an oval shape. These can be defined mathematically, with the key factor being the eccentricity: how much the ellipse deviates form a circle. A perfect circle has an eccentricity of 0, and the higher the eccentricity, the more elliptical the orbit, up to a value of just under 1. An orbit with an eccentricity of 0.99, say, is extremely elongated; you might find that an object dropping down very close to the sun from the outer solar system has an eccentricity that high. It's possible to have an eccentricity higher than 1 as well. That kind of trajectory is called hyperbolic—named after the mathematical curve, not because it's exaggeratedly over-the-top—and an object on this path is not bound to the sun gravitationally. Once it's heading out, it's gone forever. It ain't coming back. This is how we know 'Oumuamua, Borisov and ATLAS are from interstellar space; each has an eccentricity greater than 1—'Oumuamua's is about 1.2 and Borisov's 3.4, which is quite high, but ATLAS has them both beat with an astonishing eccentricity of 6.2. That's extraordinarily high and also indicates it's hauling asteroid (or, more accurately, it's not comet back). Do we see any meteors with eccentricities like these? If the exact path of a meteoroid (the term for the solid bit that burns up in the air and becomes a meteor) through Earth's atmosphere can be determined, that can be backtracked up into space, allowing the object's trajectory, including its eccentricity, to be calculated. This can be done with multiple sky cameras set up in various locations; if a meteor streaks across their field of view, the multiple vantages can allow astronomers to triangulate on the rock and measure its path. There are quite a few such camera networks. It's actually difficult getting good enough data to determine solid orbits for meteoroids, though. Many do have eccentricities very close to 1; these likely come from long-period comets that originate out past Neptune. NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory maintains a database of bright fireballs—exceptionally luminous meteors—at the Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS). The earliest recorded meteors in the database date back to 1988, so there is a rich hunting ground in the data. Are any of the meteors listed hyperbolic? Unfortunately, no. At least, not unambiguously—there have been false positives but nothing clear-cut. Additionally, a study from 2020 looked at 160,000 measurements by the Canadian Meteor Orbit Radar covering 7.5 years. The researchers found just five potential interstellar meteors. The results aren't quite statistically strong enough to claim detections for sure, but they're very compelling. What we need are more eyes on the sky, more meteor camera networks that can catch as many of these pieces of cosmic ejecta burning up in our atmosphere as possible. It's a numbers game: the more we see, the more likely we'll see some that are not from around here. The science would be, well, stellar: these meteors can tell us a lot about the environments around other stars, the ways they formed and perhaps even the stars they come from. We're getting physical samples from the greater galaxy for free. We should really try to catch them. Hat tip to planetary scientist Michele Bannister for the link to the CNEOS article. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Yellowstone is hiding more than 80,000 earthquakes below its surface
Researchers at the University of Western Ontario have uncovered over 86,000 earthquakes moving in chaotic swarms through rough, young fault lines beneath Yellowstone. The findings are significantly higher than the previously known number of earthquakes in the area. The study appears in the journal Science Advances. 'With these new insights, we're getting closer to decoding Earth's volcanic heartbeat and improving how we predict and manage volcanic and geothermal hazards,' the authors write in a statement. Researchers used a machine learning algorithm to process and identify earthquake signals within 15 years of seismic data from the Yellowstone caldera, which was formed by a volcanic eruption more than 630,000 years ago. Previously, researchers manually inspected earthquake data—a process that was both expensive and time-consuming. By automating the detection and classification of seismic events, machine learning allowed the Western team to uncover many more earthquakes in the dataset, revealing ten times more seismic activity than previously known. That brings the historical catalogue for the Yellowstone caldera up to 86,276 earthquakes between 2008 and 2022 and paints a much clearer picture of what's going on beneath the surface, researchers say. "To a large extent, there is no systematic understanding of how one earthquake triggers another in a swarm. We can only indirectly measure space and time between events," Western engineering professor Bing Li, one of the study's authors, says. "But now, we have a far more robust catalogue of seismic activity under the Yellowstone caldera, and we can apply statistical methods that help us quantify and find new swarms that we haven't seen before, study them, and see what we can learn from them." Header image: File photo of Yellowstone's Grand Prismatic Spring. (U.S. Geological Survey)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Research sheds light on bacteria outbreak that killed 1 person, several ABQ BioPark Zoo primates
