logo
DOGE Days: Inside The Dismantling Of The Federal Homelessness Agency

DOGE Days: Inside The Dismantling Of The Federal Homelessness Agency

Forbes30-04-2025
NEW YORK, NY - SEPTEMBER 10: A homeless man sleeps under an American Flag blanket on a park bench on ... More September 10, 2013 in the Brooklyn borough of New York City. As of June 2013, there were an all-time record of 50,900 homeless people, including 12,100 homeless families with 21,300 homeless children homeless in New York City. (Photo by)
Terminations, reductions in force, administrative leave, and temporary restraining orders — and Tesla CEO Elon Musk — are all associated with the Trump administration's newly launched Department of Government Efficiency, better known as DOGE.
The department has made headlines for mass firings, contract cancellations, and the hollowing of key federal agencies. Yet, little is known about how DOGE actually operates. Though Musk admits DOGE may only trim $150 billion from federal spending — well below its $1 trillion goal—the behind-the-scenes process offers clues about the administration's broader governing style.
Internal documents obtained by Forbes and interviews with those involved in DOGE's handling of the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness (USICH) reveal a process best described as chaotic and opaque.
On the day the Senate voted to fund the federal government through September 2025, President Trump signed an executive order reducing USICH to its "statutory functions and associated personnel to the minimum presence and function required by law."
USICH, established by Congress in 1987, coordinates the federal response to homelessness. According to Jeff Olivet — who served as USICH executive director under the Biden administration — the council's very purpose has always been government efficiency.
'When the agency came into being, and ever since, it has been with the explicit purpose of government efficiency,' said Olivet, senior adviser for the initiative on health and homelessness at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 'Half the name of DOGE is the fundamental mission of the agency. Our council's role is to coordinate, to streamline, to eliminate duplication of funding and of efforts, and to make the best impact possible with these various federal funding streams.'
But just two weeks after Trump's order, DOGE sent an email requesting a meeting with USICH senior staff, referencing the executive order and floating the possibility of reducing or closing the agency.
Despite its modest $4 million budget, no grantmaking authority, and a 2028 sunset clause, few at USICH anticipated a collision with the DOGE wrecking ball. Over a decade, the agency had achieved significant results, including a 55% decrease in veteran homelessness since 2010.
NEW YORK, NY - SEPTEMBER 22, 2017: A man with a sign identifying himself as a homeless Army veteran ... More asks for money as he sits on a New York City sidewalk. (Photo by)
'It was a germ of an idea at USICH that led to real impact,' Olivet explained. 'We partnered with HUD, the VA, and Congress. With the right strategy and funding, we changed lives.'
None of that mattered to DOGE.
The first meeting hastily took place over Google Meet — an unsecure choice, especially after DOGE requested personally identifiable information. According to multiple sources, DOGE's representative, Nate Cavanaugh, introduced himself as 'the boss' and offered no formal appointment letter until pressed for one.
Days later, USICH received notice that Kenneth Jackson, a high-ranking USAID official, had been appointed as the new executive director. However, Jackson delegated all responsibilities to Cavanaugh.
'Typically, there is an appointment letter when the council gets an agency director, and it was days before I got that information,' one source said on the condition of anonymity.
In that letter, Jackson, whose roles include: State Department senior advisor; deputy administrator for management and resources, and chief financial officer at U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID); and agency head for the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Inter-American Foundation, and USICH, was appointed as executive director.
After a cursory review, Cavanaugh decided all but one staffer would be laid off. Those offered 'deferred resignations' would remain on payroll—on administrative leave—until September 30. The entire meeting lasted fifteen minutes and, according to attendees, felt scripted and devoid of understanding about federal operations. DOGE informed staff that it interpreted the statutory staffing requirement as just one person—effectively gutting the agency. Cavanaugh himself admitted he hadn't read the Reduction in Force (RIF) plan submitted to the Office of Personnel Management, which was due to the Trump administration on the same day the order was signed.
'It's evident that they're speaking from a point of having no real-world experience or experience with the federal government,' another anonymous source said. 'Because there are many procedures, many processes that we are paid to be experts in.'
The source continued, 'They had no grasp of agency protocols. They were reading off a template. It was robotic—like an AI module.'
US Department of Energy with Flag Reflection
DOGE staff, several sources say, have since been unreachable for basic HR and payroll questions. Meanwhile, the General Services Administration abruptly canceled the agency's office lease at 1275 First Street NE, a move USICH officials say occurred independently of DOGE. They were instead instructed to use the much-maligned SpaceMatch.gov system, which has previously placed displaced federal employees in everything from abandoned restaurants to crowded shared spaces.
Within a week of DOGE's arrival, USICH had been reduced to a single employee: a payroll administrator. Those declining the deferred resignation were immediately RIFed.
Senators Susan Collins (R-ME) and Jack Reed (D-RI) urged the Trump administration to maintain USICH's staffing, describing the agency as 'cost-effective' and 'critical.' Their bipartisan letter to OMB fell on deaf ears.
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) also condemned the move.
'As if dismantling HUD wasn't enough, the Trump administration quietly gutted USICH late on a Friday night, hoping no one would notice,' Waters said. 'It's clear Trump has no idea what USICH does or why it matters.'
WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 10: U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) speaks as Congressional Democrats and ... More CFPB workers hold a rally to protest the closing of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the work-from-home order issued by CFPB Director Russell Vought outside its headquarters on February 10, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo byfor MoveOn)
Even as Congress pushed back, DOGE prevailed, leading many government professionals to question the viability of checks and balances.
'As a government professional, I have spent my life and career upholding my oath to the country and, most importantly, the Constitution and the checks and balances prescribed in it,' a USICH staffer said on the condition of anonymity. 'But this process makes clear that the checks we count on are little more than theater.'
In FY 2020, African-American women represented 11.7% of the civilian federal workforce, nearly double their representation in the civilian labor force. One USICH employee believes that Trump's targeting of the USICH and agencies like it is an affront to Black women civil servants.
'Highly skilled professional Black women in government service make up a great deal of those being targeted by DOGE,' one USICH employee told Forbes. 'Undergirding the middle class of Southern Maryland, Northern Virginia, Washington, D.C., and communities throughout the nation. The rogue firing of these workers put the middle class in peril.'
Despite the agency's dismantling, Olivet believes USICH's legacy will endure, highlighting the council's work in Denver and Dallas.
'Throughout the entirety of the Biden administration, our focus was to have real community impact,' he said. 'We tried to push money, resources, information and support out to communities that are not as easily undone once you've already been out.'
Yet as homelessness continues to climb, and local governments struggle under increasing burdens, the future remains uncertain. With USICH defunded and dismantled, one pressing question looms: In Trump's "Golden Era," who will stand between the unhoused and the street?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oklahoma Governor Details Steps to Secure State Against CCP Influence
Oklahoma Governor Details Steps to Secure State Against CCP Influence

