Visa stock stumbles 5% in sudden dip, putting the brakes on its strong streak of annual gains
Visa Inc. shares took an unexpected hit today, dropping sharply by 5.23% to close at $351.98 on the New York Stock Exchange, as per a report. That's a fall of $19.42 in a single trading session, a rare stumble for one of the most consistent performers in the global payments space, according to a Daily Chhattisgarh report.
Why did Visa stock drop?
The global payments giant's shares dropped after the Wall Street Journal reported that retail giants Walmart and Amazon revealed that they are planning to issue their own stablecoins, a move that could bypass traditional payment networks, reported Investopedia.
What does this mean for the payment industry?
The Wall Street Journal, in its report, pointed out that this move could shift billions of dollars in payment volume away from banks and card networks and would lead large merchants to limit transaction fees and tighten control over payment infrastructure.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Top 5 Dividend Stocks for May 2025
Seeking Alpha
Read Now
Undo
How much did Visa lose?
The stock's sudden dip erased recent gains and left the stock down 5.05% over the past five days and 1.55% over the last month, as per Daily Chhattisgarh report. It's a significant pullback, especially after a long stretch of growth that had given investors plenty of reason to be optimistic, according to the Daily Chhattisgarh report.
But is Visa still a strong long-term investment?
But for many long-term investors, today's red numbers aren't likely to spark panic, as Visa has climbed 11.18% over the past six months and 29.89% over the last year and remains up 10.49% in 2025 so far, as per the Daily Chhattisgarh report. Even with this drop, the broader trajectory of the stock is still up. According to the report, Visa's stock has given an 80.80% return over the past five years and a phenomenal all-time return of over 2,260%.
FAQs
What is a stablecoin and why does it matter?
Live Events
It's a digital currency and if major retailers use them, they might reduce using Visa or Mastercard.
Is Visa still profitable overall this year?
Yes. Even after this dip, it's up 10.49% in 2025 so far.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
Good news for expats: No Dh26.25 fee for sending money to India, UK, 4 other countries, Emirates NBD clarifies
Emirates NBD confirmed that its DirectRemit transfers to India, UK, Philippines, Pakistan, Egypt, and Sri Lanka will remain free of charge despite the upcoming Dh26.25 fee for other countries/ (Image composite: Emirates NBD) Emirates NBD has addressed recent customer concerns regarding international money transfer fees, assuring that its popular DirectRemit service will continue to offer free transfers to six major remittance destinations, including India, Pakistan, Egypt, Sri Lanka, the Philippines, and the UK. Fee Clarification and Affected Corridors Following an email notification sent to customers on Friday, which stated that from September 1, 2025, a transfer fee of Dh26.25 (inclusive of VAT) would apply to all international transfers via the bank's digital platforms, many customers expressed worry about the end of zero-fee remittances. In a clarification statement sent in response to media reports, the bank said: 'To clarify: Emirates NBD will not be charging Dh26 for remittances to key corridors such as India, Pakistan, Egypt, and the Philippines. These corridors will remain free of charge for our customers. The Dh26 fee applies only to non-core corridors, in line with Central Bank regulations.' Further emphasizing the commitment to its customers, the spokesperson said: 'Emirates NBD remains committed to offering seamless and cost-effective banking solutions for our valued customers. As part of this commitment, Emirates NBD DirectRemit Transfers to India, Pakistan, Egypt, Sri Lanka, the Philippines, and the UK will continue to be offered free of charge to all Emirates NBD customers.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy the Dip: Top 5 Dividend Stocks with Growth Potential Seeking Alpha Read Now Undo Details of the New Transfer Fees and Service Expansion The Dh26.25 fee will only apply to international transfers sent to countries outside the bank's designated zero-fee corridors, and only when transfers are initiated via online, mobile banking, or the ENBD X digital channels. Transfers within the six core countries will continue to have no charge, provided the transfer amount meets the minimum threshold of Dh100. The bank is also expanding its DirectRemit service to over 30 additional countries, allowing customers to benefit from near real-time transfers. The spokesperson added: 'Customers will no longer be charged any correspondent bank fees and will just be charged a nominal transfer fee of up to Dh26.25 (inclusive of VAT). All other international transfers will also incur a nominal fee of up to Dh26.25. These charges will be effective from September 1, 2025.' Additionally, Emirates NBD's Private Banking, Priority Banking, and Personal Banking Beyond customers will continue to enjoy free DirectRemit and international transfers as usual. How DirectRemit Works and Alternative Options DirectRemit is a digital money transfer service enabling Emirates NBD customers to send money quickly, within 60 seconds, to India, the Philippines, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Egypt, and the