How Hindi and fund crunch ‘unite' southern states in protest
Hindi is like the Aurangazeb of Indian languages. The Mughal emperor was ruthless when he aggressively stretched the borders into the Deccan and beyond. History tells us that both have been expansionists and steamrolled rivals into insignificance. Delhi's noble intention has been to 'unify' India that lay 'tukde-tukde' by a legion of regional languages. With a unifier — that's Hindi.
For southern states, Hindi had already ceased to hold the old charm. They have been busy exporting techies, doctors, nurses, and teachers in huge numbers to foreign lands and earning dinars and dollars (ignore Trump's new remittance law). Job markets in Mumbai and Delhi no longer fascinate them. And for the hardcore Bollywood fans, the Khans have begun to speak in Tamil and Malayalam in the new digital era. The two prime reasons to try out Hindi have thus died a natural death.
New Delhi clarified that the National Education Policy did not compel anyone to teach Hindi. It only wants every Indian to learn three languages. It can be Sanskrit (like some of the big northern states have now decided to go for) or any other Indian language. Quite big-hearted in its approach. All schools run by the central government (CBSE and KV) chose to teach Hindi as the third language, citing convenience.
Given that a lot of Indian students are migrating to foreign universities for higher studies, can they opt for Spanish, German, French, Arabic, or Chinese as their third language? The quick retort comes with a snub: it is more about one's culture and values. Not everyone is a linguaphile. Some love to learn languages; some do not.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why Canada made a u-turn on its contentious Digital Services Tax
In a bid to restart stalled trade negotiations with the United States, Canada scrapped its Digital Services Tax (DST) hours before it was due to take effect on Monday. Calling the DST 'a direct and blatant attack' on the US, President Donald Trump had on Friday announced the termination of all trade discussions with Canada. With the contentious tax out of the way, talks between Washington and Ottawa will likely resume. What was the DST? The DST was a 3% levy on the digital services revenue a firm made from Canadian users above $20 million in a calendar year. Controversially, the tax was set to be retroactively implemented beginning 2022. This would have had a significant impact on American technology giants such as Google, Meta, Apple, and Amazon — American tech companies would have had to pay roughly $2.7 billion to the Canadian government, if the tax were to be implemented, The New York Times had reported. 'The DST was announced in 2020 to address the fact that many large technology companies operating in Canada may not otherwise pay tax on revenues generated from Canadians…,' Canada's finance ministry said in its statement on Sunday. While the law had been passed earlier, payments were due from Monday. What does Canada's U-turn mean? Canada is the United States' second-largest trading partner after Mexico, and the largest buyer of US exports. It bought $349.4 billion of US goods and exported $412.7 billion to the US last year, according to US Census Bureau data. At the same time, it currently faces the steepest of Trump's tariffs: apart from the 10% base tariff imposed on most countries, Canada (and Mexico) face an additional 25% on all exports to the US, apparently meant to curb illegal immigration and stop fentanyl smuggling. Trump has also slapped 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from Canada and 25% on auto imports. This makes getting a trade deal with the US a top priority for Canada. Scrapping the DST would help in this regard — Trump had been among its most vehement critics. Early indications are that Washington and Ottawa could meet the previously-set July 21 deadline for a trade agreement. Domestically, the U-turn is unlikely to hurt Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney, despite his election platform revolving around standing up to the US President. This is because the DST was not particularly popular in Canada either since it could have raised the cost of all kinds of digital services — from hailing cab rides to streaming movies. In fact, in recent months, many speculated that the tax's best purpose could be to serve as a bargaining chip in ongoing trade talks with the US.