Epoch Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Epoch Times

Oklahoma Governor Details Steps to Secure State Against CCP Influence

Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt said China has been trying to exert influence at the state level across the United States, which he has rejected while also creating his own international strategy to avoid reliance on China-made imports. 'They're going to the states now because Congress is so dysfunctional. It's so political. It's so partisan that they're literally coming directly to the states,' Stitt said in an interview with ' American Thought Leaders ' that aired on Aug. 1.

Investing in Freightways Group (NZSE:FRW) five years ago would have delivered you a 88% gain
Investing in Freightways Group (NZSE:FRW) five years ago would have delivered you a 88% gain

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Investing in Freightways Group (NZSE:FRW) five years ago would have delivered you a 88% gain

When we invest, we're generally looking for stocks that outperform the market average. Buying under-rated businesses is one path to excess returns. For example, the Freightways Group Limited (NZSE:FRW) share price is up 56% in the last 5 years, clearly besting the market decline of around 6.3% (ignoring dividends). On the other hand, the more recent gains haven't been so impressive, with shareholders gaining just 29%, including dividends. So let's investigate and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement. During five years of share price growth, Freightways Group achieved compound earnings per share (EPS) growth of 1.8% per year. This EPS growth is slower than the share price growth of 9% per year, over the same period. So it's fair to assume the market has a higher opinion of the business than it did five years ago. That's not necessarily surprising considering the five-year track record of earnings growth. You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image). Dive deeper into Freightways Group's key metrics by checking this interactive graph of Freightways Group's earnings, revenue and cash flow. What About Dividends? It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. In the case of Freightways Group, it has a TSR of 88% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return. A Different Perspective We're pleased to report that Freightways Group shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 29% over one year. And that does include the dividend. That's better than the annualised return of 13% over half a decade, implying that the company is doing better recently. Given the share price momentum remains strong, it might be worth taking a closer look at the stock, lest you miss an opportunity. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Freightways Group you should be aware of. We will like Freightways Group better if we see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of undervalued stocks (mostly small caps) with considerable, recent, insider buying. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on New Zealander exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Largest National Org Of OB-GYNs Cuts Financial Ties With Trump Admin
Largest National Org Of OB-GYNs Cuts Financial Ties With Trump Admin

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Largest National Org Of OB-GYNs Cuts Financial Ties With Trump Admin

The country's largest organization of OB-GYN providers announced this week that it will stop accepting funds from the federal government. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which has more than 60,000 members nationwide, will reject federal funding for all programs and contracts in response to the Trump administration's policies, Axios reported Friday. ACOG appears to be the first nationwide physician organization to cut ties with the Trump administration since President Donald Trump enacted his large-scale campaign to slash all federal initiatives for diversity, equity and inclusion. The national organization states on its website that diversity, equity and inclusion are part of the group's core values, which are integral to combating racism and oppression in medical care. The organization declined to expand on how this funding cut will impact its services but reiterated that ACOG remains committed to quality patient care and improving health outcomes. 'After careful deliberation, ACOG has made an organization-wide decision to stop accepting federal funding for all ACOG programs and activities for current contracts,' ACOG said in a statement to HuffPost on Friday. 'Recent changes in federal funding laws and regulations significantly impact ACOG's program goals, policy positions, and ability to provide timely and evidence-based guidance and recommendations for care.' The organization said it will continue to work with the Trump administration on policymaking decisions and advocating for OB-GYNs. 'We will evaluate opportunities to partner with the government in the future where our program goals align,' the statement reads. In response, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields told HuffPost on Friday afternoon: 'Protecting the civil rights and expanding opportunities for all Americans is a key priority of the Trump administration, which is why he took decisive actions to terminate unlawful DEI preferences in the federal government.' The Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to HuffPost's request for comment. ACOG has been at odds with Trump since his conservative Supreme Court repealed federal abortion protections. The fall of Roe v. Wade created a domino effect of state abortion bans that put pregnant people's lives in danger and threatened to criminalize reproductive health providers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store