UK. This ease and speed have made it a preferred choice for many expatriates in the UAE. O utside of Emirates NBD, there are other apps such as Botim, Careem Pay, e& money, and Taptap Send, which offer free or minimal fees for money transfers from the UAE. Some of these apps require no registration fees, no minimum balance, and no bank account—only an active UAE mobile number, a debit or credit card, or online banking access. These apps not only facilitate global and local money transfers but also support bill payments, merchant payments, and transfers directly to mobile wallets. UAE's Significant Role in Global Remittances The UAE ranks as the third-largest sender of remittances worldwide, after the US and Saudi Arabia. Last year, Indian expatriates sent $21.6 billion to India from the UAE, representing 19.2% of the country's total dollar inflows, making the UAE the second-largest source of global remittance to India after the US. Filipino workers in the UAE remitted approximately $1.52 billion in 2024, contributing to the Philippines' record $38.34 billion in total overseas remittances for that year, as reported by Statista and the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (Philippine Central Bank). Major sources of these remittances include the US, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and the UAE. What Customers Should Do Next Emirates NBD is preparing to send electronic direct mails (EDMs) to customers affected by the fee changes and plans to release a formal press statement to further clarify the details. Customers are encouraged to check the list of eligible zero-fee corridors on their Emirates NBD app or online platform before initiating transfers to confirm whether their intended destination qualifies for free remittance.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
World economy faces 'pivotal moment', central bank body BIS says
Trade tensions and fractious geopolitics risk exposing deep fault lines in the global financial system, central bank umbrella body the Bank for International Settlements , said in its latest assessment of the state of the world economy . Outgoing head of the BIS, often dubbed the central bankers' central bank, Agustín Carstens, said the U.S.-driven trade war and other policy shifts were fraying the long-established economic order. He said the global economy was at a "pivotal moment", entering a "new era of heightened uncertainty and unpredictability", which was testing public trust in institutions, including central banks . by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo The bank's report is published just over a week before U.S. President Donald Trump's trade tariff deadline of July 9 and comes after six months of intense geopolitical upheaval . When asked about Trump's criticisms of U.S. Federal Reserve Jerome Powell, which have included Trump labelling the Fed chair as "stupid", he was not overly critical. Live Events "It is to be expected at certain points in time that there will be friction," former Mexican central bank governor Carstens told reporters, referring to the relationship between governments and central banks. "It is almost by design". DOLLAR DROP The BIS' annual report, published on Sunday, is viewed as an important gauge of central bankers' thinking given the Switzerland-based forum's regular meetings of top policymakers. Rising protectionism and trade fragmentation were "particular concerning" as they were exacerbating the already decades-long decline in economic and productivity growth, Carstens said. There is also evidence that the world economy is becoming less resilient to shocks, with population ageing, climate change, geopolitics and supply chain issues all contributing to a more volatile environment. The post-COVID spike in inflation seems to have had a lasting impact on the public's perception about price moves too, a study in the report showed. High and rising public debt levels are increasing the financial system's vulnerability to interest rates and reducing governments' ability to spend their way out of crises. "This trend cannot continue," Carstens said referring to the rising debt levels and he said that higher military spending could push the debt up further. Hyun Song Shin, the BIS's main economic adviser, also flagged the sharp fall in the dollar. It is down 10% since the start of the year and on track to be its biggest H1 drop since the free-floating exchange rate era began in the early 1970s. He said there was no evidence that this was the start of a "great rotation" away from U.S. assets as some economists have suggested, but acknowledged that it was still too early to know given sovereign funds and central banks move slowly. Shorter-term analysis, though, showed "hedging" by non-U.S. investors holding Treasuries and other U.S. assets appears to have made an "important contribution" to the dollar's slide over the last few months. "We haven't seen anything (yet) that would give us any cause for alarm," Shin added. The BIS had already published one part of its report last week that gave a stark warning about the rapid rise of so-called stablecoins. In terms of the BIS' own finances, it said it made a net profit of 843.7 million IMF SDR ($1.2 billion), while its total comprehensive income reached a record high of SDR 3.4 billion ($5.3 billion) and currency deposits at the bank also reached a new high. "It is important that the BIS has the highest creditworthiness out there," Carstens said.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