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) – A bacterial outbreak in Albuquerque between May 2021 and November 2023 that spread among people and primates from the ABQ BioPark Zoo, came from the same source, according to newly published research. The illness that plagued the community was determined to be shigella, a highly contagious gastrointestinal infection that is spread through the fecal-oral route and can be contracted by drinking contaminated food or water or coming into contact with someone who is sick or recently infected with shigellosis. Story continues below Education: APS Board members respond after vulgar text messages sent during board meeting New Mexico News Insiders: PFAS: The Most Contaminated Waters In New Mexico Trending: Albuquerque officials discuss moving historic diner to Route 66 Visitor Center The shigella outbreak left one person dead, and nearly 70% of people with the infection were hospitalized, according to the research article. The infection spread into the zoo, resulting in the death of six primates and leaving others infected. Upon learning of the outbreak, BioPark and NMDOH staff worked together to address the spread among both populations. Researchers were able to learn more about the outbreak, how it spread, and where it may have come from. The research team started by analyzing gene sequence samples from infected humans and primates. 'In looking at the genomes between human cases and the primate cases, we were able to see that in that there were zero differences. So there is no way that happens by chance. That means that they were the same strain of Shigella that was circulating in the zoo and in the human population,' said Sarah Shrum Davis, emerging infections program foodnet coordinator for the UNM Office of Community Health, and an NMDOH enteric team lead. Based on the data, Shrum Davis, and researchers were able to conclude the Shigella outbreak came from the same source, was introduced around February 2021, and possibly came from Texas. ' 'So bacteria evolve at a certain rate, and so Shigella evolves at a rate of about three mutations per year. We were able to look at the genetic sequences of our Shigella bacteria, and the closest strain that matched them did occur in Texas. And so by doing it by looking at the evolutionary rate of the bacteria, this is called a molecular clock, we were able to backtrace about when we think it was introduced into New Mexico,' she explained. According to Shrum Davis, cases of Shigella are reported year-round across the state of New Mexico. But what caught health officials' attention was the sharp uptick in cases in the Albuquerque area in both humans and primates around May 2021. NMDOH began investigating and alerted doctors that the strain was resistant to the first line of antibiotics that are used for treatment, and that they should potentially try and use other drugs to treat patients in this area. The City of Albuquerque also set up portable hand-washing stations to prevent the spread, Shrum Davis said. As for the ABQ BioPark, it had temporarily closed the Ape Walk while it provided medicine and care to its primates, including orangutans, siamangs, and gorillas. Unfortunately, some of the treatments did not work. 'I was disappointed and heartbroken when some of our animals were not getting better as quickly as I had hoped,' Carol Bradford, the senior veterinarian at the ABQ BioPark Zoo, said in an interview with UNM Health Sciences. 'Even though they were treated with appropriate antibiotics, the antibiotics didn't seem to make them feel better very quickly.' Bradford said there were 13 animals that were affected by the illness over the course of several weeks. 'What we do not think happened, and we want to be really clear about this, is that we don't think that there is any intentional exposure, and we don't think that, you know, anybody sort of had like contact with animals that they shouldn't have or anything like that. No keepers were sick,' said Shrum Davis. Researchers still do not know how the bacteria spread to the primates, but they do have a guess. 'Our leading hypotheses are that, you know, somebody who, you know, had the Shigella bacteria on their hands threw something into the primate areas and contaminated that way. We also do wonder about the potential of things like house flies bringing it in. Although the zoo does trap for flies, you know, at a certain point, there's only so much you can do,' Shrum Davis explained. The ABQ BioPark Zoo does have signs warning visitors not to throw food or other items into enclosures. To view the published research article, click here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