Hans India
20 minutes ago
- Hans India
EAM Jaishankar gives firsthand account to refute Trump's claims on ceasefire
New York: With his firsthand account of the talks between New Delhi and Washington, External Affairs Minister (EAM) S. Jaishankar has dismissed the claims of US President Donald Trump that he used trade to force India and Pakistan to accept a ceasefire. He said on Monday that he was with Prime Minister Narendra Modi when US Vice President J.D. Vance spoke to him by phone, and there was no linking of trade and ceasefire as far as India was concerned. "I can tell you that I was in the room when Vice President Vance spoke to Prime Minister Modi on the night of May 9, saying that the Pakistanis would launch a very massive assault on India," he said. "We did not accept certain things," he said, "and the Prime Minister was impervious to what the Pakistanis were threatening to do." "On the contrary, he (PM Modi) indicated that there would be a response from us," he said, giving the chronology of interactions. "The Pakistanis did attack us massively that night, (and) we responded very quickly," he recalled. The next contact with Washington was between the EAM and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. "And the next morning, Mr. Rubio called me up and said the Pakistanis were ready to talk," he said. Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations, Major General Kashif Abdullah, directly called his Indian counterpart, Lieutenant General Rajiv Ghai, that afternoon to ask for a ceasefire. "So, I can only tell you from my personal experience what happened," Jaishankar said while speaking at a fireside chat here with Newsweek's CEO Dev Pragad. He was asked about Trump's repeated claims that he used trade to get the neighbours to agree to a ceasefire after the escalation of India's Operation Sindoor in May. Last Wednesday, at a news conference in The Hague, Trump said again, despite India's denials, "I ended that with a series of phone calls on trade." "I said, 'Look, if you're gonna go fighting each other ... we're not doing any trade deal,'" he said. They responded that "You have to do a trade deal," the US President asserted. Jaishankar said that was not what happened, and diplomacy and trade were not interlinked and operated independently of each other. "I think the trade people are doing what the trade people should be doing, which is negotiate with numbers and lines and products and do their tradeoffs," he said. "I think they're very professional and very, very focused," he added. Operation Sindoor was launched by India against terrorist bases in Pakistan in retaliation for the Pahalgam terrorist attack by The Resistance Front, an outfit linked to Pakistan-supported Lashkar-e-Taiba.
Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
‘America Party', ‘PORKY PIG PARTY': Four times Elon Musk flipped on Donald Trump after quitting DOGE
Days after US President Donald Trump called Tesla CEO as 'wonderful man' weeks after a much public fallout of the bromance, Elon Musk got right back in it. As the Senate debated President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' on Monday before a final vote, Tesla boss Elon Musk issued a stark warning via his social media platform X – the warning that he would launch the 'America Party' the day after Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' is passed. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' Elon Musk posted early on Monday. A few hours later the Tesla and SpaceX chief executive doubled down: 'If the insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day.' He added: 'Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat‑Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE.' The row escalated when Elon Musk blasted the Senate package for boosting borrowing by a record US$5 trillion: 'It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one‑party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!! Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people.' Elon Musk insists lost subsidies for electric vehicles and solar power are not his chief concern; instead, he brands the bill 'debt slavery' that props up 'industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future'. Elon Musk accused Republicans of colluding with Democrats on US debt reduction despite their opposing claims. Replying to a post, Elon Musk Wrote, 'They just pretend to be two parties. It's just one uniparty in reality.' Elon Musk accused GOP lawmakers of hypocrisy for supporting massive debt increases, calling the spending bill 'debt slavery' and warning that both parties are effectively a 'one-party' system when it comes to fiscal irresponsibility The Senate package contains deeper tax cuts, fewer spending cuts and provisions that would raise revenue. The White House has argued the bill 'slashes deficits' and the debt, while 'unleashing economic growth.' The Trump administration and certain Senate Republicans are opting not to include the cost of extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts in their calculations of the bill's impact on the federal deficit. Version 10-year-deficit impact Main Differences House‑passed +US$2.4 trn Sharper spending trims Senate Draft +US$3.3 trn Deeper tax cut, fewer savings Elon Musk's resolution to support candidates who plan to launch primary campaigns against members of Congress is one of Musk's most concrete political threats since leaving his post as a White House adviser. Musk spent more than $275 million to support Trump and other Republican candidates in the 2024 election. In late May he said in an interview he was planning to cut back on political spending. After pouring hundreds of millions into Republican races in 2024 and briefly serving as a White House adviser, Elon Musk claimed in May 2025 he had 'done enough' politically. Monday's threat to bankroll challengers shows the retreat was short‑lived. Though Elon Musk has said the loss of electric vehicle and solar energy subsidies and credits in the bill are not why he opposes the legislation, he has complained the bill 'gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' Federal Election Commission data reveal his America PAC last donated in March to Florida hopefuls Randy Fine and Jimmy Patronis, but the tech mogul now signals a new spending spree to punish Republicans who endorse the bill. Since Elon Musk quit the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in May 2025, he has blown hot and cold with Donald Trump at least four notable times: Early May 2025 – Elon Musk publicly criticised Donald Trump's flagship spending legislation, the "One Big Beautiful Bill," calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and warning it would worsen the national debt. This marked the start of their fallout. Late May 2025 – Following his criticism, Musk left the Trump administration and distanced himself from Trump's policies, signalling a rupture in their alliance. June 5, 2025 – The feud escalated into a public war of words on social media, with Musk accusing Trump of ungratefulness and making controversial allegations, while Trump threatened to withdraw federal contracts from Musk's companies. Early to mid-June 2025 – Musk attempted a partial reconciliation by deleting some inflammatory posts and resharing Trump's posts related to immigration enforcement, but the overall relationship remained tense and unstable.