NATO's 5% pledge: Rearming the West or rebalancing the world
In an era where geopolitical boundaries are blurred and warfare has morphed from trenches to tech, NATO 's recent commitment to invest 5% of GDP annually in defence by 2035 sends a thunderous signal—not just to adversaries, but to allies questioning the alliance's strategic relevance. The Hague Summit Declaration, adopted by 32 member states, marked a pivotal moment in transatlantic security thinking. The question now is whether this is a forward-looking strategy or a reactionary bulwark clinging to the past paradigms. At the core of the declaration lies an emphatic reaffirmation of Article 5—the principle that an attack on one NATO member is an attack on all NATO members. However, the real headline is the proposed ramp-up in defence and security-related spending: 3.5% of GDP earmarked for traditional defence infrastructure and capabilities, and an additional 1.5% for resilience, critical infrastructure protection, and innovation. This is a fundamental reset of NATO's budgetary posture, reflective of a world no longer anchored to the certainties of post-Cold War peace. The strategic rationale behind this move is evident in the literature. From Russia's protracted war in Ukraine to hybrid warfare tactics deployed through cyberattacks, misinformation campaigns, and economic coercion, the threats facing the Euro-Atlantic region are no longer just physical; they are systemic. However, the implications of NATO's new doctrine stretch far beyond Europe. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo By including Ukraine's security under the umbrella of NATO's own, the alliance is signalling that Kyiv's stability is no longer peripheral—it is central to the European defence architecture. Although the declaration stops short of directly naming Russia as an aggressor, it unequivocally categorises it as a long-term threat. The political calculus here is clear: to maintain unity among diverse member states while advancing a credible deterrent posture. However, pledging 5% of GDP—especially in times of economic uncertainty, rising public debt, and shrinking fiscal room—will not be without domestic blowback. For many European countries, where defence budgets have long played second fiddle to social spending, the pivot will require not only financial reallocation but also political will. The path to 2035 will be fraught with parliamentary debates, economic trade-offs, and inevitable scrutiny from taxpayers questioning the utility of militarisation during peacetime. Live Events That said, NATO's blueprint smartly distinguishes between "hard power" and 'soft shield' spending. By allocating up to 1.5% for cyber defense , critical infrastructure, industrial innovation, and civil preparedness, the alliance acknowledges the multidimensional nature of modern warfare. Drones, AI, satellite technologies, and quantum encryption will define future battles. This is NATO's attempt to future-proof itself. Another compelling aspect of the declaration is its call to dismantle internal defence trade barriers and catalyse transatlantic industrial cooperation. The subtext? Europe's dependence on American defence systems must evolve into a mutual technological collaboration. With U.S. domestic politics becoming increasingly isolationist and polarised, especially in light of looming electoral uncertainties, Europe has no choice but to shoulder more of the strategic burden of NATO. The timing of this declaration cannot be ignored. This occurs at a time when questions are being raised about the longevity of American leadership and the cohesion of Western alliances. Populist politics, migration crises, climate-induced conflicts, and digital disruptions are redrawing the map of security concerns. In this light, NATO's 5% commitment is as much about deterrence as it is about staying relevant. However, for all its ambition, the declaration raises a philosophical question: can militarised investment alone secure peace in a world where most battles are fought in cyberspace, legislatures, and courtrooms? While NATO shores up its arsenal, adversaries weaponize currency systems, manipulate public opinion through AI-generated propaganda, and infiltrate supply chains. In such a scenario, defence must be defined not only by missiles and manpower but also by legal resilience, technological agility, and economic fortitude. In its closing remarks, the summit's declaration looks ahead—to Türkiye in 2026 and Albania thereafter. Symbolically, this eastward shift in NATO meeting venues reflects a changing strategic frontier. The frontlines are no longer confined to the Fulda Gap but extend into the Black Sea, Indo-Pacific, and digital cloud networks connecting us all. Ultimately, NATO's 5% pledge is more than just a budgetary item. It is a test of collective resolve in a fractured global order. If implemented wisely—with strategic clarity, equitable burden-sharing, and an eye on emerging threats—it could become a blueprint for securing liberal democracies in a multipolar, volatile world. But if the focus remains confined to tanks and treaties while ignoring the algorithmic and institutional battlefields of the 21st century, NATO risks building a fortress for yesterday's war The author is Department of Commerce, Assistant Professor and Research Supervisor, St. Thomas College (Autonomous), Thrissur, Kerala
